Make no bones about it, the dosage is higher than a kite and it is not what the doctor ordered. Are your kids at risk at school in these wireless classrooms with the schools using commercial or industrial grade routers that broadcast on several frequencies at the same time? You want your kids slouched over an in use wireless radiation emitting cell phone all day? How about at home or everywhere else with these things right in front of their heads and in their laps all the time? That is exactly what your children are doing at school and at home. These tablet devices are microwave transmitters and emit wireless radiation trillions of times the normal background levels that many of us and our parents were exposed to as children.
What will it take to get the parents to act . I think that there are many obstacles, not the least of which is them dealing with the fact that they themselves have been irradiating their children since the beginning. So if they acknowledge this as harmful, then they have to deal with their guilt. It is time to deal with reality, swallow the pride and put your children ahead of your fears, the school administrators and your fair weather friends ladies and gentlemen. We are talking about your kids, a trillion dollar industry that doesn’t give a rat’s behind about them, and school administrators that will do whatever they are ordered to do without batting an eye.
Let us begin.
In this chart, we can see that for those that used a cell phone for over 1640 hours in 1-4 years, meaning about an hour a day, had an OR of 4.8 for developing a meningioma brain tumor and an OR of 3.77 for developing a glioma.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on
use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours
diagnosed in 1997-2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006
It takes a certain amount of exposure for brain tumors to start to appear. In this chart by a Swedish team of independent researchers lead by Lennart Hardell, there was only a slight increase in risk from using a cell phone 1-1000 hours. The brain tumor risk really jumped, however, after 1000 hours of usage, and was much higher with prolonged usage.
According to the science, using a cell phone for over 1000 hours leads to an increased risk of brain cancer. According to the manufacturer, iPads emit as much or more radiation than cell phones. According to research, children absorb more radiation than adults. Given this evidence, what will happen to these children who spend at least 4 hours a day on an iPad at school, followed by another 4 hours at home? This is at least 2000 hours each and every year, and at least 12,000 hours of exposure in elementary school alone.
Papers finding adverse biological effects such as impaired fertility or damage to health from Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5 GHz).
Avendaño C. et al., 2012. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertility and Sterility 97(1): 39-45.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
Aynali G. et al., 2013. Modulation of wireless (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative toxicity in laryngotracheal mucosa of rat by melatonin. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(5): 1695-1700.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Gumral N. et al., 2009. Effects of selenium and L-carnitine on oxidative stress in blood of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 132(1-3): 153-163. http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5: 273-300.http://www.icems.eu/
Maganioti A. E. et al., 2010. Wi-Fi electromagnetic fields exert gender related alterations on EEG. 6th International Workshop on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic fields.http://www.istanbul.
Margaritis L.H. et al., 2013. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med., Epub ahead of print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
Naziroğlu M. and Gumral 2009. Modulator effects of L-carnitine and selenium on wireless devices (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative stress and electroencephalography records in brain of rat. Int J Radiat Biol. 85(8): 680-689. http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca2+ influx in human leukemia cancer cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 88(6): 449–456.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Oksay T. et al., 2012. Protective effects of melatonin against oxidative injury in rat testis induced by wireless (2.45 GHz) devices. Andrologia doi: 10.1111/and.12044, Epub ahead of print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
EMF Refugee:
The International Coalition for an Electromagnetic Safe Planet (IC-ESP)
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”
George Orwell
Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5
GHz).Papers listed are only those where exposures were 16V/m or below.
Someone using a Wi-Fi-enabled tablet computer can be exposed to
electromagnetic fields up to 16V/m. Papers are in alphabetical order.
A file of first pages, for printing, can be found here (please pass on
to schools).Wi-Fi:
Atasoy H.I. et al., 2013. Immunohistopathologic demonstration of
deleterious effects on growing rat testes of radiofrequency waves
emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices. Journal of Pediatric Urology
9(2): 223-229.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases
sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertility and Sterility 97(1):
39-45.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
induce DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa in vitro by a
non-thermal effect: a preliminary report. American Society for
Reproductive Medicine 66th Annual Meeting: O-249
http://wifiinschools.org.uk/
oxidative toxicity in laryngotracheal mucosa of rat by melatonin. Eur
Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(5):
1695-1700.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Gumral N. et al., 2009. Effects of selenium and L-carnitine on
oxidative stress in blood of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from
wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 132(1-3): 153-163.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability
shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic
nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:
273-300.http://www.icems.eu/
part 2.
Havas M. and Marrongelle J. 2013. Replication of heart rate
variability provocation study with 2.45GHz cordless phone confirms
original findings. Electromagn Biol Med 32(2):
253-266.https://www.ncbi.nlm.
Maganioti A. E. et al., 2010. Wi-Fi electromagnetic fields exert
gender related alterations on EEG. 6th International Workshop on
Biological Effects of Electromagnetic
fields.http://www.istanbul.
Margaritis L.H. et al., 2013. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker
responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med., Epub ahead of
print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
Naziroğlu M. and Gumral 2009. Modulator effects of L-carnitine and
selenium on wireless devices (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative stress and
electroencephalography records in brain of rat. Int J Radiat Biol.
85(8): 680-689. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative
stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca2+ influx in human
leukemia cancer cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology
88(6): 449–456.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012b. Melatonin modulates wireless (2.45
GHz)-induced oxidative injury through TRPM2 and voltage gated Ca(2+)
channels in brain and dorsal root ganglion in rat. Physiol Behav.
105(3): 683-92.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Oksay T. et al., 2012. Protective effects of melatonin against
oxidative injury in rat testis induced by wireless (2.45 GHz) devices.
Andrologia doi: 10.1111/and.12044, Epub ahead of
print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
Papageorgiou C. C. et al., 2011. Effects of Wi-Fi signals on the p300
component of event-related potentials during an auditory hayling task.
Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 10(2): 189-202.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
(Wi-Fi alters brain activity in young
adults:http://wifiinschools.
Shahin S. et al., 2013. 2.45 GHz Microwave Irradiation-Induced
Oxidative Stress Affects Implantation or Pregnancy in Mice, Mus
musculus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169: 1727–1751.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Türker Y. et al., 2011. Selenium and L-carnitine reduce oxidative
stress in the heart of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from wireless
devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 143(3): 1640-1650.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
A few more studies of similar microwave frequencies at low exposures
(6V/m or below):
(Not comprehensive)
Balmori A. 2010. Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana
temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn.
Biol. Med. 29(1-2):31-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Erdinc O. O. et al., 2003. Electromagnetic waves of 900MHz in acute
pentylenetetrazole model in ontogenesis in mice. Neurol. Sci.
24:111-116.http://www.ncbi.
Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Stimulation of murine natural killer cells
by weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range. Biofizika
44:737–741.http://www.ncbi.
Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. I.
Effect of whole body microwave irradiation on tumor necrosis factor
production in mouse cells, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.
49:29–35.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability
shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic
nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:
273-300.http://www.icems.eu/
part 2.
Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Microwave exposure affecting
reproductive system in male rats. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
162(2):416-428.http://www.
Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Fifty-gigahertz microwave exposure
effect of radiations on rat brain. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
158:126-139.http://www.ncbi.
Khurana V. G. et al., 2010. Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk
from Mobile Phone Base Stations. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health
16:263–267.http://www.ncbi.
Maier R. et al., 2004. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on
cognitive processes – a pilot study on pulsed field interference
with cognitive regeneration. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 110:
46-52.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
Nittby H. et al., 2008. Cognitive impairment in rats after long-term
exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 29:
219-232.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Novoselova E. G. et al., 1998. Stimulation of production of tumor
necrosis factor by murine macrophages when exposed in vivo and in
vitro to weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range Bofizika
43:1132–1333.
Novoselova E. G. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. II.
Immunostimulating effects of microwaves and naturally occurring
antioxidant nutrients. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.
49:37–41.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Otitoloju A. A. et al., 2010. Preliminary study on the induction of
sperm head abnormalities in mice, Mus musculus, exposed to
radiofrequency radiations from Global System for Mobile Communication
Base Stations. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 84(1):51-4.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Panagopoulos D. J.et al., 2010. Bioeffects of mobile telephony
radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna.
Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Vol 86(5):345-357.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Persson B. R. R. et al., 1997. Blood-brain barrier permeability in
rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication.
Wireless Networks 3: 455-461.
Pyrpasopoulou A. et al., 2004. Bone morphogenic protein expression in
newborn kidneys after prenatal exposure to radiofrequency radiation.
Bioelectromagnetics
25:216-27.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Salford L. G. et al., 2010. Effects of microwave radiation upon the
mammalian blood-brain barrier. European Journal of Oncology Library
Vol.
5:333-355.http://www.icems.eu/
part 2.
Salford L. G., et al., 2003. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain
after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ. Health
Perspect. 111:881-883. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
http://wifiinschools.org.uk/
“Two new papers are published in Pathophysiology this fall that may be
of interest to you.
These papers are the same content as the 2012 BioInitiative Report
Chapter 20
by Martha Herbert and Cindy Sage
http://www.bioinitiative.org/
.
This counters the usual criticism that ‘it isn’t good science’ unless
it is peer-review published.
The US annual cost for autism is reported to be $137 billion.
That compares to the EU annual cost for cancer (105 billion
euros/$147 billion USD)
and to heart disease ((165 billion euros/$227 billion USD).
Staggering costs, and the prevalence of autism now in the US is one
child in 88
(one child in 50 by 2012 estimates that include the 8 yr and younger
cohort).
In 1975, it was one child in 5000. This is a 100-fold increase.
It parallels the explosive rise in wireless technologies and their
pulsed RFR. It should be
considered another possible risk factor for autism, autism spectrum
conditions and ADHD.
https://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/
#1 by Ray on October 17, 2013 - 6:12 am
This is to Dr. Roman Schulze, the Fullerton area physician who has been debating the issue of wireless health effects.
I challenge you openly to put aside your personal beliefs and to openly investigate the issue of cell phone science and brain cancer.
You have accused us of misrepresenting the science, without actually engaging the science.
I recommend that you start with the highest quality independent research on cell phones and brain cancer, which is understood to be the work of Lennart Hardell of Sweden.
I request that, for the sake of your community, you thoroughly examine this body of research spanning over a decade, and report back to us with your findings.
#2 by who wears the pantalones? on October 17, 2013 - 12:09 pm
He cares only about his wife’s little clique over at Acacia. You know the little group fundraising for Ipads for all that ignores every thing on here? Someone needs to let these gals know that High school has been out for at least 20 years, at least the last time I checked anyway.
#3 by amateur night on October 18, 2013 - 11:09 am
Si Senior, my little Schulzeepoo is really just a little lap dog for the honeys.
#4 by Jamie on October 18, 2013 - 6:04 pm
Ohhhhh, that explains a lot. He wants to irradiate the children because it garners favors from the “honeys.” I got it.
#5 by Ray on October 19, 2013 - 4:52 am
If he is that connected with the moms, then he may be providing guidance to parents on this issue. It’s disturbing to think that he would be steering those families wrong with this pro-industry spin.
It was obvious from the beginning that he was heavily biased, as he wouldn’t address any science that reported health effects.
How can a physician, in good conscience, ignore thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers?
I guess it comes back to the honeys.
#6 by Jamie on October 19, 2013 - 12:21 pm
It is very likely that he is “providing guidance to parents”, who look to him as a medical authority and trust his words. Likewise, it is disturbing to think that he is influencing the Acacia parents with the pro-industry spin at the expense of risking their children’s health.
I think some of us are trying to figure out what would motivate Dr. Schulze to promote throwing caution to the wind and advocate for wireless radiation in the classrooms. Could it be something as banal and infantile as appealing to the honeys?
#7 by Joe Imbriano on October 19, 2013 - 1:11 pm
He claims that he is not providing guidance but merely presenting facts without a bias and allowing people to make up their own minds. Yes read that-close their eyes to the 20,000 studies that show harm.
What is deeply concerning is that as you know Ray, it takes thousands of hours to get your arms around the studies, the science, the disinformation, the obfuscation, the fraud, and spin put forth at the behest of the wireless industry and the government entities involved, the areas where the studies never go, the areas where the studies flat out lie, and the fact that we are talking about every last child in the entire nation’s physical and reproductive health being on the line. It appears to be clear that in terms of having that amount of hours under his belt on this issue it is impossible for him to be objective as he is new to this issue as evidenced by his behavior and comments here.
What is so insidious about this is as Roman is a D.O., people will likely swallow his slant at face value and refuse to do their own research because people by nature like to be followers, and for the most part by nature are both lazy and cowardly. It is easy to bury your head in the sand when everyone is doing it too. Acacia was built on an old ostrich farm and it sure looks like one is still in operation over there. On the heels of this campaign to get the wireless out of those rooms at Acacia Elementary which is ground zero in the FSD for the wireless classroom roll out, the Acacia PTA and Foundation are totally ignoring the experts and the 20,000 studies. These folks instead try to make the issue about me by choosing to claim that these are my assertions. They are continuing to ignore my emails, and are proceeding full speed ahead with their ambitious goal of funding the fulfillment of what I believe to be Robert Pletka’s fantasy of placing one of these microwave transmitters in the laps of every last one of the 15,000 children in The Fullerton School District.
In my opinion, Roman is a hero of the worst kind, championing a cause that he refuses to believe is from the pit of hell. You think he would have learned his lesson from the last rodeo.
It appears that this guy fell off the turnip truck and rolled into the debate as soon as his wife got wind of what he refers to my intent to “sabotage” the FSD’s technology program.
I tried to reach out to these groups that Roman is tight with in an email back in July and I tried to call a meeting with the PTA and the Foundation before school resumed to discuss and present this information and they refused. Michelle Knowles told me that that I cant just call them at my beckoning and they didn’t have time to meet with me and yet they had time to all meet during the summer over planning a “DOUGHNUTS WITH DAD” day. Are you kidding me?
You see this directly interferes with the brownie point program Roman’s clique of gal pals are involved in pandering to parents for all kinds of money when the district is flush with cash, taking showers in cash, living well above and beyond their means and at the same time deficit spending. Look at all of the recent budgets over the last few years rubber stamped by the four union lackey trustees and it will make you sick to your stomach. Not only do they deficit spend with 100 million in the till, leach from the scam ballot initiatives foisted on and passed by the unsuspecting voters, but they play the fiddle for the parents trying to get into their wallets 180 days a year even after they are in the parent’s wallets the other 180 days a year as well. Every time the panda folder comes home they have a handout that has their hands out for handouts. It is really a joke if your eyes are open to it all. These parent groups are hurting the kids by enabling the districts to live beyond their means by being relied upon to provide funding for basic services that should be provided by the district. When you have a family member that can’t live within their means, how long do you keep reaching into your pocket always writing the check for them instead of teaching them to tighten the belt and trim the fat?
I have no intentions of sabotaging the technology program. My stated goal is simple and that is not to sabotage but to have A MORATORIUM PLACED ON ALL CLASSROOM WIFI USE AND REMOVE ALL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY FROM ALL THE CLASSROOMS IN THE FSD AND THE FJUHSD.
I could care less if Obama and Torlakson order this experiment to go forth. They have no right to do this to these innocent children of all of these misinformed and unsuspecting parents. We will simply broaden and continue our quest to end the largest forced irradiation of school children that the world has ever seen. What’s more is that we will never turn our backs on these children even if their own parents and teachers willfully continue to do so. They have all read and will continue to receive flyers, handouts and bookmarks, information on this and other websites and coming soon and even more direct forms of information dissemination. They are and will continue to remain accountable as we will continue to make all involved eternally accountable in every legal manner possible. On that ladies and gentlemen, you have my word.
#8 by the oracle on October 19, 2013 - 5:33 pm
Everyone’s got a price. Here is what the Fullerton teachers are being paid to ignore and refuse to investigate everything you and the scientific experts have put forth to betray the children Mr. Imbriano.
http://www.myfeta.org/pdfs/FETA_Agreement1208.pdf
You earlier blog posts stated that you had emailed all district staff, PTA and Foundation members, and placed thousands of flyers on the cars of these parents? What is truly remarkable is the question of what is in it for these parent groups to betray the students? It is really beyond me. Maybe they are just in denial. What if they are just flat out cowards of the worst kind? It is really sickening, it truly is.
This was a great article Joe. You have really done a great job of amassing facts here.There are many parent groups forming across the country and you have many eyes and ears on this battle in Fullerton. It looks to be the flash point. You have demonstrated the ability and the courage to prayerfully carry this cause. Don’t back down. The kids need people like yourself.