Looks like one of our 15,000+ hits yesterday struck a nerve in the belly of some sort of beast.


Is Autism  a direct result of wireless microwave EMF emissions acting upon the brains and intestines of  the anemic unborn, barbaric birthing procedures and vaccines?  Is this the medical establishment with their eyes wide shut, the Autism researchers  and foundations hiding up in first class and the wireless industry literally waiting in the wings staring them in the face together on a flight taking our unborn and newborn children straight into an uncertain future?  Get your tickets in advance for this one folks.   

Not too long ago, I put forth the following article on this very topic on this very blog: https://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/

SO IS THIS  WHERE THE RUBBER NOW MEETS THE ROAD?

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/08/07/even-when-its-not-all-about-vaccines-its-all-about-vaccines/

 Maybe so for now but this wheel turns awful fast. In the meantime, let’s hope all of their carbonyl iron levels are where they need to be as they all fly in circles on their flat earth.

I GUESS WE GOT THEIR ATTENTION FOR ALL IT IS WORTH.

THE MOST DANGEROUS PLACE IN AMERICA TODAY IS STILL INSIDE OF A MOTHER’S WOMB.  YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD KNOW BETTER OR AT LEAST WANT TO HELP.

  1. #1 by Pigeon on March 23, 2014 - 8:52 pm

    “RF Microwave radiation as emitted from wireless devices in classrooms is:

    1. Scientifically proven to be a hazard to human health.” – Not reputably. Even such things as the biased “bioinitiative” reports linked above do not support such a conclusion.

    “2. Unnecessary. Hardwired computers do not emit RF microwave radiation.” – Oh yes they do. They may lack devices specifically intended to function as transmitters but they contain thousands of signal lines carrying squarewave signals at hundreds of MHz which are essentially unshielded and radiate with enthusiasm.

    “3. Easily corrected.” – Someone is missing out on an extremely lucrative career selling magic to TEMPEST contractors 🙂

    UHF television transmitters operating at power levels of hundreds of kilowatts have been around for far longer than wireless networks and create fields many orders of magnitude more intense. Is there a massive cluster of autism cases among the residents of Sutton Coldfield and other such places? No, there is not. If there was any truth to the kind of claims Imbriano is making it would have been blindingly obvious decades before low power consumer wireless devices became available.

    There is no “conspiracy” to repress claims such as Imbriano’s. There doesn’t need to be. They are such transparent garbage that they do a fine job of repressing themselves. When residents of certain areas have been exposed to vastly greater RF power levels for many decades without ill effect it doesn’t require anything more than common sense to see that these claims are total nonsense.

    If you want something to *really* worry about concerning computers in classrooms then campaign against the habituation of children to commercial lock-in and the creativity-stifling, understanding-blocking “black box” view of computing devices by the use of Apple products in the classroom.

    • #2 by mom1 on March 24, 2014 - 9:27 am

      Are you another Roman Schulze that advocates the irradiation of our children?

      You are late in the game.

      Take a look:

      1) Dr Hardell of the World Health Organization EMF Working Group, now states radio frequency radiation meets criteria for a group 1 carcinogen and that “Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised”. http://lennarthardellenglish.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/using-the-hill-viewpoints-from-1965-for-evaluating-strengths-of-evidence-of-the-risk-for-brain-tumors-associated-with-use-of-mobile-and-cordless-phones/

      Conclusion: Based on the Hill criteria, glioma and acoustic
      neuroma should be considered to be caused by RF-EMF
      emissions from wireless phones and regarded as carcinogenic
      to humans, classifying it as group 1 according to the
      IARC classification. Current guidelines for exposure need
      to be urgently revised.

      or

      2) YouTube recording of a presentation to the Oregon House Committee on Health Care by Dr. Martin Pall on February 24, 2014. The Youtube is 14:51 minutes in length.

      Dr. Pall’s presentation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf3ayl6c4Yw&feature=youtu.be

      Please listen to Dr. Pall make known to Oregon committee members that EMF (electromagnetic frequency), wireless radiation is known to cause:

      1. Oxidative stress
      2. Single strand breaks in cellular DNA
      3. Double strand breaks in cellular DNA
      4. Cancer
      5. Male and female infertility
      6. Loss of melatonin . . .
      7. . . . Consequent sleep disruption
      8. Therapeutic effects

      “Possible effects:
      Various effects on brain function (these are diverse and the literature has not focused on a few specific effects).
      Effects on the electrical control in the heart including tachycardia (rapid heartbeat), and arrhythmia – (may lead to sudden cardiac death).”

      “ . . . . there is no question that this thing (EMFs) is causing autism.”

      Yes, but I guess we parents should *really* worry about habituation. Yes, . . . . habituation.

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!