Here is an excellent example of the depths my enemies will go to try to ruin my reputation straight from the on-line comments of the recently dug up from the ashes Friends for Fullerton’s Future website approved by Travis Kiger

Travis Kiger-administrator FFFF

“The City Attorney explained it to you Barry..remember?

May 25, 2017 at 10:30 AM

“Barry was let go from P and R due to him repeatedly harassing an employee who was just this side of suing him and the city for not protecting her from Barry. But Barry lies and says he has no clue why.”

The comments quoted above directly from the Friends for Fullerton’s Future website are a total and complete lie.  The city attorney explained absolutely nothing to me and I did not harass any city employee or anybody else for that matter.

How very sad and very disgusting at the same time that it was none other than current Appointed Mayor and my former friend Bruce Whitaker who stated this falsehood for the first time in the July 2016 Fullerton Observer approximately 5 weeks after he informed me that he would remove me after stating that he considered doing this for months.  For the record , he never gave me an explanation then or did he to this day every contact me with a direct explanation from him.  What a guy!

Here is Whitaker’s shameful totally false defamation of me as follows:  “The (Fullerton) Observer asked Council member Whitaker for his reason for removing his appointed commissioner.  He sent the following response:”  ““Faced with an imminent employee action which would have likely generate substantial cost to the City, to avoid that action, I opted to remove the commission member.  That member’s term would otherwise have expired in December 2016.  As you know there had been an effort by Council members in October 2014 to remove that same appointee from the P&R commission which failed on a 3-2 vote.  An involuntary removal required four votes.””  

What Whitaker so deceitfully left out was that he voted against removing me and said at the time that there was no evidence to support my removal but that it seemed to be nothing more than a political vendetta against my activism by then Police Chief Dan Hughes and members of the City Government. What a guy you are Bruce.  Can you be any more deceptive than with that quoted statement sir from the Fullerton Observer?  Here below are your exact words on the City Council dais.  You paint a totally different picture on that night of November 4, 2014 as follows:


Now for the readers I can’t tell you how many times in the past after I spoke out on some problem facing Fullerton during a Fullerton Council meeting that Council member Whitaker would call me immediately after the meeting to thank me for my great input and to keep up the good work.  I never ever received any criticism for any of my service to the community as a Fullerton resident activist at City Hall or for my service of almost 6 years (well into my second term) as Whitaker’s appointee to the P&R Committee.  Funny that he has never mentioned any of this false storyline to me.  I guess this would be another example of his failure to do his fiduciary responsibility for the good people of Fullerton.  Because if there were any bit of truth to this, if I were his boss, I would have immediately discussed the accusation with him.  The first time I hear this total fabrication is indirectly thru the Fullerton Observer article over five weeks after he removed me.

To the anonymous writer of this complete defamation, please give me your full name and address and I will take appropriate action against you.  For you are a low life, a coward and a liar all wrapped together in one disgusting human being.  (Please note that the only difference between the actions of Bruce Whitaker and the anonymous person commenting on the FFFF website is the fact that Bruce Whitaker gave us his name.)  Please also give me the name of the employee that you allege I harassed!

To the administrator of the FFFF website (which was Travis Kiger and I suspect still is), I demand that you give me the IP address of the person who spewed out those defaming comments.  I would ask you to do this on your site but you have already seen fit to block any more of my comments.  So much for your so-called libertarian beliefs.

Fullertonians please take note that this is all that the phony and corrupt people supporting our corrupt city hall have as a defense.  When they can’t handle the truth and when the heat gets too high, they turn to libel, slander and defamation.  In other words, they have nothing to defend themselves, for you can’t defend yourself from the truth and the facts.  So they make up totally false allegations in an attempt to assassinate someone’s character, namely mine in this case.

Is Bruce Whitaker telling another tall tale or worse?

I seriously doubt you will come out from the shadows because you know you are not being truthful and do not want to get sued.  I have asked Bruce Whitaker to provide details to his false character assassination story.  He has remained dutifully silent.  What does that tell you about our Appointed Mayor?

There are some very morally bankrupt people participating and defending our city government.  It it contemptuous that there are allegations given anonymously with the person allegedly harassed by me conveniently not identified, nor the nature of the alleged harassment.  It is very simple that you can’t provide a name that does not exist.  Your allegations are so, so dishonest, baseless with absolutely no specifics whatsoever.   I deal with facts and if you can’t live with the facts I suggest that you change your behavior.  I am putting those responsible for the FFFF website on notice that going forward I expect that you either do not post these defamations or respond to the defamations that they are to be ignored without the weight of any evidence.

FFFF’s Travis Kiger eating his …….

Why would these miscreants go to such lengths to defame me, when all I have done is to speak the truth and give the facts?  For you see Fullertonians if that were not the case many of these big money special interests would have already filed lawsuits against me.  They had nothing before and they have nothing now, but to lower themselves by defaming my character.  All I can say when you read or hear these lies….Remember the Source (when they actually give the source, which is very infrequent).

Here’s Bruce Whitaker shovelin’ more …….

It is so very sad that Bruce Whitaker had a golden opportunity to make a difference if only he meant a small portion of the things he told his supporters and constituents.  He failed us miserably over the past six and one-half years as a council member and now finds it necessary to defame me without any proof for any of his defaming remarks.

Barry Levinson

, , , ,

  1. #1 by Barry Levinson on May 31, 2017 - 4:09 pm

    Here is Whitaker’s shameful totally false defamation of me as follows: “The (Fullerton) Observer asked Council member Whitaker for his reason for removing his appointed commissioner. He sent the following response:” ““Faced with an eminent employee action which would have likely generated substantial cost to the City, to avoid that action, I opted to remove the commission member. That member’s term would otherwise have expired in December 2016. As you know there had been an effort by Council members in October 2014 to remove that same appointee from the P&R commission which failed on a 3-2 vote.” Bruce you claim to be an honorable man. Then why have you chosen to defame me and totally mislead the public sir. What is honorable about those actions? Your comments sent to the Fullerton Observer consist of only six lines but the number of deceptions, false innuendos and falsehoods will take more than six lines to outline to the good people reading this Facebook page. Here is a list of the things blatantly wrong with your comments about me. You start off with “Faced with an eminent employee acton”. You only have to read six small words and you have already shown yourself to be a very disingenuous politician. For you fail to mention who was that so-called employee you refer to and what action was that employee about to take sir. Six little words and you have proven yourself to be unworthy of the position of trust you hold as one of our city council members. You continue with your statement. “Faced with an eminent employee action which would have likely generated substantial cost to the City, to avoid that acton, I opted to remove the commission member.” You didn’t disclose the action or the employee but now you tell us with confidence this phantom action by a phantom employee was likely to generate substantial costs to the city. You also state that “to avoid that action” referring to the likely substantial cost to the city you terminated me from the committee. Your know very well that terminating a committee member will not stop someone from filing an action, i.e. a lawsuit. Yet you use this false scenario to justify your deplorable removal of me. I hope the readers can tell how carefully Bruce Whitaker tried so hard to cast such a negative cloud over my character without giving the readers not one single solitary piece of actual information or supporting documentation whatsoever. What a guy is our current Appointed Mayor. You finish your six lines of total character assassination with this final sentence. ” As you know there had been an effort by Council members in October 2014 to remove that same appointee from the P&R commission which failed on a 3-2 vote.” What was your motive to bring up something that occurred 2 years prior. Was it to once more attempt to defame me while leaving out the key points of those October and November 2014 council meetings? The answer is apparent to me. Bruce Whitaker what a guy. For the innuendo you so carefully but falsely crafted was to strongly suggest that this was not the first time I have done something to warrant my removal from the P and R committee. Yet Bruce Whitaker made these dasdardly public comments without having to state one bit of fact or evidence against me. This is supposedly a wise man, a man of honor. I do not think so. So here you have a youtube video of what Council memer Whitaker said in defense of me the first time the City Council attempted to remove me from my post as a volunteer committee member. Whitaker was totally against removing me because he found no evidence to support my removal but did find much evidenced to strongly suggest it was all about a political vendetta led by our former Police Chief Dan Hughes. I have shown the readers that by just using Bruce Whitaker documented statements and words, he has proven in my opinion to be a totally unreliable source of information. In other words I believe I have shown that his word means little and that based on his proven track record he cannot and should not be trusted by the public. In conclusion, I truly don’t know how our Appointed Mayor, Mr.Bruce Whitaker sleeps at night or is able to look at himself in the mirror. Here is more evidence, Mayor Whitaker’s own words in 2014 that were very different than what he tried to convey to you in July 2106 in the pages of the Fullerton Observer as follows: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c55JtrCcmso

    Bruce Whitaker and Dan Hughes on the attempted framing of…

    • #2 by Bitter Barry on May 31, 2017 - 6:40 pm

      Take a pill big guy. Calm down.

  2. #3 by Fullerton's Conscience on May 31, 2017 - 7:02 pm

    Bitter Barry must be one of the sycophants supporting Bruce Whitaker. They have absolutely nothing in the form of a response, so all they can do is make a silly statement against Mr. Levinson. They do this hoping that no one will notice how they ignore the numerous undisputed facts provided by Mr. Levinson.

    I think people who allow the power structure to bully them, lie about them and let them get away with it without defending themselves would be the ones to become bitter. Mr. Levinson is a champion of the truth and that makes him political enemy number one in a city as corrupt and bankrupt as is Fullerton.

    • #4 by Or Maybe on May 31, 2017 - 9:33 pm

      We just don’t want him to have an aneurysm.

      I’ve been up close with “the vain”. It ain’t pretty.

      Live long and prosper! Be happy! Take up bird watching at the lake.

      • #5 by Anonymous on May 31, 2017 - 9:38 pm

        IAgreed. He should take a break. He has broken ground on enough dirt to bury them all. Barry, some good advice. Hughes needs to go to jail. Maybe Ponsi will bring him flowers.

  3. #6 by Barry Levinson on May 31, 2017 - 11:07 pm

    It is so ironic that the same people now acting concerned about my health… which is fine, were the same people or their supporters who tried in vain to put me in jail as a political prisoner and throw me off the P and R committee.

    If the crooked but not that smart people who keep trying to defame me or worse have not yet figured out that the more you try to intimidate me, the more energized I become to make sure that we will someday have a Fullerton government made up of wise and honest people.

    • #7 by Joe Imbriano on May 31, 2017 - 11:51 pm

      Isn’t it ironic that it looks like Hughes may go to jail for obstruction of justice and maybe get fired from Disney? Looks like the plan to frame you hatched by Hughes and that old divorce attorney Flory didn’t work out so well. Thanks to their misguided, evil intentions, you have been energized enough to fight back and stop all these huge projects like college town, and of course the DCCSP. You have also been energized to successfully continue relentlessly exposing all the crooks and frauds in Fullerton city government and the filthy players in the political scene.

    • #8 by Tried in Vain on June 1, 2017 - 6:23 am

      The vain! THERE IT IS!

      So much throbbing.

      • #9 by pee wee on June 1, 2017 - 11:21 am

        The vein, there it is in your mouth with the viagra pulsing through it, oh the glory hole awaits…….

        • #10 by Anonymous on June 4, 2017 - 9:39 am


  4. #11 by Barry Levinson on June 1, 2017 - 12:06 pm

    Joe the truth is those corrupt elected and appointed government officials in Fullerton have probably never had this experience before. The experience is that their disgusting character assassination of me did not work for them. They brought out all their political cronies and all their tricks but they failed to bury me with their governmental bullying of me. They believed that even if their attempt to railroad me into jail failed (it did based on the facts), that they would have intimidated me more than enough that I would go away for good (guess what I did not).

    With a little help from the good man upstairs and our perseverance their immoral attempts to ruin me had failed.

    Now the spotlight is back where it should have been all along. It is now on those shameless, dishonest and grotesque (yes I find morally bankrupt, dishonest officials grotesque) elected and appointed government officials.

    Flory in my opinion saw the writing on the wall that even with many city officials best efforts they had failed and decided it was time for her to retire. Next time Ms. Flory if you choose to lend yourself to the attempt to assassinate anyones character, you must first look at the evidence, such as the city’s own video tape, which in my case proved the allegations totally false and again in my case that the alleged victim could not remember if I touched her. Not much of a case of assault and battery when the alleged victim less than 2 months after the alleged incident did not remember being touched, i.e. victimized at all.

    Yet all of that did not stop Dan Hughes one man mission to recommend to the OCDA that I be charged with assault and battery against the alleged victim in his official police report to them. Video tape evidence exonerated me as well as no support by the alleged victim of the charges, screams there is absolutely no case against me. But the man who stated on the record that he could hate Mr. Levinson, namely former Police Chief Dan Hughes handed out voluntarily complete copies of the entire police report on this shameful empty case. (As as side note; Do you know how difficult the FPD makes it to get official police records? Joe and I know from experience?) Yet Hughes chooses to make the entire police report not only available to the public but chooses to hand out copies of the report himself at the city council meeting. Hughes had at least 50 to 100 copies of the report that night at city council meeting. Is this proper conduct of any City Police Chief? Compare those actions of Dan Hughes vs. that FPD personnel files on Ramos, Cincinelli and Wolfe to this day are not available to the public. Do you see Fullertonians and other Californians just how broke our law enforcement system under POBAR in California has become.

    Is it any wonder that the City of Fullerton is in such terrible shape? I report, you decide.

    • #12 by sizzler cheese toast with decaf on June 4, 2017 - 1:11 pm

      Look no further than Pat Shuff, Sharon Nelson, and Cynthia Thacker, who for years run the cracker club that worships the ground the dregs like Royce, Hughes and Fitzgerald walk on.

  5. #13 by Old School on June 1, 2017 - 12:33 pm

    From someone who viewed the camera worn by Sgt. Corbett….Corbett covered his camera with his hand blocking the video while he took Felz by the hand and had him sit in the front seat of the Sgt’s patrol car. Then Corbett verbally narrated a FCT test to be captured on the audio track of the recording.
    If that doesn’t show presence of mind of a criminal act committed by Corbett. No other officers present saw Corbett administering an FCT to Felz.

    • #14 by Barry Levinson on June 1, 2017 - 4:40 pm

      Old School I thank you very much for your contributions and insights to this website.

      It is so, so sad that articles being put out by the Behind the Badge, which is a Fullerton taxpayer funded propaganda or public relations rag depending on how nice you want to be, are so disingenuous.

      For in the May 12, 2015 Behind the Badge interview with former Police Chief Dan Hughes he is asked the following question.
      How is the body cams working out? Chief Hughes answer is that they are tremendous. I guess he feels they are tremendous maybe because officers are allowed to get away with shutting them off completely or hiding the video portions of the cameras when it suits there less than honorable purposes. Once again in my opinion, it is becoming clearer and clearer how Dan Hughes betrayed the public’s trust as our former Police Chief.

      Yet I keep reminding our City of Fullerton leaders that he is still gainfully employed by the FPD as a Reserve Officer.

      Now that the allegation is out in the public from none other than former OCDA investigator Abraham Santos that Sgt. Jeff Corbett of the FPD, was not disciplined at all by then Police Chief Dan Hughes for having sex in the back of an FPD vehicle while on duty. Now we learn from Old School and I believe Santos as well that the same Sgt. Corbett was summoned by Dan Hughes to apparently do his dirty work for him to repay the favor of not firing Corbett for his abysmal on duty actions. These are very, very serious allegations. They now are a central part of an on-going whistle blower case involving OCDA investigator A. Santos.

      My last question is why is he not only still employed by the FPD but that he is still employed by Disney. Is their squeaky clean reputation not important to them? I believe there is more than enough evidence now out in the public for Disney to rightfully part company with the likes of one Dan Hughes. But Fullertonians that is only one man’s opinion, mine!

  6. #15 by Barry Levinson on June 1, 2017 - 1:23 pm

    Can anyone with a straight face still claim that former Police Chief Dan Hughes reformed the Fullerton Police Department?
    I should say other than Council member Jennifer Fitzgerald who recently still talks glowingly of our FPD and the great job done by Dan Hughes.

    Did anybody know that Council member Jennifer Fitzgerald minored in Biblical Studies at BIOLA (Bible Institute of Los Angeles)? Yes accorded to her it is true.

    Question for Ms. Fitzgerald: What did you learn from all those courses?

    Another question for Ms. Fitzgerald and the other four council members?
    Why now that we know that the OCDA investigator asked for criminal obstruction of justice charges against former Police Chief and current Fullerton Reserve Officer Dan Hughes, has not those five council members and/or the City Manager and/or the Police Chief and/or the City Attorney asked to place Dan Hughes on administrative leave from the FPD?

    • #16 by on the hill on June 2, 2017 - 3:20 pm

      Jennifer Fitzgerald and Dan Hughes are the screen gems of the Fullerton Republican Women Federated cracker clan.

  7. #17 by Old School on June 2, 2017 - 1:13 pm

    Hopefully waiting for the State AG to charge Corbett with obstruction and destruction of evidence…then have Corbett testify against the Chief and the Mayor for conspiracy.

    • #18 by Anonymous on June 4, 2017 - 8:22 pm

      All responding officers at the scene should be charged. They all obstructed justice. How do you immediately not test a guy that crashed his car, fled the scene that reeked of booze? It is just a matter of time before the entire truth is brought forth. You know what? Hughes needs to be fired from Disney.

  8. #19 by a closer look on June 2, 2017 - 3:16 pm

    Keep dreaming you assholes and maybe we will…….

  9. #20 by Anonymous on June 2, 2017 - 4:03 pm

    Old School that would be great but Corbett must not be allowed to go totally free. He must be terminated from the FPD for his deeds. If he testifies he would escape prison.

    • #21 by Anonymous on June 7, 2017 - 2:51 pm

      Corbett and Siko are the new bosses and in that order. The ship can never sink because they just keep throwing the garbage off over into the deep end when no one is looking. Santos just scratched the surface.

  10. #22 by Old School on June 2, 2017 - 5:14 pm

    Use little fishes to catch big fishes.

  11. #23 by Anonymous on June 2, 2017 - 5:33 pm

    I agree but Corbett has already disgraced the uniform he wears to work everyday. Tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice, using a police vehicle while on duty to fornicate in the back seat. I am sure he is guilty of many other crimes since Dan apparently had him on his leash.

    Old School I think you would agree but none of the above sounds anything remotely similar to Reform.

  12. #24 by Barry Levinson on June 3, 2017 - 10:16 am

    Old School could you please expose other wrongdoings within the FPD.

  13. #25 by Old School on June 3, 2017 - 12:36 pm

    The Hughes legacy will linger for years. From the beginning of the Hughes tenure he made an example of and took care of the whistle blowers and those officers wanting and willing to do the right thing. The remaining officers got the hell out.

    Under Chief Hughes leadership 35 percent of trained, experienced officers have left the Fullerton Police Department and were hired by other police departments. These were officers with spotless records, no history of bad acts and clean backgrounds. The city lost future police leaders.

    Who is left at the Fullerton Police Department? Officers and leaders who modeled their conduct after their leader Chief Hughes. Some of these officers were rewarded by Hughes by favorable decisions on citizen complaints, misconduct investigation cover-ups, promotion, and loads of unearned overtime. The remaining officers are new…ready and willing to be molded like clay to the prevailing culture of the department.

    Hughes was promoted to the rank of Chief without the scrutiny of a law enforcement background being conducted.
    A background on Hughes would have revealed a career long history of acts of dishonesty and disregard for police policy. Maybe this was already know by the City Council who hired Hughes. Maybe this was already know by Disney? Maybe this is just the kind of leader these decision makers were looking for?

    A police department will only be as corrupt as the city government will allow it to be.

    • #26 by Joe Imbriano on June 3, 2017 - 8:53 pm

      I agree and it is corrupt as hell. Now we have Mr. Siko running the department who twice refused to take a report when Barry and I attempted to get the FPD to investigate Dan Hughes for his alleged criminal activities the night Felz smashed into the tree. Siko, both times, was off duty and he was the one who responded to us at the station and told us to pound sand and referred us to the goon at the DA that in spite of Santos at the DA clearly finding evidence to charge Hughes with obstruction, refused to charge Hughes. Siko is part of the culture of corruption and is now technically in charge of it. Our council is morally bankrupt. People need to go to jail in the FPD. Something needs to be done and fast. Our council needs to be replaced with thinking human beings.

  14. #27 by Barry Levinson on June 3, 2017 - 2:28 pm

    Old School you allege just how badly and corruptly the FPD has been run under former Police Chief Dan Hughes. You indicate that over the approximate 5 year period that Dan Hughes was in charge of the FPD that 35% of the entire FPD (more than one third of the department) have left the force. That number is astonishing, yet you make that number that much worse by alleging it was the best and the most honest officers, i.e. the cream of the crop who left the department.

    Your last two paragraphs not only indict Hughes but the entire Fullerton City Government. Old School states “Hughes was promoted to the rank of Chief without the scrutiny of a law enforcement background being conducted,” Old School you continue “A background on Hughes would have revealed a career long history of acton of dishonesty and disregard for police policy. Maybe this was already know (known) by the City council who hired ahgueses. Maybe this was already know (known) by Disney? Maybe this is just the kind of leader these decision makers were looker for? A police department will only be as corrupt as the city government will allow it to be.”

    This is all very damning information if true and I certainly will look to co-oberate as much as possible your very specific and damning allegations. Old School I hope you know by reading these pages that I try very hard to be fair and objective and to give my readership a lot of evidence and facts and not just my opinions.

    You state that “a police department is only as corrupt as the city government will allow it to be.” I have two questions for you. 1. Doesn’t POBAR make it somewhat more difficult for even the City Council to know exactly what is going on in any State of California police department? 2. You state that our Fullerton City Council did not do their due diligence in checking out Dan Hughes. Can you be a little more specific or give the readership an example of what our city council failed to do with regard to looking into the background of Dan Hughes?

    I very much look forward to your responses to my questions and I hope you continue to contribute to this website as well.

  15. #28 by What a "Great" Bunch of Guys on June 4, 2017 - 12:13 pm

    Can the City of Fullerton be in any worse hands than our current elected and appointed officials?

    They can’t even bring themselves to ask for the removal of former Police Chief Dan Hughes who currently is still employed by the FPD as a Fullerton Reserve Police Officer.
    Yes only in Fullerton has our government officials taken no action to take away an alleged criminal’s fire arms/weapons.

    All I can say is there no city in the country that has a deeper and more connected group of corrupt government officials in their community. The tentacles of their closing ranks and knowingly providing false information to the public has even reached our Fullerton School District leadership, headed by Superintendent Dr. Robert Pletka. A topic of the misinformation campaign is none other than Fullerton Ordinance 3149, the Child Sex Offender Residency Restriction Act that has been repealed based on lies by our own City Attorney and our own City Council and then passed along by Dr. Pletka. What a “Great” Bunch of Guys!

    I can’t wait for Council member Jennifer Fitzgerald or Doug Chaffee to applaud the great work of our FPD or our Parks and Recreation Department and their contractors. I forgot, Ms. Fitzgerald already did just that at the last City Council meeting. What a Lady!

  16. #29 by streets on June 7, 2017 - 8:14 pm

    The grand jury needs to tune up Hughes, Corbett, and Goodrich. The responding patrol officers need to take the stand and rat these bad boys out. Spitzer wants TRack’s gig really really badly. There is no way he is going to let this one go.

  17. #30 by About Time on June 28, 2017 - 9:46 am

    I’m so delighted that the NUTS in Fullerton are starting to eat each other!

    • #31 by Joe Imbriano on June 28, 2017 - 10:06 am

      Isn’t it great? Anyone with half a brain can see this is another view that is long overdue. No more Pam Keller Kennedy attack dog posse and Bushala’s bullshit being the only dichotomy. Finally no more two party system in Fullerton with the political Kaubuki theater starring the fake, phony conservatives and the rabid, mentally ill liberals. Welcome to the third rail. Welcome to what the fraudsters call crazy town.

    • #32 by Nuts eating each other on June 28, 2017 - 8:51 pm

      Taz and Goodrich alone could probably finish off Flory and Cox in one sitting.

  18. #33 by Barry Levinson on July 1, 2017 - 4:12 pm

    Well if you watch the attached video, you will see an extremely guilty looking Bruce Whitaker bow his head in shame once he notes that my wife Susan is about to speak during Public Comments. He obviously expected her to point out his libelous comments about me in the Fullerton Observe and his many failures to do his job properly. I was present when my wife spoke, and once he saw her, he bowed his head and stared into the dais table like the coward he is. Well instead, Susan came to speak that night about the inexcusable comments made by then Mayor Jennifer Fitzgerald in her defense of so-called comedian Andy Dick. Here is her message to then Mayor Fitzgerald. By the way Council member Fitzgerald my wife has more class and dignity in her little pinky than you do in your entire body. You are a terrible council member but an even worse human being. Please notice the scowl on her face while my wife is addressing her. There was no apology just her ugly frowns. That Fullertonians was the real Jennifer Fitzgerald and the real Bruce Whitaker.

    • #34 by Anonymous on July 1, 2017 - 8:42 pm

      He looks like he stained his depends.

    • #35 by Anonymous on July 2, 2017 - 6:09 pm

      all the right information, all the facts, all the reasons to be upset and yet the masses…….let them eat cake

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!