Robert Pletka, Fullerton School District Superintendant puts another 6000 iPads into Fullerton school children’s laps today


FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA SAYS THAT THE WIRELESS CLASSROOMS ARE “… TOTALLY SAFE FOR THE CHILDREN.”

Good evening Fullerton School District parents, this is Superintendent Bob Pletka. I am very pleased to announce that during the coming week, the District will be distributing over 6,000 iPads to all 5th through 8th grade students throughout our District as a part of our 1:1 VIP (Visual Innovation Program). California State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tom Torlakson, will be joining me at Valencia Park School, Wednesday, August 27, 2014 at a press conference to announce the distribution of these iPads. 

We are excited that the District’s commitment to including high-level technology that reaches beyond the classroom is becoming a reality. We are also committed to being your first source of information regarding our progress. We expect that this announcement will receive broad local news coverage, and we wanted to keep you apprised.

This e-mail has been sent to you by FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT. To maximize their communication with you, you may be receiving this e-mail in addition to a phone call with the same message. If you no longer wish to receive email notifications from FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, please click here to unsubscribe.
image001 (15)
dr_pletka

Fullerton School District Superintendent Robert Pletka

FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA SAYS THAT THE WIRELESS CLASSROOMS ARE “… TOTALLY SAFE FOR THE CHILDREN.”

SAY WHAT? http://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Schools-and-Wireless-and-Health-EHT-Preliminary-DraftAugust-2014.pdf

I wonder if Torlakson was going to read the statement that we gave him in the parking lot from U.C. Berkeley School of Public Health telling him to shut off the wireless.

I wonder if  Torlakson was going to read the statement that we gave him minutes earlier in the parking lot written by The U.C. Berkeley School of Public Health telling him to shut off the wireless in the classrooms. Yea he denied in front of our camera knowing anything about  our concerns even though he , his office, his facebook page and staff has been presented our concerns multiple times and even personally in his Sacramento office. Yeah this tool said he never heard of this before even though the blog tracking shows his Sacramento office’s IP address as a repeat visitor and he had me thrown out of Sharon Quirk Silva’s shin dig over a Troy last year- https://thefullertoninformer.com/insert-foot-in-mouth/ I wonder if  greenhouse gas Janny Meyer realized that she left her car running with her keys in her car after she ran away from our camera? What about the $300,000 club member Mijares in the back row who came in the side door who for the better part of a year and a half, to this day ignores everything we have ever sent him and hides it from his board members? I wonder if Chaffee realizes that this is all way over his head as he goes on record stating wireless technology is “wonderful for the children”  as he came up for air in front of our camera. I wonder.

Sure Torlakson is unaware of the wireless debate just like when he had me illegally thrown out on my ass from a public meeting last year, https://thefullertoninformer.com/insert-foot-in-mouth/#sthash.2jK4mSiu.dpuf 

Some more info on how he knows nothing about anything.

https://thefullertoninformer.com/tom-torlakson/

https://thefullertoninformer.com/straight-from-the-horses-mouth/

Yes,we were there with our banners to warn the mind controlled masses, the spineless, lackey school district minions and to film and greet the brass, Berryman had no comment and the District’s IT guy hid in the shadows. Yeah the establishment is all going along for the ride as the largest unmitigated public health disaster in the making is being ordained by the most respected (depending on your subjective frame of reference) members of our community.

 

SO NOW THE MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION: ARE WOMEN GETTING BREAST CANCER FROM CARRYING THEIR CELL PHONES IN THEIR BRAS?

If soft tissue cancer results from wireless cell phone microwave exposure, what do we make of this wireless iPad microwave exposure?

images (11)

A FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT PUPIL  IN ONE OF ROBERT PLETKA’S WIRELESS CLASSROOMS. THIS CHILD HAS A MICROWAVE TRANSMITTER IN HIS LAP WITH THE ANTENNA RIGHT ON HIS ZIPPER.

Fullerton School District Superintenedent  Robert Pletka.

Fullerton School District Superintendent Robert Pletka. “Your request that the district turn off wireless connectivity and remove IPads from your children’s respective classrooms….is respectfully DENIED.” 11-1-2013 letter to Joe Imbriano

HE CHOOSES TO IGNORE SCIENTIFIC STUDIES THAT WARN AGAINST WHAT HE IS FORCING ON THE STUDENTS

The Fullerton Joint Union High School District awarded an electrical contract THAT INCLUDES NO WIRELESS SYSTEMS a few months back sparing 14,000 High School students and staff who will not be be forcibly exposed to wireless microwave radiation at school which would have been trillions of times background levels. That meant that all of the hot mapping for deployment has been called off, and the wireless access points, and related equipment is sitting in a warehouse where it MAY HAVE COST THE TAXPAYERS SOME MONEY BUT AT LEAST IT can’t hurt anyone.

Robert Singer Ph.D.

Robert Singer Ph.D. FJUHSD Trustee -safety first-bravo Mr. Singer

ROBERT SINGER, Ph.D., CITED SAFETY CONCERNS WHEN THE DECISION WAS MADE TO HARD WIRE THE ENTIRE F.J.U.H.S.D

Here it is-THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACT from earlier this year

doc-08-6o-apps-v..

Meanwhile, back home on the range for the most vulnerable segment of our student population here in town, the K-8 students, The Fullerton School District under Superintendent Robert Pletka’s watch is GOING WIRELESS ALL THE WAY DOWN TO KINDERGARTEN.

https://thefullertoninformer.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/

skull-vs-ipad-basic

IPADS EMIT MORE MICROWAVE RADIATION THAN CELL PHONES

Dr Dariusz Leszczynski, Adjunct Professor, Division of Biochemistry and Biotechnology at the University of Helsinki and a member of a working group of 31 scientists from 14 countries constituted by World Health Organization (WHO) that classified cellphone radiation as possibly carcinogenic, in conversation with Maitri Porecha, reveals how leading cell phone operators and manufacturers are withdrawing funding for research, leading to closing down of laboratories studying effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields as emitted by wireless devices, cellphones and cell towers

http://www.dnaindia.com/scitech/report-use-of-cell-phones-increases-cancer-risk-2011557

download (3)

Is this what you signed your kids up for gang? They might as well just put a cell tower in the room.

antenna

WHATS THE DIFFERENCE? -these transmitters are up in the air, and in the classrooms, the transmitters are between their legs.

Fullerton has quite the establishment folks. Its roots runs deep and dark in my opinion. It involves the schools, the city hall crowd, the FPD and even some of the wanna be big timers who play church on Sundays.

In 2 weeks, 6000 more iPads will be going into the laps of Fullerton school children. Everyone is all in.

Fullerton’s Praetorian guard. In 2 weeks, 8000 more iPads will be going into the laps of Fullerton school children forcing 8000 households to install wireless connectivity so that they can do their homework.

The player's club.  Anyone want to join?

The player’s club. Anyone want to join?

She is a little shy

She is a little shy

Come and knock on our door, we've been waiting for you... Whoa Doug, your the man-wireless technology- "..It is great for the children.."

Come and knock on our door, we’ve been waiting for you… Whoa Doug, your the man-wireless technology- “..It is great for the children..”

I believe the children of those who value their wallets over their own flesh and blood will soon learn the hard way. Their parents ignored the fact that the jury on wireless has been in for decades. The verdict was found to be comprised of cancer, ADHD, autism and infertility. Check out these women who are along for the ride:

JenniferFitzgerald2012sm_1-1 (1)

Fullerton Council woman Jennifer Fitzgerald– Voted yes on the 4000 watt cell tower next to a school and voted yes for a homeless shelter next to a school. On school forced wireless exposure-” I don’t agree with your assertions”

TOO BAD THESE ARE NOT MY ASSERTIONS- http://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Schools-and-Wireless-and-Health-EHT-Preliminary-DraftAugust-2014.pdf

https://thefullertoninformer.com/fullertons-newest-cell-tower-in-richman-park

Fitzgerald she needs to spend a little less time at the hair salon and devote a lot more time to dealing with reality.

Hilda Sugarman, a member of the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees, “My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7

Hilda Sugarman, Fullerton School District  Trustee on iPads,
“My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7″-this one is too far gone to reason with

https://thefullertoninformer.com/hilda-sugarmans-dystopic-vision-of-wireless-ipads-every-single-child-will-have-one-247/

Jennifer Fitzgerald, Doug Chaffee and Jan Flory all voted to put a 4000 watt cell tower right on top of a community health clinic next to a school last night with Robert Pletka’s blessing. Yes it is one big happy party for these deniers.

I motion to post the ATT report on our website-Potius Pilate

Fullerton Councilwoman Jan Flory voted to place a 4000 watt cell tower next to a school and voted to place a homeless shelter next to a school. “I move the motion to post the ATT report on our website and approve the cell tower”-Pontius Pilate

Where is the flag? I feel a draft.

Fullerton councilman Doug Chafeee “Your three minutes are up…” Where is the flag? I feel a draft. The tower is approved. I don’t understand radio waves  and microwaves but I will vote to stick this 4000 watt antenna array right on top of a community health clinic in a park next to a school because I am up for re-election and I don’t want to be associated with the tin foil hat brigade. I just want to cozy up with my establishment cronies and union hacks. Just get me over to the arboretum.

How much again?

Jennifer Fitzgerald-Curt Pringle’s Pride.How much does the city get for the tower lease again?

I wonder what Hughes is thinking while he poses for photo ops with Pletka? What does Hughes and Fitzgerald think when they send their daughters off to be irradiated at school everyday while they pretend to ignore the wireless discussion every other Tuesday night on this issue? What’s for lunch or probably nothing as that would explain their behavior. What about the five F.S.D.  board members that are connected at the hips to each of these establishment deniers?

Janny_Meyer (2)

JANNY MEYER Fullerton School District Trustee who is also member of the board of the technology foundation-NO COMMENT-she just smiles at everything.

Beverly_Berryman (1)

BEVERLY BERRYMAN Fullerton School District Trustee . “Thank you for forwarding this information to me. I am attempting to understand all of the data, not being a scientist, it is pretty complicated. I am continuing to follow up to ensure that we are doing what we need to do in researching the issues that you have and I know that our superintendent has been communicating with you regarding the progress of the testing. I do understand your passion for this topic and do appreciate your concern. I want you to know that even though I do not comment back in the board meetings, your concerns are being heard.”

Lynn_Thornley

LYNNE THORNLEY Fullerton School District Trustee. NO COMMENT of course

Chris_Thompson (1)

CHRIS THOMPSON Fullerton School District Trustee. I wonder what Joe is here to talk about tonight? “….

 

Hilda_Sugarman

HILDA SUGARMAN Fullerton School District Trustee and board member of the technology foundation. NO COMMENT as would be expected

– See more on these five at:https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-fullerton-five/

Cognitive dissonance in this town has quite the high price, seemingly having  no end and apparently knowing no limits after thousands of studies have been presented to and ignored by these people warning against what is being done to your children.

images (13)

Why do wireless and microwaves always get a pass? Did it ever occur to any of you as to why we have this explosion of  Down Syndrome babies born to very young mothers today? How about Testicular Cancer in young men from the cell phones in their pockets, wireless laptops, tablets and gaming controllers in their laps, Prostate Cancer in young men,  Autism, ADHD in our young children, Infertility in our young men and women, Atrial Fibrillation  in our parents, heart murmers arising out of nowhere in our children, kids dropping dead at school, bizarre rheumatic conditions and all the other forms of  Cancer today? Close your eyes and pretend this is all a conspiracy theory while the emission levels go off the charts all around us. This stuff is not natural and is trillions of times the normal background levels. Wake up.

When Federal Legislation is written to forcibly irradiate you and your children with categorical exemptions for cellular infrastructure jammed down our leaders throats, the last thing we need is ill informed, spineless lackeys and educrats making health decisions for you and your children in areas where there are no categorical exemptions like classrooms.

I wonder if It ever occurred to any of these reprehensatives that this is a decision well above their pay grade as well as their intellect and has been placed there by design replete with 1st and 10th amendment violations just for good measure as icing on the cake. I wonder where we would be today if the same pass that wireless is being given was given to DDT, tobacco, asbestos, dioxin, mercury, BPA or any other loving compound? I wonder. Yeah the government never lies and scientists would never serve up results catered to order.

Folks that is exactly what we have and you are all going along for the ride. So why do they roll the dice with your kids?

The welcome wagon was rolling nice and smoothly for a feel good time and happy party over at EV Free last Friday for all the accessories to the forced irradiation of 14,000 school children in the FSD with FSD and FPD top brass as well as  hack council members that have demonstrated their total willful ignorance of this issue .

Pletka's in the pulpit at EV Free

Pletka’s in the pulpit at EV Free

Well, I wonder if any of these cats opened The Word to 1 Timothy 6:10 that was staring them in the face on the back of the pew at their little shin dig last week.

I prefer the King James Translation over the New American Standard-

So why do they roll the dice with your kids again?

“I’m holding it up as a model for the state,” said Tom Torlakson, state superintendent of public Instruction, said at the presentation.

 THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL.

In closing, I have been asked to please share this letter with the world .

An Open Letter from Traci Frantz On Cell Phone Safety


My name is Traci Frantz and I live in Strasburg, Pennsylvania. On January 4, 2012 my
daughter, Tiffany, was diagnosed (in Lancaster, PA) with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in her left breast.
Tiffany submitted to genetic testing and, as a family, we underwent genetic counseling. Genetic tests
including BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 tested negative. Therefore, there is no genetic pre­disposition to
breast cancer. However, Tiffany stored her cell phone in her bra (against her bare skin) for at least 5
years, every day, all day (12 hours/day) and the masses that were found lined up exactly with where she
stored her cell phone.
By November of 2012, Tiffany had a left mastectomy, radiation therapy and reconstructive
surgeries (at Hopkins) and we were convinced that the cancer had been removed and obliterated by 6
weeks of radiation therapy. However, in March of 2013 it was discovered via PET scan and MRI (in
Lancaster, PA) that Tiffany’s breast cancer had metastasized to her hip, pelvis, spine, sternum and
skull. Tiffany underwent surgery to insert a plate into her left hip as a stabilizer and 2 weeks of radiation
to treat the tumor that was quite sizeable. She currently is undergoing monthly Zometa IV treatments
(for 2 years) and daily Tamoxifen treatments (for 5 years).
We most recently (June 2014) have been informed that according to her latest PET scan, her
cancer has metastasized to her liver.
The wording that is being advocated for is already in the owner’s manual which no one takes the
time to read. Cell phone manufacturers KNOW there is a danger otherwise they would not include it in
their verbage. We are only asking for it to be better seen by the consumer at the point of sale for the
sole purpose of heeding caution and for nothing more. Have you and your family taken the time to read
your owner’s manual? Have you and your family heeded the advice your cell phone manufacturer
recommends?
I WISH there would have been a warning on the outside of the box for ALL of us to read ­
My daughter may not have to fight for her life if it were!!!


Traci Frantz

images (2)

PARENTAL COGNITIVE DISSONANCE DEFINED. To the fool, the ultimate way to electronically babysit while you all wine a bit.  I am telling you, your children are gonna lose it all.

What do you think these devices are doing to your daughters’ eggs ladies and gentlemen? What about your sons’ reproductive organs? I believe that there are no accidents here gang. I believe that this is all being done on purpose. They are jamming wireless down your throats and up your backsides. 

BREAK YOUR CONDITIONING FOLKS.

https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-inconvenient-truth-of-the-wireless-agenda/.

https://thefullertoninformer.com/the-wireless-agenda-purloining-their-fecundity-the-next-generation-betrayed-enslaved-and-ending-up-depraved/

YOUR ENTIRE LINEAGE IS ON THE LINE

  1. #1 by Joe Imbriano on August 27, 2014 - 8:33 am

    We were there with our banners to film and greet the brass-Torlaksen was presented with a statement from UC Berkeley warning him to end wireless in schools, he said he never heard of this before even though the blog tracking shows his Sacramento office’s IP address as a repeat visitor and he had me thrown out of Sharon Quirk Silva’s shin dig over a Troy last year- https://thefullertoninformer.com/insert-foot-in-mouth/ Upon Janny Meyer’s arrival she was asked about her position on wireless. She ran away and left her car running in front of us with her keys in the ignition and went into the event. Doug Chafee, upon his arrival, when asked about wireless technology said it was wonderful for the kids, Felz was a no show, Mijares came in through the side, Berryman had no comment and the District’s IT guy hid in the shadows. Yeah the establishment is all going along for the ride as the largest unmitigated public health disaster in the making is being ordained by the most respected (depending on your frame of reference) members of our community.

    • #2 by Shane on August 27, 2014 - 10:56 pm

      Give em hell Joe.

  2. #3 by Sonja on August 27, 2014 - 9:56 am

    A new study raises concerns of a possible association between cell phone radiation exposure and breast cancer in young women.

    The research team, led by Dr. Lisa Bailey, a former president of the American Cancer Society’s California Division and one of California’s top breast surgeons, studied four young women – aged from 21 to 39 years old – with multifocal invasive breast cancer.

    The researchers observed that all the patients developed tumors in areas of their breasts next to where they carried their cell phones, often for up to 10 hours per day, for several years. None of the patients had a family history of breast cancer. They all tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 – breast cancer genes linked to about one-half of breast cancer cases – and they had no other known breast cancer risks.

    Imaging of the young girls’ breasts revealed a clustering of multiple tumor foci in the part of the breast directly under where their cell phones touched their body.

  3. #4 by Barry Levinson on August 27, 2014 - 10:31 am

    Ladies and gentlemen, we are now experiencing government at all levels that is out of control. You might say, Barry that is a very strong statement. It certainly is ladies and gentlemen but I can back it up with many examples.

    For instance, any of you who have either attended a city council meeting or for that matter a board of education meeting knows this to be true. After the Fullerton City Council under Mayor Chaffee spends an hour and sometimes more on presentations that having little or nothing to do with city business, we the people are given 3 whole minutes to discuses our concerns about the city. In a recent meeting our pathetic Mayor after wasting an hour or more on his presentations, then wanted to reduce the time we the people had to speak to only 2 minutes.

    The arrogance and the disrespect shown by Mayor Chaffee making that recommendation should give him a one way ticket to Toledo. Fortunately, it was Council member Whitaker alone on the dais who stood up for the people. All the other council members were silent. Only Council member Whitaker spoke out for the people. Why? If it was not for Council member Whitaker I believe Mayor Chaffee’s motion to reduce our speaking time to 2 minutes would have passed.

    We are also facing the raw, arrogant, push for undemocratic action with the attempted passage of the DCCSP. If passed one man, unelected administrator, Joe Felz will have the power to approve 100’s of millions of dollars of building projects in our city. Why should one unelected man be given that kind of power. That kind of power usually leads to bad outcomes in my opinion.

    I could go on and on but I hope the readers get my point that government is out of control and our democracy is in the balance.

    • #5 by streets on August 27, 2014 - 11:31 am

      There appears to be no end to their corruptness that they hide behind a facade of ineptness.

  4. #6 by Bozo Esq. on August 27, 2014 - 12:17 pm

    Abstract Living cells react defensively and start to synthesize stress proteins when exposed to potentially harmful stimuli. Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are among the many different environmental stimuli that initiate stress protein synthesis. Although there is greater energy transfer and heating due to EMF at higher frequencies, there is no greater stress response. The cellular stress response is far more sensitive to EMF than to an increase in temperature. It should be obvious that an EMF safety standard should be based on the more sensitive, natural biological response

  5. #7 by Anonymous on August 27, 2014 - 5:56 pm

    Lets start a revolution!

    • #8 by Anonymous on August 27, 2014 - 6:46 pm

      Let’s not and say we did.

      • #9 by Anonymous on August 28, 2014 - 9:51 am

        Let’s do it and say we didn’t.

  6. #10 by Connie on August 27, 2014 - 8:41 pm

    6000 iPads? Are you kidding me? This is insane. They give off more than a cell phone. Where are they getting all of the money to pay for all of this? My daughter has 35 kids in her class at Fern Drive. You would think that they would hire more teachers to shrink the class sizes instead of wasting money on iPads.

  7. #11 by Joe Imbriano on August 28, 2014 - 8:07 am

    I will quote Dr. Henry Lai-

    “I think there is a need to ‘demystify EMF’. EMF is nothing different from any physical entities, e.g., drugs, tobacco, alcohol, asbestos, psychological stress, etc, that can cause biological effects. The effect is based on the interaction of a particular entity at the biological site of action, e.g., tobacco smoke in the lung, psychological stress at the hormonal systems. Nonlinear dose-response is very common in biological systems, e.g., the Hebb-function and the Yerkes–Dodson law. Non-linearity is also true in drug actions. Low-level exposure has different effects than higher-dose exposure is not uncommon. The fact is any physical systems, including biological systems, that have the ability to compensate for perturbation, demonstrate non-linear dose-response property.

    We need to first accept that EMF is not different from any other physical entities in the environment. Then, we can solve the problem of the health effects of EMF. However, unlike other physical entities, EMF is more ubiquitous and exposure is mostly involuntary and unavoidable.”

    Dr. Henry Lai, M.D. University of Washington

  8. #12 by Acacia PTA on August 28, 2014 - 8:15 pm

    I have to believe that ALL of these folks are doing some pretty heavy denial. They must be having to bury this stuff really deep so that they can wake up each day and continue on this horrible path.

    To look the other way when your own kids are being irradiated, WOW!!!!!

  9. #13 by Joe Imbriano on August 28, 2014 - 11:50 pm

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: joe imbriano
    Date: Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:47 PM
    Subject: Fullerton School District California Public Records Act request
    To: Carmen Serna , Robert Pletka , “info@thefullertoninformer.com” , Fritz Heirich

    Dear Carmen,

    Pursuant to my rights under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.), I ask to obtain a copy of the following, which I understand to be held by your agency:

    All emails and written correspondence between district staff, parents, board members, sub contractors, contractors, law enforcement and any member of the general public that has been sent or received to or from any district staff, employee, sub contractor, board member, contractor, parent, parent group, law enforcement agent or agency or any member of the general public relating to the purchase, deployment, safety, and legality of wireless technology in Fullerton Schools since 2-11-2011.

    I ask for a determination on this request within 10 days of your receipt of it, and an even prompter reply if you can make that determination without having to review the record[s] in question.

    I am sending a copy of this letter to your legal advisor over at ASCIP to help encourage a speedy determination, and I would likewise be happy to discuss my request with him at any time.

    If you determine that any or all or the information qualifies for an exemption from disclosure, I ask you to note whether, as is normally the case under the Act, the exemption is discretionary, and if so whether it is necessary in this case to exercise your discretion to withhold the information.

    If you determine that some but not all of the information is exempt from disclosure and that you intend to withhold it, I ask that you redact it for the time being and make the rest available as requested.
    In any event, please provide a signed notification citing the legal authorities on which you rely if you determine that any or all of the information is exempt and will not be disclosed.
    If I can provide any clarification that will help expedite your attention to my request, please contact me at (provide phone or fax number, pager number, etc.). I ask that you notify me of any duplication costs exceeding $100 before you duplicate the records so that I may decide which records I want copied.

    Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

    Sincerely,
    Joe Imbriano

  10. #14 by Joe Imbriano on August 28, 2014 - 11:57 pm

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: joe imbriano
    Date: Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:56 PM
    Subject: Fullerton School District California Public Records Act request #2
    To: Carmen Serna , Robert Pletka , Fritz Heirich , “info@thefullertoninformer.com”

    Pursuant to my rights under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.), I ask to obtain a copy of the following, which I understand to be held by your agency:

    All emails and written correspondence between district staff, and board members that have been sent or received to or from Apple Computer Company, Cisco and Time Warner, or any staff member, employee, or sub contractor of Apple Computer Company, Cisco and Time Warner relating to the purchase, deployment, safety, and legality of wireless technology in Fullerton Schools since 2-11-2011.

    I ask for a determination on this request within 10 days of your receipt of it, and an even prompter reply if you can make that determination without having to review the record[s] in question.

    I am sending a copy of this letter to your legal advisor over at ASCIP to help encourage a speedy determination, and I would likewise be happy to discuss my request with him at any time.

    If you determine that any or all or the information qualifies for an exemption from disclosure, I ask you to note whether, as is normally the case under the Act, the exemption is discretionary, and if so whether it is necessary in this case to exercise your discretion to withhold the information.

    If you determine that some but not all of the information is exempt from disclosure and that you intend to withhold it, I ask that you redact it for the time being and make the rest available as requested.
    In any event, please provide a signed notification citing the legal authorities on which you rely if you determine that any or all of the information is exempt and will not be disclosed.
    If I can provide any clarification that will help expedite your attention to my request, please contact me at (provide phone or fax number, pager number, etc.). I ask that you notify me of any duplication costs exceeding $100 before you duplicate the records so that I may decide which records I want copied.

    Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

    Sincerely,
    Joe Imbriano

  11. #15 by EV Free Church? on August 29, 2014 - 8:28 pm

    So, the politicians and school board trustees are all affiliating with EV Free Church because of the large number of voters? They are all trying to appeal to these folks? That’s what it looks like.

    What pretense. I wonder if the politicians grow weary of being constantly false and hypocritical. That must be quite a grind.

    • #16 by Streets on September 10, 2014 - 12:34 pm

      They don’t care about anything except money.

  12. #17 by Message to parents. on September 1, 2014 - 7:05 am

    Parents: Remove your children from wireless classrooms.

  13. #19 by Joe Imbriano on September 3, 2014 - 11:30 pm

    While Pletka stays stuck on stupid, Refuse to Use is a world-wide Movement by responsible and futuristic thinking parents and teachers to ban all school-based technology for children under 12 years of age, and bring back tried and true methods of teaching. The 0-12 years are formative for brain and body development, and are a fragile time when deprivation and damage can be permanent.

    Four critical factors for enhancing child development, behaviour, and learning are movement, touch, connection, and nature. Technology stops children from engagement in these critical factors. Technology is sedentary, isolating, overstimulating, and results in child neglect, causing delays in child development, problematic and difficult to manage behaviours, as well as limited attention and learning ability. Teachers teach, not technology. Join the Refuse to Use Movement by reading “Ten reasons to NOT use technology in schools for children under the age of 12 years”, and signing the petition to show your support.

    They don’t need it. In fact, education technology appears to be doing more harm than good in the areas of literacy and overall academic performance. If education technology is so great, why has Canada dropped out the top 10 to 13th, and the US is ranked 27th on the PISA, a global test for math, science, and reading (PISA 2013)? Half of grade eight students do not demonstrate job entry literacy (National Center for Education Statistics 2010). Use it or you lose it rings true: today’s fast paced technology doesn’t appear to require frontal lobe activity, causing atrophy in the very area of the brain that should be growing (Dunckley V, 2014). This means, according to the Learning Paradox, the more you use this technology the less likely you are to learn. Today’s students are quite possibly only as smart as their device.

    Not research evidenced. While education technology holds promise for the future, too much too soon has been shown to have perilous consequences. While every parent would like their child to grow up with the knowledge and skills needed to be successful as an adult, pushing apps around a screen at one year of age is likely to result in exactly the opposite. The face of technology will change significantly over the next 5 to 10 years. Teaching tech to toddlers now is senseless and vastly detrimental to their developing brain and body.

    It’s not proven to be safe. Children are being forced by schools to absorb potentially harmful radiation without choice or parental consent. In 2011, the World Health Organization classified radiation emitted from technology devices, including laptops, cell phones, tablets, wifi, routers, to be a Class 2B carcinogen (WHO 2011). Health Canada followed with warnings to parents to use “precautionary measures” regarding technology use, and to not allow children under 12 to carry cell phones in their pockets. In 2013, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) requested the Federal Trade Commission to reinvestigate radiation effects on children, citing thinner skulls, more aqueous brain tissue, and rapidly dividing cells (AAP 2013).

    Recent research suggests that the electromagnetic (EMF) and radio frequency (RF) radiation emissions from cell phones and laptops are causing reduction in sperm motility and sperm DNA fragmentation (Avendano 2012) as well as acoustic neuromas (Hardell 2013). Without long term data demonstrating safety, continuing to expose children to devices categorized as possible carcinogens seems beyond all common sense or reason, and is an infringement of individual right and freedom from harm. Would schools continue in this manner, if they were to be held personally responsible for their actions? School wifi waiver forms can be found at Citizens for Safe Technology website.

    Pediatrician guidelines actively ignored. Both the AAP and the Canadian Paediatric Society released policy stating the following limits: no technology exposure for 0-2 years, 1 hour/day for 3-5 years, and 2 hours/day for 6-18 years, yet the average child uses 4 to 5 times that amount of entertainment technology before they even get to school (AAP 2014). Additional school-based education technology usage is estimated to average 2-3 hours per day.

    How can this happen? Teachers, school boards, parent advisory committees…right on up to the highest levels of education government have not only sanctioned escalating usage, but are encouraging it. To actively ignore policy put in place by two of the world’s largest paediatric organizations, who represent all the paediatricians in North America, is not only unethical and unprofessional but could, in the near future, be considered an indictable offence.

    Sedentary bodies can’t learn. Research abounds that exercise enhances attention and learning (Ratey J 2008), yet schools continue to restrict movement through recess reduction and boring playgrounds. At the same time provision of sedentary, expensive, and useless technology explodes. As sedentary lifestyles become the norm, developmental delay and obesity escalate, right along with inability to pay attention and learn.

    Highly anxious children can’t learn. Anxiety is the fastest growing child mental illness. Technology isolates children from not only the attentions of parent and teacher, but also from potential cooperative learning with other students. Immersion in a virtual world that is fast paced, immediate, “me” focused, reward-based, and totally in the student’s control, causes immense difficulties transitioning back into the real world. Waiting, taking turns, and socializing with other children are daunting and difficult for the tech immersed child. Poor self-regulation, tantrums, impulsivity, aggression, and explosive violence in North American children are now the norm. Selfie was the 2013 word of the year.

    Impossible to manage and monitor. A Los Angeles school had to recall all its iPads from students as it couldn’t keep them from accessing porn, video games, Facebooking and texting. Teachers and parents like to console themselves by thinking children are doing their homework. Well…they aren’t; 95 percent of time children spend on tech devices is for mindless entertainment purposes, not education.

    Highly addictive. A 2009 study indicated 1 out of 11 children aged 8 to18 years are addicted to technology (Gentile D 2009). Never in the history of humankind have there been child addictions. Though treatment is difficult and expensive, in the near future this will be the job of every health and education professional — addressing student tech addictions. Schools wouldn’t give children cocaine or crack, yet they readily hand out an equally damaging and addictive device to students on a daily basis. Starting now to restrict usage in school settings would send a message to students and parents that it is imperative to reduce the use of technology, before it’s too late.

    Displaces the basics. Remember the 3 R’s – reading, writing and arithmetic? Teaching printing is passé, and reading and math instruction are increasingly relegated to two-dimensional screens. Yet whenever a child is tested prior to age 12 years, on any subject, they’re expected to be proficient with printing. When children learn to print, they create a visual memory for letter recognition in reading. When they practice printing over and over, their printing speeds get fast, allowing them to free up their brains for spelling, sentence production, and math.

    Not teaching children to print ensures illiteracy and academic failure. If adults were told to print all day every day in a foreign language, but not given proper instruction or teaching, how long would they continue this insane task? Students who do not demonstrate subconscious motor planning for letters and numbers by grade three, are very slow printers, hate school, and resist all subjects requiring printing output.

    Not sustainable. The ways in which parents and teachers are raising and educating children with technology are not sustainable. It’s time to bring the tech train back to the station and rethink who, what, when, where, why and how parameters to safely and effectively use technology with children. Join the Refuse to Use Movement petition below to stop use of school-based technology with children under the age of 12 years until such time as research indicates safety and efficacy.

    * Referenced research can be located on Zone’in Fact Sheet now available in English and Spanish versions.

    Cris Rowan is a pediatric occupational therapist, biologist, speaker and author of “Virtual Child – The terrifying truth about what technology is doing to children”. Cris can be reached at info@zonein.ca This article was orginally published on her website, Zone’in, and is reproduced here with permission.

    – See more at: http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/left_to_their_own_devices#sthash.VagqYSgb.dpuf

  14. #20 by Anonymous on September 4, 2014 - 6:04 am

    good points on the decline of test scores since this technology. when I grew up none of this stuff was available. it would have been absurd to think each kid needed a phone installed in the classroom like they were on-call paramedics. equally absurd would be that each kid needed a tv installed in the classroom with the expectation to only watch documentaries, not cartoons. today being “connected” has promised increased learning, but so far hasn’t delivered. distracted driving? noooo… distracted learning.

    • #21 by Amy on September 10, 2014 - 7:46 pm

      Equally absurd is the fact that the US has been declining for decades and the final slide has begun in terms of academic performance. In the interim, DAS technology is now beginning to replace the towers and I am very concerned that the current pace at which deployment of wireless infrastructure is progressing, it may in fact be too late to save what is left of the reproductive capabilities of most people. In vitro will soon be the only viable option and it will be under lock and key if it is not already.

  15. #22 by Anonymous on September 4, 2014 - 8:14 am

    Nobody cares about the kids, not even their own parents. This is unbelievable. There are no words to describe this phenomenon.

  16. #23 by Anonymous on September 4, 2014 - 11:22 am

    Nice work Joe-keep calling them out-all of them

  17. #24 by Anonymous on September 9, 2014 - 9:13 am

    You are so disrespectful towards these individuals. Didn’t your mother ever teach you that you will catch more flies with honey than vinegar? Just what exactly are you trying to accomplish here?

    • #25 by circle jerk on September 9, 2014 - 7:22 pm

      They don’t deserve respect, they deserve to go to jail for what they are involved in. Joe knows exactly what he is doing. These people are nothing but caffeinated, placation spewing fools who are in way over their heads now.

      • #26 by Shane on September 10, 2014 - 9:11 pm

        That’s a good one. I shouldn’t be laughing because none of this is funny. What do you do with a jack ass that doesn’t want to budge? Ask a farmer. He’ll tell you.

  18. #27 by Heath on September 10, 2014 - 7:02 pm

    I always wondered where Meth heads and their tweaker friends hung out. Now I know…it’s on this website! Please seek help for your addiction issues and the paranoid delusions that are caused by it. If you are truly afraid, you can get some aluminum foil from the 99 cent store and fashion some protective helmets to save you from the “dangers of wifi.” Question: who protects your children from your incoherent rants?

  19. #34 by Barry Levinson on October 2, 2014 - 1:23 pm

    Heath your solution above is both hilarious and dangerous. Guess what happens when you put aluminum foil in a microwave. It starts a fire. For 40 years, experts have been warning people to never stand in front of a microwave when it is in use. But I guess Heath believes that warning is ill-founded.

    • #35 by Anonymous on October 2, 2014 - 8:34 pm

      Heath typifies the finished product of a contemporary public education. Personal critical thinking skills have been exchanged for collaboration and creativity. Can’t you tell?

  20. #36 by Amelia on October 2, 2014 - 2:48 pm

    They are being embraced by educators as important learning tools, but some health experts are warning that tablets and smartphones can have harmful health effects, especially on young, developing children.

    Dr. Devra Davis, President of Environmental Health Trust, says microwave radiation from the devices pose significant risks to children.

    “The radiation from a cellphone, which is a two-way microwave radio, gets twice as deep into the head of a child as an adult,” she said.

    “Those who begin to use cellphones before the age of 20 have four to eight times more brain cancer 10 years later.”

    The group also warns about dangers in adults, especially women who sleep or run with their smartphones.

    “We are seeing breast cancer right in the centre of the chest where young women have stored their cellphones while running,” she said.

    “The World Health Organization said that radio wireless and cell phone frequencies are a possible class-2 carcinogen. That’s the same classification as lead, DDT and chloroform,” warns Dr. Davis.

  21. #37 by Joe Imbriano on October 2, 2014 - 11:45 pm

    Hi Don, and good evening.

    As a follow up to our discussion on dielectric heating by microwaves- The microwave RF emissions at 2.4 GHz, the same frequency utilized by WiFi and WiFi enabled devices, interact with water molecules by transferring energy to the separated positive and negative charges of the water molecules. The water molecules then violently rotate to line up with the charges in the oscillating electromagnetic field. This violent rotation or flipping back and forth of these molecules creates thermal energy.

    The sparks on the tip of a fork in a microwave are actually voltage discharges creating the dielectric breakdown of the air. Metals, as you know, are electrically conductive. If the conductive object has points, the conduction of the RF energy will cause the electrons to collect at the edges creating an arc. The voltage can approach several million volts on the tips of the fork which is enough to exceed the dielectric field strength of the air.

    These waves have energy. The Rf emissions of an iPad at point blank on the boys zipper in the photo are the same as standing 1 foot away from the door of an in use microwave oven. This amount of radio frequency exposure at 2.4 GHz is trillions of times the normal background levels that our parents and their parents were exposed to.

  22. #38 by Shane on October 3, 2014 - 2:39 pm

  23. #39 by It's ILLEGAL in Taiwan!!! on February 4, 2015 - 12:41 pm

    Pletka says wireless is “totally safe”.

    What does Taiwan know that Pletka doesn’t????

    Does YOUR toddler play on an iPad? Taiwan makes it ILLEGAL for parents to let children under two use electronic gadgets… and under-18s must limit use to ‘reasonable’ lengths

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2929530/Does-toddler-play-iPad-Taiwan-makes-ILLEGAL-parents-let-children-two-use-electronic-gadgets-18s-limit-use-reasonable-lengths.html#ixzz3QoSSR57O
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    • #40 by Anonymous on February 4, 2015 - 8:11 pm

      FSD’s Robert Pletka is an education doctor. He is not a medical doctor. Fullerton’s Roman Schulze is a medical doctor. Roman Schulze says that it is safe. What does Taiwan know that Roman Schulze doesnt?

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!