Please look at our Facebook page. http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Fullerton-Informer/606854526009581?ref=stream
Arrow down a few inches and have a look at the proposed real world classroom application of wireless technology in action. This photo truly puts it into perspective. I remember growing up where there were ashtrays everywhere and now I see the poor folks on oxygen. And then there are those who sadly checked out way too early from an insidious in-your-face out of control marketing strategy that went unchallenged for way too long. Yes, they were lied to in the most egregious manner. So this begs the question: Does this child know what this is doing to him? Do his parents?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20353343
http://www.rfsafe.com/research/rf_hazards/dna_damage/dna_full.htm
By the way, hook up an earpiece to any WiFi enabled laptop or tablet and guess what? You get a 300% plus increase in the level of EMF emissions as the wire acts as an antenna. What is in the speaker in the child’s ear? The speaker contains a small magnet and a coil which takes it up another couple of notches, and you guessed it, right to the child’s head special delivery. Low intensity is safe you say?
http://www.bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/
We won’t even get into the children’s orthodontic fixtures at this time. They all come complete with that necessary metallic alloy array that is required for reception. Ok, just a little aside, I digress. Those industrial WiFi systems which already are, or will be installed in the FSD, will STAY ON ALL DAY in the classrooms. They have plenty of power to spare. They go right through wire mesh and concrete unlike those cheap ones you have at home. It’s just what the doctor ordered. Remember, the electrical conductivity of the human body can act as an antenna. Keep in mind that this is all courtesy of what you thought would help your child’s smile but mostly because of what you are being told by the experts that the child needs to learn and can no longer live without.
READ THESE STATEMENTS FROM A PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGIST FROM HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND OTHER EXPERTS.
http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6v75sKAUFdc
WE ARE NOT MAKING THIS STUFF UP-YOU AS PARENTS HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT THE DISTRICT IS NOT TELLING YOU.
#1 by Joe Imbriano on April 30, 2013 - 11:50 pm
Tonight we addressed the FSD Board of Trustees again presenting them with a few pieces of the LAUSD testimony after being completely ignored since the last meeting. After they moved the 2 non-agenda public comments (us) to follow after an agenda item with a room full of speakers to reduce the captive audience, we managed to get our 2 cents in. Slick move on their part but my intended audience was not the parents looking after their own wallets. It was the silent Board of Trustees and the entire administration, who in my opinion are not looking after the students but rather the top down agenda coming from their “superiors”. There were some refusing to look at me as I spoke all the while the room was emptying out as the clock was ticking while I was talking. No respect I tell you.
Many received our handouts and information gladly on their way out. But tonight yet another teacher and principal refused to accept a letter from a Harvard Pediatric Neurologist and a Bio-physicist warning of the dangers of RF emissions, DNA strand breaks and other nasty stuff that I tried to offer them. The teacher stated that “there might be a problem with my superiors if I accept this”. Wow, that statement just paid for my gas tonight. Just more evidence that there is a concerted effort to block this side of the story from getting out. The genie is out of the bottle on this one already, so I feel that resistance, at this point, is futile.
I even reminded him that this was public property, a public place and that this was an open meeting. As soon as the camera came, he went inside. That one teacher happened to be from my children’s school and was there accepting a check from the Rotary for more Ipads for the students. He stated in the presentation “It is what they need” A concerned parent came to his defense splitting hairs over how he really didn’t refuse the information but rather stated “he wasn’t really sure that he could accept the information.” I appreciated her concern and she later gladly accepted the handout. Is this Leningrad circa 1946, Orwell’s 1984 or Fullerton? A public servant that is more concerned with his superiors than public safety is neither serving the public or a servant. Look, where I come from you took it or you didn’t. The latter is the equivalent of refusal in my opinion.
My 13 year old son and Diane running the cameras tonight did a great job. My son learned more tonight about human nature and establishment politics, than most College grads ever will. Life is the best schoolmaster. The sooner they figure out that things are not as they seem, the better they are. Certain cliques are not worth the dues, I explained to him. He watched in amazement, as almost all of the faces on the wall paraded right by, knowing full well that EVERYONE LAST ONE OF THEM RECEIVED AND COMPLETELY IGNORED THE MASS EMAIL I SENT LAST MONTH ON THE DANGERS OF WIRELESS CLASSROOMS.
Yes, if a picture is worth a thousand words, then videos are just priceless and all, my friends, thanks to the Brown Act.
#2 by Veritas on May 1, 2013 - 7:41 am
Teachers, principals, administration, school board, all refusing to looking at the information. It sounds like your son was witness to the dark side of humanity.