I report, you decide-by Barry Levinson
We Want Excellence From Our Students, Teachers and Administrators. Why Common Core will not get us there.
BARRY LEVINSON
We Want Excellence From Our Students, Teachers and Administrators. Why Common Core will not get us there.
I report, you decide.
As a concerned and involved parent of a son in a Fullerton elementary school that is instituting Common Core, I want to know how this major change will impact the quality of my son’s education.
F.S.D. Superintendent Robert Pletka-He could stop this if he wanted to.
What I have learned up until now has been anything but reassuring. My son’s school had a briefing for the parents earlier this year to discuss Common Core. We were told the following:
1. If your child does poorly on a Common Core exam, under Common Core the school will automatically dumb down the next test for your child. This process will not lead to excellence in academic achievement in my opinion. They would not be challenging the students with this scenario. There are many reasons why a student might do poorly on any given exam and to automatically dumb down future tests would be a total over reaction by the school.
2. I discussed with the administrators at the school that I believed there would be a lot of lessons learned in the first year of instituting Common Core throughout this elementary school and throughout the district. I asked at the end of the year a list of lessons learned could easily be created. I then asked would the individual schools and/or the district then make those changes to install those lessons learned the following year or would the district send the list to Sacramento and wait for their guidance. I was very saddened to learn that Sacramento has total control.
3. What real control does both the district and the individual teacher really have in the new Common Core System? In my opinion, it appears that most if not almost all of the control has been relinquished to bureaucrats in Sacramento. This is rarely a good thing.
If you believe that this change is mostly a bad thing, as parents you must let your school district board members as well as your principal know your concerns.
Clearly, this is a big step in taking away parental rights as well. The further away the real power is, the less control parents will have in the quality of the education given to their children.
Finally, I was informed that parents can legally opt out their kids from taking the Common Core tests but not the Common Core curriculum. However, I was also told that without the Common Core test scores the schools do not get money for your child, i.e. it impacts the financing of the schools.
If true, why is this important. It is important because if enough parents have their kids opt out, the schools will not be able to financially function and would have to consider dropping Common Core altogether.
Barry Levinson
#1 by Joe Imbriano on August 13, 2014 - 8:11 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjsBA6mrU5A
At the conclusion of the NBC Education Nation conference in New York today, writer William Doyle (A SOLDIER’S DREAM, A MISSION FROM GOD) asked U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan a question involving billions of dollars of taxpayer funds. A transcript of the substance of the conversation, which began before the video rolled:
Doyle: “Are you aware of the fact that your own What Works Clearinghouse [U.S. Department of Education research department] has found virtually no [K-8] technology interventions with solid evidence of academic benefit [exception: special needs and distance learners]?”
Secretary Duncan: “We’re nuts on that. We’ve gotta fix it. It’s a big problem. John Easton runs the IESD, have you talked to John?”
Doyle: “No, is that the What Works Clearinghouse?”
Secretary Duncan: “It comes out of his shop. This is not my first time hearing it. I haven’t fixed it. I gotta figure it out. I got it. [ex-Apple exec] Karen Cator on my staff is my tech guru, she is phenomenal. She totally gets this.”
Doyle: “I think maybe we should stop spending all these [many billions of] dollars [on those K-8 technology products that don’t have strong evidence of academic benefit] until we validate it.”
Secretary Duncan: “Talk to John.”
Additional William Doyle note: “Personally, I support the effective use of technology for learning by older children, with those technologies that have been found to have strong evidence of academic benefit through independent research. The problem is, according to the Department of Education’s own research criteria available on the What Works Clearinghouse website, almost none have such evidence, despite the spending of many billions of dollars of taxpayer funds over many years on unproven computer products in schools. I am not certain that when Secretary Duncan said ‘I haven’t fixed it,’ he meant the technology or his own department’s research clearinghouse.”
Folks here is the real reason for the technology-it is called the wireless agenda-https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-wireless-agenda-purloining-their-fecundity-the-next-generation-betrayed-enslaved-and-ending-up-depraved/