THIS PHOTO REPRESENTS A FULLERTON STUDENT ENGAGING WITH HIS 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DEVICE. THE IPAD HAS 5 ANTENAE AND THE WIFI ANTENNA IS LOCATED LITERALLY RIGHT ON HIS ZIPPER. NEED I SAY ANYMORE?
YES THE PHOTO WAS SO PROUDLY DISPLAYED ON THE FSD SUPERINTENDENT’S PUBLIC FACEBOOK PAGE LINKED UP ON THE DISTRICT’S OWN WEBSITE HERE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=479084712158056&set=a.467172693349258.106292.467056220027572&type=1&theater.
http://buildingbiology.ca/wd/news/wi-fi-in-schools-no-way/
HERE ARE ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation RIGHT HERE:
http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/Electrosmog-Bibliography-COLLECTIONS,28,3376
SO DOES THIS GUY LISTEN TO AN INDUSTRIAL HYGENIST THAT SHOWED UP AT MY CHILDREN’S SCHOOL WITH RENTED EQUIPMENT THAT COULDN’T EVEN DETECT WIFI THE FIRST TIME AROUND ON TAXPAYER MONEY OSTENSIBLY TO DO AN RF SURVEY?
F.S.D. SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA
DOES HE IGNORE THOUSANDS OF STUDIES THAT SHOW HARM?
DOES HE CONTINUE TO DENY AND IRRADIATE? DOES HE REALIZE THAT IPADS EMIT MORE WIRELESS RADIATION THAN CELL PHONES?
15,000 CHILDREN DEPEND ON HIS GUIDANCE AND FINAL UP OR DOWN VOTE FOR THEIR SAFETY.
The following recently released information from http://www.saferemr.com/ is of tremendous importance to our children:
#1 by Anonymous on January 7, 2014 - 11:45 am
The actual research of 29 scientists of the BioInitiative Report, who hold 10 MDs, 21 PhDs, 3 Msc, MA or MPHs is of serious regard.
The Interphone Study excluded cellphone users under 30 years of age and it classified “regular” use as ONE call per week and heavy use as 2.5 hrs per week. You are all being decieved into believing that industry- funded and designed studies that show a nil result or are inconclusive somehow, cancel out independently-funded studies that show harm.
Unfortunately, Damon Wyman, has been misrepresented by the media as blaming WiFi for his son’s death. The loss of his boy led him to study the subject and that is why he wants the microwave emitted by WiFi, out of the school. It is not reasonable to saturate kids in a possibly carcinogenic substance ever, but especially so when there is a safer alternative. Parents at Te Horo are willing to pay for the school to be hardwired which provides faster and more reliable service anyway.
Tobacco and asbestos were Category 2B for many years. Asbestos used to be common in schools. Both industries funded ‘research’ and ‘experts’ to defend their products. The first peer reviewed study linking smoking to cancer, came out in 1939, but the public were not warned until the 1970s.
Apart from industry profit, there is no good reason why all children should not have at least the same level of protection as Austria, Italy, Israel, Switzerland, Russia and China.
#2 by Anonymous on January 8, 2014 - 8:52 pm
You fools. Wireless is the new tobacco and asbestos. Your government knows this and they don’t give a damn because it fits into a much larger plan. These school district perps are along for the ride. The boards don’t care because it’s a part time job that doesn’t pay. Any of you that think this is all being driven by financial windfalls need your screws tightened with an air ratchet.