Calling for the revocation of Dr. Richard Pans’s medical license over SB 277


 THE MOST DANGEROUS DOCTOR IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-RICHARD PAN-Complaint Information:click the link below to file against physician license number 84883

images (95)

The Medical Board is responsible for reviewing and investigating complaints about, and disciplining licensed physicians. We must flood the medical board with requests and make our voices heard. We believe Dr. Pan is the most dangerous doctor in the country and must be stopped. Forced unlimited vaccinations is the most dangerous and tyrannical proposed edict in our Nation’s history.

Complaint Against Senator Richard Pan 

California Senate Health Committee Hearing and Vote on SB277, Public Health:  vaccinations

Date:  4/8/2015

Testimony given by California State Senator, Dr.  Richard Pan, on April 8, 2015, directly contradict established facts in the following source documents:

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
  2. CA SB277, Public health:  vaccinations

In context, Dr.  Pan, as author of SB277, is using his medical license to create, influence passage, and enact public health legislation based on testimony in direct conflict with readily-available and established fact.

The following is excerpted testimony given by Sen. Richard Pan as statements and in answer to fellow Health Committee member’s questions.  The video of this testimony is provided here:http://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=7&clip_id=2716&hc_location=ufi

 

Senator Pan testimony:

 

  1. 00:21:50  Vaccines are safe and efficacious.

 

  1. 00:23:45  Evidence shows that the disease that has been prevented by vaccination is at least a thousand times more likely to cause a lasting problem than the vaccine itself and there have been no confirmed deaths caused by the measles vaccine.

 

Statements 1 and 2 are invalid, as evidenced in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to compensate vaccine-related injury or death.  The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database, as of December 14, 2014 articulates 6,962 serious adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with measles vaccine since 1990, with over half of those occurring in children three years old and under. Of these events329 were deaths, with over half of the deaths occurring in children under three years of age. To date, more than $2.8 billion has been awarded to victims and victim’s family for overall vaccine injury and death.

http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/index.html

  1. 0026:00  Let me be clear, SB277 does not mandate vaccinations, but the choice, that choice, requires responsibility and we have the responsibility to protect all children attending school by requiring vaccinations when children go attend school with other children.
  1. 3:02:00    As I said before, this bill is not about mandatory vaccinations; we don’t want to get to the place where we are going to be mandatorily vaccinating children against their parents’ will.
  1. 03:37:30  Informed consent is still necessary to get your child vaccinated.  (in reference to the amended bill)

 

Statements #3 – 5 are incorrect. Reference SB277 Public health: vaccinations, which calls for mandatory vaccination for all school children, where parents will not be able to get a medical exemption for their children and will not be able to home school and will face the possible permanent removal of their children from their homes, fines and imprisonment.  The bill does, in fact, get rid of “personal believe exemption” the only non-medical exemption.  Per SB277 language, “This bill would eliminate the exemption from immunization based upon personal beliefs.”  Furthermore, “informed consent” is not an exemption and, therefore, cannot be asserted as ‘still necessary to get your child vaccinated.’

Source document:  http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB277

 

This bill is about taking away your God given rights to protect our children’s bodies from the tyrannical edicts of medical tyranny and what amounts to forced medical procedures and forced poisoning of our children’s bloodstreams. No religious or personal belief exemption in the bill means an impossible to obtain medical exemption door is closed resulting in forced vaccinations at gunpoint for those who cannot afford to home school.

Dr. Pan acting as a physician in his professional capacity in order to unduly directly influence the legislative process with what appear to bald faced lies is, in our opinion amounts to valid grounds for revocation of his medical license. In addition, we believe his actions are in clear, absolute and direct violation of the American Medical Association’s code of ethics.  Dr. Pan knows the following American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Ethics opinions completely contradict FORCED vaccination:

Apparently, Richard Pan has no regard for Freedom of Religion, informed consent that the American Medical Association upholds in its Code of Ethics.  Does he support a totalitarian government that will force parents to vaccinate their children whether they are publicly, privately, or homeschooled or face criminal charges? Therefore it is time for all parents to call for the: 

Revocation and/or Suspension of Dr. Pan’s Physician License.

The state has the power to revoke a license to practice medicine granted to a physician for good cause.  The state power to revoke the license of a medical practitioner stems from the general police power to prescribe all reasonable regulations that necessarily affect the public health, safety, and morals.

The state licensing board has wide discretion in the matter of revocation of licenses and may revoke a license without any terms or conditions, leaving no possibility for reinstatement.

The general defenses against a revocation of license include denial of due process, violation of equal protection clause, compelling self-incrimination, etc.  However, courts have held in a number of cases that the “state  had a legitimate interest in protecting its citizens from incompetent physicians, and requiring doctors suspected of being incompetent to attend an investigatory hearing or submit to reexamination was rationally related to that interest, so neither a statute nor a board’s treatment of a physician violated the equal protection clause[iii].”  However, such revocation shall be done only after affording sufficient notice and hearing and courts have held that a substantially ex parte proceeding of revocation violates due process.

A statute empowering the state licensing board to revoke licenses shall not be vague and ambiguous.  Courts have held that certain acts or conduct that are described in broad general terms are not prima facie objectionable if the general words are accompanied by more specific ones that may be properly construed to limit and make certain the general ones.  The legislative purpose of the statute is protecting the public against the unauthorized practice of medicine and courts have held that the Board must be accorded authority to define the grounds for medical discipline on a case-by-case basis[iv].

The Board’s power to revoke licenses includes the power to suspend an erring medical practitioner from practice.  Upon a finding of unprofessional conduct warranting revocation, the Board has discretion suspend the practitioner from practice for the period permitted by the statute.  The board can also impose conditions during the suspension period and may require a showing of professional competence before reinstating a license[v].

Professional incompetence, bad character, immorality, professional misconduct, dishonorable conduct, conviction of criminal offense, and gross negligence form valid grounds for revocation of license.  The valid grounds for revocation of license may often be enlisted in the statute.  Acting in excess of one’s professional authority, like for instance, engaging in the general practice of medicine or surgery, or professing to do so, in excess of a license limited to the practice of special branch of medicine warrants the revocation of the limited license.

The board has power to initiate disciplinary action against a physician even in the absence of any complaints from the patients.  The board may take action even in the case of a single act of violation and in the absence of proof of injury.

Courts have held that the revocation of a license is proper if the physician has been found guilty of drug abuse or was suffering from mental disability.

The procedure for revocation may be established by statute and state legislatures generally delegate to an administrative tribunal the power of revocation or suspension, together with the power to hear and determine charges.  “A trial and conviction in a court of competent jurisdiction is not a condition precedent to a proceeding by the state board of health against a physician to revoke his license for any of the causes provided by statute[viii].”

Generally, statutes of limitation are not applicable to disciplinary proceedings and courts have held that due process does not require the application of a statute of limitations to such proceedings.  However, due process requires the application of the doctrine of laches, albeit narrowly to license revocation proceedings[ix].  Courts have held that this has to be done without jeopardizing the public interest.

Moreover, the evidence must unequivocally indicate that the conduct of the licensee did not conform to the conduct of a member of the same profession exercising reasonable care and skill, supplemented by testimony to the effect that other professionals would have utilized a different procedure is insufficient to establish negligence or incompetence[xi].

The burden of proof is on the applicant seeking restoration of a medical license.  The applicant must adduce sufficient evidence so ineluctable in its implications that it would compel restoration of license by the Board.  There is conflict of opinion regarding the burden of proof.  One view is that issues of fact in a revocation or suspension proceeding do not have to be shown beyond a reasonable doubt, but only by a preponderance of the evidence.  On the other hand, some courts have held that the board is required to use clear and convincing evidence due to the plenary nature of the proceedings[xii].

Courts will review the conclusions of law de novo.  While reviewing the sanctions imposed by the licensing board, the court defers to the board’s expertise and will not generally substitute its discretion for that of the board.  The physician can seek mandamus as an available and appropriate remedy for wrongful revocation if no other method of review has been provided by the statute.  However, mandamus is not the proper remedy if the statute provides another adequate remedy, such as appeal.

[i] Younge v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346 (Mo. 1969).

[ii] Faulkenstein v. District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 727 A.2d 302 (D.C. 1999).

[iii] Artman v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 918 S.W.2d 247 (Mo. 1996).

[iv] State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. McCroskey, 880 P.2d 1188 (Colo. 1994).

[v] Board of Dental Examiners v. Hufford, 461 N.W.2d 194 (Iowa 1990).

[vi] Ricks v. Mississippi State Dept. of Health, 719 So. 2d 173 (Miss. 1998).

[vii] Paulson v. Board of Medical Examiners of State of Iowa, 592 N.W.2d 677 (Iowa 1999).

[viii] Bandeen v. Howard, 299 S.W.2d 249 (Ky. 1956)

[ix] Sinha v. Ambach, 91 A.D.2d 703, 457 N.Y.S.2d 603 (3d Dep’t 1982).

[x] Artman v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 918 S.W.2d 247 (Mo. 1996).

[xi] Sizemore v. Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 747 S.W.2d 389 (Tex. App. Dallas 1987).

[xii] Painter v. Abels, 998 P.2d 931 (Wyo. 2000).

  1. #1 by Wilma Miles on April 16, 2015 - 10:28 am

    May i tweet about this?Just checking…..

  2. #2 by Wilma Miles on April 16, 2015 - 10:52 am

    There is also a petition doing the rounds for him to resign

  3. #4 by Gail Fitches on April 16, 2015 - 2:10 pm

    Dr. Pan has been given so much information from people, and he still did not give accurate information. Please review this information, because this is what our politicians and people in the medical field are not being told regarding vaccinations with information from the CDC, FDA, and WHO Websites. Ingredients in Vaccines by the CDC: Controversial products used to make vaccines: African Green Monkey (Vero) cells, aluminum, cow products, Cocker Spaniel cells, formaldehyde, human fetal lung tissue cells, insect products, and mouse brains. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf

    World Health Organization on type of cell substrates: http://www.who.int/biologicals/Cell_Substrates_clean_version_18_April.pdf

    FDA regarding what type of cells are used in vaccines. http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ScienceResearch/BiologicsResearchAreas/ucm127328.htm

    Vaccines are biological blood products, and that needs to come out. There are many articles on the FDA website. Please do research on what are really in vaccines and how they are made. http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/default.htm

    China enters the Global Vaccine Market. http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/92/9/14-020914/en/

    Manufacturer Vaccine Inserts – Please read them all the way through. Please note that on 13.1 on all vaccine inserts, it states the vaccine has not been tested or evaluated for Carcinogenesis (to create cancer), Mutagenesis (to mutate our genes and cause autoimmune diseases and cancer), Impairment of Fertility, as in to sterilize the future generations. http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/package_inserts-bymanuf.htm

    • #5 by dawn on June 13, 2015 - 5:55 am

      He also said that it was a myth that vaccines contain aborted fetal cells. Using his so called “Status” as a doctor her persuaded other members of senate to trust those words. As a person who is pro life I am absolutely against using aborted fetal cells in any fashion to make a vaccine. There are many vaccines that contain aborted fetal cells. That was an out right lie.

  4. #6 by Dr. Richard is in the Pan on April 16, 2015 - 2:23 pm

    I have read Dr. Pan’s testimony. He is telling outright lies about vaccines and even the bill he authored. How much worse can it get? Is it now permissible for an elected official/medical doctor to stand before a state governing body, influencing the decision on public health laws that will affect millions of children and spew lies? If the Health Committee had done its job, they would know that Pan was making false statements.

    What is at stake is the integrity of the medical profession and, along with it, everyone’s trust in the doctors. I know I no longer trust the system/medical establishment.

    He should have his license revoked and be removed from public office. Where is the petition?

    • #7 by Anonymous on April 16, 2015 - 10:36 pm

      No it is far from permissible. Now the legislators are actually reading the bills before they vote.

  5. #8 by Lori Unitt on April 17, 2015 - 12:10 am

    He’s a liar and stands to profit from Pharma
    by mandating vaccines.

  6. #9 by Patricia Holliday on April 17, 2015 - 3:11 am

    I should imagine that the US too is signed off on the Nuremberg Accord and the Declaration of Helsinki which clearly states that no one is to be forced into experimental medication against their will. Those volunteering are to be given full disclosure of all the risks. Mandatory vaccinations are illegal as they are experimental medication because the public has never ever been given full disclosure either by the vaccine companies themselves or independent groups. If you want these actions overturned hire a good medical and/or human rights lawyer. Hope this helps.

  7. #10 by Karol Zieliński on April 17, 2015 - 5:16 am

    Vacancies are evil and never proven to work anyone who support them is either stupid or paid for by the big pharma

  8. #11 by Susan Hamilton on April 17, 2015 - 5:21 am

    Dr. Pan and several thousand others. This could have a real impact. Dr.’s might think twice about working for the pharma industry if an example is set here.

  9. #12 by Tammy Pittenger on April 17, 2015 - 7:04 am

    I pay property taxes for my children to attend our local school. This is unconstitutional and removes my spiritual beliefs. The research and truth is out there and he’s ignoring it!

  10. #14 by Barry Levinson on April 17, 2015 - 11:30 am

    Last month Zonya Townsend, President of the California Nurses for Ethical Standards read a statement at the Fullerton City Council meeting.

    She made very clear that the American Medical Association’s Opinion 9.1333 states that doctors should respect a person’s refusal to get any vaccine for medical, religious or philosophical reasons.

    Therefore Dr. Pan is in direct noncompliance with the tenets of the AMA.

    Wake up America, our representatives such as Dr. Pan will go against his own professional standards to meet his own undemocratic wishes for the forced vaccinations of all people in the state of California.

    I have one simple question to ask Dr. Pan. Who made you God sir? I do not and will never worship false idols!

  11. #15 by Joe Imbriano on April 17, 2015 - 1:09 pm

    THE PRINCIPLE THAT SUSTAINS MANDATORY VACCINATION IS BROAD ENOUGH TO COVER CUTTING THE FALLOPIAN TUBES

    Think of this ruling in light of proposed forced vaccinations and irradiation of children in the classrooms by forced wireless microwave radiation exposures…

    Buck vs. Bell: 1927 decision on sterilizing “moron” Carrie Buck:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell

    On May 2, 1927, in an 8-1 decision, the Court accepted that she, her mother and her daughter were “feeble-minded” and “promiscuous,”[4] and that it was in the state’s interest to have her sterilized. The ruling legitimized Virginia’s sterilization procedures until they were repealed in 1974.
    The ruling was written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. In support of his argument that the interest of the states in a “pure” gene pool outweighed the interest of individuals in their bodily integrity, he argued:

    “We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.

    Historian Paul A. Lombardo argued in 1985 that Buck was not “feeble-minded” at all, but that she had been put away to hide her rape, perpetrated by the nephew of her adoptive mother. He also asserted that Buck’s lawyer, Irving Whitehead, poorly argued her case, failed to call important witnesses, and was remarked by commentators to often not know what side he was on. It is now thought that this was not because of incompetence, but deliberate.

    The effect of Buck v. Bell was to legitimize eugenic sterilization laws in the United States as a whole. While many states already had sterilization laws on their books, their use was erratic and effects practically non-existent in every state except for California. After Buck v. Bell, dozens of states added new sterilization statutes, or updated their constitutionally non-functional ones already enacted, with statutes which more closely mirrored the Virginia statute upheld by the Court.

  12. #16 by Jason on April 17, 2015 - 10:52 pm

    Lol, good luck with that. The only place these complaints are going is straight to the shredder.

  13. #18 by Anonymous on April 18, 2015 - 4:19 am

    This goes back to having a power analysis of the playing field. Pan is just a figurehead of the opposition. Even on the very very very very slim chance that this tactic–or the recall effort or other forms of character assassination that periodically crop up in the larger anti-SB 277 CA FB groups–was/were successful, there would a new figurehead (or already are really) to take his place in a snap. If we constantly focus on the figureheads whom are a many headed hydra, we lose sight of the bigger picture and waste our effort & energy. The true opposition of this “war” is Big Pharma. Their agenda is to influence/control politics towards universal vaccination so they can make unlimited, unregulated profit.

    And while in previous generations’ campaigns, using the campaign strategy of going after the opposition by personalizing the target–i.e. going after the figurehead of the corporation for example–was successful, that was in a different historical context. I’m referring to the Olensky campaign model that is being favored here of personalizing the fight and attacking/character assassination of the oppositions’ figureheads. It is not working for multi-national corporations and the meta-industries which are a lot more like the Borg of Star Trek. (Good gracious I can’t believe I just made a ST analogy but I can’t think of another way to express that targeting the entity is far more important than the individual face du jour of it, even Star Wars doesn’t work here.) For a more clear analogy, in the GMO labelling fight, it would be futile to target individual politicians for recall/character assassination when Big Agric like Monsanto are the real opposition.

    Our larger goal should be to restore democracy by/for/of the people. It would be far more strategic and a better use of our energy to overturn the National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 which would eliminate pharma industry’s blanket immunity from liability and to eliminate corporate/industrial influence in politics by overturning Citizens United v FEC which is the Supreme Court ruling that allowed corporations are entitled to free speech and removed some bans on corporate political spending. Take down the whole house of cards.

    • #19 by Anonymous on April 18, 2015 - 12:27 pm

      The whole house of cards does need to fall. However, how long will it take to overturn the Nat’l Vaccine Injury Act & overturn Citizens United v FEC?

      Our immediate fight is to stop SB277, just as Oregon, Washington have.

      The fact that we are even in this position is symptomatic of a country that has been taken over by the medical industrial complex. It doesn’t even recognize “We the People” and that is evident in the laws that came to be.

  14. #20 by Sasha on April 18, 2015 - 7:10 am

    This petition is absurd.

  15. #21 by Denise Treesh on April 18, 2015 - 8:05 am

    No one on earth has been granted the authority to inject foreign material into anyone’s body against their will.

    We need to eradicate, from medical practice, any doctor who is not proving informed consent thus violating the Nuremberg Code.

    The fact that Dr. Pan is introducing a bill that violates the aforementioned Nuremberg Code, should not have a license to practice and has no respect for “First Do No Harm.”

  16. #22 by Must read on April 18, 2015 - 9:49 pm

    Democrats Sell California Children For Campaign Money…
    Merck Bought the California Senate Health Committee Vote – 6 to 2.

    California “NO on SB277” Groups, Formerly Stumbling, Now Involved In Major Assault…

    Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

    Friday, April 17th , 2015

    How in the F*** did you LOSE California?

    Autism Leadership Council
    I’ve been in California a VERY long time. I’ve watched California politics on health care. Here, the Health Freedom Movement thrives. Every one of our practitioners is protected. The State is wide open for excellent health care.

    So, tell me ­ How in the F*** did you lose SB277 in the Senate Health committee? Do people in the autism world not know where Sacramento is? It is the State capital. It’s right there where it has always been.

    There, in Sacramento, there is this thing called the State Legislature. They author and vote on bills. SB277 was, and is, a bill that the State Legislature is looking at ­ so the people you need to talk to are going to be in Sacramento. Look it up on a map.

    This isn’t rocket science. It’s politics ­ and politics isn’t being namby-pamby nice, and smiling softly to a staffer.

    The “No on SB277” strategies and tactics I’ve been watching, from the sidelines, are seventy years old, out of the Jimmy Stewart “Mr Smith goes to Washington” movie. They didn’t work in real life then, and they certainly don’t work now.

    Wake the f*** up people…

    Having the members of the State legislature “like you” is NOT a factor. It plays NO PART in the argument. This is politics. There are books on this process you could read.

    The California strategy team (snort here) was given information on how much money was given to each member of each committee by MERCK, just recently,
    that will review SB277 ­ and decided to hide it and NOT make it an issue.

    I’m beginning to think the California campaign is being run by “Health Choice.” Are Ken and Barbie about to show up in the Barbie Yacht on the Sacramento River hosting a yacht party for only $5,000 per attendee? Will there be photo opportunities with the bill’s authors?

    There are TWO more committees, people. Put down the lolly-pops and get out the napalm…

    You need to win.

    Tim Bolen
    http://www.bolenreport.com

    What I predicted would happen over the California Mandatory Vaccine bill SB277, for innocent children, in the California Senate Health Committee did happen. The bill was approved in committee six to two, with one abstention. California was the one place Merck needed to win. What happens in California spreads across the nation. We’ll see what happens next.

    Although this battle has already been won by the “No Mandatory Vaccines” groups in Washington, Oregon, North Carolina, Oklahoma, New Jersey, and Maryland, California became a problem. As former Republican gubernatorial candidate “Tim Donnelly” describes his new radio show, he is “Broadcasting from deep behind enemy lines in the occupied territory of the socialist republic of California.”

    My kind of guy…

    So much money was poured, in the last few years, into Democratic campaign coffers in California, by Big Pharma, that you could feed a starving country. Why? Obviously, to get Mandatory Vaccinations forced on California children. And why is that? Because both Merck, and the Democrats, need the money generated by that campaign, desperately…

    Desperately.

    A week ago I wrote a piece for the “Autism Leadership Council” email list called “How In the F*** Did You Lose California…” referring, of course, to the California Mandatory Vaccination bill SB277 in the Senate Health Committee. It ended up all over FaceBook. Good. It is in the box on the right.

    I received a lot of comments, and was brought up to speed on EXACTLY how the loss occurred. As it turns out I HAD sensed what was wrong, and mentioned it in my piece.. There was a fox in the henhouse.

    Two of the comments came from activism leadership in other parts of America. I’ll let you read them just below. The first is from the North Carolina group that wiped the legislative floor with the sponsors of the same Mandatory Vaccine bill in North Carolina. The second is from long-time activist Ingri Cassell.

    From North Carolina:

    “Hi Tim,

    I read your recent letter about how CA is screwing up. My husband could have written the same letter. How we beat the bill here in NC is by not baking cookies (as one infiltrator suggested) but by slamming them hard & fast.

    Please add me to any newsletter you send out.

    My group was formed in 1996 to educate parents. vaccineeducation.com.

    Lisa Jillani, founder/director, PAVE

    flamingly & unashamedly anti-vaccine – Lisa Jillani, PAVE [werpave@yahoo.com]

    Maybe the California people could contact Lisa and her husband?

    From Ingri Cassell:

    “Well, we know Tim Bolen is angry at Autism Leadership. He also knows that many autism advocacy groups have been bought off by Big Pharma. And there are still many parents of autistic children in denial of the vaccine connection. Heck, it seems to me that since Tim is a main advocate for Health Freedom, and since the vaccine issue is the NUMBER ONE health freedom issue, he should be angry at himself for not doing more since he lives in California and should have done a lot more to do the effective activism needed to defeat SB 277. But it is not over yet. If this does pass, there will be a mass exodus into our state…we already have too many Californians moving here… Following are the four points that I sent to someone else — points that the Senate H&W Committee members seemed to be completely unaware of.

    1) THREE Merck (MMR) whistleblowers See http://ww.vaclib.org/news/CDCwhistleblower.htm
    2) The lack of credible science justifying vaccines. There is quite a debate on the ‘lack of’ real science behind the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ recomendations for Vaccines for Children (VFC). David L. Lewis, PhD, worked for the EPA and CDC for over 30 years and details this problem in his book, Science for Sale: How the US Government Uses Powerful Corporations and Leading Universities to Support Government Policies, Silence Top Scientists, Jeopardize Our Health, and Protect Corporate Profits.
    3) the MYTH of herd immunity. See http://ww.vaclib.org/links/herdimmunity.htm, and
    4) the biggest issue of all — the fact that ALL players in the vaccine scam are released of liability for the harm the vaccines are known to cause.

    ~Ingri”

    Note to Ingri: You are right. I should have done more. And now, after what I have been told, I am on the warpath…

    When the earlier California bill, last year, AB 2109 came around, making you get a signature from your doctor for a vaccine exemption, I did offer my services (for free). I ran into a wall of defeatism, anger, and boundless unpleasantness. I knew, right then, that AB2109 would pass. Why? The anti-AB2109 people I had contacted, had NO CLUE how to run a campaign, and were not interested in learning how, or taking advantage of the assets, knowledge, and skills, of the millions of advocates in the US Health Freedom Movement.

    For a while it looked like the same bag of idiots were running the anti-SB277 campaign, and California was going down in flames.

    But then some things happened, and other groups began to rip the leadership reins out of their hands and start to function in a way that made sense. And things started to happen.

    Yup – it turns out one of original California organizers of anti-SB277 were the Health Choice/Canary Party, emphasis on “Party.” For those of you who have just tuned in, please take the time to read about them by clicking here – http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/autism%20infighting16.htm.

    More Articles About the Vaccine Hoax

    Of Course I’m Anti-Vaccine… I Have a Brain. 2/6/15

    It is Time to Stop This Vaccine Nonsense… It is all One Monstrous Horror Show… 2/17/15

    It Is Time To Kill The Drug Lord Vampires… Get out the Silver Bullets. Sharpen the Wooden Stakes. Grab Some Garlic. Let’s Go Hunting… We Need to Save Our Children… 2/25/15

    It is Time To End the US Vaccine Program… This Dangerous “Vaccine Construction” Needs to be Disassembled… We Need to Save Our Nation… 3/12/15

    Another group is being run by what appear to be avatars – and they will not identify who they are. A FaceBook group, calling itself “Our Kids Our Choice” has suddenly come into question because of considerable “Controlled Opposition” tactics. Frankly, this group looks to me like they are being run by the SB277 bill’s author Richard Pan MD, and/or his associates.

    Make no mistake – THERE WERE definitely honest, competent groups working on this problem, some centered around the five thousand (5,000) member “California Coalition For Vaccine Choice” FaceBook page. It is just that OTHERS, it looks to me, were attempting to DOMINATE the project and EXCLUDE those that knew what to do, and when.

    And, there was the very smart emerging Los Angeles based group… More on that later.

    A little Side Note.

    The Mandatory Vaccine bills were introduced in about twenty State locations – all at once and ALL THE SAME. They were all the same language. In other words the same group wrote every one of them. So far, every State has rejected them. They have been defeated everywhere except California, so far.

    Back to the California Campaign…

    If you are on the internet at all, in the world that discusses these kinds of issues, you couldn’t help but stumble over the bragging about how great the RALLY was in Sacramento, the day before the meeting of the Senate Health committee, for the SB277 campaign. There was famous Bobby Kennedy Jr, right there talking about the issue on the Capitol Steps.. Eric Gladen brought his terrific movie “Trace Amounts.”

    But, as the “No on SB277” groups found out, a RALLY is NOT the same thing as dealing with a legislature. FAR from it. Even if the RALLY was on the Capitol Steps. While all of them (2,800)were out there, on the steps, on camera with Bobby Kennedy, Jr., Pharma lobbyists were inside, in the Senate offices, stuffing hundred dollar bills into Senatorial coat pockets, so to speak. Guess who’s tactic worked? The vote was 6-2-1 against you, people.

    Stuffing hundred dollar bills? Yup – keep reading.

    Then, the next day, there was the Senate Health Committee meeting on SB277. To me the “No on SB277” organizing committee treated the hearing like it was an afterthought to the RALLY. Freshman Senator Richard Pan MD introduced his bill to the Committee, lying, prevaricating, obfuscating, and propagandizing, continuously throughout his presentation, and nobody called him on it.

    NOBODY CALLED HIM ON IT!

    Pan, at first, said that Merck’s MMR vaccine was “perfectly safe.” Perfectly safe? The MMR package insert, itself, is eighty (80) pages long, documenting the MMR problems. And, it went on from there. My friend Sherry Tenpenny MD has a library of close to seven thousand (7,000) peer-reviewed studies, from all over Planet Earth, on vaccines that show how dangerous they are.

    In short, it looks to me like Pan lied, as described above, to the Health Committee to get their votes. In California that’s called “Fraud.” I know 100 people who could take Pan’s testimony apart, and help write a formal complaint to the Senate Ethics Committee, the Attorney General’s Office, and the Chairman of the Senate Health Committee.

    But, let’s get to the meat, right now….

    California Fair Political Practice Act (FPPC) Violations?

    The really serious problem, with certain Senators, lies in campaign contributions, specifically from Merck, and the astroturf organizations, that pass-through money from Merck (and other big pharma operations) to Pan and others. There is undeniable evidence of this happening. California’s Fair Political Practices Act is very specific on this subject. For instance, right at the beginning of the Act it says (pay special attention to the bolded sections):

    § 81001. Findings and Declarations. The people find and declare as follows: (a) State and local government should serve the needs and respond to the wishes of all citizens equally, without regard to their wealth; (b) Public officials, whether elected or appointed, should perform their duties in an impartial manner, free from bias caused by their own financial interests or the financial interests of persons who have supported them;

    Then it goes on to say, under Chapter Seven – Conflict of Interest:

    § 87100. Public Officials; State and Local. No public official at any level of state or local government shall make, participate in making or in any way attempt to use his official position to influence a governmental decision in which he knows or has reason to know he has a financial interest. (see definition financial interest below)

    § 87102.5. Legislature; Use of Position to Influence Decisions. (a) The remedies provided in Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 83100) shall apply to any Member of the Legislature who makes, participates in making, or in any way attempts to use his or her official position to influence any of the following governmental decisions in which he or she knows or has reason to know that he or she has a financial interest: (1) Any state governmental decision, other than any action or decision before the Legislature, made in the course of his or her duties as a member. (2) Approval, modification, or cancellation of any contract to which either house or a committee of the Legislature is a party. (3) Introduction as a lead author of any legislation that the member knows or has reason to know is nongeneral legislation. (4) Any vote in a legislative committee or subcommittee on what the member knows or has reason to know is nongeneral legislation. (5) Any rollcall vote on the Senate or Assembly floor on an item which the member knows is nongeneral legislation.

    § 91003.5. Conflicts of Interest Violation. Any person who violates a provision of Article 2 (commencing with Section 87200), 3 (commencing with Section 87300), or 4.5 (commencing with Section 87450) of Chapter 7 is subject to discipline by his or her agency, including dismissal, consistent with any applicable civil service or other personnel laws, regulations and procedures.

    What constitutes ” Financial Interest” under the Act?

    § 87103. Financial Interest. A public official has a financial interest in a decision within the meaning of Section 87100 if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the official, a member of his or her immediate family, or on any of the following: (a) Any business entity in which the public official has a direct or indirect investment worth two thousand dollars ($2,000) or more. (b) Any real property in which the public official has a direct or indirect interest worth two thousand dollars ($2,000) or more. (c) Any source of income, except gifts or loans by a commercial lending institution made in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating five hundred dollars ($500) or more in value provided or promised to, received by, the public official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. (d) Any business entity in which the public official is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. (e) Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by, or promised to the public official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. The amount of the value of gifts specified by this subdivision shall be adjusted biennially by the Commission to equal the same amount determined by the Commission pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 89503.

    What constitutes “nongeneral legislation?”

    § 87102.6. Nongeneral Legislation; Definitions. (a) “Nongeneral legislation” means legislation as to which both of the following apply: (1) It is reasonably foreseeable that the legislation will have direct and significant financial impact on one or more identifiable persons, or one or more identifiable pieces of real property. (2) It is not reasonably foreseeable that the legislation will have a similar impact on the public generally or on a significant segment of the public. (b) For purposes of this section and Section 87102.5, all of the following apply: (1) “Legislation” means a bill, resolution, or constitutional amendment. (2) “Public generally” includes an industry, trade, or profession. (3) Any recognized subgroup or specialty of the industry, trade, or profession constitutes a significant segment of the public. (4) A legislative district, county, city, or special district constitutes a significant segment of the public. (5) More than a small number of persons or pieces of real property is a significant segment of public. (6) Legislation, administrative action, or other governmental action impacts in a similar manner all members of the public, or all members of a significant segment of the public, on which it has a direct financial effect, whether or not the financial effect on individual members of the public or the significant segment of the public is the same as the impact on the other members of the public or the significant segment of the public. (7) The Budget Bill as a whole is not nongeneral legislation. (8) Legislation that contains at least one provision that constitutes nongeneral legislation is nongeneral legislation, even if the legislation also contains other provisions that are general and do not constitute nongeneral legislation.

    Why is this important?

    Now we are going to talk, once again, about “Controlled Opposition” tactics. It seems that a person, using an internet name “Saku,” posted an article on the “Our Kids – Our Choice” FaceBook page that got A LOT of interest, at first.. It was called “We The People…” In that article Saku outlined Merck’s contributions to California legislators and how they related to California’s Fair Political Practice Act. Just below I will give you the link to the article. Read it all. But before you do, let me point out two things significant. (1) Up above I had said “While all of them were out there, on the steps, on camera with Bobby Kennedy, Jr., Pharma lobbyists were inside, in the Senate offices, stuffing hundred dollar bills into Senatorial coat pockets, so to speak. Guess who’s tactic worked? The vote was 6-2-1 against you, people.”

    Well, I wasn’t joking, nor exaggerating, for effect. In Saku’s article scroll down to the section that shows the Senate Health Committee highlighted in green and yellow. Pay close attention to the fact that those that got bags of money from Merck voted “Yes on SB277.” And Saku wasn’t counting “astroturf” money. What’s “astroturf” money? The California Fair Political Practices Commission calls this practice “Political Money Laundering.” it is where someone like Merck gives 500 million dollars to an astroturf organization they caused to be formed called something like “Citizens for Vaccines Stabbed into Eyeballs,” who then gives 450 million dollars to a created second group, to a third group, then to scumbags like SB277 author Richard Pan, either directly, or indirectly through a PAC. Remember that Pan had 4.6 million spent ON him by outsiders during his Senate election campaign?

    You can read Saku’s article by clicking here.

    (2) Saku’s article DISAPPEARED from “Our Kids Our Choice” FaceBook page overnight. I’m told that anyone who questioned or complained about that was removed from the page also.

    I Questioned who this “Saku” person was, and what was her source of information…

    She came back with a surprising answer. She said “I got it from Merck…” Specifically, she got it from here, and places like this.

    So, What’s happening?

    I don’t write much stuff without checking it out first. So, I am backtracking the information. Do I think there are California FPPC violations? Yup. Enough to cause some serious political harm to certain California Senators? Yup. And, even more “yup.”

    I’ve been corresponding with top people at the California FPPC. I started by asking two simple questions, quoting the Fair Political Practice Act sections I included above.

    (1) Are there any circumstances where a California legislator is allowed to author legislation that benefits a major campaign contributor?

    (2) Are there any circumstances where a California legislator is allowed to vote on legislation that benefits a major campaign contributor?

    The Bottom Line…

    The “No on SB277” bunch, the RIGHT bunch, is organizing things now. Things got VERY interesting in the Senate Education Committee, with the pointed questions to the then stuttering, and stammering, Pan, and the delayed vote to give Pan time to answer.. My guess – Pan is going to pull the bill to try to save himself.

    If it gets through Senate Education, then it goes to “Judicial” which will ask the obvious question “Pan, you dumb s***, are you on crack? How. exactly, in your convoluted brain, do you think this proposed law of yours, to claim OWNERSHIP of California’s children by the State, ignoring the State and Federal Constitutions, is going to meet legal challenges?”

    Things are about to get EVEN MORE interesting…

    Stay tuned.

    Tim Bolen – Consumer Advocate

    – See more at: http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/antivaccine%20yes6.htm#sthash.cK48J5Ax.dpuf

  17. #23 by MDs & vaccine $ on April 19, 2015 - 8:34 am

    Let’s face it, can you really trust the physicians anymore? Some/many of them do not even know the vaccine ingredients, do not know efficacy rates, do not know the history of vaccines relative to disease eradication, do not know of the vaccine injuries/deaths, participate in underreporting of vaccine injury.

    How on earth can you trust the guy who is nothing but a big pharma robot, making money off of this crap?

    The medical profession (?) has a lot to lose in this battle as the truth emerges from the horrors and misery from Pandora’s vaccine Box.

  18. #25 by Maria cordova on April 26, 2015 - 2:54 pm

    I agree with all written here.

  19. #26 by Irene on April 30, 2015 - 5:10 pm

    This is an incredibly well drafted complaint. I agree with all written here.

  20. #27 by Lisa on April 30, 2015 - 11:32 pm

    The online link to submit a complaint goes to a page with a 404 error, fyi.

  21. #28 by Bev allor on June 11, 2015 - 3:26 pm

    Dr. Pan is trying to take away our parental rights to make vaccine decisions that are the safest and most appropriate for our children. That decision needs to be left in the hands of the properly educated parents and their physicians, not the government. Even the CDC states that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” One size does not fit all for any medication, especially vaccines for babies and children. Please no on SB277.

  22. #29 by DeDe on June 12, 2015 - 2:28 am

    He claims “The parents and children need punishment and penalty for not complying with his wishes!”.

  23. #30 by Joy on June 13, 2015 - 7:30 am

    Watching the live televised hearings, Pan was taking instructions from the vaccine lobbyist! Pan couldn’t even answer his own questions without turning to the lobbyist for assistance. He’s incompetent and it’s obvious he is receiving money from the pharma/vaccine industry.

  24. #31 by Joe Imbriano on June 13, 2015 - 7:21 pm

    In the past few years more professionals have come forward to share a truth that, for many people, proves difficult to swallow. One such authority is Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.

    Dr. Horton recently published a statement declaring that a lot of published research is in fact unreliable at best, if not completely false.

    “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” (source)

  25. #32 by Joe Imbriano on June 13, 2015 - 7:22 pm

    Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor in Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEJM), which is considered to another one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, makes her view of the subject quite plain:

    “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine” (source)

  26. #33 by RN, CCRN, Health coach on June 13, 2015 - 8:13 pm

    I hope more people will file their comments to the board for his cavalier behavior towards the safety of all the children involved!

    Dr. Pan lied while giving testimony to a bill he wanted to pass. He told them that NO child had ever been injured by vaccines, and that they were safe and effective. He also stated that the measles outbreak in Disney was an epidemic.
    1) More children died last year from the measles vaccine than there were cases of measles (NO ONE died from the measles).
    2) If vaccines were safe, we wouldn’t need to sue for damages; as seen by the 5% of people who receive monies for damages that file in the vaccine court.
    3) He lied when he told the senators that no parent could prove their child had a vaccine injury, that it was purely coincidence
    4) Several of the vaccines are not effective at the prevention of disease such as the mumps, whooping cough, and HPV (which is being taken off the market in several countries from deaths/injuries to girls).
    5) He has received monies from pharmaceutical companies to push the vaccine agenda without the consideration of each individual. Bribes should never be allowed when they are used to push medications on anyone, but especially children!
    6) He failed to use the ethic of “First do no harm” when attempting to remove the power of the parent and coerce them into vaccinations as he admitted to in his presentation on June 9, 2015 to the senate stating that he was trying to “force” parents into vaccinating their children.
    7) He lied when he told the senators and people that human aborted fetuses were not used in childhood vaccines.,
    8) He lied when he reported the pope as saying it was fine to use human aborted fetuses in vaccines.
    9) He lied when he said that vaccines do not cause autism (vaccine manufacturer Dr. Deisher has stated otherwise at the MN senate as testimony of the damage human fetal cells cause to humans.
    10) He endangered children when he said that despite the testimony of a CDC scientist that has filed charges against the MMR vaccine manufacturers for fraud and covering up the fact that blacks have >350% of autism related to that vaccine, but continued to push his bill through despite the risks. Not bothering to wait until the hearing was complete to ensure the most safety for the children.
    11) He lied when he told senators and parents that NO physician would get into trouble for providing a medical exemption. The lie was because most doctors are bullied by their employers to vaccinate for bonus/reimbursement funds. They may not have a job for long if they give exemptions and bring down profits.

  27. #34 by olga hammond on June 13, 2015 - 10:00 pm

    Dr. Pan lies and endangers children all for money.

  28. #35 by Joe Imbriano on June 13, 2015 - 11:02 pm

    Health Choice, Our Kids Our Choice, and the Canary Party have sold you all down the river- Pan needs to go to jail and these shills need to be put out of business.

  29. #36 by Anonymous on June 13, 2015 - 11:54 pm

    Dr. Richard Pan is a puppet for the lobbyists with big pharma and is being paid handsomely for his efforts to get this ludicrous bill passed.

    He is violating the Nuremberg Code and our 1st Amendment right. The one for “informed consent” and that we own our body. Meaning the government and Dr. Pan and pharma companies do not own our body.

    SB 277 is definitely a bill that is discrimination. It discriminates and does not allow perfectly healthy children to attend public schools in which we pay school taxes to attend. It is our right to an education just as much as the ones being injected and shedding live viruses. Same as the ones with diseases are protected and not discriminated against for having said disease. Why punish a healthy child from receiving an education?

    I am fed up with the government and Dr. Pan trying to shove this down our throats. The problem you have here is people have done these vaccines. We have severely injured children who will never be the same, should we be forced to continue to inject them with the very thing that injured them to start with? This is medical tyranny at it’s best. This should’ve never been allowed to start with. This man definitely has no business having a medical license.

  30. #37 by Joe Imbriano on June 14, 2015 - 12:06 am

    Dr. Bed Pan, aside from sterilization with the tetanus vaccine, wont tell you that fully vaccinated patients with B pertussis infections have a 2- to 4-fold greater odds of having PRN- B pertussis infection. Investigators concluded that the greater odds of having PRN- B pertussis when fully vaccinated according to schedule suggests that vaccinated persons have greater susceptibility to PRN- strains compared with PRN+ strains. I heart immunity.

  31. #38 by back in 1996 on June 14, 2015 - 10:16 am

    From LA Times:

    CDC Says It Erred in Measles Study
    Health: Agency failed to tell parents that one of two vaccines used on infants in L.A. during epidemic was experimental, officials say.
    June 17, 1996|MARLENE CIMONS | TIMES STAFF WRITER
    Email
    Share

    WASHINGTON — A government-sponsored study of two measles vaccines, begun in 1989 during a major U.S. epidemic and conducted on nearly 1,500 minority infants in Los Angeles, failed to disclose to parents that one of the vaccines was experimental, federal health officials said Sunday.

    “A mistake was made,” said Dr. David Satcher, director of the Atlanta-based federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one of the study sponsors. “It shocked me.”

    Satcher said in an interview that the CDC plans to contact all the families involved. He said he was very concerned that the events not fuel suspicion in the minority community of government-sponsored medical research.

    “Every little mistake like that seeds the concerns of people,” he said. “We need to move to a new level of assurance so people can really trust what we’re doing.”

    None of the Los Angeles children, most of whom are now 5, was injured by the unlicensed vaccine, the CDC said. However, similar clinical trials conducted in Africa and Haiti with the vaccine raised questions about its relationship to an increased death rate among female infants who received the more potent of two dosages being studied. Those children died within two years after the vaccination. In light of the questions, the Los Angeles study was halted in 1991.

    The inquiry into the measles research was conducted after a physician connected to a public-interest vaccine safety group raised questions. Satcher, who was not CDC director at the time the study began, said he concluded from his review that “there was no ill intent” on the part of the agency in not telling parents that the vaccine had not been licensed for use in the United States, which is why it is termed “experimental” in this country.

    “But things sometimes fall through the cracks,” he said.

    CDC officials acknowledged that the omission was serious and attributed it to researchers’ knowledge that the lesser doses of the unlicensed vaccine, known as Edmonston-Zagreb, or E-Z, had been used safely for decades outside the United States and that it had been recommended by the World Health Organization.

    “Our doctors just didn’t think of it as being ‘experimental,’ ” said Barbara Reynolds, an agency spokeswoman.

    The study was co-sponsored by Kaiser Permanente of California and was begun during a national measles epidemic, with California among the most stricken states.

    The purpose was to compare E-Z with the Moraten vaccine, the standard vaccine used in this country. Researchers were trying to determine whether immunity could be obtained by vaccinating children younger than a year old and which of the dosage strengths should be used.

    Both vaccines are made of live but weakened measles virus.

    The trial involved children in communities hardest hit by the disease, including East and West Los Angeles and Inglewood. The majority of the children were African American and Latino.

    These neighborhoods were recruited because “you have to study the area where the disease is occurring,” Reynolds said.

    Worldwide, measles has been a devastating disease. Global health officials believe that 2.5 million lives are saved annually through vaccination. In the United States, before the era of vaccinations, an estimated 500,000 cases and 500 deaths occurred annually. From 1989 to 1991, 55,000 cases occurred across the nation, hospitalizing 11,000 people and killing more than 130 children and adults.

    During the epidemic, 2,476 infants younger than 1 were hospitalized, and 35 died. At that time, the routine age for receiving the first dose of measles vaccine was 15 months, and 12 months in areas experiencing outbreaks. Today, the vaccine is routinely given 12-month-old children.

    The “informed consent” papers signed by parents, which were reviewed and approved by institutional review boards at the CDC and Kaiser, said children would receive one of two vaccines and that two different doses of the E-Z vaccine would be studied.

    The form did not say that E-Z was experimental or unlicensed. But a brochure that accompanied the form said: “This vaccine has been shown to be effective in younger children. Over 200 million children around the world have received this vaccine, but Los Angeles County is the first place in the United States where it is being offered.”

    Researchers became concerned in 1990 and 1991, when data from studies in Senegal and Guinea-Bissau, and later from Haiti, suggested an increased death rate among female infants receiving the stronger dose of the E-Z vaccine.

    Dr. Stephen Hadler, director of the epidemiology and surveillance division of the CDC’s national immunization program, said researchers have not confirmed a causal association between the more potent dose of E-Z vaccine and the deaths.

    However, “it was enough to make [the World Health Organization] say that high [doses of the] vaccine should no longer be considered for use in kids,” he said.

  32. #39 by Martha Wright on June 14, 2015 - 1:34 pm

    Is Pan a healer? or is he making us all sick? I am not kidding. A doctor should promote healing on all levels. This SB277 bill does not spring from a compassionate concern to bring people together in health, love and unity. It is tyrannical. It is hysterical and not founded in good science. What is the real agenda here? Perhaps is has to do with dollars. I say there is more wrong with Pan than meets the eye. A thorough investigation is in order. I say he has disgraced a profession that does not need more dissilusioned patients.

  33. #40 by Dan Welch on June 14, 2015 - 9:10 pm

    You wacky anti-vaxers, you’re just so… ADORABLE. With your big words that you don’t understand, to your complete and under misunderstanding of basic facts — it’s really too cute for words. Please, please make this petition happen. I can’t wait to hear the laughter ringing from the halls of whatever regulatory body you choose to send it to.

  34. #41 by Bev allor on June 15, 2015 - 6:09 am

    First do no harm. Dr. Pan doesn’t care about the harm he is inflicting on the vulnerable people who can’t or don’t want to that the chance on every take vaccine.
    More people are being harmed in the US by vaccines, than by the childhood illness they are supposed to prevent. We have the country with the most recommended vaccines, but also the country with the most sick children.

  35. #42 by Cathey Painter on June 15, 2015 - 5:44 pm

    Senator Pan has wrongfully and irresponsibly used his Dr.title along with false information to rally the support of other elected officials to push SB277 that would mandate forced vaccinations in exchange for a public or private education. He has ignored the advice of many Pediatricians, Attorneys, as well as MIT Sr. Research Scientist Stephanie Seneff who has studied vaccines for 8 years. These experts all agree that “A one size fits all vaccination list and schedule” is dangerous and will cause harm to many.
    Senator Pan should have his licensed revoked immediately

  36. #43 by malka milhous on June 16, 2015 - 9:36 pm

    How can you revoke a medical license this way? There is no malpractice.

  37. #44 by CA Gov + Pope on Depopulation on June 17, 2015 - 7:13 am

    Monday, June 15, 2015
    by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
    Tags: Vatican, climate science, world depopulation

    Vatican speaker and California Governor in push for massive depopulation… talk of ‘Planetary Court’ and removal of 6 billion people under new ‘Earth Constitution’ and ‘World Government’

    (NaturalNews) The depopulationists are on the move again, pushing hard for the elimination of six billion people on planet Earth in order to bring the planet down to what’s being touted as its “sustainable carrying capacity of one billion people.”

    But this time, the depopulation agenda may be codified by the Vatican. Professor John Schellnhuber has been chosen as a speaker for the Vatican’s rolling out of a Papal document on climate change. He’s the professor who previously said the planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people. Now, the Vatican is giving him a platform which many expect will result in an official Church declaration in support of radical depopulation in the name of “climate science.”

    “The teaching document, called an encyclical, is scheduled for release on June 18 at Vatican City,” reports Breitbart.com. “Perhaps with the exception of the 1968 encyclical on contraception, no Vatican document has been greeted with such anticipation.”

    A new Planetary Court to hold power over all nations… one ring to rule them all

    Schellnhuber daydreams about a “Planetary Court” guided by a new “Earth Constitution” which would hold power over every nation and government on the planet. As he explains himself in this document on HumansAndNature.org, he’s a proponent of an all-powerful, climate-focused world government that would rule over the planet… a literal “science dictatorship” based on whatever “science” the climate change proponents can fudge together each year.

    As Schellnhuber says:

    Let me conclude this short contribution with a daydream about those key institutions that could bring about a sophisticated — and therefore more appropriate — version of the conventional “world government” notion. Global democracy might be organized around three core activities, namely (i) an Earth Constitution; (ii) a Global Council; and (iii) a Planetary Court. I cannot discuss these institutions in any detail here, but I would like to indicate at least that:

    – the Earth Constitution would transcend the UN Charter and identify those first principles guiding humanity in its quest for freedom, dignity, security and sustainability;

    – the Global Council would be an assembly of individuals elected directly by all people on Earth, where eligibility should be not constrained by geographical, religious, or cultural quotas; and

    – the Planetary Court would be a transnational legal body open to appeals from everybody, especially with respect to violations of the Earth Constitution.

    Schellnhunber, in other words, believes a new world government can create “freedom” for humanity by dictating to it with a new Planetary Court guided by an Earth Constitution which will no doubt begin by declaring the planet can only sustain one billion people. The other six billion or so simply have to go. So instead of a Bill of Rights, this new Earth Constitution will be founded on a Bill of Deaths and a global government that might order the extermination of billions of human beings in order to “save the climate.”

    “In an unprecedented encyclical on the subject of the environment, the pontiff is expected to argue that humanity’s exploitation of the planet’s resources has crossed the Earth’s natural boundaries,” reports The Guardian. “…[T]he world faces ruin without a revolution in hearts and minds.”

    The Guardian goes on to report:

    The pope is “aiming at a change of heart. What will save us is not technology or science. What will save us is the ethical transformation of our society,” said Carmelite Father Eduardo Agosta Scarel, a climate scientist who teaches at the Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina in Buenos Aires.

    California Governor worried that too many people exist

    Interestingly, California Governor Jerry Brown might welcome such a depopulation agenda organized under a new world government. He recently tweeted about California having too many people, saying, “At some point, how many people can we accommodate?” Gov. Brown goes on to say that climate change is the reason the current drought is so much more worse than anything they’ve seen in the past.

    Apparently, California has too many people, Gov. Brown says, and that means California needs to be deliberately depopulated.

    With this, the Vatican and Jerry Brown join the efforts of other depopulation advocates like Bill Gates, who once said that vaccines can help reduce the world population by 10 to 15 percent.

    True to that claim, vaccines given to young women have now been discovered to be intentionally laced with sterilization chemicals, according to the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization funded in part by UNICEF.

    Similarly, a shocking 75% of children given vaccines in a small town in Mexico ended up hospitalized or dead after a recent round of vaccine shots that many have speculated might be part of a depopulation test run.

    Fast depopulation vs slow depopulation

    Since YOU are one of the targets of global depopulation, you may want to increase your awareness of how it might be accomplished. When it comes to depopulation, there are two approaches considered by the globalists:

    SLOW DEPOPULATION: This method focuses on covert sterilization via vaccines, free birth control pills, and “social services” education efforts that try to convince women to have fewer children. The idea is to slowly let the current population of 7 billion die off while the birth rate plummets, causing the total population to shrink over time. You might call this the “non-violent” way to gradually reduce the population over time. Nobody has to prematurely die for this to be pulled off, in other words.

    FAST DEPOPULATION: This method involves fast-kill strategies to essentially murder billions of people while blaming it on something else. The most likely candidates include the release of an aerosolized bioweapon (Ebola 2.0?), the insertion of aggressive cancer viruses in vaccines (see the confession of former Merck vaccine scientist Maurice Hilleman for background), global nuclear war, the intentional release of EMP weapons that destroy the power grid, and so on. These are obviously the more nefarious, dastardly depopulation pursuits, and they would obviously consist of global murder on a massive scale.

    “Slow depopulation” methods have been tried since the 1970’s. They haven’t worked. As world population continues to rise, the global power brokers now seem to be experimenting with “fast depopulation” approaches to achieve their goal of eliminating six billion people from the planet.

    Deliberate depopulation vs. unintentional depopulation

    Another dimension in this discussion emerges in the distinction between “deliberate” and “unintentional” depopulation.

    Deliberate depopulation is, of course, the pursuit of actions and policies which are intended to directly and quantifiably reduce the number of humans living on the planet.

    Unintentional depopulation is what happens when catastrophe strikes and the systems keeping modern civilization humming along suddenly collapse: a power grid failure, for example, or a runaway genetic pollution of crops that leads to global starvation. The climate change scientists insist that the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere will somehow cause the catastrophic collapse of society, leading to the deaths of millions or billions of people.

    Accordingly, the globalists see themselves as being compassionate for humanity by invoking deliberate depopulation, thereby preventing catastrophic, unintentional depopulation (i.e. a global die-off following the catastrophic collapse of the global ecosystem). That’s how they justify covert vaccine sterilization programs, for example, or talk of eliminating six billion people on the planet. In other words, when they are murdering you and six billion of your brothers and sisters, just remember that in their own minds, they LOVE life and are protecting the ecosystem!

    But how, exactly, do you go about eliminating six billion people if you’re a globalist pushing for mass murder in the name of climate science?

    How do they kill six billion people? Twelve monkeys!

    Killing one person is called murder. Killing six billion people is called “climate science.” But how do you pull it off, exactly?

    It’s easier than you might think. As depicted in the movie Twelve Monkeys, all it takes is the release of a weaponized, genetically engineered virus in any major airport, anywhere in the world. (I’m not saying this is true because it was in a movie. That would be absurd. Rather, in this case, the movie correctly depicts the reality of how easily a bioweapon could be spread by someone with the intent to destroy human civilization as we know it.)

    From there, the virus replicates and spreads globally, causing widespread death and depopulation while simultaneously empowering world governments to control their populations with medical police state powers such as forced quarantines, restrictions on travel, forced immunizations, medical checkpoints on highways and so on. (It’s sort of the perfect police state model if you think about it, and it gives governments the justification to insert medical tracking RFID chips into everybody’s bodies at gunpoint. C’mon you control freaks, you know how excited you get when you think about microchipping the population! It’s FUN!)

    The U.S. military already possesses biological weapons which could kill one billion or more

    It’s an undebatable fact that the U.S. military has long engineered and tested such viral bioweapons to potentially use as weapons of war. (I previously wrote about the airborne Ebola that ran wild through a U.S. Army medical research facility in 1990, killing an entire building full of monkeys before they “nuked” the building with sterilization chemicals.)

    While international treaties claim such research has been abandoned, only a fool believes such hollow promises are ever kept. In reality, the research is merely shifted into covert status, continuing as normal on “black budgets.” Today, the United States government possesses viral strains which could decimate humanity in less than a year’s time… and they could be “accidentally-purposely” released anywhere on the planet without notice.

    Of course, if you were going to release a deadly virus to decimate humanity (the word “decimate” means to kill 1 in every 10, by the way, it does not mean to “eradicate”), you would first make sure all your elite globalist buddies received vaccine shots against the virus. Naturally, those vaccine shots would be manufactured without any of the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and MSG found in vaccines given to the general public, thereby making them significantly safer. The CDC, of course, would stay completely silent on this pandemic, just as they’ve maintained absolute silence on the confession of their scientist Dr. William Thompson, who publicly admitted to taking part in scientific fraud at the CDC to hide the links between vaccines and autism in African-Americans.

    The public would be left to fend for itself. And in this scenario, guess who would be most likely to survive? People who use medicinal herbs and immune-boosting superfoods. Those who are wiped out by the weaponized population control virus would largely consist of the elderly, the immunosuppressed, and the malnourished.

    That might be precisely who the new “Planetary Court” world government wants to eliminate in the first place, sparing the able-bodies workers who pay confiscatory taxes to governments and produce economic output that can be exploited by the globalist corporations.

    So I now throw the question back to the Pope, Professor John Schellnhuber, Bill Gates, Ted Turner and other depopulation fanatics: How exactly are you planning to eliminate six billion people from this planet?

    The truly hilarious part in all this is that the world’s masses are already so totally brainwashed by climate propaganda that if you ordered them to voluntarily report to “eco-friendly euthanasia chambers” to save the planet by killing themselves, they’d line up in droves to comply! Heck, they’d buy tickets!

    Interestingly, that might not be such a bad idea just to invoke the global Darwin award and invite the world’s most idiotic, obedient sheeple to voluntarily remove themselves from the human gene pool in a sort of modern-day mass sacrifice to Gaia. The Aztecs did it, and that worked out just great! (Just ask all the Aztecs that are still around.) What could possibly go wrong?

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/050075_Vatican_climate_science_world_depopulation.html#ixzz3dKQVDC6b

  38. #45 by Jesuits? on June 17, 2015 - 12:49 pm

    aren’t both the pope and brown jesuits?

  39. #46 by DR Richard Muccillo on June 17, 2015 - 4:57 pm

    Since when is it legal to take bribes –yes he is being paid to do the wishes of corrupt big pharma and cdc

  40. #47 by Phillip on June 22, 2015 - 5:39 pm

    GUILTY of taking money pharmaceutical lobbyists in order to write legislation that removes the right of informed consent from parents.

    This man has forgotten his oath to ‘do no harm’. He should never be allowed to practice again.

  41. #48 by young kim -- she votes "yes" on SB277 on June 25, 2015 - 2:51 pm

    I understand that Young Kim voted for SB277.
    I guess she thinks the state of California has the power and right to mandate damage and death via vaccines.

  42. #49 by Yunona Hagopjanian on July 3, 2015 - 3:43 pm

    GUILTY of taking money from pharmaceutical lobbyists in order to write legislation that removes the right of informed consent from parents.

    This man has forgotten his oath to ‘do no harm’. He should never be allowed to practice again.

  43. #50 by William Carroll on July 4, 2015 - 12:54 pm

    This man is dangerous and greedy. A very bad combination.

  44. #51 by Lana Thomas on July 4, 2015 - 4:36 pm

    Vaccines can and do cause harm. That is, after all the reason the vaccine court has awarded money time and time again to the vaccine injured. Forcing vaccination under the threat of losing your child’s right to a FAPE is violating the “do no harm” oath Dr. Pan took. Obviously if you are forcing people to vaccinate regardless of the potential risks, you are causing harm. Not to mention the violation of a child’s right to a free appropriate public education. Parents should make medical decisions for their children. Not the government. Take his license.

  45. #52 by Off the market on July 5, 2015 - 7:38 am

    Vaccines damage and destroy life

    How about this?

    Take all vaccines off the market.

    If the companies and MDs cannot be held liable, vilify them in the court of public opinion. This will happen regardless.

    Dissolve all corrupted US bureaucracies: CDC, NIH, FDA, IRS, DOJ, etc.

    Expose all public health colleges that have kept the vaccine death and destruction hidden.

    Expose big pharma takeover of medical schools.

    Educate people about the bodies natural immunity.

  46. #53 by Anonymous on July 5, 2015 - 1:20 pm

    If we want to do this right we have to hold accountable the main source… pharmaceutical companies and organizations like Merk. Now those are the ones we need to come after! And Hard!

  47. #54 by Anonymous on July 7, 2015 - 10:09 pm

    Pan has other bills in the works and you can bet he won’t stop with the children. He will move into the prisons, public health and then the private sector employment with his vaccine crusade. You legislators and governor just gave him the green light.

  48. #55 by Anonymous on July 12, 2015 - 2:18 pm

    Don’t look now but Dr Pan has even more horrific bills in the hopper-don’t go to prison or you will become a lab rat

  49. #56 by Dave on July 30, 2015 - 8:49 pm

    What a lot of loons are posting on this website. Dr. Pan is a hero for standing up to people who want to kill children.

      • #58 by Anonymous on July 31, 2015 - 12:04 pm

        The sale or purchase of human fetal tissue is a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison or a fine of up to $500,000 (42 U.S.C. 289g-2).

        “Planned Parenthood’s sale of aborted baby parts is an offensive and horrifying reality that is widespread enough for many people to be available to give first-person testimony about it,” notes David Daleiden, Project Lead for The Center for Medical Progress. “CMP’s investigative journalism work will continue to surface more compelling eyewitness accounts and primary source evidence of Planned Parenthood’s trafficking and selling baby parts for profit. There should be an immediate moratorium on Planned Parenthood’s taxpayer funding while Congress and the states determine the full extent of the organization’s lawbreaking.”

        Wow, I don’t care WHO you are- that is insane…

  50. #59 by Georgia Guidestones on August 9, 2015 - 10:11 am

  51. #60 by Anonymous on August 10, 2015 - 1:54 pm

    This is all so disgusting but it is all true.

  52. #61 by J-Dub on August 20, 2015 - 4:49 pm

    Don’t forget to support the recall effort against Pan Here:

    http://sb277recalls.com/senator-richard-pan-recall/

    And the SB277 Referendum here:

    http://sb277referendum.com

    Please Sign, Volunteer, Donate Etc if you can. If Pan is not recalled, you can guarantee more mandatory vaccine bills will come next year!

  53. #62 by Marwen on August 21, 2015 - 11:44 am

    Vaccines damage and destroy life, let’s talk and practice immunization.

  54. #63 by Amy on August 26, 2015 - 2:16 pm

    This man deserves to never practice medicine again. He is a monster.

  55. #64 by Tina dimatos on September 8, 2015 - 5:01 pm

    Dr. Pan takes money from pharmaceutical lobbyists and is trying to take away the rights of parents.

  56. #65 by C.Diello on September 8, 2015 - 5:43 pm

    Freedom.

  57. #66 by nina brandt on September 20, 2015 - 8:22 pm

    Stop big pharma and Dr. Pan from ravishing our future..

  58. #67 by Anonymous on September 20, 2015 - 10:12 pm

    Dr. Pan needs to be removed from office. He needs to be recalled. He is clearly guilty of ethics violations and should be reported to the Senate Ethics committee.

  59. #68 by Anonymous on September 21, 2015 - 11:22 am

    Dr. Pan needs to be stopped and I don’t know what else to do if this referendum fails? What do we do next? They can’t do this.

  60. #69 by Smart Person on September 21, 2015 - 4:11 pm

    You people are bunch nut cases. All 50 states should passed a law making mandatory vaccinations.

    • #70 by Anonymous on September 21, 2015 - 8:10 pm

      I agree. The entire population should be sterilized because they are nothing but a bunch of useless eaters.

    • #71 by Chipmunk on August 2, 2016 - 9:58 pm

      Heil Hitler !!!

(will not be published)


Copyright © 2013 TheFullertonInformer.com. All rights reserved. TheFullertonInformer.com is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!