Flory, Fitzgerald and Chaffee’s 3-2 vote approving the Richman Park cell Tower


It' not funny ya lamebrain

It’ not funny ya lamebrain

I wish it was something to laugh about.

Flory, Fitzgerald and Chaffee’s 3-2 vote approving the Richman Park cell Tower-by Diane Hickey

As in the past, I am following up with the source documents/media references made during my public comments at the August 19, 2014, Fullerton City Council Meeting.  The following are links to the assertions made at that meeting:

 

1)       Resonance:  Beings of Frequency

http://documentaryheaven.com/resonance-beings-of-frequency/#sthash.wtR32yBq.dpuf

 

“Over the last 25 years:

A number of species, which rely on the earth’s magnetic fields to navigate, have mysteriously gone into decline.

5 species of butterfly have become extinct in Britain

109 species of Arctic migratory birds have declined dramatically in numbers

36 species of Australian shore birds have decreased in numbers by 75%

10% of the world’s butterflies face extinction

45% of a Europe’s common birds have declined in numbers

50% decline in all European grassland butterflies

Bee numbers have dropped by up to 70%

62% of Asia’s migratory water birds declining or extinct

4 species of American bee decreased in numbers by up to 98%

Farmland birds falling by as much as 79%

190 different species of bird face imminent extinction”

2)       Letter from the Department of the Interior to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, dated Feb 7, 2014, “regarding the adverse impact of cell tower radiation on wildlife.”

http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf

3)       Washington Post:  Electromagnetic ‘noise’ can confuse migrating songbirds, study says

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/electromagnetic-noise-can-confuse-migrating-songbirds-study-says/2014/05/07/c4ef1bdc-d5fc-11e3-8a78-8fe50322a72c_story.html

 

As time progresses, more information is coming out at an increasing pace in regard to the health detriments of wireless radiation.

As we all know, UC Berkeley is a well-respected education and research institution. You should be interested in the June, 2014, release from UC Berkeley, Center for Family and Community Health,Some Tips For Reducing Your Exposure To Wireless Radiation. Among those tips are:

“Turn off wi-fi on devices being used by kids.”

“ . . .  use hardwired networks in schools to provide Internet access.”

Those of you that have children in the Fullerton School District (FSD) should be asking yourselves the question:  Why is the FSD wireless classroom practice completely contrary to UC Berkley’s tips on wireless radiation avoidance?  Or, why does FSD continue to expose the children to wireless radiation when numerous medical doctors, researchers, and the American Academy of Environmental Medicine have written letters to Los Angeles USD imploring them to use WIRED technology.   Berkeley is not the only institution telling the schools to hardwire the classrooms.

The link is here:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B14R6QNkmaXuT1o0aDhWRERmYlE/edit?pli=1

Do you recall the testimonies of Drs. Martin Pall and Dr. Paul Dart before a state governmental body, the Oregon State House of Representatives Committee on Health Care?  Those testimonies were sent to you a number of weeks ago; did you view them?

It is inconceivable that Mss. Fitzgerald and Flory and Mr. Chaffee voted for a cell tower at Richman Park, where children play, attend school, and reside nearby. Is it only a matter of time before these neighborhoods experience breast cancer rates 23 times higher and brain cancer rates 121 times higher than those not located near the cell tower?  These were rates cited from just one study, conducted in Austria (1984-1987), and you were given this information weeks ago.

Council members Fitzgerald, Flory, and Chaffee, will your vote to allow the cell tower have set in motion the health detriments as testified to by Drs. Pall and Dart?

You were provided many resources from which to examine a topic that has a significant impact on the Richman Park community.  It has been testified to that cancer and infertility are health outcomes of wireless radiation emissions, how could this vote be anything but hugely significant?  Your votes defy reason, logic, and, most of all, human compassion.  Certainly, none of you have the credentials to refute the information provided you.

You three council members could have, as did Messrs.  Whitaker and Sebourn, cited other non-health issues for a “no” vote.

Only you know your motivations for voting for the cell tower and I can only surmise that those motivations held more significance and value to you than did the impact to the health of the Richman Park community.

Sincerely,

 

Diane Hickey, Co-founder

National Association For Children and Safe Technology

www.nacst.org

I motion to post the ATT report on our website-Potius Pilate

Jan Flory

How much again?

Jennifer Fitzgerald

Where is the flag? I feel a draft.

Doug Chaffee

 

 

 

 

  1. #1 by Sick and Tired on January 8, 2015 - 7:46 pm

    Thank you, Flory, Fitzgerald and Chaffee. You did vote the right way. You did not cave to the tin foil hat wearing Joe Imbriano.

    • #2 by Joe Imbriano on January 8, 2015 - 11:32 pm

      Thank you Flory Fitzgerald and Chaffee for ignoring all of these tin foil hat people

      http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html , http://www.wifiinschools.com/open-letters.html
      http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/scientists_and_medical_doctors.pdf
      I would also like to mention that the 60,000 member American Academy of Pediatrics recently put a letter out to the FCC regarding wireless exposure involving children: http://www.scribd.com/doc/104230961/American-Academy-of-Pediatrics-letter-to-the-FCC
      As we know, brain tumors generally take at least 10 years, and in many cases 20-30 years to develop. So these children will be grown up before we know the results of this FORCED IRRADIATION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN. Reproductive harm may not show up for decades either. That’s not the kind of running start into the brick wall and over the cliff, head first dive that we want to give them…..Do we really want to look back and find out that we made a wrong decision, that we ignored scientists and advisories from experts in the medical field, and now one of our children has a brain tumor, some other form of cancer or irreversible reproductive harm? Maybe some of the obstinate, myopic, cowardly school administrators and board members along with their worshipers do, but in the meantime we are certainly not going to sit back and watch these folks carry out what we believe to be the largest forced irradiation of school children that the world has ever known. It is our hope that by informing all of you that you will no longer be able to continue to turn your backs on all of these children. A long overdue about face is in order ladies and gentlemen.
      Papers finding adverse biological effects such as impaired fertility or damage to health from Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5 GHz).
      Papers listed are only those where exposures were 16V/m or below. Someone using a Wi-Fi-enabled tablet computer can be exposed to electromagnetic fields up to 16V/m. Papers are in alphabetical order. A file of first pages, for printing, can be found here (please pass on to schools).
      Wi-Fi:
      Atasoy H.I. et al., 2013. Immunohistopathologic demonstration of deleterious effects on growing rat testes of radiofrequency waves emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices. Journal of Pediatric Urology 9(2): 223-229.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22465825

      Avendaño C. et al., 2012. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertility and Sterility 97(1): 39-45.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22112647
      Avendaño C. et al., 2010. Laptop expositions affect motility and induce DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa in vitro by a non-thermal effect: a preliminary report. American Society for Reproductive Medicine 66th Annual Meeting: O-249 http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/laptops+and+sperm.pdf)

      Aynali G. et al., 2013. Modulation of wireless (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative toxicity in laryngotracheal mucosa of rat by melatonin. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(5): 1695-1700.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23479077

      Gumral N. et al., 2009. Effects of selenium and L-carnitine on oxidative stress in blood of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 132(1-3): 153-163. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19396408

      Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5: 273-300.http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL part 2.
      Havas M. and Marrongelle J. 2013. Replication of heart rate variability provocation study with 2.45GHz cordless phone confirms original findings. Electromagn Biol Med 32(2): 253-266.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675629

      Maganioti A. E. et al., 2010. Wi-Fi electromagnetic fields exert gender related alterations on EEG. 6th International Workshop on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic fields.http://www.istanbul.edu.tr/6internatwshopbioeffemf/cd/pdf/poster/WI-FI%20ELECTROMAGNETIC%20FIELDS%20EXERT%20GENDER.pdf

      Margaritis L.H. et al., 2013. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med., Epub ahead of print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915130

      Naziroğlu M. and Gumral 2009. Modulator effects of L-carnitine and selenium on wireless devices (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative stress and electroencephalography records in brain of rat. Int J Radiat Biol. 85(8): 680-689. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19637079

      Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca2+ influx in human leukemia cancer cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 88(6): 449–456.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22489926
      Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012b. Melatonin modulates wireless (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative injury through TRPM2 and voltage gated Ca(2+) channels in brain and dorsal root ganglion in rat. Physiol Behav. 105(3): 683-92.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22019785

      Oksay T. et al., 2012. Protective effects of melatonin against oxidative injury in rat testis induced by wireless (2.45 GHz) devices. Andrologia doi: 10.1111/and.12044, Epub ahead of print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145464
      Papageorgiou C. C. et al., 2011. Effects of Wi-Fi signals on the p300 component of event-related potentials during an auditory hayling task. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 10(2): 189-202. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21714138
      (Wi-Fi alters brain activity in young adults:http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/wifi+brain+July+2011.pdf)
      Shahin S. et al., 2013. 2.45 GHz Microwave Irradiation-Induced Oxidative Stress Affects Implantation or Pregnancy in Mice, Mus musculus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169: 1727–1751. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23334843
      Türker Y. et al., 2011. Selenium and L-carnitine reduce oxidative stress in the heart of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 143(3): 1640-1650. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21360060

      A few more studies of similar microwave frequencies at low exposures (6V/m or below):
      (Not comprehensive)
      Balmori A. 2010. Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 29(1-2):31-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20560769
      Erdinc O. O. et al., 2003. Electromagnetic waves of 900MHz in acute pentylenetetrazole model in ontogenesis in mice. Neurol. Sci. 24:111-116.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14600821
      Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Stimulation of murine natural killer cells by weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range. Biofizika 44:737–741.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10544828
      Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. I. Effect of whole body microwave irradiation on tumor necrosis factor production in mouse cells, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 49:29–35.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619445
      Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5: 273-300.http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL part 2.
      Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Microwave exposure affecting reproductive system in male rats. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162(2):416-428.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19768389
      Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Fifty-gigahertz microwave exposure effect of radiations on rat brain. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 158:126-139.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089649
      Khurana V. G. et al., 2010. Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone Base Stations. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 16:263–267.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20662418
      Maier R. et al., 2004. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on cognitive processes – a pilot study on pulsed field interference with cognitive regeneration. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 110: 46-52.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15180806
      Nittby H. et al., 2008. Cognitive impairment in rats after long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 29: 219-232.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18044737
      Novoselova E. G. et al., 1998. Stimulation of production of tumor necrosis factor by murine macrophages when exposed in vivo and in vitro to weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range Bofizika 43:1132–1333.
      Novoselova E. G. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. II. Immunostimulating effects of microwaves and naturally occurring antioxidant nutrients. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 49:37–41.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619446
      Otitoloju A. A. et al., 2010. Preliminary study on the induction of sperm head abnormalities in mice, Mus musculus, exposed to radiofrequency radiations from Global System for Mobile Communication Base Stations. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 84(1):51-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19816647
      Panagopoulos D. J.et al., 2010. Bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Vol 86(5):345-357. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20397839
      Persson B. R. R. et al., 1997. Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication. Wireless Networks 3: 455-461.
      Pyrpasopoulou A. et al., 2004. Bone morphogenic protein expression in newborn kidneys after prenatal exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 25:216-27.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15042631
      Salford L. G. et al., 2010. Effects of microwave radiation upon the mammalian blood-brain barrier. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:333-355.http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL part 2.
      Salford L. G., et al., 2003. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ. Health Perspect. 111:881-883. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12782486
      http://wifiinschools.org.uk/30.html
      Brought to you by
      EMF Refugee:

      The International Coalition for an Electromagnetic Safe Planet (IC-ESP)

      http://prd34.blogspot.com/

      “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”

      George Orwell

      “Papers finding adverse biological effects or damage to health from
      Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5
      GHz).Papers listed are only those where exposures were 16V/m or below.
      Someone using a Wi-Fi-enabled tablet computer can be exposed to
      electromagnetic fields up to 16V/m. Papers are in alphabetical order.
      A file of first pages, for printing, can be found here (please pass on
      to schools).Wi-Fi:
      Atasoy H.I. et al., 2013. Immunohistopathologic demonstration of
      deleterious effects on growing rat testes of radiofrequency waves
      emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices. Journal of Pediatric Urology
      9(2): 223-229.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22465825Avendaño C. et al., 2012. Use of laptop computers connected to
      internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases
      sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertility and Sterility 97(1):
      39-45.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22112647Avendaño C. et al., 2010. Laptop expositions affect motility and
      induce DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa in vitro by a
      non-thermal effect: a preliminary report. American Society for
      Reproductive Medicine 66th Annual Meeting: O-249
      http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/laptops+and+sperm.pdf)Aynali G. et al., 2013. Modulation of wireless (2.45 GHz)-induced
      oxidative toxicity in laryngotracheal mucosa of rat by melatonin. Eur
      Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(5):
      1695-1700.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23479077
      Gumral N. et al., 2009. Effects of selenium and L-carnitine on
      oxidative stress in blood of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from
      wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 132(1-3): 153-163.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19396408

      Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability
      shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic
      nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:
      273-300.http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL
      part 2.

      Havas M. and Marrongelle J. 2013. Replication of heart rate
      variability provocation study with 2.45GHz cordless phone confirms
      original findings. Electromagn Biol Med 32(2):
      253-266.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675629

      Maganioti A. E. et al., 2010. Wi-Fi electromagnetic fields exert
      gender related alterations on EEG. 6th International Workshop on
      Biological Effects of Electromagnetic
      fields.http://www.istanbul.edu.tr/6internatwshopbioeffemf/cd/pdf/poster/WI-FI%20ELECTROMAGNETIC%20FIELDS%20EXERT%20GENDER.pdf

      Margaritis L.H. et al., 2013. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker
      responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med., Epub ahead of
      print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915130

      Naziroğlu M. and Gumral 2009. Modulator effects of L-carnitine and
      selenium on wireless devices (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative stress and
      electroencephalography records in brain of rat. Int J Radiat Biol.
      85(8): 680-689. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19637079

      Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative
      stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca2+ influx in human
      leukemia cancer cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology
      88(6): 449–456.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22489926

      Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012b. Melatonin modulates wireless (2.45
      GHz)-induced oxidative injury through TRPM2 and voltage gated Ca(2+)
      channels in brain and dorsal root ganglion in rat. Physiol Behav.
      105(3): 683-92.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22019785

      Oksay T. et al., 2012. Protective effects of melatonin against
      oxidative injury in rat testis induced by wireless (2.45 GHz) devices.
      Andrologia doi: 10.1111/and.12044, Epub ahead of
      print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145464

      Papageorgiou C. C. et al., 2011. Effects of Wi-Fi signals on the p300
      component of event-related potentials during an auditory hayling task.
      Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 10(2): 189-202.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21714138

      (Wi-Fi alters brain activity in young
      adults:http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/wifi+brain+July+2011.pdf)

      Shahin S. et al., 2013. 2.45 GHz Microwave Irradiation-Induced
      Oxidative Stress Affects Implantation or Pregnancy in Mice, Mus
      musculus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169: 1727–1751.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23334843

      Türker Y. et al., 2011. Selenium and L-carnitine reduce oxidative
      stress in the heart of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from wireless
      devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 143(3): 1640-1650.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21360060

      A few more studies of similar microwave frequencies at low exposures
      (6V/m or below):
      (Not comprehensive)
      Balmori A. 2010. Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana
      temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn.
      Biol. Med. 29(1-2):31-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20560769

      Erdinc O. O. et al., 2003. Electromagnetic waves of 900MHz in acute
      pentylenetetrazole model in ontogenesis in mice. Neurol. Sci.
      24:111-116.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14600821
      Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Stimulation of murine natural killer cells
      by weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range. Biofizika
      44:737–741.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10544828
      Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. I.
      Effect of whole body microwave irradiation on tumor necrosis factor
      production in mouse cells, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.
      49:29–35.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619445

      Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability
      shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic
      nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:
      273-300.http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL
      part 2.

      Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Microwave exposure affecting
      reproductive system in male rats. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
      162(2):416-428.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19768389
      Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Fifty-gigahertz microwave exposure
      effect of radiations on rat brain. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
      158:126-139.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089649
      Khurana V. G. et al., 2010. Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk
      from Mobile Phone Base Stations. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health
      16:263–267.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20662418

      Maier R. et al., 2004. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on
      cognitive processes – a pilot study on pulsed field interference
      with cognitive regeneration. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 110:
      46-52.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15180806
      Nittby H. et al., 2008. Cognitive impairment in rats after long-term
      exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 29:
      219-232.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18044737
      Novoselova E. G. et al., 1998. Stimulation of production of tumor
      necrosis factor by murine macrophages when exposed in vivo and in
      vitro to weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range Bofizika
      43:1132–1333.

      Novoselova E. G. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. II.
      Immunostimulating effects of microwaves and naturally occurring
      antioxidant nutrients. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.
      49:37–41.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619446
      Otitoloju A. A. et al., 2010. Preliminary study on the induction of
      sperm head abnormalities in mice, Mus musculus, exposed to
      radiofrequency radiations from Global System for Mobile Communication
      Base Stations. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 84(1):51-4.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19816647

      Panagopoulos D. J.et al., 2010. Bioeffects of mobile telephony
      radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna.
      Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Vol 86(5):345-357.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20397839

      Persson B. R. R. et al., 1997. Blood-brain barrier permeability in
      rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication.
      Wireless Networks 3: 455-461.
      Pyrpasopoulou A. et al., 2004. Bone morphogenic protein expression in
      newborn kidneys after prenatal exposure to radiofrequency radiation.
      Bioelectromagnetics
      25:216-27.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15042631

      Salford L. G. et al., 2010. Effects of microwave radiation upon the
      mammalian blood-brain barrier. European Journal of Oncology Library
      Vol.
      5:333-355.http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL
      part 2.
      Salford L. G., et al., 2003. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain
      after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ. Health
      Perspect. 111:881-883. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12782486

      http://wifiinschools.org.uk/30.html”

      “Two new papers are published in Pathophysiology this fall that may be
      of interest to you.

      These papers are the same content as the 2012 BioInitiative Report
      Chapter 20
      by Martha Herbert and Cindy Sage
      http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec20_2012_Findings_in_Autism.pdf
      .
      This counters the usual criticism that ‘it isn’t good science’ unless
      it is peer-review published.

      The US annual cost for autism is reported to be $137 billion.
      That compares to the EU annual cost for cancer (105 billion
      euros/$147 billion USD)
      and to heart disease ((165 billion euros/$227 billion USD).

      Staggering costs, and the prevalence of autism now in the US is one
      child in 88
      (one child in 50 by 2012 estimates that include the 8 yr and younger
      cohort).
      In 1975, it was one child in 5000. This is a 100-fold increase.

      It parallels the explosive rise in wireless technologies and their
      pulsed RFR. It should be
      considered another possible risk factor for autism, autism spectrum
      conditions and ADHD.

    • #3 by Joe Imbriano on January 8, 2015 - 11:39 pm

      when are you morons going to realize that making this all about me is about as effective as your kids carrying a rabbits foot so they can avoid being sterilized by the infertility pads and laptops. -here is one for you sick and tired- READ THE LAST SENTENCE-

      Welcome to the Matrix: Enslaved by Technology and the Internet of Things
      By John W. Whitehead
      January 07, 2015
      “There will come a time when it isn’t ‘They’re spying on me through my phone’ anymore. Eventually, it will be ‘My phone is spying on me.’” ― Philip K. Dick
      If ever Americans sell their birthright, it will be for the promise of expediency and comfort delivered by way of blazingly fast Internet, cell phone signals that never drop a call, thermostats that keep us at the perfect temperature without our having to raise a finger, and entertainment that can be simultaneously streamed to our TVs, tablets and cell phones.
      Likewise, if ever we find ourselves in bondage, we will have only ourselves to blame for having forged the chains through our own lassitude, laziness and abject reliance on internet-connected gadgets and gizmos that render us wholly irrelevant.
      Indeed, while most of us are consumed with our selfies and trying to keep up with what our so-called friends are posting on Facebook, the megacorporation Google has been busily partnering with the National Security Agency (NSA), the Pentagon, and other governmental agencies to develop a new “human” species, so to speak.
      In other words, Google—a neural network that approximates a global brain—is fusing with the human mind in a phenomenon that is called “singularity,” and they’ve hired transhumanist scientist Ray Kurzweil to do just that. Google will know the answer to your question before you have asked it, Kurzweil said. “It will have read every email you will ever have written, every document, every idle thought you’ve ever tapped into a search-engine box. It will know you better than your intimate partner does. Better, perhaps, than even yourself.”
      But here’s the catch: the NSA and all other government agencies will also know you better than yourself. As William Binney, one of the highest-level whistleblowers to ever emerge from the NSA said, “The ultimate goal of the NSA is total population control.”
      SNIP
      Read the post here. http://www.emfacts.com/2015/01/welcome-to-the-matrix-enslaved-by-technology-and-the-internet-of-things/

    • #4 by back paige on January 9, 2015 - 3:12 am

      Sick and Tired, you, Flory, Fitzgerald and Chaffee are a nothing more than a bunch of dumb shits. Everything is over your empty heads except for a stack of Grants, some lame photo op for the paper no one reads, and a bottle of Bombay. Go ahead and ignore all the warnings while you shove tin foil right up your assholes.

    • #5 by Joe Imbriano on January 9, 2015 - 8:07 am

      Look, we welcome everyone’s input here but you need to watch the language. I will let this one stay up but this is it.

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!