The forced irradiation continues over at Acacia Elementary School.


The forced irradiation continues over at Acacia Elementary School. 

Seniorita Leon calls the police on Joe Imbriano for trying to warn the parents about what she is doing to their children.

You would think that the billions in E-Rate funds, State monies, Federal monies, property tax, and of course all of the lottery proceeds would be enough to cover the expenses to operate all these run down facilities with all these overpaid teachers.

Yes, these teachers and staff at Acacia have ignored the dire warnings from scientists of how dangerous their actions are in forcing wireless exposure on young children. Yes, they try to have me arrested when I try to warn the parents. Shame on them and shame on you for driving by and ignoring the warnings.

The police should be arresting the principal and teachers and not threatening Joe Imbriano

Well, these people need your money and they need it to hurt your children. Please read this pitch to soak the parents for more money to deploy more wireless devices in your children’s laps. Shame on these people who ignore the warnings and harm the children.

WIRELESS DEPLOYMENT IN SCHOOLS IS AN AGENDA LADIES AND GENTLEMEN-

LOOKY HERE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN BECAUSE THE DEVIL’S IN THE DETAILS

WIRELESS DEPLOYMENT IN SCHOOLS IS AN AGENDA LADIES AND GENTLEMEN-A STERILIZATION AGENDA

IS THE IPAD A DEPOPULATION TOOL? APPLE 666, ARTEMIS AND THE INFERTILITY PAD.

WIRELESS DEPLOYMENT IN SCHOOLS IS AN AGENDA LADIES AND GENTLEMEN-A STERILIZATION AGENDA AND IS CRIMINAL

Pletka belongs in jail

ROBERT PLETKA BELONGS IN PRISON FOR WHAT HE HAS IGNORED, DONE AND KEEPS ON DOING TO THE 15,000 CHILDREN IN THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT

Robert Pletka, Fullerton School District Superintendant puts another 6000 iPads into Fullerton school children’s laps today

 

 

Formal demand to the Troy PTSA on wireless

 

  1. #1 by Monica on January 27, 2017 - 12:19 pm

    I have had EHS for over ten years and I cannot imagine what these children must feel like. What a sad state of affairs in your city Joe. So much right in front of their eyes and nobody gives a hoot about their own children. You are so articulate and patient with these people. I don’t know how you maintain your composure. I would not be able to remain as calm as you. These people are just horrible. If I had children, I would never allow them to ever attend Fullerton schools.

    • #2 by Sarah on January 28, 2017 - 7:32 am

      I have a growing number of friends, some of them severely EHS. Some of them are teachers and became so from the wireless classrooms.

      Once they become sensitive, their lives are turned upside down because wireless has been put everywhere.

    • #3 by Jes on February 17, 2017 - 8:24 pm

      In 1996 Swiss Insurance published a risk report and as of 2015, they no longer insure wireless of any kind for injury

      1996 – Swiss Insurance – Electrosmog

      2013 -Swiss Insurance – Emerging Risks

      These risks are now Exclusion 32

      “The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionizing radiation exposure.”

      We will not;

      a) make any payment on your behalf for any claim, or
      b) incur any costs and expenses, or
      c)reimburse you for any loss, damage, legal expenses, fees or costs sustained by you,
      d) pay any medical expenses: directly or indirectly
      arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields,
      electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.”

      Does this mean that School Boards that have put Wifi in schools and Cities and Municipalities that have voted in Smart Meters are not insured for “injury to health”.

      Wake up People!!!

  2. #4 by Anonymous on February 6, 2017 - 1:00 pm

    Following the scientific and medical consensus of the 1960s, which resulted in greater protections from the US Congress (as below), the electronics industry began to pummel the professional culture in a variety of ways. Medical and scientific communities in particular were attacked with public ridicule, until the term “electromagnetic fields” itself became an embarrassment amongst professionals. This continued over the decades, to the point that few in the medical or scientific community would even use the term or discuss the subject! To this day, shame surrounding the discussion of electromagnetic fields or “EMFs” persists. (This is why we are more successful using the term “radiation” than the term “fields”.) I don’t know whether the same cultural problem of shaming tactics and their resultant silence exists amongst professionals in the French language cultures.

    Belief in the harmful nature of electronic products was so strong by the end of the 1950s that every medical doctor advised parents to ensure that their children kept a significant distance from the TV, usually 10 feet. Ask any American who was old enough to remember the 1960s and s/he will confirm this. The parents didn’t independently come up with the notion of TV’s harmfulness: in that early-1960s culture, they were very much followers of authorities. The belief in medical doctors was practically religious amongst adults: you can still see such cultural persuasion in persons age 75+ today. Medical doctors instructed their patients to keep a “safe distance” from the TV because of its emissions, and everyone obeyed and made their children obey in turn.

    This belief in the danger of electronic products generally, which derived from the extant science on adverse effects to humans, such effects considered by the scientific community as established, also brought about at the US federal level the October 18, 1968 Amendment to the Public Health Service Act, which reads precisely as follows:

    Public Law 90-602 of 1968 (PDF):

    An Act to amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the protection of the public health from radiation emissions from electronic products.

    Subpart 3 – Electronic Product Radiation Control

    DECLARATION OF PURPOSE

    Sec. 354. The Congress hereby declares that the public health and safety must be protected from the dangers of electronic product radiation.

    https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-82/pdf/STATUTE-82-Pg1173.pdf

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!