«
»

APRIL FOOLS ON THE FOURTH OF JULY- THE FSD’S EMF/ RF CLASSROOM EMISSIONS REPORT


For several months now I have been patiently waiting for permission to film and record the microwave radiation level readings in the wireless classrooms at my children’s school Acacia Elementary, which was voted the number one elementary school in The O.C. by the O.C. Ragister (yes the Ragister). Well they won’t let me in to do my own readings just yet. I was told that it would be disruptive to the learning process. You know, I believe that they really weren’t kidding when the experts over at Executive Environmental got the cushy gig from the District to go in and tell us what we have all been waiting to hear. Could it have been a hack job designed to turn out what the FSD wanted to hear?

I believe that they were undergoing on the job training on the taxpayer dime when they found EMF readings that could only be found on  the inside of a Faraday cage or down and out in the Okefenokee swamp. Hey gang, get a load of this April fools joke on the Fourth of July. The FSD is way more than a day late and a dollar short on this one. I don’t know about you all but I want my money back.

acacia compared to other readings4 (4)

ACACIA’S READINGS ACTUALLY WERE REPORTED BY EXECUTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL TO BE EVEN LOWER THAN 0.01. PEAK AVERAGES WERE REPORTED TO BE IN THE RANGE OF 0.001 MICRO WATT PER SQUARE CENTIMETER AND AVERAGES WERE REPORTED TO BE IN THE 0.0000001-0.000007 RANGE-THERE IS NO WAY THEY WOULD EVEN SHOW UP ON THIS GRAPH AT THOSE LEVELS.

This entry was posted on July 6, 2013, 3:48 pm and is filed under Forced irradiation of school children. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  1. #1 by sayitlikeitis on July 7, 2013 - 9:34 pm

    Anyone hear from FSD, explaining their ridiculous report?

    Reply Quote

    • #2 by Joe Imbriano on July 7, 2013 - 10:03 pm

      The Fullerton School District has posted some technology resources on their website.
      http://fsd.k12.ca.us/parent_resources/index.html

      Looks like they are gonna see if anyone else questions the results of the emissions report which in my opinion are blatantly obvious to the trained eye. In my opinion, I can’t tell if this was a dirty trick or they just had no idea what they were doing. I want to believe the latter but anything is possible when an agenda this big is involved. We must continue to educate all involved.

      Quote

    • #3 by JBeck on July 8, 2013 - 7:57 pm

      So there is really no “news” here. They are saying nothing new and it is all disingenuous because the FCC guidelines are 17 years old!!!! Is operating under 17 year old guidelines supposed to make the parents feel better?

      They are saying nothing new because they are holding up erroneous data gathered from an incompetent environmental firm. Is the chart up above, which is obviously and ridiculously wrong, supposed to make parents feel better? Is FSD that lacking in common sense? Does it really seem plausible to FSD that those numbers could actually be accurate?

      Is expressing the same old platitudes about caring about our children and, all the while, refusing to look at what all the experts are saying supposed to make parents feel better?

      So, the latest information FSD put out is no “news”, but a bunch of baloney and now it is in writing.

      Quote
1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 14
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!