Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership.
THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!
#1 by Ray on August 19, 2013 - 11:08 am
Dear Representative of the “science blog”,
It used to be believed that EMR radiation could not cause damage to DNA or other genetic material because, as with all non-ionizing radiation, it does not possess enough energy to knock electrons out of orbit.
Over the last several decades, however, it has been shown in laboratories around the world that damage to DNA and other genetic material does occur as a result of exposure to EMR radiation. The exact mechanisms are not yet understood, but it may have to do with the Fenton Reaction and or oxidative stress.
I have provided you and your gang the most up to date peer reviewed research, but it appears that you do not believe it. Your beliefs are preventing you from being able to see the evidence before you.
I can understand that this would be the case, because the whole reason for your blog’s existence is to attempt to discredit scientific and or medical information such as this.
I do not expect you or your other cohorts to come around any time soon, in fact I wouldn’t be surprised if you were the last to accept this evolution in scientific understanding.
Here are the links to the Bioinitiative Report’s Section on Genotoxicity, which provides hundreds of peer reviewed studies reporting genetic effects from EMR radiation.
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec06_2007_Evidence_For_Genotoxic_Effects.pdf
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec06_2012_genetic_effects_non-ionizing.pdf
One of the more recent studies by Adendano et al, 2012, found that exposure to WiFi laptops for only 4 hours caused increases in DNA fragmentation as well as reduced sperm motility.
The scientists concluded:
“These findings raise questions about the safety of radiofrequency exposure from Wi-Fi Internet access devices for growing organisms of reproductive age, with a potential effect on both fertility and the integrity of germ cells”
#2 by Anonymous on August 19, 2013 - 10:07 pm
2012 Bioinitiative suggests that .03 microwatts/cm2 should be the exposure limit. How is it possible to operate within that range?
#3 by Joe Imbriano on August 19, 2013 - 11:32 pm
It is not possible to achieve that level of exposure with current technology in the classrooms.