Please look at our Facebook page. http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Fullerton-Informer/606854526009581?ref=stream
Arrow down a few inches and have a look at the proposed real world classroom application of wireless technology in action. This photo truly puts it into perspective. I remember growing up where there were ashtrays everywhere and now I see the poor folks on oxygen. And then there are those who sadly checked out way too early from an insidious in-your-face out of control marketing strategy that went unchallenged for way too long. Yes, they were lied to in the most egregious manner. So this begs the question: Does this child know what this is doing to him? Do his parents?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20353343
http://www.rfsafe.com/research/rf_hazards/dna_damage/dna_full.htm
By the way, hook up an earpiece to any WiFi enabled laptop or tablet and guess what? You get a 300% plus increase in the level of EMF emissions as the wire acts as an antenna. What is in the speaker in the child’s ear? The speaker contains a small magnet and a coil which takes it up another couple of notches, and you guessed it, right to the child’s head special delivery. Low intensity is safe you say?
http://www.bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/
We won’t even get into the children’s orthodontic fixtures at this time. They all come complete with that necessary metallic alloy array that is required for reception. Ok, just a little aside, I digress. Those industrial WiFi systems which already are, or will be installed in the FSD, will STAY ON ALL DAY in the classrooms. They have plenty of power to spare. They go right through wire mesh and concrete unlike those cheap ones you have at home. It’s just what the doctor ordered. Remember, the electrical conductivity of the human body can act as an antenna. Keep in mind that this is all courtesy of what you thought would help your child’s smile but mostly because of what you are being told by the experts that the child needs to learn and can no longer live without.
READ THESE STATEMENTS FROM A PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGIST FROM HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND OTHER EXPERTS.
http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6v75sKAUFdc
WE ARE NOT MAKING THIS STUFF UP-YOU AS PARENTS HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT THE DISTRICT IS NOT TELLING YOU.
#1 by Joe Imbriano on April 7, 2013 - 12:17 pm
Acacia’s classroom frequency with a lower power output but yet all soon to be deployed on your children.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3507243/
Sometimes less is more. In this case, a lower power level could end up being more dangerous because flying below the radar can circumvent immune and cellular defense mechanisms.
WiFi enabled tablets have a SAR rating of 1.05 with a maximum permissible SAR of 1.6. Please look at this experiment with SAR of 3.21 for 28 days for an hour a day of the same type of pulsed emissions. The FSD students will get a lot more time of exposure. Yes, the pupil’s SAR exposure is roughly 1/2- 1/3 but the duration of the exposure is over 50 X higher conservatively in just a single school year. Look at its potential reproductive system ramifications-In this study the authors conclude that electromagnetic field exposure affects spermatogenesis and apoptosis. Hey, they are your children folks.
http://www.emf-portal.de/viewer.php?aid=19016&l=e