It’ not funny ya lamebrain
I wish it was something to laugh about.
Flory, Fitzgerald and Chaffee’s 3-2 vote approving the Richman Park cell Tower-by Diane Hickey
As in the past, I am following up with the source documents/media references made during my public comments at the August 19, 2014, Fullerton City Council Meeting. The following are links to the assertions made at that meeting:
1) Resonance: Beings of Frequency
http://documentaryheaven.com/resonance-beings-of-frequency/#sthash.wtR32yBq.dpuf
“Over the last 25 years:
A number of species, which rely on the earth’s magnetic fields to navigate, have mysteriously gone into decline.
5 species of butterfly have become extinct in Britain
109 species of Arctic migratory birds have declined dramatically in numbers
36 species of Australian shore birds have decreased in numbers by 75%
10% of the world’s butterflies face extinction
45% of a Europe’s common birds have declined in numbers
50% decline in all European grassland butterflies
Bee numbers have dropped by up to 70%
62% of Asia’s migratory water birds declining or extinct
4 species of American bee decreased in numbers by up to 98%
Farmland birds falling by as much as 79%
190 different species of bird face imminent extinction”
2) Letter from the Department of the Interior to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, dated Feb 7, 2014, “regarding the adverse impact of cell tower radiation on wildlife.”
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf
3) Washington Post: Electromagnetic ‘noise’ can confuse migrating songbirds, study says
As time progresses, more information is coming out at an increasing pace in regard to the health detriments of wireless radiation.
As we all know, UC Berkeley is a well-respected education and research institution. You should be interested in the June, 2014, release from UC Berkeley, Center for Family and Community Health,Some Tips For Reducing Your Exposure To Wireless Radiation. Among those tips are:
“Turn off wi-fi on devices being used by kids.”
“ . . . use hardwired networks in schools to provide Internet access.”
Those of you that have children in the Fullerton School District (FSD) should be asking yourselves the question: Why is the FSD wireless classroom practice completely contrary to UC Berkley’s tips on wireless radiation avoidance? Or, why does FSD continue to expose the children to wireless radiation when numerous medical doctors, researchers, and the American Academy of Environmental Medicine have written letters to Los Angeles USD imploring them to use WIRED technology. Berkeley is not the only institution telling the schools to hardwire the classrooms.
The link is here:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B14R6QNkmaXuT1o0aDhWRERmYlE/edit?pli=1
Do you recall the testimonies of Drs. Martin Pall and Dr. Paul Dart before a state governmental body, the Oregon State House of Representatives Committee on Health Care? Those testimonies were sent to you a number of weeks ago; did you view them?
It is inconceivable that Mss. Fitzgerald and Flory and Mr. Chaffee voted for a cell tower at Richman Park, where children play, attend school, and reside nearby. Is it only a matter of time before these neighborhoods experience breast cancer rates 23 times higher and brain cancer rates 121 times higher than those not located near the cell tower? These were rates cited from just one study, conducted in Austria (1984-1987), and you were given this information weeks ago.
Council members Fitzgerald, Flory, and Chaffee, will your vote to allow the cell tower have set in motion the health detriments as testified to by Drs. Pall and Dart?
You were provided many resources from which to examine a topic that has a significant impact on the Richman Park community. It has been testified to that cancer and infertility are health outcomes of wireless radiation emissions, how could this vote be anything but hugely significant? Your votes defy reason, logic, and, most of all, human compassion. Certainly, none of you have the credentials to refute the information provided you.
You three council members could have, as did Messrs. Whitaker and Sebourn, cited other non-health issues for a “no” vote.
Only you know your motivations for voting for the cell tower and I can only surmise that those motivations held more significance and value to you than did the impact to the health of the Richman Park community.
Sincerely,
Diane Hickey, Co-founder
National Association For Children and Safe Technology
Jan Flory
Jennifer Fitzgerald
Doug Chaffee
#1 by Joe Imbriano on August 26, 2014 - 8:11 am
I tried to make it simple for them to understand. I sent them VIDEO LINKS, SCIENTIFIC STUDIES AND all this FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND MEDICINE
http://www.iaff.org/hs/Resi/CellTowerFinal.htm
EVEN THE FULLLERTON FIREFIGHTER’S ASSOCIATION was provided with this information. Most of them have kids in the wireless classrooms in the Fullerton School District. Are they all in denial as they place their children in harm’s way EVERYDAY AT SCHOOL AS THEIR WIVES DROP THEIR KIDS OFF AT SCHOOL TO BE IRRADIATED? ONE OF THE FULLERTON FIREFIGHTERS WHOSE CHILD ATTENDS ACACIA ELEMENTARY WAS INVOLVED IN TRYING TO GET AN 87 YEAR OLD GRANDMOTHER ARRESTED BY CALLING THE POLICE ON SEVERAL WOMEN IN OUR GROUP WHEN THEY WERE LEGALLY HANDING OUT FLIERS ON THE SIDEWALK ABOUT THE DANGERS OF IPADS AND WIRELESS RADIATION. WHY DO THEY IGNORE OUR BANNERS ON THE SIDEWALK AND THE FLYERS ON THE WINDSHIELDS WARNING OF THE POTENTIAL OF REPRODUCTIVE HARM, CANCER, ADHD AND AUTISM? THEY ARE PAID WELL ENOUGH TO WHERE PUBLIC SCHOOL IS NOT A NECESSITY. THEY COULD MAKE OTHER ARRANGEMENTS.
THE FULLERTON FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION TAKES IT ONE STEP FURTHER. AFTER UNFREINDING AND BLOCKING THE FULLERTON INFORMER ON FACEBOOK, THEY REMAIN SILENT ON THE ERECTION CELL TOWERS ON THEIR OWN FULLERTON FIRE STATIONS IN DIRECT OPPOSITION TO THE ASSOCIATION’S HANDPICKED SCIENTIFIC BODY’S CONCLUSION-THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND MEDICINE. The International Association of Fire Fighters’ position on locating cell towers commercial wireless infrastructure on fire department facilities, as adopted by its membership in August 2004 (1), is that the IAFF oppose the use of fire stations as base stations for towers and/or antennas for the conduction of cell phone transmissions until a study with the highest scientific merit and integrity on health effects of exposure to low-intensity RF/MW radiation is conducted and it is proven that such sitings are not hazardous to the health of our members.
This is the Twilight Zone ladies and gentlemen.
#2 by Sonja on August 26, 2014 - 7:21 pm
Unbelievable. How can they ignore all of this?