«
»

The Fullerton School Board of Trustees gets mail. Will they read it?


Here is a  letter to The F.S.D. from a group of physicians: mail-attachment… (2)

You know just because the classroom microwave emissions are legal doesn’t mean that they are safe for our children.

The Fullerton School District Board of Trustees needs to stop hiding behind the outdated FCC guidelines that were based on thermal exposures established decades ago on marine infantry soldier type mannequins when non thermal dangers are an entirely different threat that we worry is potentially facing the children.

This entry was posted on May 13, 2013, 9:38 pm and is filed under Forced irradiation of school children. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  1. #1 by amateur on May 16, 2013 - 4:01 pm

    I have been reading this website for more than a month. This is how I would expect a publicly-elected school board to treat this WiFi in the schools issue.

    There are two sides to the issue, the pro-wifi side says the emissions are within the legal guidelines, tech industry assuring us it is “OK”, and has thermal test research to say it is “OK”.

    The pro-wired technology side says that the emission levels need to be updated because there is ample evidence and research that says that wifi in the schools is harmful. Here are some of the Ph.D.s, M.D.s, and scientists that have stepped up and articulated why wifi in the school is harmful: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
    The researcher’s message is very clear: don’t use wifi in the schools. The thermal impact is not a issue here, it is the EMF radiation that is the issue. Nothing from the other side talks about non thermal effects of EMF radiation. The author here adds another cavaeat, EMF interactions with metals. Additionally, there are 29 scientists and researchers from around the globe that have researched EMF and have compiled the BioInitiative 2012 report: http://www.bioinitiative.org/
    And, if you were to do a search on EMF you would find not only a substantive amount of videos, but websites and organizations, that are talking about the harms of EMF radiation. I was shocked by all the information.

    So, at the very least, I would expect the school board members to be looking at both sides of the argument. I will tell you that even if I personally thought the pro-wired technology side was wrong, I would know that it is my obligation to do what is right for the children’s health. The LEAST CONSERVATIVE position would be to err on the side of caution and opt for wired technologies.

    It astounds me that FSD takes the riskiest path with the children.

    Reply Quote

    • #2 by Joe Imbriano on May 16, 2013 - 4:09 pm

      Thank you for your post. I agree with you that there is ample evidence that should warrant a precautionary approach. So far we have received no indication of such. Would you please contact me at info@thefullertoninformer.com? Thank you.

      Quote
1 2 3 … 5
(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!