Mike Oates posing with police union establishment operative goon Doug Chaffee
From: Mike Oates <oatesforschoolboard2018@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Interview
To: <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Interview
To: <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Hi Joe:
Thank you for reaching out to me. I’ve decided to pass on a personal interview, but if you’d like to forward me a list of questions or concerns you may have regarding the Fullerton Joint Union High School District I’d be happy to respond with my position.
Best,
Mike Oates
Mike Oates posing with FJUHSD forced irradiatior and father of the microwave soldier who voted to put children in classrooms with sheet metal walls with 1000 percent overpowered microwave systems-BOB SINGER
———- Forwarded message ———
From: The Fullerton Informer <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Interview
To: <oatesforschoolboard2018@gmail.com>
From: The Fullerton Informer <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Interview
To: <oatesforschoolboard2018@gmail.com>
I am still hoping for an interview. In the meantime, as requested, here are the questions and per your statement you will respond with your position.
1-What will you do to end common core?
2-What will you do to address the public health crisis in the making and get the microwave weaponry (wireless chromebooks and Ruckus access points) out of the classrooms especially at Troy High School that has sheet metal walls and massively overpowed wireless access points designed to run hundreds of devices per access point when there are only 30 devices in each classroom?
3-What will you do about the medically inaccurate, morally bankrupt, mental health damaging and innocence destroying sex education curriculum?
4-What will you to allow me access to the take microwave radiation measurements in the classrooms specifically the ones with the metal walls at Troy and Sonora?
5-What will you do about the well documented out of control illegal drug use at all of the high schools?
6-What will you do about the massive mental health crisis in the FJUHSD that the microwave exposure combined with the screen time addictions and the common core has created by the actions of and the decisions made by employees of the school district and board members?
7-Will you immediately work to hardwire all of the computers being used in the FJUHSD?
8-Will you work towards banning cell phone usage on all campuses during school hours?
Joe Imbriano
Mike Oates posing w FJUHSD forced irradiator Karl Zener who sits back and allows children in classrooms with sheet metal walls with 1000 percent overpowered microwave systems
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Mike Oates <oatesforschoolboard2018@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Interview
To: The Fullerton Informer <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
From: Mike Oates <oatesforschoolboard2018@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Interview
To: The Fullerton Informer <joeimbriano777@gmail.com>
Joe:
Thank you for your questions. You have brought up some very interesting points. Though I can’t respond to what I would do about them right now, I will definitely do some research, and seek out the opinions of those privy to the statistical information and with a more knowledgeable understanding of the current status of these issues.
Mike
Mike Oates posing with police union establishment operative goon Doug Chaffee who has officially ignored the plight of the children in classrooms with sheet metal walls with 1000 percent overpowered microwave systems
#1 by Anonymous on October 26, 2018 - 10:49 am
Fullerton Highschool district /Fullerton Highschool, has had a serious drug problem the last 2 years that administration has well been aware of and is well documented. Whether or not parents or community are in the know of the serious drug issue plaguing the school is another story as Fullerton Highschool from administration on up has well kept the out of control problem under wraps and away from the community of parents who really do need to be aware and alert what’s going on. . Drug use on/ off campus, drug use in classrooms , bathrooms, drug sales on/ off campus, drug dealers on/ off campus. If administration is liable for the community of kids during school hours , lunch included, and all things that happen that they are in the know of on the way to school or home….seems they would want to outreach to the community and parents exactly what is going on to keep our kids and campuses safe from the different drugs being sold, distributed on/ off campus and from the drug dealers who have comfortably set up around the campus. Leadership in this community from the city, school district , school administration needs to stop hiding , covering up, or just keep silent…, which is just as bad and start dealing with the real issues effecting the community of kids every day. It’s real people. Wake up!
#2 by A Neighbor on October 30, 2018 - 10:16 pm
There is a psychopath, drug using/dealing lunatic that hangs out at the skate park at Independence Park. He has a public Instagram page that is full of demonic imagery and absolutely deranged behavior. The FPD must know about this guy, I don’t see how they couldn’t, but the drug problem persists. I stopped at Walgreens on Chapman/Raymond one day on my way to work and I witnessed a decommissioned black Crown Victoria with two scumbags in it wait in the lot adjacent to the dirt plot that once was the Salvation Army building and take something from a bike rider who rode right up to them. I followed the car down Raymond, taking pictures while on the phone with FPD before I continued my workday to fund this bullshit. I hope they stopped these guys because one of them looked like the scumbag from Independence Park. Joe, I think I can dig up his name from social media.
#3 by Joe Imbriano on October 30, 2018 - 10:28 pm
please do and email me at fjuhsdparents@gmail.com
#4 by Anon on October 31, 2018 - 3:23 am
Guys name is Ariel Santiago. Well known to FPD. Arrest record where he knowingly admits to selling to the students. Recently arrested by undercover cop for selling to a kid. But still right back out there always at the local skate parks doing drugs, selling drugs, providing to minors. More specifically his main hangout is independent park “ Indy”. Posts all the time on his social media his drug sales weed, wax, pills of all sorts, cocaine, you name it he has it. Probably uses all the former and current skate kids to distribute to Fullerton and all other local high schools.
#5 by Anonymous on October 31, 2018 - 9:39 am
Ariel Santiago. His public page both for instagram, snapchat : elwubluntgang. His scumbag, degenerate friends. Bunch of grown men who prey on the kids at Independence Park and uses the older ones ( former and current students) who attend the nearby highschools to distribute drugs to students. All these grown men use, sell drugs openly freely around Fullerton, the schools, DTF, and at Independence park. All these areas within seconds from Fullerton pd station. Of course Fullerton PD knows about this guy. And yet, zero police presence at inpendence park to send this scumbag and his scumbag friends a strong message. Guys been around for two years. Just as long as the drug problem around the high schools. Makes you wonder what kind of free pass this scumbag and his friends have to still comfortably be living in Fullerton.
#6 by Anonymous on November 1, 2018 - 9:13 am
Hi All,
There is a new court decision from France, from Sept 2018 that recognizes EHS and its correlation to EMFs ( I don’t like the name EHS and prefer to call it Microwave Sickness -the older and more accurate name). Glad to see another judge who has shown commitment to common sense and truth.
Unfortunately courts have been failing especially on the wireless issue however, this decision and a few others keep me still hoping that courts may be of help nevertheless. That some judges are left with common sense and who are brave enough to see the truth and act upon it.
My feelings remind of a quote from the movie Philadelphia when Andrew Beckett, who was an attorney says “It’s that every now and again – not often, but occasionally – you get to be a part of justice being done. That really is quite a thrill when that happens” This is the quote I put on my law schools notebooks.
Summary of the French Case
The Plaintiff, a technical assistant in the service department was diagnosed with EHS. The company’s doctor asked twice – once in 2011 and once in 2012 to allow him to work in a low EMF environment. But the employer didn’t accommodate him.
In Nov. 2013 a meeting took place in the office and many wireless devices were used – cell phones and tablets. The P didn’t feel well, his heart rate increased, he was dizzy fell and got injured.
He claimed that the cause for the symptoms and therefore the injury was the EMFs.
The insurance company refused to pay him claiming there was no casual link between the EMFs and the fall.
He appealed the decision. The court appointed a medical examiner, a neurosurgeon who claimed that there is no causal relationship and that the cause of the fall is psychiatric – the Ps anxiety of EMFs ie, not the EMFs themselves.
The court was not convinced by the report of the medical examiner and asked for another expert to be appointed. Dr. Pons – senior lecturer in cervicomaxillo-facial surgery at the university was appointed.
Dr. Pons, the second medical examiner determined that there was no external cause to the accident and that the causal link between the exposure to the EMFs and the accident should not be excluded. He said that even if it is not possible to scientifically prove it, because the P was already recognized as suffering from EHS by the doctor in 2011, the accident could have been caused by his exposure to the EMFs.
The court rejected the suggestion that the P suffers from a psychiatric condition – anxiety because he just believe that EMFs are harmful. The court said no other external cause can explain the symptoms and the fall and that a causal relationship between his EMF exposure and the accident is possible especially as he was diagnosed with EHS and was forced to continue and work in an unsuitable environment.
I think it is a good decision for us because:
1) Just like in the US EHS is not an officially recognized condition. Nevertheless, doctors DO diagnose patients with it and courts are acknowledging the diagnosis.
2) Just like in the US – the court did conclude in the past that EHS is real and can be caused by exposure to non-thermal EMFs
3) Although the medical examiner didn’t accept the doctor’s diagnosis of EHS and claimed that P doesn’t suffer from EHS but from a psychiatric problem of being afraid of EMFs which leads to an anxiety, the court rejected the medical examiner report, had another expert appointed and accepted the diagnosis of the doctor of EHS…
See below a more elaborate explanation of the case in English from a Martine Vriens, a Dutch attorney who told me about the case. The court’s decision is attached.
Thanks to Martine Vriens and Meris Michaels for sharing the information with me and for helping with translation.
Dafna
More Elaborate Explanation from Martine:
Yvelines: a man recognized as a victim of a work accident due to his electrosensitivity
In France, on 27 September 2018, the Yvelines Social Security Court ruled that an employee had an work accident as a result of his intolerance to electromagnetic fields (EMF). The man, a technical assistant in a customer service department, became unwell at work on 6 November 2013. He becomes unwell due to an accelerated heartbeat (tachycardia) and dizziness and falls to the ground. Earlier – in 2011 – the man had been diagnosed as electro-sensitive and the company doctor had twice – in 2011 and in 2012 – requested to be transferred to another position, but this had not been followed.
The sickness insurance company refuses to regard it as a work accident because the causal relationship between the accident and the injury was not established. He lodges an appeal. The court orders a medical examination to establish whether there is a direct causal link between the claimed injury and the work accident of that day or whether this is the result of an exclusive external cause.
Medical examinations
Dr. Mireau, neurosurgeon and forensic scientist, states that there is no causal relationship and that the injury has a psychiatric cause related to an anxiety disorder and not to the work environment. The doctor states that the awareness that one is in an electromagnetic field, to the exclusion of any observable physical phenomenon, can cause the anxiety attack.
The Court found this investigation unclear and insufficiently motivated and states that the external cause of the accident had not been described and demonstrated and asked Dr. Pons – senior lecturer in cervicomaxillo-facial surgery at the university – for a new medical expertise.
Dr Pons, on the other hand, states that the accident was not caused by a traumatic event and that a causal link between the injury and the work is not excluded. Even if it is not scientifically demonstrable, the injury may be due to his hypersensitivity. This is because his hypersensitivity was already recognised in 2011 and he was asked to be transferred twice, which had not happened. The injury can therefore coincide with the complaints resulting from exposure to EMR.
Judgment of the Court
The Court of Appeal concludes from this report that a psychiatric cause is excluded. Furthermore, the injury concerns a precise and sudden event in which the existence of an exclusive external cause is not reported by the health insurance and is not objectified in the report of Dr. Pons. In addition, the company doctor’s advice that he was suitable for a job in a low EMF environment and that he was asked to be transferred was not followed. The Court of Appeal therefore ruled that there are clear and consistent indicators that the injury can be regarded as a work accident and that the lack of evidence of an external cause leads to its recognition as an occupational accident.
The Court of Appeal rules in this judgment that the presumption of imputability must be assumed by these mentioned clear and consistent indicators. (First, a psychiatric cause is excluded. In addition, Dr. Pons did not rule out a possible causal link between the injury and the work and did not attribute it to a non-work related cause. Furthermore, the fact that it concerned a precise and sudden event that occurred at work and an external cause was not objectively identified. In addition, the man continued to work in an unsuitable environment because the requests for transfer were not followed up.)