THIS PHOTO REPRESENTS A FULLERTON STUDENT ENGAGING WITH HIS 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DEVICE. THE IPAD HAS 5 ANTENAE AND THE WIFI ANTENNA IS LOCATED LITERALLY RIGHT ON HIS ZIPPER. NEED I SAY ANYMORE?
YES THE PHOTO WAS SO PROUDLY DISPLAYED ON THE FSD SUPERINTENDENT’S PUBLIC FACEBOOK PAGE LINKED UP ON THE DISTRICT’S OWN WEBSITE HERE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=479084712158056&set=a.467172693349258.106292.467056220027572&type=1&theater.
http://buildingbiology.ca/wd/news/wi-fi-in-schools-no-way/
HERE ARE ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation RIGHT HERE:
http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/Electrosmog-Bibliography-COLLECTIONS,28,3376
SO DOES THIS GUY LISTEN TO AN INDUSTRIAL HYGENIST THAT SHOWED UP AT MY CHILDREN’S SCHOOL WITH RENTED EQUIPMENT THAT COULDN’T EVEN DETECT WIFI THE FIRST TIME AROUND ON TAXPAYER MONEY OSTENSIBLY TO DO AN RF SURVEY?
F.S.D. SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA
DOES HE IGNORE THOUSANDS OF STUDIES THAT SHOW HARM?
DOES HE CONTINUE TO DENY AND IRRADIATE? DOES HE REALIZE THAT IPADS EMIT MORE WIRELESS RADIATION THAN CELL PHONES?
15,000 CHILDREN DEPEND ON HIS GUIDANCE AND FINAL UP OR DOWN VOTE FOR THEIR SAFETY.
The following recently released information from http://www.saferemr.com/ is of tremendous importance to our children:
#1 by David Morrison on December 30, 2013 - 4:05 pm
Dr. George Carlo, who headed the first study for Motorola (with industry funding) discovered that cell phones do cause negative biological effects. His assessment of children in school who are forcibly irradiated with wi fi was that the schools should be “liable for assault and battery.” someday our entire school system may be bankrupted by law suits and these bureaucrats who govern and make decisions without considering science will be on the streets. they have blood on their hands.
#2 by Foolerton's educratic assemblage on January 3, 2014 - 8:21 pm
And for that he got his home burned down.
http://www.hans.org/magazine/349/
#3 by Anonymous on January 7, 2014 - 1:34 pm
It takes 30 – 40 years for brain cancers to develop. We haven’t been using mobile phones or Wi-Fi that long nor has there been any research performed over such a long period of time. Rather than looking at the Interphone study which was flawed because it clumped cordless phone users with the control group and therefore leads to an underestimated risk you should look at some of Lennart Hardell’s studies.
One thing that people also need to realize is that epidemiologists when performing studies do not take a holistic view on everyday RF exposure. Even control subjects are being irradiated by cell towers, WiFi, TV and Radio broadcasts every day. This would be like testing smokers and non smokers for cancer when both subjects are located in a room of smokers.
Not everyone follows ICNIRP Guidelines and ICNIRP has said their guidelines are not the final word on RF safety. ICNIRP guidelines are based on short term exposures of a thermal nature. They do not adequately address non thermal effects by claiming there is not enough known about them to include them. Non thermal effects include the capability to damage DNA by oxidative stress.
India recently reduced its RF standards to 10% of ICNIRP levels as a result of environmental studies.