Robert Pletka, Fullerton School District Superintendant puts another 6000 iPads into Fullerton school children’s laps today


Good evening Fullerton School District parents, this is Superintendent Bob Pletka. I am very pleased to announce that during the coming week, the District will be distributing over 6,000 iPads to all 5th through 8th grade students throughout our District as a part of our 1:1 VIP (Visual Innovation Program). California State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tom Torlakson, will be joining me at Valencia Park School, Wednesday, August 27, 2014 at a press conference to announce the distribution of these iPads.

We are excited that the District’s commitment to including high-level technology that reaches beyond the classroom is becoming a reality. We are also committed to being your first source of information regarding our progress. We expect that this announcement will receive broad local news coverage, and we wanted to keep you apprised.

This e-mail has been sent to you by FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT. To maximize their communication with you, you may be receiving this e-mail in addition to a phone call with the same message. If you no longer wish to receive email notifications from FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, please click here to unsubscribe.

Fullerton School District Superintendent Robert Pletka




If soft tissue cancer results from wireless cell phone microwave exposure, what do we make of this wireless iPad microwave exposure?

images (11)


Fullerton School District Superintenedent  Robert Pletka.

Fullerton School District Superintendent Robert Pletka. “Your request that the district turn off wireless connectivity and remove IPads from your children’s respective classrooms….is respectfully DENIED.” 11-1-2013 letter to Joe Imbriano


The Fullerton Joint Union High School District awarded an electrical contract THAT INCLUDES NO WIRELESS SYSTEMS a few months back sparing 14,000 High School students and staff who will not be be forcibly exposed to wireless microwave radiation at school which would have been trillions of times background levels. That meant that all of the hot mapping for deployment has been called off, and the wireless access points, and related equipment is sitting in a warehouse where it MAY HAVE COST THE TAXPAYERS SOME MONEY BUT AT LEAST IT can’t hurt anyone.

Robert Singer Ph.D.

Robert Singer Ph.D. FJUHSD Trustee -safety first-bravo Mr. Singer


Here it is-THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACT from earlier this year


Meanwhile, back home on the range for the most vulnerable segment of our student population here in town, the K-8 students, The Fullerton School District under Superintendent Robert Pletka’s watch is GOING WIRELESS ALL THE WAY DOWN TO KINDERGARTEN.



Dr Dariusz Leszczynski, Adjunct Professor, Division of Biochemistry and Biotechnology at the University of Helsinki and a member of a working group of 31 scientists from 14 countries constituted by World Health Organization (WHO) that classified cellphone radiation as possibly carcinogenic, in conversation with Maitri Porecha, reveals how leading cell phone operators and manufacturers are withdrawing funding for research, leading to closing down of laboratories studying effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields as emitted by wireless devices, cellphones and cell towers

download (3)

Is this what you signed your kids up for gang? They might as well just put a cell tower in the room.


WHATS THE DIFFERENCE? -these transmitters are up in the air, and in the classrooms, the transmitters are between their legs.

Fullerton has quite the establishment folks. Its roots runs deep and dark in my opinion. It involves the schools, the city hall crowd, the FPD and even some of the wanna be big timers who play church on Sundays.

In 2 weeks, 6000 more iPads will be going into the laps of Fullerton school children. Everyone is all in.

Fullerton’s Praetorian guard. In 2 weeks, 8000 more iPads will be going into the laps of Fullerton school children forcing 8000 households to install wireless connectivity so that they can do their homework.

The player's club.  Anyone want to join?

The player’s club. Anyone want to join?

She is a little shy

She is a little shy

Come and knock on our door, we've been waiting for you... Whoa Doug, your the man-wireless technology- "..It is great for the children.."

Come and knock on our door, we’ve been waiting for you… Whoa Doug, your the man-wireless technology- “..It is great for the children..”

I believe the children of those who value their wallets over their own flesh and blood will soon learn the hard way. Their parents ignored the fact that the jury on wireless has been in for decades. The verdict was found to be comprised of cancer, ADHD, autism and infertility. Check out these women who are along for the ride:

JenniferFitzgerald2012sm_1-1 (1)

Fullerton Council woman Jennifer Fitzgerald- Voted yes on the 4000 watt cell tower next to a school and voted yes for a homeless shelter next to a school. On school forced wireless exposure-” I don’t agree with your assertions”


Fitzgerald she needs to spend a little less time at the hair salon and devote a lot more time to dealing with reality.

Hilda Sugarman, a member of the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees, “My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7

Hilda Sugarman, Fullerton School District  Trustee on iPads,
“My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7″-this one is too far gone to reason with

Jennifer Fitzgerald, Doug Chaffee and Jan Flory all voted to put a 4000 watt cell tower right on top of a community health clinic next to a school last night with Robert Pletka’s blessing. Yes it is one big happy party for these deniers.

I motion to post the ATT report on our website-Potius Pilate

Fullerton Councilwoman Jan Flory voted to place a 4000 watt cell tower next to a school and voted to place a homeless shelter next to a school. “I move the motion to post the ATT report on our website and approve the cell tower”-Pontius Pilate

Where is the flag? I feel a draft.

Fullerton councilman Doug Chafeee “Your three minutes are up…” Where is the flag? I feel a draft. The tower is approved. I don’t understand radio waves  and microwaves but I will vote to stick this 4000 watt antenna array right on top of a community health clinic in a park next to a school because I am up for re-election and I don’t want to be associated with the tin foil hat brigade. I just want to cozy up with my establishment cronies and union hacks. Just get me over to the arboretum.

How much again?

Jennifer Fitzgerald-Curt Pringle’s Pride.How much does the city get for the tower lease again?

I wonder what Hughes is thinking while he poses for photo ops with Pletka? What does Hughes and Fitzgerald think when they send their daughters off to be irradiated at school everyday while they pretend to ignore the wireless discussion every other Tuesday night on this issue? What’s for lunch or probably nothing as that would explain their behavior. What about the five F.S.D.  board members that are connected at the hips to each of these establishment deniers?

Janny_Meyer (2)

JANNY MEYER Fullerton School District Trustee who is up for re election- also member of the board of the technology foundation-NO COMMENT-she just smiles at everything.

Beverly_Berryman (1)

BEVERLY BERRYMAN Fullerton School District Trustee . “Thank you for forwarding this information to me. I am attempting to understand all of the data, not being a scientist, it is pretty complicated. I am continuing to follow up to ensure that we are doing what we need to do in researching the issues that you have and I know that our superintendent has been communicating with you regarding the progress of the testing. I do understand your passion for this topic and do appreciate your concern. I want you to know that even though I do not comment back in the board meetings, your concerns are being heard.”


LYNNE THORNLEY Fullerton School District Trustee. NO COMMENT of course

Chris_Thompson (1)

CHRIS THOMPSON Fullerton School District Trustee. I wonder what Joe is here to talk about tonight? “….



HILDA SUGARMAN Fullerton School District Trustee and board member of the technology foundation. NO COMMENT as would be expected

- See more on these five at:

Cognitive dissonance in this town has quite the high price, seemingly having  no end and apparently knowing no limits after thousands of studies have been presented to and ignored by these people warning against what is being done to your children.

images (13)

Why do wireless and microwaves always get a pass? Did it ever occur to any of you as to why we have this explosion of  Down Syndrome babies born to very young mothers today? How about Testicular Cancer in young men from the cell phones in their pockets, wireless laptops, tablets and gaming controllers in their laps, Prostate Cancer in young men,  Autism, ADHD in our young children, Infertility in our young men and women, Atrial Fibrillation  in our parents, heart murmers arising out of nowhere in our children, kids dropping dead at school, bizarre rheumatic conditions and all the other forms of  Cancer today? Close your eyes and pretend this is all a conspiracy theory while the emission levels go off the charts all around us. This stuff is not natural and is trillions of times the normal background levels. Wake up.

When Federal Legislation is written to forcibly irradiate you and your children with categorical exemptions for cellular infrastructure jammed down our leaders throats, the last thing we need is ill informed, spineless lackeys and educrats making health decisions for you and your children in areas where there are no categorical exemptions like classrooms.

I wonder if It ever occurred to any of these reprehensatives that this is a decision well above their pay grade as well as their intellect and has been placed there by design replete with 1st and 10th amendment violations just for good measure as icing on the cake. I wonder where we would be today if the same pass that wireless is being given was given to DDT, tobacco, asbestos, dioxin, mercury, BPA or any other loving compound? I wonder. Yeah the government never lies and scientists would never serve up results catered to order.

Folks that is exactly what we have and you are all going along for the ride. So why do they roll the dice with your kids?

The welcome wagon was rolling nice and smoothly for a feel good time and happy party over at EV Free last Friday for all the accessories to the forced irradiation of 14,000 school children in the FSD with FSD and FPD top brass as well as  hack council members that have demonstrated their total willful ignorance of this issue .

Pletka's in the pulpit at EV Free

Pletka’s in the pulpit at EV Free

Well, I wonder if any of these cats opened The Word to 1 Timothy 6:10 that was staring them in the face on the back of the pew at their little shin dig last week.

I prefer the King James Translation over the New American Standard-

So why do they roll the dice with your kids again?


In closing, I have been asked to please share this letter with the world .

An Open Letter from Traci Frantz On Cell Phone Safety

My name is Traci Frantz and I live in Strasburg, Pennsylvania. On January 4, 2012 my
daughter, Tiffany, was diagnosed (in Lancaster, PA) with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in her left breast.
Tiffany submitted to genetic testing and, as a family, we underwent genetic counseling. Genetic tests
including BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 tested negative. Therefore, there is no genetic pre­disposition to
breast cancer. However, Tiffany stored her cell phone in her bra (against her bare skin) for at least 5
years, every day, all day (12 hours/day) and the masses that were found lined up exactly with where she
stored her cell phone.
By November of 2012, Tiffany had a left mastectomy, radiation therapy and reconstructive
surgeries (at Hopkins) and we were convinced that the cancer had been removed and obliterated by 6
weeks of radiation therapy. However, in March of 2013 it was discovered via PET scan and MRI (in
Lancaster, PA) that Tiffany’s breast cancer had metastasized to her hip, pelvis, spine, sternum and
skull. Tiffany underwent surgery to insert a plate into her left hip as a stabilizer and 2 weeks of radiation
to treat the tumor that was quite sizeable. She currently is undergoing monthly Zometa IV treatments
(for 2 years) and daily Tamoxifen treatments (for 5 years).
We most recently (June 2014) have been informed that according to her latest PET scan, her
cancer has metastasized to her liver.
The wording that is being advocated for is already in the owner’s manual which no one takes the
time to read. Cell phone manufacturers KNOW there is a danger otherwise they would not include it in
their verbage. We are only asking for it to be better seen by the consumer at the point of sale for the
sole purpose of heeding caution and for nothing more. Have you and your family taken the time to read
your owner’s manual? Have you and your family heeded the advice your cell phone manufacturer
I WISH there would have been a warning on the outside of the box for ALL of us to read ­
My daughter may not have to fight for her life if it were!!!

Traci Frantz

images (2)

PARENTAL COGNITIVE DISSONANCE DEFINED. To the fool, the ultimate way to electronically babysit while you all wine a bit.  I am telling you, your children are gonna lose it all.

What do you think these devices are doing to your daughters’ eggs ladies and gentlemen? What about your sons’ reproductive organs? I believe that there are no accidents here gang. I believe that this is all being done on purpose. They are jamming wireless down your throats and up your backsides. 




Are iPads safe in the laps of school children? Why are women getting BREAST CANCER from keeping cell phones in their bras?



Fullerton School District Superintendent Robert Pletka




If soft tissue cancer results from wireless cell phone microwave exposure, what do we make of this wireless iPad microwave exposure?

images (11)


Fullerton School District Superintenedent  Robert Pletka.

Fullerton School District Superintendent Robert Pletka. “Your request that the district turn off wireless connectivity and remove IPads from your children’s respective classrooms….is respectfully DENIED.” 11-1-2013 letter to Joe Imbriano


The Fullerton Joint Union High School District awarded an electrical contract THAT INCLUDES NO WIRELESS SYSTEMS a few months back sparing 14,000 High School students and staff who will not be be forcibly exposed to wireless microwave radiation at school which would have been trillions of times background levels. That meant that all of the hot mapping for deployment has been called off, and the wireless access points, and related equipment is sitting in a warehouse where it MAY HAVE COST THE TAXPAYERS SOME MONEY BUT AT LEAST IT can’t hurt anyone.

Robert Singer Ph.D.

Robert Singer Ph.D. FJUHSD Trustee -safety first-bravo Mr. Singer


Here it is-THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACT from earlier this year


Meanwhile, back home on the range for the most vulnerable segment of our student population here in town, the K-8 students, The Fullerton School District under Superintendent Robert Pletka’s watch is GOING WIRELESS ALL THE WAY DOWN TO KINDERGARTEN.



Dr Dariusz Leszczynski, Adjunct Professor, Division of Biochemistry and Biotechnology at the University of Helsinki and a member of a working group of 31 scientists from 14 countries constituted by World Health Organization (WHO) that classified cellphone radiation as possibly carcinogenic, in conversation with Maitri Porecha, reveals how leading cell phone operators and manufacturers are withdrawing funding for research, leading to closing down of laboratories studying effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields as emitted by wireless devices, cellphones and cell towers

download (3)

Is this what you signed your kids up for gang? They might as well just put a cell tower in the room.


WHATS THE DIFFERENCE? -these transmitters are up in the air, and in the classrooms, the transmitters are between their legs.

Fullerton has quite the establishment folks. Its roots runs deep and dark in my opinion. It involves the schools, the city hall crowd, the FPD and even some of the wanna be big timers who play church on Sundays.

In 2 weeks, 8000 more iPads will be going into the laps of Fullerton school children. Everyone is all in.

Fullerton’s Praetorian guard. In 2 weeks, 8000 more iPads will be going into the laps of Fullerton school children forcing 8000 households to install wireless connectivity so that they can do their homework.

The player's club.  Anyone want to join?

The player’s club. Anyone want to join?

She is a little shy

She is a little shy

Come and knock on our door, we've been waiting for you... Whoa Doug, your the man-wireless technology- "..It is great for the children.."

Come and knock on our door, we’ve been waiting for you… Whoa Doug, your the man-wireless technology- “..It is great for the children..”

I believe the children of those who value their wallets over their own flesh and blood will soon learn the hard way. Their parents ignored the fact that the jury on wireless has been in for decades. The verdict was found to be comprised of cancer, ADHD, autism and infertility. Check out these women who are along for the ride:

JenniferFitzgerald2012sm_1-1 (1)

Fullerton Council woman Jennifer Fitzgerald- Voted yes on the 4000 watt cell tower next to a school and voted yes for a homeless shelter next to a school. On school forced wireless exposure-” I don’t agree with your assertions”


Fitzgerald she needs to spend a little less time at the hair salon and devote a lot more time to dealing with reality.

Hilda Sugarman, a member of the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees, “My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7

Hilda Sugarman, Fullerton School District  Trustee on iPads,
“My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7″-this one is too far gone to reason with

Jennifer Fitzgerald, Doug Chaffee and Jan Flory all voted to put a 4000 watt cell tower right on top of a community health clinic next to a school last night with Robert Pletka’s blessing. Yes it is one big happy party for these deniers.

I motion to post the ATT report on our website-Potius Pilate

Fullerton Councilwoman Jan Flory voted to place a 4000 watt cell tower next to a school and voted to place a homeless shelter next to a school. “I move the motion to post the ATT report on our website and approve the cell tower”-Pontius Pilate

Where is the flag? I feel a draft.

Fullerton councilman Doug Chafeee “Your three minutes are up…” Where is the flag? I feel a draft. The tower is approved. I don’t understand radio waves  and microwaves but I will vote to stick this 4000 watt antenna array right on top of a community health clinic in a park next to a school because I am up for re-election and I don’t want to be associated with the tin foil hat brigade. I just want to cozy up with my establishment cronies and union hacks. Just get me over to the arboretum.

How much again?

Jennifer Fitzgerald-Curt Pringle’s Pride.How much does the city get for the tower lease again?

I wonder what Hughes is thinking while he poses for photo ops with Pletka? What does Hughes and Fitzgerald think when they send their daughters off to be irradiated at school everyday while they pretend to ignore the wireless discussion every other Tuesday night on this issue? What’s for lunch or probably nothing as that would explain their behavior. What about the five F.S.D.  board members that are connected at the hips to each of these establishment deniers?

Janny_Meyer (2)

JANNY MEYER Fullerton School District Trustee who is up for re election- also member of the board of the technology foundation-NO COMMENT-she just smiles at everything.

Beverly_Berryman (1)

BEVERLY BERRYMAN Fullerton School District Trustee . “Thank you for forwarding this information to me. I am attempting to understand all of the data, not being a scientist, it is pretty complicated. I am continuing to follow up to ensure that we are doing what we need to do in researching the issues that you have and I know that our superintendent has been communicating with you regarding the progress of the testing. I do understand your passion for this topic and do appreciate your concern. I want you to know that even though I do not comment back in the board meetings, your concerns are being heard.”


LYNNE THORNLEY Fullerton School District Trustee. NO COMMENT of course

Chris_Thompson (1)

CHRIS THOMPSON Fullerton School District Trustee. I wonder what Joe is here to talk about tonight? “….



HILDA SUGARMAN Fullerton School District Trustee and board member of the technology foundation. NO COMMENT as would be expected

- See more on these five at:

Cognitive dissonance in this town has quite the high price, seemingly having  no end and apparently knowing no limits after thousands of studies have been presented to and ignored by these people warning against what is being done to your children.

images (13)

Why do wireless and microwaves always get a pass? Did it ever occur to any of you as to why we have this explosion of  Down Syndrome babies born to very young mothers today? How about Testicular Cancer in young men from the cell phones in their pockets, wireless laptops, tablets and gaming controllers in their laps, Prostate Cancer in young men,  Autism, ADHD in our young children, Infertility in our young men and women, Atrial Fibrillation  in our parents, heart murmers arising out of nowhere in our children, kids dropping dead at school, bizarre rheumatic conditions and all the other forms of  Cancer today? Close your eyes and pretend this is all a conspiracy theory while the emission levels go off the charts all around us. This stuff is not natural and is trillions of times the normal background levels. Wake up.

When Federal Legislation is written to forcibly irradiate you and your children with categorical exemptions for cellular infrastructure jammed down our leaders throats, the last thing we need is ill informed, spineless lackeys and educrats making health decisions for you and your children in areas where there are no categorical exemptions like classrooms.

I wonder if It ever occurred to any of these reprehensatives that this is a decision well above their pay grade as well as their intellect and has been placed there by design replete with 1st and 10th amendment violations just for good measure as icing on the cake. I wonder where we would be today if the same pass that wireless is being given was given to DDT, tobacco, asbestos, dioxin, mercury, BPA or any other loving compound? I wonder. Yeah the government never lies and scientists would never serve up results catered to order.

Folks that is exactly what we have and you are all going along for the ride. So why do they roll the dice with your kids?

The welcome wagon was rolling nice and smoothly for a feel good time and happy party over at EV Free last Friday for all the accessories to the forced irradiation of 14,000 school children in the FSD with FSD and FPD top brass as well as  hack council members that have demonstrated their total willful ignorance of this issue .

Pletka's in the pulpit at EV Free

Pletka’s in the pulpit at EV Free

Well, I wonder if any of these cats opened The Word to 1 Timothy 6:10 that was staring them in the face on the back of the pew at their little shin dig last week.

I prefer the King James Translation over the New American Standard-

So why do they roll the dice with your kids again?


In closing, I have been asked to please share this letter with the world .

An Open Letter from Traci Frantz On Cell Phone Safety

My name is Traci Frantz and I live in Strasburg, Pennsylvania. On January 4, 2012 my
daughter, Tiffany, was diagnosed (in Lancaster, PA) with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in her left breast.
Tiffany submitted to genetic testing and, as a family, we underwent genetic counseling. Genetic tests
including BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 tested negative. Therefore, there is no genetic pre­disposition to
breast cancer. However, Tiffany stored her cell phone in her bra (against her bare skin) for at least 5
years, every day, all day (12 hours/day) and the masses that were found lined up exactly with where she
stored her cell phone.
By November of 2012, Tiffany had a left mastectomy, radiation therapy and reconstructive
surgeries (at Hopkins) and we were convinced that the cancer had been removed and obliterated by 6
weeks of radiation therapy. However, in March of 2013 it was discovered via PET scan and MRI (in
Lancaster, PA) that Tiffany’s breast cancer had metastasized to her hip, pelvis, spine, sternum and
skull. Tiffany underwent surgery to insert a plate into her left hip as a stabilizer and 2 weeks of radiation
to treat the tumor that was quite sizeable. She currently is undergoing monthly Zometa IV treatments
(for 2 years) and daily Tamoxifen treatments (for 5 years).
We most recently (June 2014) have been informed that according to her latest PET scan, her
cancer has metastasized to her liver.
The wording that is being advocated for is already in the owner’s manual which no one takes the
time to read. Cell phone manufacturers KNOW there is a danger otherwise they would not include it in
their verbage. We are only asking for it to be better seen by the consumer at the point of sale for the
sole purpose of heeding caution and for nothing more. Have you and your family taken the time to read
your owner’s manual? Have you and your family heeded the advice your cell phone manufacturer
I WISH there would have been a warning on the outside of the box for ALL of us to read ­
My daughter may not have to fight for her life if it were!!!

Traci Frantz

images (2)

PARENTAL COGNITIVE DISSONANCE DEFINED. To the fool, the ultimate way to electronically babysit while you all wine a bit.  I am telling you, your children are gonna lose it all.

What do you think these devices are doing to your daughters’ eggs ladies and gentlemen? What about your sons’ reproductive organs? I believe that there are no accidents here gang. I believe that this is all being done on purpose. They are jamming wireless down your throats and up your backsides. 




Flory, Fitzgerald and Chaffee’s 3-2 vote approving the Richman Park cell Tower

It' not funny ya lamebrain

It’ not funny ya lamebrain

I wish it was something to laugh about.

Flory, Fitzgerald and Chaffee’s 3-2 vote approving the Richman Park cell Tower-by Diane Hickey

As in the past, I am following up with the source documents/media references made during my public comments at the August 19, 2014, Fullerton City Council Meeting.  The following are links to the assertions made at that meeting:


1)       Resonance:  Beings of Frequency


“Over the last 25 years:

A number of species, which rely on the earth’s magnetic fields to navigate, have mysteriously gone into decline.

5 species of butterfly have become extinct in Britain

109 species of Arctic migratory birds have declined dramatically in numbers

36 species of Australian shore birds have decreased in numbers by 75%

10% of the world’s butterflies face extinction

45% of a Europe’s common birds have declined in numbers

50% decline in all European grassland butterflies

Bee numbers have dropped by up to 70%

62% of Asia’s migratory water birds declining or extinct

4 species of American bee decreased in numbers by up to 98%

Farmland birds falling by as much as 79%

190 different species of bird face imminent extinction”

2)       Letter from the Department of the Interior to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, dated Feb 7, 2014, “regarding the adverse impact of cell tower radiation on wildlife.”

3)       Washington Post:  Electromagnetic ‘noise’ can confuse migrating songbirds, study says


As time progresses, more information is coming out at an increasing pace in regard to the health detriments of wireless radiation.

As we all know, UC Berkeley is a well-respected education and research institution. You should be interested in the June, 2014, release from UC Berkeley, Center for Family and Community Health,Some Tips For Reducing Your Exposure To Wireless Radiation. Among those tips are:

“Turn off wi-fi on devices being used by kids.”

“ . . .  use hardwired networks in schools to provide Internet access.”

Those of you that have children in the Fullerton School District (FSD) should be asking yourselves the question:  Why is the FSD wireless classroom practice completely contrary to UC Berkley’s tips on wireless radiation avoidance?  Or, why does FSD continue to expose the children to wireless radiation when numerous medical doctors, researchers, and the American Academy of Environmental Medicine have written letters to Los Angeles USD imploring them to use WIRED technology.   Berkeley is not the only institution telling the schools to hardwire the classrooms.

The link is here:

Do you recall the testimonies of Drs. Martin Pall and Dr. Paul Dart before a state governmental body, the Oregon State House of Representatives Committee on Health Care?  Those testimonies were sent to you a number of weeks ago; did you view them?

It is inconceivable that Mss. Fitzgerald and Flory and Mr. Chaffee voted for a cell tower at Richman Park, where children play, attend school, and reside nearby. Is it only a matter of time before these neighborhoods experience breast cancer rates 23 times higher and brain cancer rates 121 times higher than those not located near the cell tower?  These were rates cited from just one study, conducted in Austria (1984-1987), and you were given this information weeks ago.

Council members Fitzgerald, Flory, and Chaffee, will your vote to allow the cell tower have set in motion the health detriments as testified to by Drs. Pall and Dart?

You were provided many resources from which to examine a topic that has a significant impact on the Richman Park community.  It has been testified to that cancer and infertility are health outcomes of wireless radiation emissions, how could this vote be anything but hugely significant?  Your votes defy reason, logic, and, most of all, human compassion.  Certainly, none of you have the credentials to refute the information provided you.

You three council members could have, as did Messrs.  Whitaker and Sebourn, cited other non-health issues for a “no” vote.

Only you know your motivations for voting for the cell tower and I can only surmise that those motivations held more significance and value to you than did the impact to the health of the Richman Park community.



Diane Hickey, Co-founder

National Association For Children and Safe Technology

I motion to post the ATT report on our website-Potius Pilate

Jan Flory

How much again?

Jennifer Fitzgerald

Where is the flag? I feel a draft.

Doug Chaffee








I report, you decide. by BARRY LEVINSON

Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson

I report, you decide. By Barry Levinson.


It seems that Mayor Chaffee has a hard time doing anything right lately.

We had a somewhat heated by respectful discussion about an agenda item to approve a declaration passed by the US Congress about 7 years ago concerning the human rights violations by the Japanese Imperial Army during WWII as it related to the 200,000 Korean “Comfort Women” forced into sexual slavery.

Mayor Chaffee gave almost all of the speakers many of whom were either of Korean or Japanese heritages more than the normal 3 minutes to speak before them.  It seemed that many of them went over their three minutes by 2, 3 or more minutes easily.

I personally thought it was perfectly okay to give these speakers this additional time.  It was obviously a very personal and difficult subject to talk about and each and every speaker presented their opinions with much grace and dignity.

But then came the public comments for all those items not on the agenda.  It should have been one of the first pieces of business but Mayor Chaffee moved the WWII issue in front of regular public comments.

As is frequently the case, significant portions of the public comments are critical of one or more members of the council.  In this case, no additional time was granted to any of the speakers.  Once again, Mayor Chaffee even when he is going to face the voters in November apparently can’t bring himself to conduct the meeting in a fair manner for everyone.

At one point, a speaker asked Mayor Chaffee if he has paid for all the volunteer signs that he gives out to those he believes are worthy of that honor.  His answer to the speaker was that it was “none of his business”.


Councilperson Chaffee

Once again, Mayor Chaffee you find yourself on the wrong side sir. For it was you early on in this program who declared that you were paying for these signs and it would not cost the taxpayer’s a dime.

Screen Shot 2014-08-22 at 5.42.34 PM

The ball started rolling on 7-24-14

Screen Shot 2014-08-22 at 5.42.48 PM

Doug paid up 5 days after being called out- stringing the taxpayers along for a year and a half. I wonder if he would have ever paid it back if he was not asked to?



Now less than a year later you are telling us it is none of our business.  It is no wonder that recently our fair city of Fullerton was ranked as one of the snobbiest cities throughout the country.  I am now wondering how much Mayor Chaffee had to do with that dubious ranking.



Screen Shot 2014-08-22 at 5.42.21 PM

I guess he only paid up because the heat was on? Since December of 2012 no payments reimbursing the taxpayers through July of 2014? What else does he have going on at city hall?



Barry Levinson on Common Core Curriculum in The Fullerton School District

I report, you decide-by Barry Levinson


We Want Excellence From Our Students, Teachers and Administrators. Why Common Core will not get us there.



We Want Excellence From Our Students, Teachers and Administrators. Why Common Core will not get us there.

I report, you decide.

As a concerned and involved parent of a son in a Fullerton elementary school that is instituting Common Core, I want to know how this major change will impact the quality of my son’s education.

Robert Pletka-He could stop this if he wanted to.

F.S.D. Superintendent Robert Pletka-He could stop this if he wanted to.

What I have learned up until now has been anything but reassuring. My son’s school had a briefing for the parents earlier this year to discuss Common Core. We were told the following:

1. If your child does poorly on a Common Core exam, under Common Core the school will automatically dumb down the next test for your child. This process will not lead to excellence in academic achievement in my opinion. They would not be challenging the students with this scenario. There are many reasons why a student might do poorly on any given exam and to automatically dumb down future tests would be a total over reaction by the school.

2. I discussed with the administrators at the school that I believed there would be a lot of lessons learned in the first year of instituting Common Core throughout this elementary school and throughout the district. I asked at the end of the year a list of lessons learned could easily be created. I then asked would the individual schools and/or the district then make those changes to install those lessons learned the following year or would the district send the list to Sacramento and wait for their guidance. I was very saddened to learn that Sacramento has total control.

3. What real control does both the district and the individual teacher really have in the new Common Core System? In my opinion, it appears that most if not almost all of the control has been relinquished to bureaucrats in Sacramento. This is rarely a good thing.

If you believe that this change is mostly a bad thing, as parents you must let your school district board members as well as your principal know your concerns.

Clearly, this is a big step in taking away parental rights as well. The further away the real power is, the less control parents will have in the quality of the education given to their children.

Finally, I was informed that parents can legally opt out their kids from taking the Common Core tests but not the Common Core curriculum. However, I was also told that without the Common Core test scores the schools do not get money for your child, i.e. it impacts the financing of the schools.

If true, why is this important. It is important because if enough parents have their kids opt out, the schools will not be able to financially function and would have to consider dropping Common Core altogether.

Barry Levinson


And the Race for Fullerton City Council begins: I report, you decide. -By Barry Levinson



And the Race for Fullerton City Council begins:

I report, you decide.

Well the field of candidates is shaping up for the Fullerton City

Council race. Seven have filed papers and assuming they all have

the necessary valid signatures they will be as follows:

Bill Chaffee, (Doug Chaffee’s younger brother)

Jane Rands, Green Party

Doug Chaffee, Democrat

Greg Sebourn, Republican

Rick Alvarez, Republican

Larry Bennett, Republican

Sean Paden, Republican

During the course of this campaign I will be speaking on the issues

and noting each candidates strengths and weaknesses. I will report

on what they have said and what they have done that may or may

not jive with their campaign rhetoric. It is so important that I point out

any candidate’s inconsistencies. I believe this will help the voters

determine who is trustworthy and who may not be as trustworthy.

  • As I have said many times there are certain characteristics that I
  • believe are essential to have for any candidate that I want to support
  • wholeheartedly. Those characteristics are the following:
  • 1. Honesty and integrity,
  • 2. Knowledge, intelligence and wisdom,
  • 3. Common Sense and
  • 4. Guts and strength of character and convictions
  • I believe it should be rather self-evident why all the above
  • characteristics are important for the good candidate to possess. But
  • if I had to name just one reason, it would be that a candidate that
  • possesses all of the above characteristics I believe can be counted
  • on to make informed, impartial decisions that are in the best interests
  • of the citizens of Fullerton. This is something that a majority of our council does not consistently do now in my opinion.
  • A candidate for instance could have the first three characteristics and
  • still not be able to carry forth their principles without guts.
  • So I will be informing all of you what positions each candidate has on
  • all key issues facing Fullerton. I will also be telling you whether based
  • on the candidates previous words and actions that we can reasonably
  • count on them keeping their campaign promises.

Of course I will be stating what positions I believe are best for our city as well.

Barry Levinson


Barry Levinson-My Thoughts on the Fullerton City Council’s Unanimous Vote Passing a Resolution Supporting Proposition 13 and Other Recent Local Developments



The FUJHSD has placed a $175 million bond issue on the

November ballot. The NOCCCD has placed a $574 million

bond issue for North Orange County on the November ballot.

The city of Fullerton when it has the chance to pass

meaningful public labor negotiation reform says no thanks

but we can sure pass a sham C.O.I.N. ordinance instead.

Finally, the city is attempting to ram down our throats a

huge undemocratic power grab by City Manager Joe Felz.

Another really bad idea from the same city that allowed the

bars in downtown Fullerton to expand exponentially in the

90′s and then at the turn of the century shackled the city’s

taxpayers with a huge retroactive pension increase for our

police and firemen that will eventually cost the taxpayer’s

10′s of millions of dollars under the guise that it would cost

the Fullerton taxpayers nothing at all.

Now don’t we all feel much better that our council passed a

meaningless resolution in support of Prop 13. I would not be

poking fun at this resolution if the majority of our council

were doing a good job with making policy that would create

a financially healthy and open city government. But the fact

is they have not even come close to that goal. In fact the

majority of the council I believe does not even have that goal

for the city and its citizens.

We need much better on our council and we better start

demanding much better from our council. If we do not

have the right mix of council members that want to do the

right things for our city, it is the public’s responsibility to

put enough pressure on those officials to force them by

overwhelming public opinion to do the right things despite


Let us start with pressuring our city council to vote down the

DCCSP. It is a real shame that we as citizens have to force

some of our elected officials to do the right thing.


What is your opinion about Judeo-Christian Bible study? Why faith matters? I Report, You Decide. By Barry Levinson



I Report, You Decide. By Barry Levinson

Dennis Prager, a nationally syndicated radio host likes to recount this

story when he speaks before a live audience.

If you were walking alone, late at night on a dark and deserted street

and you saw a large group of teenagers in gang style clothing, would

you feel more safe or less safe if you knew they just came from a

Christian bible study class?

Even the most ardent atheist if they were being truthful, would have

to say that they would feel more safe knowing that this large group of

teenagers just came from a Christian bible study session.

What does that tell you about the goodness of the Judeo-Christian

faiths? It tells you that even an atheist knows that being a religious

Christian is a net positive to how people will behave in society.

I like to recount this story because it proves a point that having

Western religious moral values is a good thing for the individual and

for society as well.

Does that mean that atheists are by in large bad people? This is

obviously not true. But the point is that just knowing someone is an

atheist really tells you nothing either positive or negative about the

character and values of that person.

And in fact that is what I perceive as a real shortcoming in atheism, is

that it provides no moral backbone for the individual to draw on. In the

atheist’s world each individual can and does come up with their own

set of “moral” principles.

For me, I will draw on the 10 Commandments as the cornerstone of

my moral principles.


Who is Behind This Massive Grab of Money and Power Known as the Downtown Core and Corridor Specific Plan (DCCSP), City Manager Joe Felz?

I report you decide-by Barry Levinson




Who is Behind This Massive Grab of Money and Power Known as the

Downtown Core and Corridor Specific Plan (DCCSP)? City Manager

Joe Felz?

Fullerton City manager Joe Felz

Fullerton City manager Joe Felz

Let me be as direct as I can be. Any council member who votes for

the DCCSP in its current form is basically thumbing their noses at

democracy and the people of Fullerton.

I say this because this would be a major power grab by City Manager

Joe Felz and a loss of control and transparency for the people of


Those in favor are going to argue that those not in favor are against

development, against progress, etc.

The main thing I am against is having my rights as a citizen of

Fullerton being taken away. My right to be able to go before council

and voice my opinion on a new high tower development in my city

before my elected representatives vote yes or no.

This will be taken away from me if the DCCSP proposal is approved

in its current form. All projects in this huge area of Fullerton will not

require additional EIR’s (Environmental Impact Reports) and will not

normally require any votes by council. All it will need is our unelected

City Manager, Joe Felz. It would be very convenient for him and

awful for the rest of us with the exception of some developers.

Who elected City Manager Joe Felz? Why is he making policy and

then taking over this huge plan that gives the go ahead for massive

high-rise development along most of the major corridors of our city?

Why would any council member vote to give away the necessary

checks and balances and replace it in the hands of one unelected

man, our city manager? This so-called “specific plan” gives almost

unlimited powers to develop wide portions of our city to Joe Felz. My

understanding is that this plan could result in 8,000 new buildings,

almost all of them multi-story in both commercial and also in and

around predominantly residential neighborhoods.

Checks and balances in government is always a good thing. This

aims to take those checks and balances away from future councils

and from the public at-large.

Any Fullerton politician in favor of this monstrosity in my opinion does

not care that they are usurping the rights of all citizens. Governor

Brown ended redevelopment and City Manager Joe Felz and his

minions are bringing it back exponentially with no oversight by future

councils or the public.

If this is passed, there will be no further review for this massive

amount of new development, which could easily increase the current

population of Fullerton from 140,000 to well over 200,000 and

beyond. But don’t you worry Mr. and Mrs. Fullerton citizen, because

Uncle Joe will take care of everything.

Ladies and gentlemen this is exactly what I am afraid of.

So please come to our next Fullerton Council meeting on Tuesday

August 5 at 6:30PM

Barry Levinson


Rotten to the core-Fullerton’s core corridor proposed fast track back door road to an urban nightmare.


image001 (7)





Well after much careful thought, it looks like in a 5-0 vote our beloved planning commission just green lighted a citywide red light district. Yup, you heard me. How many, is it 9,000 more residential units in addition to the 13,000 residents being added over on Nutwood College town nut house.  You watch as the name of that street will live up to its etymology when you lock up 13,000 people in WiFi prisons with no yards. They will eventually figure it out.
Yes folks we are all gonna get loaded together with special global warming combating sun blocking  8 story tall  monstrosities spanning entire city blocks to offset the wind blocked landlocked choking emissions of idling cars stuck in traffic garnished with permit denying, job killing in the fast track lane without any transponder and no speed limit.
What about traffic? Oh that’s a piece of cake. The experts tell us that no one is going to drive anywhere because the 30,000 + additional residents will just go downstairs and walk right into yogurt land  to get their breakfast, lunch, dinner, groceries, pills, booze, dime bags, baby formula, toilet paper, oil changed, soccer cleats, or their pet food and never use their cars. Ha ha ha ha ha. Hey look, it is no joke but that is the twisted pretzel logic that is being applied here.
Oh what about water? Oh it’s no problem as it is not even an issue being taken into consideration in this project. It is not even on the stinkin’ table. It only is a problem for you or I if we wanna wash our cars that we wont be able to drive and your ninny neighbor wants to rat you off the the water police.I guess these thousands of units will have to be connected to a massive solar powered condensation, dehumidifying water generating apparatus that is still in secret development while the auto mechanics all will be run out of Dodge at permit point.Yes folks that is what our leaders want to sell us. They all think that we  just fell off of the turnip truck and they tell us this is progress. I am sorry, forgive me as I digress while the planning commission looks on.
image001 (5)

image001 (6)

After being rubber stamped by these development experts, this nightmare will now go to the council with the commission’s blessing in August.

Before these three on the council hand over the keys to the kingdom to the fat cat builder man and the combo on the variance lock to some unelected bureaurocrats, we  need to fully expose this thing and get it to the voters in November so we can send it to where the sun don’t shine, not rammed through in some back door deal on a midsummer’s night.  When Fullerton’s is gone, she is gone ladies and gentleman.



Council member Chaffee

Council member Chaffee


Jan Flory

From: joe imbriano <>

Date: Wed, Jul 30, 2014
Subject: downtown corridor
To: “” <>, Barry Levinson <>, “” <>, “” <>, “” <>, Bruce Whitaker <>, “Greg Sebourn, PLS” <>
Cc: Fullerton Observer <>, Davis Barber <>

As a resident and a taxpayer, I am requesting that this item be placed on the November Ballot leaving the final approval to the voters. There is absolutely no reason to ram this through right now. This is a one stop shop, one E.I.R., council bypass that, in my opinion, is too huge to be handed off to unelected city staff through the hands of you five. Going forward, there is no objective, honest way that you can conclude that green lighting such a massive project is in the best interests of the residents of this city, especially when hardly anyone knows about it. The insidious irony of projects of this magnitude and nature is that the scope of the public reporting requirements decreases inversely proportionate to the size of the development. Placing this on the ballot remedies that injustice to the residents.

This is leaps and bounds above and beyond the scope and magnitude of what is warranted at this time. It is an immense concession of checks and balances in the City’s long standing traditional approach to planning. Fast tracking makes sense in times of fiscal or other emergencies.The occupany rates of Fullerton housing is no where near 100 percent at this time.

This thing is a total Agenda 21 developer and variance orgy clothed in an affordable housing garb. Send the money back to the state and get Felz to disband the redevelopment has been dream team and you will have doubled your money in 12 months.

In addition, almost none of the claims that this thing makes are even remotely possible to accomplish. Mitigating traffic with a few more trash cans is an insult. I have not even mentioned that there are several legal challenges that will be brought forth if this item is moved forward as it is written.

Put the brakes on this thing and please do the right thing. Let’s look at this through the eyes of your constituents by placing it on the ballot where it belongs.

Thank you.

Joe Imbriano

site admin


Average Orange County Public Employee Pension is 88% of Final Salary


Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson

This is according to an article written by Robert Fellner on July 20, 2014.

The reason all taxpayers should be outraged by the final percentage of retirement income vs. final pay for OCERS retirees is simple.
The taxpayer cannot afford to pay these public servants that kind of retirement money.

It may be called a pension, but in reality part of it is simply welfare created by the unions’ cozy relationship with so many of our elected officials.


A pension benefit should be earned and paid for by the contributions of the employees with a matching contribution by the employer/taxpayer and nothing more.





As someone who has studied and worked in the financial field my entire life, I wish there was a financially prudent way to afford these lavish pensions. There is only one way to do this and that would be to have each and every public employee pay at least 30 – 50% of his or her gross salary into the pension fund. Of course that will never happen but that is exactly what we the taxpayer’s are facing now or will face in the near future without a major reduction in public retirement benefits.



For instance, in 2012 I reviewed the employer cost for the Fullerton, California safety workers (police and fire). The employer portion (which in public service means the taxpayer) was scheduled to be over 40% and rising. This is not fair to the taxpayer. Most of the taxpaying public makes less in salary than our police and fire employees, and could only dream of getting any pension let alone 88% of final salary.



Let me state something plain and simple. Those public union bosses are self-centered, selfish people who do not really care about the financial well being of all those taxpayers who have paid for their incredibly generous benefits and very healthy salaries as well.



The question that must be asked is the following:

The union goon breaking out the bong just in time for the din din bell

FPD’s  Internal affairs investigator Schoen breaking out the bong just in time for the din din bell in front as 100 elementary schoolers look on.



When will those public employee unions stop their conflict of interest campaigns of supporting only agreeable candidates for office— JENNIFER FITZGERALD


Fullerton Mayor Doug Chafee

Fullerton Mayor Doug Chafee


Jan Flory

-and start acting like true public servants who actually care about the communities they are supposed to serve?

Road repairs? Sorry pal, we are closed. Come back next year after we put in the 8 story affordable housing units.

Road repairs?  Come back next year after we three vote to put in the 8 story housing units all over every last commercial property left in Foolerton and the C.O.I.N. provisions on audits have expired.




The Manhattan Beach Shark attack and the City of Manhattan Beach’s illegal attack on fishing.


images (5)

When sharks smell blood, they show up. When the media smells hysteria, they show up. When city officials smell what the media smells and put their noses together for an opportunity to wage a sort of elitist socioeconomic ethnic cleansing of an exclusive waterfront community, they appear to push the envelope as far as they can. The right to feed yourself is as basic as you can get and so much so that the framers of our beloved California Republic wrote it into our State Constitution in Article I Section 25.

images (7)

What happened to the swimmer was tragic to say the least, and thank God he is O.K.  What happened was an accident, plain and simple but If anyone is negligent here it is the city for not addressing the fact that there are dangerous sharks sharing the surf with with beach goers and for not banning swimming, surfing, and boating within 100 yards of the pier like almost all other cities do up and down the coast. 

I want all involved to know that like we have always said all along, at the Fullerton Informer, there are two sides to every coin and every story. This one is especially newsworthy because it garnered such attention and the actions of city leaders appear to be so blatantly illegal.

image001 (10)

Ironically, this an issue that I am revisiting from some 20 years ago in Newport Beach. The issue is when taxpayer funded government entities, in this case city officials, violate the public trust and jeopardize the very legal agreement that gives the beach city the ability to be a beach city, what is the city’s tideland grant. It, through Legislative enactment, deeds State  property, such as tidelands and submerged lands to a municipal corporation, in this case, in revocable trust to the City of Manhattan Beach. S1955_Ch1427

What happened to the swimmer over the July 4th weekend was a tragic accident, but that is all  it was. It was an ACCIDENT. There is inherent risk when entering the ocean to swim or dive. There is inherent risk when swimming near a public fishing pier where white sharks are known to congregate. Here is a photo just weeks before the attack adjacent to the pier. Tell me praytell, would you let your five year old swim there?  Misguided City officials and ill-informed residents at the last council meeting declared that the pier area is safer than ever because the fisherman are gone. Really?


6-10-2014 manhattan-beach-sharks-closeup


The behavior of city officials, in my opinion, is criminal and the behavior of the media was par for their course. The slant was obvious and the fact that the media showed complete disregard for the illegal nature of the city’s actions is abhorrent. The fact that the media is going along for the ride while advocating for a fishing ban and not advocating for a swimming ban makes no sense.  But hey, what else would you expect from the talking heads on the idiot box.

Instead of banning swimming in shark infested waters, they ban a legally protected activity-fishing, with an “emergency coastal development permit”. I believe that the city of Manhattan Beach is involved in illegal activity with its ridiculously issuing an emergency CDP for 60 days banning a legal and protected activity.

They should be banning swimming until they can sort out the fact that 2014 is an El Nino year and with the warm currents come food and sharks and swimmers. 


The fact that they even considered making the fishing ban permanent at any point in the past while leaving the beach open to swimmers leads me to believe that there is incompetent legal counsel involved or worse- a concerted effort by some in city government to break the law to further an elitist agenda.

If the fishing ban is not lifted by the next council meeting, I am prepared to request an investigation with the State Attorney General’s office, put general counsel on notice at the State Land’s commission and look into a partial or full revocation of the city’s tideland grant.

image001 (9)

As far as the media, they are all a bunch of big fat liars with the exception of NBC channel 4. They were the only ones that told the truth without the PETA pandering. 

Well here is the version that the media won’t allow you to hear directly from the fisherman who has been threatened, vilified and even being subjected to threats of criminal prosecution and grand jury investigations by ridiculous grandstanding city officials in spite of the fact that HE DID NOTHING ILLEGAL.  Here is the version from the fisherman in his own words. Much of what he has written has been omitted from the slanted reports pushing the fishing ban agenda. There is much more to this story. Here is the account from the fisherman-

“We arrived at Manhattan pier around 5:30 am 2 poles a piece 3 anglers 1 bag of 6 frozen sardines for bait.we set up our gear and casted out our lines around 6 am.only one pole each in the water due to lack of bait.40# mono with a 120# 6ft mono leader with a 5/0 circle hook mutu light by owner. With our big lines in the water we tried to catch bait such as mackerel or sardines.with no luck what so ever. A few lizard fish was all that bit. Not one bait fish in the water. We were sitting on the curb of the aquarium for about an hour playing games on our phones getting ready to leave.when my buddy’s pole started screaming. He picked up the pole set the hook.the fish made a bee line for Hermosa pier to the south. After 20 minutes he passed it to me. At this point the fish was approximately 150 to 175 yards away from the pier. It turned towards the shore and surfaced in the wave break 5 ft from a surfer 30 ft or so from shore. We seen that it was a shark. Not wanting to cut the line without warning surfers of the shark we screamed and yelled to clear the beach of everyone in the vicinity which is exactly what happened. Everyone that could hear us quickly exited the water. Eric Martin, the round house biologist was out there with us. In awe of the shark.we talked about it and he said not to cut the line yet as it might be a tagged shark. I was able to turn the sharks head out to deeper waters as it was on its way out i passed the pole to my buddy while i went to grab my knife. At this point Eric mentioned if he was out there he’d like to swim up to the shark just for the experience. I went to get the knife and we seen the swimmers approaching. My buddy tried to pull the shark towards us but was unable to do so. The swimmers were too far to warn.Heads in the water there was nothing we could do. Approximatly 200 yards off the south side of the pier we seen the shark jump but couldn’t tell if anyone was hit. About 30 seconds after we noticed something was serious. I didn’t have the pole in my hand at this time. I ran down the pier to the sand. I was there as they carried Mr. Robles out of the water. I was there as they treated him. I alerted an officer on the shore we were up there fishing and for her to come get our stories info and check our gear as she did. She then left and we cleaned up to leave. After receiving threats, we had to be escorted to our car. Quick history-we used to fish there almost every Saturday but due to constant hook ups with great whites we stopped fishing there for over a month. They were a nuisance.not what we were after. Like I said we use all mono leaders there. Any shark with teeth (gws makos) bite right through in a matter of seconds which is why the first 20 minutes of this ordeal we didn’t think it was a shark. It would have bit through.yes we target sharks.threshers soup fins leopards shovel nose.all of which pose no threat to people and all of which are unable to bite through our mono leader.

People hear shark and they automatically think we were targeting whites. Its not true and its perfectly legal to fish for those other species using the  methods we use. In  no way what so ever did we intend to cause harm to anybody in the water.While fishing there previous times groups of long distance swimmers would stop right in front of the pier, pull on our lines.and float there for as long as 10 minutes. We had told them numerous times we were fishing for sharks and it might not be safe. They would laugh like we were crazy.that video on you tube,  which by the way was not ours, and there were over 50 people on the pier for this incident. You will  hear joking and laughing. A comment was made about them seeing this shark and finally realize they’re  there. No we didn’t hold it there on purpose and there was nothing we could do to stop it. Even if we cut our line that shark still had a hook in its mouth and was still gonna be upset.

With at least 175 yards of line attached to it if we did cut it it would have been bad for the shark and any swimmer in the area.all that line out there could easily tangle around any swimmer or object in the water and result in injury to the wading public or the shark. The intentions were to bring the shark as close as possible then cut the line to reduce risk of injury due to the length of attached line in the water. I no way what so ever did we intend for this tragic accident to happen.   In no way what so ever did we intend to purposely endanger the i said we cleared the beach of swimmers and surfers.and as soon as the long distance swimmers were close enough to warn they were warned also.we didn’t chum the waters.for what We fish for there’s no need to chum.and we didn’t have anything to chum with anyways. We most definitely  didn’t use that 30 ft of wynch cable with a water bottle and marlin trolling lure that was brought in to the city council meeting that day. That’s preposterous to even think such a thing.we were fishing off a pier not deep sea trolling.that cable obviously had never even seen the water ever and was clearly a setup to fool the city council into thinking it was ours.

Absurd to even think something like that could be used off a pier.all 3 of us have fishing licenses and are well aware of the rules and regulations.were not ignorant hooligans from out of town who dont care about your city.we pay for parking and shop at your stores while were there just like everyone else.when we get to the pier we clean up any messes left by ppl who were there over night.we set up a kids swimming pool that we fill with mackeral and sardines for kids to come see and play with.when youth come by with their parents and want to try fishing we hand them a pole to try out.we interact with the public there in a very positive manner.we enjoy what we do and try to share it with others. Manhattan pier is one of the nicest piers in so cal and that’s why we fished there. Never had a problem with one person at all. We don’t drink alcohol or do drugs.We don’t tag the pier and we don’t try to scare people out there. We enjoy the atmosphere just like everyone else.i want to get into ideas that can hopefully prevent something like this from happening again.ill start with the sinks.those sinks are there for anglers to gut and clean there fish.sometimes very big fish.all the blood and guts that go into that sink drains directly into the water directly under the pier.We didn’t build those sinks.The city did. Maybe they should drain some where else. I am not a plumber so i cant fix that myself. That’s something the city needs to about enforcing the clearance the swimmers should stay from the pier. There’s plenty of ocean to swim in. All we have is the pier to fish on. Every other pier has a boundary that swimmers are to stay from the pier and its enforced but not here.

How about putting some signs up warning the public that there are dangerous sharks in the water. It’s sad that people nowadays need to be warned bout such things but that’s the society we live in. Once again that’s not the anglers job. How about installing some kind of warning system at the end of the  pier.a loud horn or even a phone that goes directly to the lifeguard stands.once again not the anglers job.If there was such a warning system maybe this could have been prevented.Those sharks are there. There is nothing you can do about it. That’s where they live. Instead of blaming the anglers for this incident lets look at ways we can prevent something like this from happening again. Banning fishing is not going to make the sharks leave.a few days after this no fishing ban was implemented great whites were spotted at the pier again. With not one angler out there.

To say these animals are gentle docile creatures is absurd. These are sharks.wild animals that can not be controlled. On the very same day in San Luis Obisbo county a surfer was laying on his board when a 8 to 10 great white slammed him off his board and bit the board in half.


He was able to get away safely. There was no one fishing anywhere near him.same sz great whites that are frequenting Manhattan beach. Open your eyes. The public is in danger and it has nothing to do with fishing. This ban should be immediately lifted and other restrictions should be imposed to protect the swimming public. This doesn’t fall on my shoulders . Everyone is so quick to blame me and fishing.Just  because I don’t live there and I got a few tattoos and my past ain’t as pretty as some other people doesn’t mean any of this is my fault.I want to thank you for your time in reading this and considering other actions than banning fishing” .by Jason Hagemann-the fisherman

So there you have it gang. No gigantic hooks, no steel cable, no winch, NO broken laws, no illegal activity, nada. Yet the media never once mentioned THAT THE FISHERMAN CLEARED THE BEACH and aided the ailing swimmer on the beach, and profusely apologized. The scumbags in the media would have us believe the fisherman were sadistic creeps getting their jollies off of someone getting attacked by a shark. NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH. Then again since when did the truth and the mainstream media stop being mutually exclusive terms?

So here we get to the meat and potatoes of the issue. First, in the interest of public safety, swimming, diving and surfing should be banned in shark infested waters, not fishing. I believe the greatest threat to public safety in Manhattan Beach right now is the city’s denial of reality. The fact is these sharks DO ATTACK unprovoked and we have children swimming in those waters while the fisherman are sent home.

Fishing is a protected right written into every beach city’s tideland grant spelling out the State Constitution article I section 25. It was done so as the right to feed yourself was and is one that is tantamount to being a free society.

When I placed a public records request over the phone for a copy of the city’s tideland grant, I was told over the phone that it would take 10 days to have it emailed to me. I then personally visited the City Clerk’s office and requested to personally inspect the document and was told that the documents were not ready nor were they available. The truth of the matter is that I pulled one up within about 16 seconds off of the State Land Commission’s website subsequent to my request. The Department of Fish and Wildlife as well as the  Coastal commission are not comfortable with 60 days CDP being used for a fishing ban and neither are we. A CDP has never been used for banning a perfectly legal activity like fishing unless there was construction going on in or around an affected area. I was rather shocked myself when I looked over the city’s staff report. 

I would like to remind all involved in city government that what I have read regarding your plans sounds eerily familiar. Here is some history from 20 years ago.
From 1993 to 1996, the City of Newport Beach under the direction of the acting city manager Kevin Murphy, embarked on a plan that ultimately led to his demise. It was a long term plan to snuff out the out of town visitors to the city’s piers so they could be developed. It involved the city attorney cooking up section 11.20.060 of the municipal code:
The city manager in cahoots with the city attorney then bamboozled the city council into adopting it.  They wanted to make, of all things, fishing illegal on all or part of the piers ostensibly to accommodate merchants. 

In reality, there were plans to develop the piers, bulldoze homes, eliminate beach access by eliminating public parking and redevelop part of the Balboa Peninsula. It would have involved busing or trollying in vistors while removing public parking.  At the same time I watched parking meters come out down Balboa Blvd when the sewer pipes were replaced and not get put back until I made a call to the Coastal Commission. There had been no hearing or permits pulled to eliminate public parking yet the red curbs went in anyway. 

After much intimidation by law enforcement and strange unannounced personal visits to my home, on one very stormy and rainy February evening, I decided to draw the line in the sand. At the  2-26-96 Newport Beach City Council meeting I arrived and in hand, I called their bluff with a letter drafted and ready to be mailed to the acting Attorney General at the time, Dan Lungren. I also had copies ready to go to General Counsel at the State Lands commission along with my rep in the State Assembly at that time, Jim Morrissey, to begin the process of the possibility of a partial or full revocation of the city’s tideland grant if the fishing ban was enacted.

It could have turned Newport into a state beach. Newport officials have never implemented the illegal portions of the ordinance nor will they ever. The city manager shortly thereafter resigned and the fishing on the piers, the homes and parking down the center of Balboa Blvd still remain to this day.

The Manhattan Beach pier is built on State property below the high tide line which consists of submerged tidelands which through legislative enactment were deeded from the State to the City to be held in Public Trust. The beaches as well, are tidelands which are State property currently deeded to the city in an agreement subject to revocation if the public trust is violated. Expressly written into the grant is the State Constitution’s provision reserving in the people the absolute right to fish. Many beach cities are a dichotomy with both State and City beaches and consequently have NEVER attempted to cross the line. The City can restrict access to fisherman on the pier but the access has to be restricted to everyone. The City needs to work with the appropriate regulatory agencies where preemption exists in terms of gear restrictions and only as a last resort.

Jurisdiction is key here. A possible no take area of sharks in the form of a type of SMCA, combined with municipal code restrictions on steel leaders, line test and hook sizes coupled with a 100 yard buffer zone all around the pier banning swimming, diving, and boating will solve the problem. Any attempts at banning fishing must be accomplished via a Constitutional amendment. The city has absolutely no legal grounds to stand on when it comes to banning fishing. This in not my legal opinion but rather established fact.

The United States is a Constitutional Republic and by nature is a nation of laws. This very fact is directly responsible for the continued gainful employment of taxpayer funded city staff whose sole purpose is to navigate and enforce these laws.

I will never forget some 40 years ago, as an 8 year old boy, we would arrive at the Balboa pier around 3:30 am so that we would get a spot at the end. I will never forget the hundreds of dirt poor farm workers and immigrant laborers that lined the rails along side myself in eager anticipation of some of the most incredible runs of pelagics in the world where literally thousands of fish were caught in a matter of a few hours. At the time, the runs seemed if they would never end. They would fill buckets to take back to the other farm workers to supplement their diets as they could not afford to buy meat.

Things have changed I know. We don’t see runs like that anymore. Sadly, socioeconomically for many in our society things have not changed.

What  remains the same is the fact that the right to fish is an absolute right clearly being  preempted at the state level being subject to the terms and conditions that the legislature deems necessary. This puts the City Council at the back of the bus. The city must tread carefully on its plans. I don’t believe that the city is being upfront with what are viable solutions are much like Newport  Beach was guilty of some 20 years ago where general services and law enforcement were intentionally called off, abandoning maintenance and refusing to cite violators as a pretext to manufacture a public health and safety crisis to package and deliver to the council a bogus, illegal, unenforceable section of the municipal code that ended the career of a city manager.

Realtors and huge developers were behind it then. They tried to railroad the fisherman out of town which would have been followed by the public at large. It didn’t work then and it won’t work now.

The fact is that the public in Manhattan Beach is in more danger now than ever before because there is a false sense of security being promulgated by city staff and the media. The idea that banning fishing will keep the sharks away is like the idea that banning umbrellas will keep the rain away.

When city officials blatantly ignore laws such as is in this case and the media fails to report it as such, there is no end to how far the envelope will be pushed.

There is nothing new under the sun ladies and gentlemen. Government must be kept on a short leash or they will eventually put all of us on one. Just a thought and hoping all involved will do the right thing. Our best goes out to Mr. Robles who in my opinion, should file a lawsuit against the city for not warning him that he was entering shark infested waters and they are shark infested waters folks-ask the biologist at the end of the pier.


The Increasing Number Of Suspected Police Abuse Incidents Caught On Video Is Becoming A Real Problem For Both Our Police Departments And Our Society As Well. Why Incidents Like The Kelly Thomas Beating Death By Police In Fullerton California Will Not Go Away?

I report you decide-By Barry Levinson.



The Increasing Number Of Suspected Police Abuse Incidents Caught On Video Is Becoming A Real Problem For Both Our Police Departments And Our Society As Well.
Why Incidents Like The Kelly Thomas Beating Death By Police In
Fullerton California Will Not Go Away?

Police Chiefs around this country tell us repeatedly how well trained the members of their departments are and how they believe their departments are one of the best in the country.

FPD's Dan Hughes

FPD’s Dan Hughes

Yet every time we witness via live taping of a police civilian contact gone terribly wrong, almost never is the officer criminally or even civilly held to account for their actions.

download (1)


They are put on paid administrative leave, which means a fully paid vacation for months or even up to a year or more while the police hierarchy and/or the DA investigates the incident. Then almost always the officer’s actions are found to be “reasonable” and they are back at their jobs fully refreshed from their extended paid vacations.

download (2)

Yes many times, we might hear that the officer will receive additional training as if every bad act by a police officer can be fixed by attending one or more classes. If an officer likes to hurt people, training will do absolutely nothing to stop his bad behavior. If the officer has the wrong temperament or lacks the necessary common sense to deal rationally with the public, training will do absolutely nothing to change that officer’s bad behavior.

images (21)

If someone is asked to sit down by an officer and he/she refuses does that give the officer the right to put that person’s life in danger? It is clear that too many police officers like the power and authority they have over the average citizen and yes have an extremely low bar before they escalate a confrontation from words to physical violence.

images (18)

I for one, if asked to sit down or stand up or even get on my knees would obey the officer out of both respect and fear that this officer might use any minor excuse to physically assault me.

images (5)

But there are those citizens who do not automatically listen to commands barked by an officer and want to know why they are being detained and want an answer before considering obeying an officer’s command.

There are situations that are not easy for the police. Non-obeying suspects are a challenge to them. But a situation where a non-violent suspect does not obey a verbal order, grounds to put someone in the hospital or worse. I do not think so.

The headline above asked if the police are more violent today then in the past. I do not know that answer. But I do know that more and more suspected police abuse has been caught on citizen’s smart phone cameras now.

I also know that laws such as POBAR, the Police Officers Bill of Rights in California that hides the records of bad police officer’s from the general public and everyone else but the police chiefs does not help the situation one little bit.

download (3)


Finally, obvious cases of police officers using excessive force and not being punished, criminally, civilly or even suspended without pay for their actions, has given the bad officer a virtual green light to continue to mete out their form of street justice to an unsuspecting public.

images (3)

See these fists?

Therefore, the real problem may not be whether there is more police abuse now than in the past. The real problem may be that the criminal justice system is ill-equipped to rein in and properly punish those bad officer’s acts.

images (4)


It is clear that a growing segment of the public has become aware of this problem and it could become dangerous for our society to test the public’s patience on this matter.

images (6)



I REPORT, YOU DECIDE.  Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson


This Tuesday evening at 5:30 PM, the North Orange County Community College Board will meet to consider approving a $574 million dollar bond issue, which the proponents say will be primarily used to revamp two Veteran’s Buildings within its facilities.

First, over a half billion dollars for two buildings should in and of itself sound warning bells for all taxpayers throughout all of North Orange County.

Second, if the language of the bond is not specific, the Community College Board could spend the money on items not having anything to do with the Veterans.

Third, do you want to give some bureaucrats the power to have over a half billion additional dollars at their disposal to spend probably at their own discretion. I for one say absolutely not.


The current N.O.C.C.D Chancellor Dr. Ned Doffoney EARNS$240,000 PER YEAR + BENEFITS AND EXPENSES


Fourth, we demand accountability, transparency and a concern for spending every dollar of our tax money wisely and carefully. Giving the Community College that much money would not be a smart move by the North Orange County taxpayers.

Welcome from the NOCCCD
Board of Trustees.

M. Tony Ontiveros

Vice President

Trustee Area 7 

Michael Matsuda
Trustee Area 5 

Dr. Barbara Dunsheath

Trustee Area 1

Leonard Lahtinen

Trustee Area 2


Molly McClanahan
Trustee Area 4

Donna Miller 

One should look to past bond issues to determine if we can trust these bureaucrats to carry out their promises.

Well in March of 2002, by a slim margin, the voters approved a $239 million dollar bond issue for the North Orange County Community College District, which governs Cypress College and Fullerton College It was called Measure X. Among the projects that would benefit from this bond issues were multimillion-dollar improvements to child development centers on the campuses that served preschool children of Fullerton and Cypress students and the communities at large.

This is what actually happened according to a story written by Dana Parsons of the Los Angeles Times on June 8, 2005. The existing Child Development Center in Cypress center closed in 2003, the year following the passage of the bond measure.  In 2005, two years after the bond approval, significant cutbacks were proposed for the existing Fullerton center. According to the news story, neither center got Measure X money.

Chancellor Dr. Jerome Hunter 2000-2008

Chancellor Dr. Jerome Hunter 2000-2008

Name Job Title/Employer/Pension Pension Benefits Disability Years of
Year of
Total pension &
benefits amount
Jerome Hunter Employer: NORTH ORANGE COUNTY CCD
Pension: CalSTRS, 2013
$198,600.00 N/A $0.00 33.36 2008 $198,600.00

This above can be explained in only one of two ways.   Either the bureaucrats misinformed the voters, or they were totally incompetent or some of both.

Show up at this Tuesday’s Board meeting to tell those bureaucrats that we reject their attempt to use our great Veterans as a ploy to get their hands on over a half billion of our tax dollars.

Meeting Location:








Name Job title Regular pay Overtime pay Other pay Total
Total pay &
VURDIEN, RAMALINGUM President, Fullerton College
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$199,079.01 $0.00 $19,682.17 $23,419.15 $242,180.33
WU, JO WEN Instructor, Biological Science
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$164,241.28 $0.00 $2,026.66 $16,847.62 $183,115.56
DU BOIS, TONI M Vice President, Student Svs
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$156,877.58 $0.00 $4,946.68 $19,394.44 $181,218.70
GIUGNI, TERRENCE D Vice President, Instruction
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$156,877.58 $0.00 $4,346.68 $19,344.90 $180,569.16
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$108,366.89 $44,272.95 $2,007.24 $19,428.62 $174,075.70
WILLOUGHBY, DAN E Div Dean, Humanities
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$146,092.28 $0.00 $3,901.16 $23,849.85 $173,843.29
JENSEN, ROBERT R Div Dean, Fine Arts
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$140,785.84 $0.00 $3,901.16 $23,877.77 $168,564.77
MC KENZIE, SCOTT V Div Dean, Technology/Engr
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$140,785.84 $0.00 $3,901.16 $23,877.77 $168,564.77
TESAR, DANIEL M Div Dean, Social Sciences
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$140,785.84 $0.00 $3,901.16 $23,877.77 $168,564.77
HOVEY, ANN G Div Dean, Business/CIS
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$145,280.96 $0.00 $3,920.30 $19,033.31 $168,234.57
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$137,811.75 $0.00 $10,383.40 $19,580.09 $167,775.24
GREENHALGH, MARK Div Dean, Math/Computer Sci
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$143,676.70 $0.00 $3,901.16 $19,921.67 $167,499.53
SEE, ROGER W Instructor, Phys Educ, Men
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$131,533.58 $0.00 $15,771.17 $19,506.62 $166,811.37
WILSON, MARCUS S Instructor, Business
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$144,979.56 $0.00 $2,076.68 $19,486.07 $166,542.31
MIRANDA, ROBERT Dean, Student Support Services
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$138,397.27 $0.00 $3,813.92 $22,975.34 $165,186.53
SANABRIA, ROLANDO E Instructor, Student Success
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$144,587.77 $0.00 $1,876.82 $17,790.18 $164,254.77
CAMPBELL, LISA P Dean, Counseling/Student Devel
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$140,785.84 $0.00 $3,971.74 $18,559.43 $163,317.01
PRICE, RHETT J Instructor, Phys Educ, Men
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$129,504.92 $0.00 $14,172.33 $18,577.59 $162,254.84
ABUTIN, ALBERT R Dean, Admissions/Records
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$134,296.46 $0.00 $3,900.93 $21,140.91 $159,338.30
NOLAN-RIEGLE, MARY C Instructor, Biological Science
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$133,456.31 $0.00 $1,976.74 $23,114.33 $158,547.38
MUMMERY, FRANCIS D Instructor, Economics
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$137,391.44 $0.00 $1,857.30 $18,212.24 $157,460.98
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$130,812.98 $0.00 $2,458.58 $22,448.41 $155,719.97
ZARSKE, CINDY D Instructor, Mathematics
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$134,641.96 $0.00 $2,007.24 $17,997.78 $154,646.98
COMBS, JENNIFER E Instructor, Student Developmt
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$133,793.21 $0.00 $1,976.74 $17,335.36 $153,105.31
MC ALLISTER, GEORGE A Instructor, Accounting
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$139,145.36 $0.00 $1,896.34 $11,935.96 $152,977.66
WOLL, GREGORY R Instructor, Music
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$120,121.52 $0.00 $9,196.72 $22,609.83 $151,928.07
GILES, SCOTT L Instructor, Phys Educ, Men
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$120,021.21 $0.00 $12,765.57 $18,701.41 $151,488.19
YIMENU, TILAHUN Instructor, Chemistry
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$131,292.11 $0.00 $2,029.21 $18,066.17 $151,387.49
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$126,594.79 $0.00 $2,213.70 $22,046.17 $150,854.66
KRESSE, DOUGLAS J Instructor, Speech
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$124,538.72 $0.00 $7,901.43 $17,650.53 $150,090.68
BYRNES, TIMOTHY A Instructor, Phys Educ, Men
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$116,818.37 $0.00 $15,447.40 $17,528.85 $149,794.62
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$110,716.97 $11,635.44 $2,213.70 $24,842.27 $149,408.38
AGUIRRE, YOLANDA Temporary Counselor/Cal Works
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$126,760.26 $0.00 $11,054.38 $11,245.92 $149,060.56
QUIRK, SHAWN C Instructor, English
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$128,642.57 $0.00 $1,957.26 $18,128.45 $148,728.28
PLETT, STEPHEN L Instructor, Mathematics
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$127,993.18 $0.00 $2,147.24 $18,474.43 $148,614.85
KYLE, DIANA J Instructor, Psychology
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$128,624.76 $0.00 $1,857.30 $17,471.64 $147,953.70
BYDE, ROBERT W Instructor, Psychology
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$123,478.50 $0.00 $2,076.68 $22,299.41 $147,854.59
DORADO, DAVID A Instructor, Health Education
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$128,436.79 $0.00 $1,907.24 $17,477.61 $147,821.64
CHAMBERLIN, WILLIAM S Instructor, Earth Sciences
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$127,004.19 $0.00 $1,926.78 $18,383.29 $147,314.26
LOZINSKY, RICHARD P Instructor, Earth Sciences
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$128,586.19 $0.00 $2,581.16 $16,034.65 $147,202.00
SALAS, RICARDO Instructor, Political Science
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$128,340.02 $0.00 $1,957.26 $16,793.44 $147,090.72
LOPEZ, CONNIE C Instructor, Cosmetology
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$127,966.86 $0.00 $1,957.26 $17,103.69 $147,027.81
TEBAY, JOHN C Instructor, Music
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$112,602.90 $0.00 $16,819.85 $17,401.57 $146,824.32
ST JOHN, PAUL R Instructor, Accounting
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$123,068.19 $0.00 $1,882.17 $21,783.77 $146,734.13
HOYT-HEYDON, PAMELA A Instructor, Dramatic Arts
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$116,467.88 $0.00 $12,376.11 $17,347.67 $146,191.66
LARSEN, CHRIS Instructor, Mathematics
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$126,453.43 $0.00 $1,907.24 $17,206.69 $145,567.36
SHIER, CAROL G Instructor, Reading
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$122,237.91 $0.00 $2,007.24 $21,313.29 $145,558.44
LEE, SCOTT Counselor/Articulation Officer
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$95,629.52 $28,749.89 $2,159.50 $18,976.89 $145,515.80
BUI, MINH Q Instructor, Mathematics
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$125,937.88 $0.00 $2,066.40 $17,246.43 $145,250.71
CRAIG, DALE A Instructor, CIS
North Orange Community College District, 2013
$120,463.21 $0.00 $1,907.24 $22,036.64 $144,407.09







‘I think it is both fitting and appropriate that I am penning this article on the 4th of July, Independence Day.

Councilmember Fitzgerald’s June 30, 2014 article entitled “Fullerton Councilmember Responds: New COIN Ordinance Has Teeth” is referring to my last article about C.O.I.N. dated June 25, 2014 without mentioning my name. She states that Supervisor Moorlach’s five components are in the Fullerton ordinance. She conveniently ignores every specific fact comparison I make for each of the 5 components. How is that responding to my very real concerns that the Fullerton ordinance will not make any major improvements to the transparency, timeliness and accountability of Fullerton’s labor negotiation process?

Let us first start out with the keys to a good C.O.I.N. ordinance. The keys are transparency, openness, timeliness and accountability. Let us take up that subject as it may relate to Ms. Fitzgerald. Let us go to her byline entitled ”About the Author”. She tells you “she serves on the Board of Directors for the Association of California Cities-Orange County Chapter and the Orange County Taxpayers Association and is a Past President of the Fullerton Chamber of Commerce.” Yet she leaves out what she does for a living and who is her current employer. Why would she not tell the audience how she earns a living? So I will tell you. She is currently Vice President of Curt Pringle and Associates which describes themselves on their Facebook page as follows:

Curt Pringle & Associates is a full-service public relations, public affairs and government relations firm, providing a wide range of services to both private and public sector clients.

General Information
The Curt Pringle & Associates team works collaboratively to maximize our knowledge, expertise and experience in tailoring a comprehensive strategy to fit the client’s specific goals, resources and abilities.

While we are perhaps best known for our governmental advocacy efforts, employing an extensive breadth of relationships with elected and appointed officials throughout southern California and at the State Capitol*, we are also well versed in the areas of land use entitlement, public outreach, crisis communications and media relations, and have produced substantial benefits in each of these fields for numerous clients.”

I would very much like Councilmember Fitzgerald to tell us why she left out this very important detail in describing herself. I would say what one does for a living could have a direct impact on various public policy positions especially when that is her business as VP of Curt Pringle and Associates as well as her elected obligation and duty as Fullerton Councilmember as well. Could it be that this is the very reason why Ms. Fitzgerald failed to mention her executive position with Curt Pringle and Associates?

There is an excellent quote whose author I do not know. The quote is as follows:

“You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts.”

It simply means that you are entitled to any opinion without the boundaries of accuracy, factuality, or even sanity. Facts by the very definition of the word, does not allow you to have your own set of facts simply because you are not the arbiter of those facts like you are with your own opinions. I know politicians wish that they could have their own set of facts and many times act like they are entitled to have their own set of facts. However, I am here to tell them unequivocally that they do not have that right if they also want to be honest communicators of the truth.

Therefore, Ms. Fitzgerald certainly is entitled to her opinions but she is certainly not entitled to her own brand of facts.

My earlier article took the five major components of a good C.O.I.N ordinance and found shortcomings in the just passed counterfeit CO.I.N. ordinance thanks to the yes votes by Mayor Chaffee and Councilmembers Fitzgerald and Flory.

It is interesting that for each specific shortcoming that I factually pointed out, Ms. Fitzgerald did not address directly any of them. I would call that rather non-responsive.

For instance, let us give the reader two examples starting with component No. 1 Independent Negotiator. This is part of what I wrote as follows:

“Under Moorlach’s component, an independent negotiator is a requirement for all negotiations.  Under Fullerton ordinance Section B.1. Principal Negotiator second paragraph states as follows: “The requirement for an outside negotiator may be waived by a majority vote of City Council.”
Therefore, since the current council put this out clause into the ordinance they must want to be able to waive the independent negotiator requirement at their convenience with a simple majority vote. If a majority of our current council wanted a truly independent process there would be no language in the ordinance to allow for the independent negotiator’s status to be tampered with by this council or for any future council as well.
Ms. Fitzgerald did not address this critical fact in her response.

For Component No. 2., Cost of Contracts, I wrote the following:

“Under Moorlach’s component the independently elected Auditor-Controller reviews the costs of proposed contracts and provides the information to all parties and the public before any contractual finalization can take place.”  In the Fullerton version it states at A.1., Annual Analysis of Costs and Liabilities, second paragraph, as follows: “The annual fiscal analysis shall be submitted to the City’s independent auditor during the course of the annual City financial audit.” Under Fullerton law, there is no requirement to provide this information prior to the signing of the labor negotiation contracts, relegating the independent auditor’s information basically worthless because the public does not receive it in a timely manner.  Therefore, the second component’s only purpose is not carried out under the Fullerton law.”
Ms. Fitzgerald failed to address this critical point as well. To use her vernacular….CHECKMATE!

I would also like to make one very important observation. I have been regularly attending Fullerton council meetings since early 2010. In those 4.5 years, any agenda item that even had the hint of potentially reducing union power, control and especially their salaries and benefits of their members always resulted in many, many city employees attending and speaking out at those meetings. Not one city employee, not one union president or member spoke out against the recently passed Counterfeit C.O.I.N. ordinance. Ladies and gentlemen doesn’t that tell you all you really need to know about which version of C.O.I.N., the Costa Mesa version or the Fullerton version is going to work best for the taxpayers of Fullerton.

In conclusion, Ms. Fitzgerald is certainly entitled to her opinions, but she is not entitled to her own facts. Unfortunately, we the people of Fullerton believed her when she told us that she would support an effective C.O.I.N. ordinance for the city of Fullerton. Now we know her opinion about C.O.I.N., and now the reader knows the facts.
Post Script: What is truly sad is that Ms. Fitzgerald as well as Ms. Flory and Mr. Chaffee will be asked to account for these and other shortcomings in the Fullerton ordinance in upcoming Fullerton city council meetings by the public and they will most likely not respond to any of the public’s questions. Is this the kind of government that our forefathers envisioned or is this the kind of government they feared might materialize while the public was not closely watching our city leaders?





I report you decide- BY BARRY LEVINSON

On Tuesday evening, Council Member Bruce Whitaker explained with great specificity why he would be voting against the Fullerton Counterfeit C.O.I.N. ordinance.



Council Member Jennifer Fitzgerald,who appears to have taken up the role of an attack dog for the City of Fullerton’s power structure, immediately responded as follows: “You are absolutely wrong.” However, she did not address one of the many specific points that Mr. Whitaker spoke to about the deficiencies in our version of C.O.I.N.  Ms. Fitzgerald it is so, so easy for you to say you are absolutely wrong. If you were a member of a debate team you would receive a failing grade of F. Let me proceed with Ms. Fitzgerald’s remarks. “It follows in the path of C.O.I.N.” Mr. Whitaker explained exactly why it does not follow in the path of C.O.I.N. as represented by the Costa Mesa law. Let me provide you with one last quote from Ms. Fitzgerald. “We are not far enough along in this reform to quibble about these small, little differences.”

Again, Ms. Fitzgerald offers no words of substance, no factual support for her conclusions whatsoever.

Once again, she casts her vote with the two status quo council members, Chaffee and Flory and turns her back on her supposed natural allies, Whitaker and Sebourn as well as the people of Fullerton.  In fact, except for some 5 to 0 votes, I do not believe that Ms. Fitzgerald has ever cast her vote in agreement with Mr. Whitaker on any substantive issue.  What does that tell you folks about Ms. Fitzgerald?

In my opinion, her comments at the July 15, 2014 council meeting were a purely political ploy, which should not be surprising based on her chosen profession as political consultant.  Only now when she speaks she has the backing of her new employer, the consulting firm of Curt Pringle and Associates. I wonder how many Fullerton voters who cast their ballot for Ms. Fitzgerald in 2012, are lamenting their decisions.

Ms. Fitzgerald did plenty of damage to her already eroding credibility by her unsubstantiated statements above.  However, she further damaged her reputation by the following comment.

According Ms. Fitzgerald, Council member Bruce Whitaker is against the Fullerton version of C.O.I.N. because it was not his idea. Ms. Fitzgerald did you not hear Mr. Whitaker’s eloquently provided specific reasons not to be in favor of the Fullerton Counterfeit version of C.O.I.N. just a few minutes before your personal attack? It seems to me that you have a real problem responding to facts presented by opposing positions.

I guess your love for Fullerton Ms. Fitzgerald does not extend to all your fellow council members. You had absolutely no excuse for your behavior toward Council member Whitaker. An apology from you at the next council meeting would be most appropriate. After all, your comments fell way below any basic standards of decency and respect that you should always demonstrate to all your fellow council members.

Barry Levinson






Park and Recreation Committee met last night and voted to approve the installation of an AT&T cell tower in Richman Park, a few feet away from the St Jude Medical Clinic and adjacent to the Richman Elementary School.

download (2)

The final vote was 4 for approval, 1 abstention and 1 rejection. The vote broke down as follows:

Wayne Carvalho, Vice-Chair 
(appointed by Greg Sebourn) Yes

Erin Haselton 
(appointed by Jennifer Fitzgerald) Yes

Jesus Silva 
(appointed by Jan Flory) Yes

Scott Stanford 
(appointed at-large) Yes

Karen Lang-McNabb 
(appointed by Doug Chaffee) Abstained

Barry Levinson, Chair
(appointed by Bruce Whitaker) No

Ladies and gentleman, it was approved despite the collection of 365 neighborhood citizen signatures telling the city that it does not want the cell tower to be installed. The committee was told that this neighborhood group only learned about this cell tower a week ago and that they were still actively collecting signatures and that more would be forthcoming. All public comments from the citizens, five in all were against the construction of the cell tower. No one from the public was for the cell tower.

It was also approved despite the fact that AT&T has not provided a contract document to the city. At my urging a similar document was provided as an example. We learned that the specifics of the cell tower equipment is not included in any contractual document but handled off line by the Park and Recreation Department.

The standard language in these cell tower contracts was somewhat troubling in a few key areas. For instance, it states under the Section entitled Use, the following: 
”The Premises may be used by the Lessee” (that would be cell tower provider), “for any lawful activity in connection with the provision of wireless communications services by the Lessee.” According to the engineering study conducted for AT&T, the cell tower in question is “one percent of the applicable public exposure limit”. So under this standard language contract they could presumably increase the exposure almost 100 times and still be within the “legal” FCC limits according to the study. All this can be done without every being reviewed again by the Parks and Recreation Committee or the Fullerton City Council. I noted last night that this contractual language was not acceptable to me. Apparently, it was acceptable to everyone else as I was the only no vote.

I also asked if the council would be given a copy of the AT&T contract prior to their vote to approve the cell tower. The answer was that it is not provided in their agenda package because it is a standard contract approved many years ago by a former council.

I found all of the above unacceptable as I believe we were voting on an agenda item based on only verbal assurances by AT&T and very little else.

Now ladies and gentleman, I have not even yet raised the part that is most concerning to many others and me. It is the potential health risks that most of the public comment speakers addressed. Joe Imbriano, administrator of even gave the council copies of several recent studies that detail the health risks of cell towers to the surrounding community.

Yet despite all of this, I was the only commissioner who voted against this agenda item. So now it goes before the city council for final approval. Unless all of us go to that meeting (it has not been put on the agenda as of yesterday) I suspect this cell tower will be approved.

Before the vote, I offered an alternative motion that the vote be delayed one month until our next meeting. At that time I recommended that AT&T could provide us with the proposed contract, the neighborhood group could provide the city with its final tally of all those against the project and members of the public could address the committee with a formal presentation of their concerns about the placement of this cell tower. The committee voted down that alternative motion.

I asked the members of the Park and Recreation Department present along with the other five committee members, what is the purpose of reviewing this cell tower proposal, if we do not have a contract and by law (the FCC) we are not to consider the health risks of our children and their parents that have been claimed by dozens if not 100′s of scientific studies throughout the world. Not surprisingly, no one provided me with an answer.

One last but vital point. Director Hugo Curiel reminded us that as a body we couldn’t consider the health effects of cell towers in making our decision to approve or reject the cell tower for Richman Park.

The FCC stands for the Federal Communications Commission. It has federal jurisdiction over interstate communications. Please tell me where such a group has the authority and the expertise to make it illegal to consider the potential negative and serious health effects of cell tower transmissions.

I for one stand tall and stand proud to state unequivocally that the FCC has no right to demand our silence on the issue of cell tower heath risks.

It was just another sad performance by people representing the city of Fullerton.  It was sad because every concern, i.e. the lack of a contract, the health concerns and the wishes of many of the neighborhood residents, all ignored by our Parks and Recreation Department and its committee.



Fullerton’s newest cell tower proposed in Richman park. Insert school kids for firemen, insert classrooms, school campuses and parks for fire stations. Stand with us to protect our children.


This one’s a doozy. It is going to be right next to Richman Elementary School, next to homes, in a park, towering right on top of The St. Jude Heritage Medical Group’s community health center. Get this-  The ATT rep told the parks and rec commission that it is ILLEGAL to consider health effects in their decision. What? Is she parroting possible disinformation based on a contorted preemption case out of San Diego? Maybe or maybe not. The San Diego Court ruling on preemption is very dicey. At any rate, the ATT rep agreed to come back in 30 days with a so called  “independent expert” to answer any questions regarding health effects and dangers to the public at the request of Parks and Recreation Commission.

So far, it appears that the commission has been bypassed, and it is set to be voted on by the council in July. WHERE IS THE DUE PROCESS AND THE ATT  EXPERT COMING OUT AND ANSWERING THE HEALTH CONCERN QUESTIONS?

Well it sure ain’t illegal to simply read and understand the health effects and say NO based on a proprietary business decision. We have enough wireless exposure gang. We don’t need another tower, especially where they want to place this one. Are school kids and neighbors worth three grand a month? They are worth a hell of a lot more than that to me folks.

It came as no surprise to me that it already has the blessing of The FSD’s Robert Pletka and the St Jude Heritage Medical Group’s president that I will not name here. I wonder if the parents at Richman know about this? How about the neighbors?  At least the parks and rec commission listened to me and agreed to review some more info and wait another 30 days before rubber stamping the proposal.


So what does the prestigious and respected organization- THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, SAFETY AND MEDICINE  think of sticking these wireless things on top of their employees firehouses humming away all day and night?






Position on the Health Effects from Radio Frequency/Microwave (RF/MW) Radiation in Fire Department Facilities from Base Stations for Antennas and Towers for the Conduction of Cell Phone Transmissions

The International Association of Fire Fighters’ position on locating cell towers commercial wireless infrastructure on fire department facilities, as adopted by its membership in August 2004 (1), is that the IAFF oppose the use of fire stations as base stations for towers and/or antennas for the conduction of cell phone transmissions until a study with the highest scientific merit and integrity on health effects of exposure to low-intensity RF/MW radiation is conducted and it is proven that such sitings are not hazardous to the health of our members.


Further, the IAFF is investigating funding for a U.S. and Canadian study that would characterize exposures from RF/MW radiation in fire houses with and without cellular antennae, and examine the health status of the fire fighters as a function of their assignment in exposed or unexposed fire houses. Specifically, there is concern for the effects of radio frequency radiation on the central nervous system (CNS) and the immune system, as well as other metabolic effects observed in preliminary studies.

It is the belief of some international governments and regulatory bodies and of the wireless telecommunications industry that no consistent increases in health risk exist from exposure to RF/MW radiation unless the intensity of the radiation is sufficient to heat body tissue.  However, it is important to note that these positions are based on non-continuous exposures to the general public to low intensity RF/MW radiation emitted from wireless telecommunications base stations.  Furthermore, most studies that are the basis of this position are at least five years old and generally look at the safety of the phone itself.  IAFF members are concerned about the effects of living directly under these antenna base stations for a considerable stationary period of time and on a daily basis.  There are established biological effects from exposure to low-level RF/MW radiation.  Such biological effects are recognized as markers of adverse health effects when they arise from exposure to toxic chemicals for example. The IAFF’s efforts will attempt to establish whether there is a correlation between such biological effects and a health risk to fire fighters and emergency medical personnel due to the siting of cell phone antennas and base stations at fire stations and facilities where they work.


Critical questions concerning the health effects and safety of RF/MW radiation remain.  Accordingly, should we allow exposure of our fire fighters and emergency medical personnel to this radiation to continue for the next twenty years when there is ongoing controversy over many aspects of RF/MW health effects?  While no one disagrees that serious health hazards occur when living cells in the body are heated, as happens with high intensity RF/MW exposure (just like in a microwave oven), scientists are currently investigating the health hazards of low intensity RF/MW exposure. Low intensity RF/MW exposure is exposure which does not raise the temperature of the living cells in the body. 

Additionally, a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences panel designated power frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF/EMF) as “possible human carcinogens.” (2)  In March 2002 The International Association on Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization also assigned this designation to ELF/EMF in Volume 80 of its IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. (3)

Fixed antennas used for wireless telecommunications are referred to as cellular base stations, cell stations, PCS (“Personal Communications Service”) stations or telephone transmission towers. These base stations consist of antennas and electronic equipment. Because the antennas need to be high in the air, they are often located on towers, poles, water tanks, or rooftops. Typical heights for freestanding base station towers are 50-200 feet.

Some base stations use antennas that look like poles, 10 to 15 feet in length, that are referred to as “omni-directional” antennas. These types of antennas are usually found in rural areas. In urban and suburban areas, wireless providers now more commonly use panel or sector antennas for their base stations. These antennas consist of rectangular panels, about 1 by 4 feet in dimension. The antennas are usually arranged in three groups of three antennas each. One antenna in each group is used to transmit signals to wireless phones, and the other two antennas in each group are used to receive signals from wireless phones.

At any base station site, the amount of RF/MW radiation produced depends on the number of radio channels (transmitters) per antenna and the power of each transmitter.  Typically, 21 channels per antenna sector are available.  For a typical cell site using sector antennas, each of the three transmitting antennas could be connected to up to 21 transmitters for a total of 63 transmitters.  When omni-directional antennas are used, a cellular base station could theoretically use up to 96 transmitters. Base stations used for PCS communications generally require fewer transmitters than those used for cellular radio transmissions, since PCS carriers usually have a higher density of base station antenna sites.

The electromagnetic RF/MW radiation transmitted from base station antennas travel toward the horizon in relatively narrow paths. The individual pattern for a single array of sector antennas is wedge-shaped, like a piece of pie.  Cellular and PCS base stations in the United States are required to comply with limits for exposure recommended by expert organizations and endorsed by government agencies responsible for health and safety.  When cellular and PCS antennas are mounted on rooftops, RF/MW radiation levels on that roof or on others near by would be greater than those typically encountered on the ground.

The telecommunications industry claims cellular antennas are safe because the RF/MW radiation they produce is too weak to cause heating, i.e., a “thermal effect.” They point to “safety standards” from groups such as ANSI/IEEE or ICNIRP to support their claims. But these groups have explicitly stated that their claims of “safe RF/MW radiation exposure is harmless” rest on the fact that it is too weak to produce a rise in body temperature, a “thermal effect.” (4)

There is a large body of internationally accepted scientific evidence which points to the existence of non-thermal effects of RF/MW radiation. The issue at the present time is not whether such evidence exists, but rather what weight to give it.

Internationally acknowledged experts in the field of RF/MW radiation research have shown that RF/MW transmissions of the type used in digital cellular antennas and phones can have critical effects on cell cultures, animals, and people in laboratories and have also found epidemiological evidence (studies of communities, not in the laboratory) of serious health effects at “non-thermal levels,” where the intensity of the RF/MW radiation was too low to cause heating. They have found:

  • Increased cell growth of brain cancer cells (5)
  • A doubling of the rate of lymphoma in mice (6)
  • Changes in tumor growth in rats (7)
  • An increased number of tumors in rats (8)
  • Increased single- and double-strand breaks in DNA, our genetic material (9)
  • 2 to 4 times as many cancers in Polish soldiers exposed to RF (10)
  • More childhood leukemia in children exposed to RF (11)
  • Changes in sleep patterns and REM type sleep (12)
  • Headaches caused by RF/MW radiation exposure (13)
  • Neurologic changes (14) including:
    • Changes in the blood-brain-barrier (15)
    • Changes in cellular morphology (including cell death) (16)
    • Changes in neural electrophysiology (EEG) (17)
    • Changes in neurotransmitters (which affect motivation and pain perception) (18)
    • Metabolic changes (of calcium ions, for instance) (19)
    • Cytogenetic effects (which can affect cancer, Alzheimer’s, neurodegenerative diseases) (20)
  • Decreased memory, attention, and slower reaction time in school children (21)
  • Retarded learning in rats indicating a deficit in spatial “working memory” (22)
  • Increased blood pressure in healthy men (23)
  • Damage to eye cells when combined with commonly used glaucoma medications (24)


Many national and international organizations have recognized the need to define the true risk of low intensity, non-thermal RF/MW radiation exposure, calling for intensive scientific investigation to answer the open questions.  These include:

  • The World Health Organization, noting reports of “cancer, reduced fertility, memory loss, and adverse changes in the behavior and development of children.” (25)
  • The U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (26)
  • The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (27)
  • The Swedish Work Environmental Fund (28)
  • The National Cancer Institute (NCI) (29)
  • The European Commission (EC) (30)
  • New Zealand’s Ministry of Health (31)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (32)
  • Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization of Australia (CSIRO) (33)
  • The Royal Society of Canada expert group report prepared for Health Canada (34)
  • European Union’s REFLEX Project (Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods) (35)
  • The Independent Group on Electromagnetic Fields of the Swedish Radiation Protection Board (SSI) (36)
  • The United Kingdom’s National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) (37)
  • The EMF-Team Finland’s Helsinki Appeal 2005 (38)

Non-thermal effects are recognized by experts on RF/MW radiation and health to be potential health hazards.  Safe levels of RF/MW exposure for these low intensity, non-thermal effects have not yet been established.

The FDA has explicitly rejected claims that cellular phones are “safe.” (39)

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has stated repeatedly that the current (ANSI/IEEE) RF/MW safety standards protect only against thermal effects. (40)

Many scientists and physicians question the safety of exposure to RF/MW radiation. The CSIRO study, for example, notes that there are no clear cutoff levels at which low intensity RF/MW exposure has no effect, and that the results of ongoing studies will take years to analyze. (41)

Internationally, researchers and physicians have issued statements that biological effects from low-intensity RF/MW radiation exposure are scientifically established:

·         The 1998 Vienna-EMF Resolution (42)

·         The 2000 Salzburg Resolution on Mobile Telecommunication Base Stations (43)

·         The 2002 Catania Resolution (44)

·         The 2002 Freiburger Appeal (45)

·        The 2004 Report of the European Union’s REFLEX Project (Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods) (46)

·         The 2004 Second Annual Report from Sweden’s Radiation Protection Board (SSI) Independent Expert Group on Electromagnetic Fields Recent Research on Mobile Telephony and Health Risks (47)

·         Mobile Phones and Health 2004: Report by the Board of NRPB (The UK’s National Radiological Protection Board) (48)

The county of Palm Beach, Florida, the City of Los Angeles, California, and the country of New Zealand have all prohibited cell phone base stations and antennas near schools due to safety concerns.  The British Columbia Confederation of Parent Advisory Councils [BCCPAC] passed a resolution in 2003 banning cellular antennae from schools and school grounds. This organization is comparable to the Parent Teachers Association (PTA) in the United States.  The resolution was directed to B.C. Ministry of Education, B.C. Ministry of Children and Family Development, B.C. School Trustees Association, and B.C. Association of Municipalities.

US Government Information

In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has used safety guidelines for RF/MW radiation environmental exposure since 1985.

The FCC guidelines for human exposure to RF/MW radiation are derived from the recommendations of two organizations, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). In both cases, the recommendations were developed by scientific and engineering experts drawn from industry, government, and academia after extensive reviews of the scientific literature related to the biological effects of RF/MW radiation.

Many countries in Europe and elsewhere use exposure guidelines developed by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The ICNIRP safety limits are generally similar to those of the NCRP and IEEE, with a few exceptions. For example, ICNIRP recommends different exposure levels in the lower and upper frequency ranges and for localized exposure from certain products such as hand-held wireless telephones. Currently, the World Health Organization is working to provide a framework for international harmonization of RF/MW radiation safety standards.

In order to affirm conformity to standards regarding heating of tissue, measurements are time averaged over 0.1 hours [6 minutes].  This method eliminates any spikes in the readings.  Computer power bars have surge protectors to prevent damage to computers.  Fire fighters and emergency medical personnel do not!

The NCRP, IEEE, and ICNIRP all have identified a whole-body Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) value of 4 watts per kilogram (4 W/kg) as a threshold level of exposure at which harmful biological thermal effects due to tissue heating may occur.  Exposure guidelines in terms of field strength, power density and localized SAR were then derived from this threshold value. In addition, the NCRP, IEEE, and ICNIRP guidelines vary depending on the frequency of the RF/MW radiation exposure.  This is due to the finding that whole-body human absorption of RF/MW radiation varies with the frequency of the RF signal.  The most restrictive limits on whole-body exposure are in the frequency range of 30-300 MHz where the human body absorbs RF/MW energy most efficiently.  For products that only expose part of the body, such as wireless phones, exposure limits in terms of SAR only are specified.

Similarly, the exposure limits used by the FCC are expressed in terms of SAR, electric and magnetic field strength, and power density for transmitters operating at frequencies from 300 kHz to 100 GHz.  The specific values can be found in two FCC bulletins, OET Bulletins 56 and 65.

OET Bulletin 56, “Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” was designed to provide factual information to the public by answering some of the most commonly asked questions. It includes the latest information on FCC guidelines for human exposure to RF/MW radiation.  Further information and a downloadable version of Bulletin 56 can be found at:

OET Bulletin 65, “Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” was prepared to provide assistance in determining whether proposed or existing transmitting facilities, operations or devices comply with limits for human exposure to RF/MW radiation adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).  Further information and a downloadable version of Bulletin 65 can be found at:

The FCC authorizes and licenses products, transmitters, and facilities that generate RF and microwave radiation. It has jurisdiction over all transmitting services in the U.S. except those specifically operated by the Federal Government.  Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the FCC has certain responsibilities to consider whether its actions will significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Therefore, FCC approval and licensing of transmitters and facilities must be evaluated for significant impact on the environment.  Human exposure to RF radiation emitted by FCC-regulated transmitters is one of several factors that must be considered in such environmental evaluations. In 1996, the FCC revised its guidelines for RF/MW radiation exposure as a result of a multi-year proceeding and as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

For further information and answers to questions about the safety of RF/MW radiation from transmitters and facilities regulated by the FCC go to

Canadian Government Information

Industry Canada is the organization that sets regulatory requirements for electromagnetic spectrum management and radio equipment in Canada. Industry Canada establishes standards for equipment certification and, as part of these standards, developed RSS-102, which specifies permissible radiofrequency RF/MW radiation levels. For this purpose, Industry Canada adopted the limits outlined in Health Canada’s Safety-Code 6, which is a guideline document for limiting RF exposure.  A downloadable version of “RSS-102 – Evaluation Procedure for Mobile and Portable Radio Transmitters with respect to Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 for Exposure of Humans to Radio Frequency Fields”, as well as additional information can be found at:

Safety Code 6 specifies the requirements for the use of radiation emitting devices. This Code replaces the previous Safety Code 6 – EHD-TR-160.  A downloadable version of “Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3 kHz TO 300 GHz – Safety Code 6”, as well as further detailed information can be found at . 

US and Canadian Legal Issues

Although some local and state governments have enacted rules and regulations about human exposure to RF/MW radiation in the past, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires the United States Federal Government to control human exposure to RF/MW radiation.  In particular, Section 704 of the Act states that, “No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” Further information on federal authority and FCC policy is available in a fact sheet from the FCC’s Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at

In a recent opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge Stephen F. Williams, No. 03-1336 EMR Network v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, the Court upheld the FCC’s decision not to initiate an inquiry on the need to revise its regulations to address non-thermal effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation from the facilities and products subject to FCC regulation as EMR Network had requested in its September 2001 Petition for Inquiry.

At the request of the EMR Network, the EMR Policy Institute provided legal and research support for this appeal.  On January 13, 2005, a Petition for Rehearing en banc by the full panel of judges at the DC Circuit Court of Appeals was filed. Briefs, background documents and the DC Circuit decision are found at:

The Toronto Medical Officer of Health for the Toronto Board of Health recommended to Health Canada that public exposure limits for RF/MW radiation be made 100 times stricter; however the recommendation was not allowed, since, as in the US, only the Canadian federal government can regulate RF/MW radiation exposure level.

World Health Organization Efforts

In 1996, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the International EMF Project to review the scientific literature and work towards resolution of health concerns over the use of RF/MW technology.  WHO maintains a Web site that provides addition information on this project and about RF/MW biological effects and research.  For further information go to


For decades, the International Association of Fire Fighters has been directly involved in protecting and promoting the health and safety of our membership.  However, we simply don’t know at this time what the possible health consequences of long-term exposure to low-intensity RF/MW radiation of the type used by the cell phone base stations and antennas will be.  No one knows–the data just aren’t there.  The chairman of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection ICNIRP), one of the leading international organizations which formulated the current RF/MW radiation exposure guidelines, has stated that the guidelines include “no consideration regarding prudent avoidance” for health effects for which evidence is less than conclusive (49)

Again, fire department facilities, where fire fighters and emergency response personnel live and work are not the proper place for a technology which could endanger their health and safety

The only reasonable and responsible course is to conduct a study of the highest scientific merit and integrity on the RF/MW radiation health effects to our membership and, in the interim, oppose the use of fire stations as base stations for towers and/or antennas for the conduction of cell phone transmissions until it is proven that such sitings are not hazardous to the health of our members.



[back] 1. Revised and Amended IAFF Resolution No. 15; August 2004

Study of Firefighters Exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) Radiation from Cell Towers/Masts

WHEREAS, fire stations across the United States and Canada are being sought by wireless companies as base stations for the antennas and towers for the conduction of cell phone transmissions; and

WHEREAS, many firefighters who are living with cell towers on or adjacent to their stations are paying a substantial price in terms of physical and mental health.  As first responders and protectors of the general public, it is crucial that firefighters are functioning at optimal cognitive and physical capacity at all times; and

WHEREAS, the brain is the first organ to be affected by RF radiation and symptoms manifest in a multitude of neurological conditions including migraine headaches, extreme fatigue, disorientation, slowed reaction time, vertigo, vital memory loss and attention deficit amidst life threatening emergencies; and

WHEREAS, most of the firefighters who are experiencing symptoms can attribute the onset to the first week(s) these towers/antennas were activated; and

WHEREAS, RF radiation is emitted by these cellular antennas and RF radiation can penetrate every living cell, including plants, animals and humans; and

WHEREAS, both the U. S. and Canadian governments established regulatory limits for RF radiation based on thermal (heat) measurements with no regard for the adverse health effects from non-thermal radiation which is proven to harm the human brain and immune system; and

WHEREAS, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency stated in a July 16, 2002, letter, “Federal health and safety agencies have not yet developed policies concerning possible risk from long-term, non-thermal exposures. The FCC’s exposure guideline is considered protective of effects arising from a thermal mechanism (RF radiation from cell towers is non-thermal) but not from all possible mechanisms. Therefore, the generalization by many that the guidelines protecting human beings from harm by any or all mechanisms is not justified”; and

WHEREAS, an Expert Panel Report requested by the Royal Society of Canada prepared for Health Canada (1999) stated that, “Exposure to RF fields at intensities far less than levels required to produce measurable heating can cause effects in cells and tissues.  These biological effects include alterations in the activity of the enzyme ornithine decarboxylase, in calcium regulation, and in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier. Some of these biological effects brought about by non-thermal exposure levels of RF could potentially be associated with adverse health effects”; and

WHEREAS, based on concerns over growing scientific evidence of dangers from RF radiation, an international conference was convened in Salzburg, Austria, in the summer of 2000 where renowned scientists declared the upper-most RF radiation exposure limit from a tower-mast should be 1/10th of 1 microwatt (Note that 1/10th of 1 microwatt is 10,000 times lower than the uppermost limit allowed by the U. S. or Canada.); and it should be noted this limit was set because of study results showing brain wave changes at 1/10th of 1 microwatt; and

WHEREAS, in a recently cleared paper by Dr. Richard A. Albanese of the U. S. Air Force, a highly recognized physician in the area of the impact of radiation on the human body, Dr. Albanese states, “I would ask a good faith effort in achieving as low exposure rates as are possible within reasonable financial constraints. Also I would fund targeted studies using animal subjects and human groups living or working in high radiation settings or heavy cellular phone users, emphasizing disease causations. I urge acceptance of the ideal that there should be no unmonitored occupational or environmental exposures whose associated disease rates are unknown.” (The opinions expressed herein are those of Dr. Albanese, and do not reflect the policies of the United States Air Force.); and

WHEREAS, recently a study, not affiliated with the wireless industry, was conducted of firefighters exposed to RF radiation from cell towers/antennas affixed to their stations.** The study revealed brain damage that can be differentiated from chemical causation (such as inhalation of toxic smoke) suggesting RF radiation as the cause of the brain damage found on SPECT scans; and

WHEREAS, firefighters are the protectors of people and property and should be protected under the Precautionary Principle of Science and therefore, unless radiation is proven safe and harmless, cellular antennas should not be placed on or near fire stations; therefore be it

RESOLVED, That the IAFF shall seek funding for an initial U. S. and Canadian study with the highest scientific merit and integrity, contrasting firefighters with residence in stations with towers to firefighters without similar exposure; and be it further

RESOLVED, That in accordance with the results of the study, the IAFF will establish protective policy measures with the health and safety of all firefighters as the paramount objective; and be it further

RESOLVED, That the IAFF oppose the use of fire stations as base stations for antennas and towers for the conduction of cell phone transmissions until such installations are proven not to be hazardous to the health of our members.

**Note:  A pilot study was conducted in 2004 of six California fire fighters working and sleeping in stations with towers.  The study, conducted by Gunnar Heuser, M.D., PhD. of Agoura Hills, CA, focused on neurological symptoms of six fire fighters who had been working for up to five years in stations with cell towers. Those symptoms included slowed reaction time, lack of focus, lack of impulse control, severe headaches, anesthesia-like sleep, sleep deprivation, depression, and tremors.  Dr. Heuser used functional brain scans – SPECT scans – to assess any changes in the brains of the six fire fighters as compared to healthy brains of men of the same age.  Computerized psychological testing known as TOVA was used to study reaction time, impulse control, and attention span.  The SPECT scans revealed a pattern of abnormal change which was concentrated over a wider area than would normally be seen in brains of individuals exposed to toxic inhalation, as might be expected from fighting fires.  Dr. Heuser concluded the only plausible explanation at this time would be RF radiation exposure.  Additionally, the TOVA testing revealed among the six fire fighters delayed reaction time, lack of impulse control, and difficulty in maintaining mental focus.

[back]  2. An international blue ribbon panel assembled by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) designated power frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) as “possible human carcinogens” on June 24, 1998. The panel’s decision was based largely on the results of epidemiological studies of children exposed at home and workers exposed on the job. The evaluation of the EMF literature followed procedures developed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), based in Lyon, France. The working group’s report will be the basis for the NIEHS report to Congress on the EMF Research and Public Information Dissemination program (EMF RAPID). The National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) of the United Kingdom noted that the views of its Advisory Group on Non-Ionizing Radiation are “consistent with those of the NIEHS expert panel.”

June 26, 1998 statement of the National Radiological Protection Board, sited in Microwave News, July/August 1998

[back]   3. World Health Organization; International Agency for Research on Cancer; IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; Volume 80 Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-Frequency (ELF) Electric and Magnetic Fields; 2002; 429 pages; ISBN 92 832 1280 0;  See   This IARC Monograph provides the rationale for its designation of ELF/EMF as a possible human carcinogen.  It states that:

A few studies on genetic effects have examined chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in lymphocytes from workers exposed to ELF electric and magnetic fields. In these studies, confounding by genotoxic agents (tobacco, solvents) and comparability between the exposed and control groups are of concern. Thus, the studies reporting an increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei are difficult to interpret.

Many studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of ELF magnetic fields on various genetic end-points. Although increased DNA strand breaks have been reported in brain cells of exposed rodents, the results are inconclusive; most of the studies show no effects in mammalian cells exposed to magnetic fields alone at levels below 50 µT. However, extremely strong ELF magnetic fields have caused adverse genetic effects in some studies. In addition, several groups have reported that ELF magnetic fields enhance the effects of known DNA- and chromosome-damaging agents such as ionizing radiation.

The few animal studies on cancer-related non-genetic effects are inconclusive. Results on the effects on in-vitro cell proliferation and malignant transformation are inconsistent, but some studies suggest that ELF magnetic fields affect cell proliferation and modify cellular responses to other factors such as melatonin. An increase in apoptosis following exposure of various cell lines to ELF electric and magnetic fields has been reported in several studies with different exposure conditions. Numerous studies have investigated effects of ELF magnetic fields on cellular end-points associated with signal transduction, but the results are not consistent.

[back] 4. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) statement “Health Issues Related to the Use of Hand-Held Radiotelephones and Base Transmitters” of 1996 reads:

“Thermally mediated effects of RF fields have been studied in animals, including primates. These data suggest effects that will probably occur in humans subjected to whole body or localized heating sufficient to increase tissue temperatures by greater than 1C. They include the induction of opacities of the lens of the eye, possible effects on development and male fertility, various physiological and thermoregulatory responses to heat, and a decreased ability to perform mental tasks as body temperature increases. Similar effects have been reported in people subject to heat stress, for example while working in hot environments or by fever. The various effects are well established and form the biological basis for restricting occupational and public exposure to radiofrequency fields. In contrast, non-thermal effects are not well established and currently do not form a scientifically acceptable basis for restricting human exposure for frequencies used by hand-held radiotelephones and base stations.”

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, “Health Issues Related to the Use of Hand-Held Radiotelephones and Base Transmitters,” Health Physics 70:587-593, 1996

The ANSI/IEEE Standard for Safety Levels of 1992 similarly states:

“An extensive review of the literature revealed once again that the most sensitive measurements of potentially harmful biological effects were based on the disruption of ongoing behavior associated with an increase of body temperature in the presence of electromagnetic fields. Because of the paucity of reliable data on chronic exposures, IEEE Subcommittee IV focused on evidence of behavioral disruption under acute exposures, even disruption of a transient and fully reversible nature.”

IEEE Standards Coordinating committee 28 on Non-Ionizing Radiation Hazards: Standard for Safe Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 KHz to 300 GHz (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1992.

[back] 5. Drs. Czerska, Casamento, Ning, and Davis (working for the Food and Drug Administration in 1997) using “a waveform identical to that used in digital cellular phones” at a power level within our current standards (SAR of 1.6 W/Kg, the maximum spatial peak exposure level recommended for the general population in the ANSI C95.1-1991 standard) found increases in cellular proliferation in human glioblastoma cells. This shows that “acceptable” levels of radiation can cause human cancer cells to multiply faster. The authors note that “because of reported associations between cellular phone exposure and the occurrence of a brain tumor, glioblastoma, a human glioblastoma cell line was used” in their research.

E.M. Czerska, J. Casamento, J. T. Ning, and C. Davis, “Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Cell Proliferation,” [Abstract presented on February 7, 1997 at the workshop 'Physical Characteristics and Possible Biological Effects of Microwaves Applied in Wireless Communication, Rockville, MD] E. M. Czerska, J. Casamento Centers for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20857, USA; H. T. Ning, Indian Health Service, Rockville, Maryland 20857, USA; C. Davis, Electrical Engineering Dept., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

[back] 6. Dr. Michael Repacholi (in 1997, currently the director of the International Electromagnetic Fields Project at the World Health Organization) took one hundred transgenic mice and exposed some to radiation for two 30 minute periods a day for up to 18 months. He found that the exposed mice developed lymphomas (a type of cancer) at twice the rate of the unexposed mice. While telecommunications industry spokespersons criticized the experiment for using mice with a mutation which predisposed them to cancer (transgenic) the researchers pointed out that “some individuals inherit mutations in other genes…that predispose them to develop cancer, and these individuals may comprise a subpopulation at special risk from agents that would pose an otherwise insignificant risk of cancer.”

Dr. Repacholi stated “I believe this is the first animal study showing a true non-thermal effect.” He repeated the experiment in 1998 using 50 Hz fields instead of the 900 MHz pulsed radiation (the type used by cellular phones) used in the original experiment and found no cancer risk. He stated that this new data had implications for his original cellular phone study: “the control groups for both our RF and 50 Hz field studies showed no statistical differences, which lessens the possibility that the RF/MW radiation study result was a chance event or due to errors in methodology.”

It is extremely important to note that Dr. Michael Repacholi was Chairman of the ICNIRP at the time its Statement on Health Issues Related to the Use of Hand-Held Radiotelephones and Base Transmitters was developed in 1996.

M. Repacholi et al., “Lymphomas in Eµ-Pim1 Transgenic Mice Exposed to Pulsed 900 MHz Electromagnetic Fields,” Radiation Research, 147, pp.631-640, May 1997

[back] 7. Dr. Ross Adey (Veterans Administration Hospital at Loma Linda University in 1996) found what appeared to be a protective effect in rats exposed to the type of radiation used in digital cellular phones. The rats were exposed to an SAR of 0.58-0.75 W/Kg 836 MHz pulsed radiation of the TDMA type two hours a day, four days a week for 23 months, with the signals turned on and off every 7.5 minutes, so total exposure was 4 hours a week. Interestingly this effect was not present when a non-digital, analog signal was used. Rats exposed developed cancer less often. This study shows that low power fields of the digital cellular frequency can influence cancer development.  Whether they would protect or promote in our children is a question for further study.

Ross Adey of the Veterans Administration Hospital at Loma Linda University, CA presented the results of pulsed (digital cellular) radiation on June 13, 1996 at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society in Victoria, Canada.  He presented the findings of the analog cellular phone radiation effect at the June 1997 2nd World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine in Bologna, Italy.  Reviews can be found in Microwave News issues July/August, 1996 and March/April 1997.

In recognition of his more than three decades of “fundamental contributions to the emerging science of the biological effects of electromagnetic fields,” the authors of the November 2004 Report of the European Union’s REFLEX Project(Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards From Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods) chose to include Dr. Adey’s personal views on Electromagnetic Field Exposure research as the Foreword to that report.  To view the entire report, see:  REFLEX Final Report.pdf

The following is taken from Dr. Adey’s Foreword found on pages 1-3 of the REFLEX Report:

The Future of Fundamental Research in a Society Seeking Categoric Answers to Health Risks of New Technologies

In summary, we have become superstitious users of an ever-growing range of technologies, but we are now unable to escape the web that they have woven around us.

Media reporters in general are no better informed.  Lacking either responsibility or accountability, they have created feeding frenzies from the tiniest snippets of information gleaned from scientific meetings or from their own inaccurate interpretation of published research.  In consequence, the public has turned with pleading voices to government legislatures and bureaucracies for guidance . . .

We face the problem brought on by the blind leading the blind.  Because of public pressure for rapid answers to very complex biological and physical issues, short-term research programs have been funded to answer specific questions about certain health risks.

In many countries, and particularly in the USA, the effects of such harassing and troublesome tactics on independent, careful fundamental research have been near tragic.  Beguiled by health hazard research as the only source of funding, accomplished basic scientists have diverted from a completely new frontier in physical regulation of biological mechanisms at the atomic level.  Not only have governments permitted corporate interests in the communications industry to fund this research, they have even permitted them to determine the research questions to be addressed and to select the institutions performing the research.

[back] 8. Dr. A. W. Guy reported an extensive investigation on rats chronically exposed from 2 up to 27 months of age to low-level pulsed microwaves at SARs up to 0.4 W/Kg. The exposed group was found to have a significantly higher incidence of primary cancers.

A. W. Guy, C. K. Chou, L. Kunz, L, Crowley, and J. Krupp, “Effects of Long-Term Low-Level Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure on Rats.” Volume 9. Summary. Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, USF-SAM-TR-85-11; 1985

[back] 9. Drs. Henry Lai and N. P. Singh of the University of Washington in Seattle have reported both single- and double-strand DNA breaks in the brains of rats exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation at an SAR of 1.2 W/Kg. DNA is the carrier of the genetic information in all living cells. Cumulated DNA strand breaks in brain cells can lead to cancer or neurodegenerative diseases.

H. Lai and N. P. Singh, “Single- and Double-Strand DNA Breaks in Rat Brain Cells After Acute Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol 69, No. 4, 513-521, 1996

[back] 10. Dr. Stanislaw Szmigielski has studied many thousands of Polish soldiers.  He has found that those exposed to radiofrequency and microwave radiation in the workplace had more than double the cancer rate of the unexposed servicemen analyzing data from 1971-1985.  He has presented further data suggesting a dose-response relationship with soldiers exposed to 100-200 W/cm2 suffering 1.69 times as many cancers as the unexposed, and those exposed to 600-1000 W/cm2 suffering 4.63 times as many cancers.  The level considered safe for the public according to FCC regulations is 1000 W/cm2.  Occupational exposure up to 5000 W/cm2 is allowed.

S. Szmigielski, “Cancer Morbidity in Subjects Occupationally Exposed to High Frequency (Radiofrequency and Microwave) Electromagnetic Radiation,” The Science of the Total Environment 180:9-17, 1996

[back] 11. Dr. Bruce Hocking found an association between increased childhood leukemia incidence and mortality in the proximity of television towers. The power density ranged from 0.2-8.0 W/cm2 nearer and 0.02 W/cm2 farther from the towers.

B. Hocking, I. R. Gordon, H. L. Grain, and G. E. Hatfield, “Cancer Incidence and Mortality and Proximity to TV Towers,” Medical Journal of Australia 165: 601-605; 1996

[back] 12. Drs. Mann and Röschke investigated the influence of pulsed high-frequency RF/MW radiation of digital mobile radio telephones on sleep in healthy humans. They found a hypnotic effect with shortening of sleep onset latency and a REM (Rapid Eye Movement) suppressive effect with reduction of duration and percentage of REM sleep. “REM sleep plays a special physiological role for information processing in the brain, especially concerning consolidation of new experiences. Thus the effects observed possibly could be associated with alterations of memory and learning functions.”

K. Mann and J. Röschke, “Effects of Pulsed High-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Human Sleep,” Neuropsychobiology 33:41-47, 1996

[back] 13. Dr. Allen Frey has been researching RF/MW radiation for over 3 decades. Here is the abstract on a paper concerning headaches and cellular phone radiation. “There have been numerous recent reports of headaches occurring in association with the use of hand-held cellular telephones. Are these reported headaches real? Are they due to emissions from telephones? There is reason to believe that the answer is “yes” to both questions. There are several lines of evidence to support this conclusion. First, headaches as a consequence of exposure to low intensity microwaves were reported in the literature 30 years ago. These were observed during the course of microwave hearing research before there were cellular telephones. Second, the blood-brain barrier appears to be involved in headaches, and low intensity microwave energy exposure affects the barrier. Third, the dopamine-opiate systems of the brain appear to be involved in headaches, and low intensity electromagnetic energy exposure affects those systems. In all three lines of research, the microwave energy used was approximately the same–in frequencies, modulations, and incident energies–as those emitted by present day cellular telephones, Could the current reports of headaches be the canary in the coal mine, warning of biologically significant effects?”

A. H. Frey, “Headaches from Cellular Telephones: Are they Real and What Are the Implications?” Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 106, Number 3, pp.101-103, March 1998

[back] 14. Henry Lai’s review of the literature concerning neurological effects of RF/MW radiation: Existing data indicate that RF/MW radiation of relatively low intensity can affect the nervous system. Changes in blood-brain barrier, morphology, electrophysiology, neurotransmitter functions, cellular metabolism, and calcium efflux, and genetic effects have been reported in the brain of animals after exposure to RF. These changes can lead to functional changes in the nervous system. Behavioral changes in animals after exposure to RR have been reported.

Even a temporary change in neural functions after RF/MW radiation exposure could lead to adverse consequences. For example, a transient loss of memory function or concentration could result in an accident when a person is driving. Loss of short term working memory has indeed been observed in rats after acute exposure to RF/MW radiation.

Research has also shown that the effects of RF/MW radiation on the nervous system can cumulate with repeated exposure. The important question is, after repeated exposure, will the nervous system adapt to the perturbation and when will homeostasis break down? Related to this is that various lines of evidence suggest that responses of the central nervous system to RF/MW radiation could be a stress response. Stress effects are well known to cumulate over time and involve first adaptation and then an eventual break down of homeostatic processes.

H. Lai, “Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Relating to Wireless Communication Technology,” Paper presentation at the IBC-UK Conference: “Mobile Phones-Is There a Health Risk?” September 16-17, 1997, Brussels, Belgium

[back] 15. Blood-Brain-Barrier: The blood-brain-barrier (BBB) is primarily a continuous layer of cells lining the blood vessels of the brain. It is critical for regulation of the brain’s activity.  Lai notes that “Even though most studies indicate that changes in the BBB occurs only after exposure to RF/MW radiation of high intensities with significant increase in tissue temperature, several studies have reported increases in permeability after exposure to RF/MW radiation of relatively low intensities…Pulsed RF seems to be more potent than continuous wave RF.”  Pulsed RF/MW is the type used in digital cellular systems.  Effects on the BBB were noted at the 0.2 W/cm2 level, and even at SAR of 0.016-5 W/kg. These effects could lead to local changes in brain function.

H. Lai, Ibid

[back] 16. Cellular Morphology: RF/MW radiation induced morphological changes of the central nervous system cells and tissues have been shown to occur under relatively high intensity or prolonged exposure to the RF/MW radiation. However, there are several studies which show that repeated exposure at relatively low power intensities caused morphological changes in the central nervous system. Again here pulsed (as in digital phone use) RF/MW radiation produced more pronounced effects. Certain drugs given to nonhuman primates sensitized them, for instance allowing eye damage to occur at very low power intensities. Dr Lai notes “Changes in morphology, especially cell death, could have an important implication on health. Injury-induced cell proliferation has been hypothesized as a cause of cancer.” Some of these experiments were in the range of SAR 0.53 W/kg or even 0.26 W/kg.

H. Lai, Ibid

[back] 17. Neural Electrophysiology: Changes in neuronal electrophysiology, evoked potentials, and EEG have been reported. Some effects were observed at low intensities and after repeated exposure, suggesting cumulative effect. Energy density levels were as low as 50 W/cm2.

H. Lai, Ibid

[back] 18. Neurotransmitters: Neurotransmitters are molecules which transmit information from one nerve cell to another. Early studies have reported changes in various neurotransmitters (catecholamines, serotonin, and acetylcholine) in the brain of animals only after exposure to high intensities of RF/MW radiation. However, there are more recent studies that show changes in neurotransmitter functions after exposure to low intensities of RF radiation. For example, effects were seen at 50 µW/cm2 in one experiment.  U.S. and Canadian RF/MW radiation safety policies allow exposures of 1000 µW/cm2 at that frequency.

RF/MW radiation  activates endogenous opioids in the brain. Endogenous opioids are neurotransmitters with morphine-like properties and are involved in many important physiological and behavioral functions, such as pain perception and motivation.

The response to RF/MW radiation  depends on the area of the brain studied and on the duration of exposure. Exposure to RF/MW radiation  has been shown to affect the behavioral actions of benzodiazepines (these are drugs such as Valium).

H. Lai, Ibid

[back] 19. Metabolic Changes in Neural Tissue: Several studies investigated the effects of RF/MW radiation exposure on energy metabolism in the rat brain. Surprisingly, changes were reported after exposure to relatively low intensity RF/MW radiation for a short duration of time (minutes). The effects depended on the frequency and modulation characteristics of the RF/MW radiation and did not seem to be related to temperature changes in the tissue.

Calcium ions play important roles in the functions of the nervous system, such as the release of neurotransmitters and the actions of some neurotransmitter receptors. Thus changes in calcium ion concentration could lead to alterations in neural functions. This is an area of considerable controversy because some researchers have also reported no significant effects of RF/MW radiation  exposure on calcium efflux. However, when positive effects were observed, they occurred after exposure to RF/MW radiation of relatively low intensities and were dependent on the modulation and intensity of the RF/MW radiation  studied (window effects). Some studies had SARs as low as 0.05-0.005 W/Kg.

H. Lai, Ibid

[back] 20.  Cytogenetic effects have been reported in various types of cells after exposure to RF/MW radiation.  Recently, several studies have reported cytogenetic changes in brain cells by RF/MW radiation , and these results could have important implication for the health effects of RF/MW radiation . Genetic damage to glial cells can result in carcinogenesis. However, since neurons do not undergo mitosis, a more likely consequence of neuronal genetic damage is changes in functions and cell death, which could either lead to or accelerate the development of neurodegenerative diseases. Power densities of 1 mW/cm2 were employed, a level considered safe for the public by the FCC.

RF/MW radiation -induced increases in single and double strand DNA breaks in rats can be blocked by treating the rats with melatonin or the spin-trap compound N-t-butyl–phenylnitrone. Since both compounds are potent free radical scavengers, these data suggest that free radicals may play a role in the genetic effect of RF. If free radicals are involved in the RF-induced DNA strand breaks in brain cells, results from this study could have an important implication on the health effects of RF exposure. Involvement of free radicals in human diseases, such as cancer and atherosclerosis, has been suggested. Free radicals also play an important role in the aging process, which has been ascribed to be a consequence of accumulated oxidative damage to body tissues, and involvement of free radicals in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s, Huntington, and Parkinson, has also been suggested. One can also speculate that some individuals may be more susceptible to the effects of RF/MW radiation exposure.

H. Lai, Ibid

[back] 21. Dr. A. A. Kolodynski and V. V. Kolodynska of the Institute of Biology, Latvian Academy of Sciences, presented the results of experiments on school children living in the area of the Skrunda Radio Location Station in Latvia. Motor function, memory, and attention significantly differed between the exposed and control groups. The children living in front of the station had less developed memory and attention and their reaction time was slower.

A. A. Kolodynski, V. V. Kolodynska, “Motor and Psychological Functions of School Children Living in the Area of the Skrunda Radio Location Station in Latvia,” The Science of the Total Environment 180:87-93, 1996

[back] 22. Dr. H. Lai and colleagues in 1993 exposed rats to 45 minutes of pulsed high frequency RF/MW radiation at low intensity and found that the rats showed retarded learning, indicating a deficit in spatial “working memory” function.

H Lai, A. Horita, and A. W. Guy, “Microwave Irradiation Affects Radial-Arm Maze Performance in the Rat,” Bioelectromagnetics 15:95-104, 1994

NOTE:  Dr. Lai’s January 2005 compilation of published RF/MW radiation studies demonstrating biological effects of exposure to low-intensity RF/MW radiation is included as a Reference section at the end of this report.

[back] 23. Dr. Stefan Braune reported a 5-10 mm Hg resting blood pressure rise during exposure to RF/MW radiation of the sort used by cellular phones in Europe. The Lancet, the British medical journal where the report appeared, stated that “Such an increase could have adverse effects on people with high blood pressure.”

S. Braune, “Resting Blood Pressure Increase During Exposure to a Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field,” The Lancet 351, pp. 1,857-1,858, 1998

[back] 24. Dr. Kues and colleagues (of Johns Hopkins University and the Food and Drug Administration) found that placing timolol and pilocarpine into the eyes of monkeys and then exposing them to low power density pulsed RF/MW radiation caused a significant reduction in the power-density threshold for causing damage to the cells covering the eye and the iris. In fact the power was reduced by a factor of 10, so that it entered the “acceptable, safe” level of the FCC, 1 mW/cm2! Timolol and pilocarpine are commonly used by people suffering from glaucoma. This is a very important study, as it points to the fact that laboratory experiments under “ideal” conditions are rarely what one finds in real life. The “safe” level of RF/MW radiation exposure for healthy people is likely to be very different than for those of us who suffer from illness, take medications, or are perhaps simply younger or older than those in the experiments.

H. A. Kues, J. C. Monahan, S. A. D’Anna, D. S. McLeod, G. A. Lutty, and S. Koslov, “Increased Sensitivity of the Non-Human Primate Eye to Microwave Radiation Following Ophthalmic Drug Pretreatment,” Bioelectromagnetics 13:379-393, 1992

[back] 25. The World Health Organization states that “concerns have been raised about the safety of cellular mobile telephones, electric power lines and police speed-control ‘radar guns.’ Scientific reports have suggested that exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted from these devices could have adverse health effects, such as cancer, reduced fertility, memory loss, and adverse changes in the behaviour and development of children.” Therefore, “In May 1996, in response to growing public health concerns in many Member States over possible health effects from exposure to an ever-increasing number and diversity of EMF sources, the World Health Organization launched an international project to assess health and environmental effects of exposure to electric and magnetic fields, which became known as the International EMF Project. The International EMF Project will last for five years.” “A number of studies at [frequencies above about 1 MHz] suggest that exposure to RF fields too weak to cause heating may have adverse health consequences, including cancer and memory loss. Identifying and encouraging coordinated research into these open questions is one of the major objectives of the International EMF Project.”

World Health Organization Fact Sheet N181, “Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health, The International EMF Project,” reviewed May 1998 and World Health Organization Fact Sheet N182, “Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health, Physical Properties and Effects on Biological Systems,” reviewed May 1998, 

[back] 26. The U. S. Food and Drug Administration in a January 14, 1998 letter to the House Telecommunications Subcommittee stated it “believes additional research in the area of RF is needed.” In 1997 the FDA established the following priorities:

  • Chronic (lifetime) animal exposures should be given the highest priority.
  • Chronic animal exposures should be performed both with and without the application of chemical initiating agents to investigate tumor promotion in addition to tumorigenesis.
  • Identification of potential risks should include end points other than brain cancer (e.g. ocular effects of RF radiation exposure).
  • Replication of prior studies demonstrating positive biological effects work is needed.  A careful replication of the Chou and Guy study (Bioelectromagnetics, 13, pp.469-496, 1992) which suggests that chronic exposure of rats to microwaves is associated with an increase in tumors, would contribute a great deal to the risk identification process for wireless communication products.
  • Genetic toxicology studies should focus on single cell gel studies of DNA strand breakage and on induction of micronuclei.
  • Epidemiology studies focused on approaches optimized for hazard identification are warranted.


Food and Drug Administration Recommendations quoted in Microwave News, March/April, 1997

[back] 27. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is planning a multi-country, multi-million dollar study of cancer among users of wireless phones, beginning 1998.  Microwave News, January/February, 1998

[back] 28. The Swedish Work Environmental Fund initiated a new epidemiological study on cellular phone radiation and brain tumors in 1997. Microwave News, November/December, 1997

[back] 29. The National Cancer Institute announced plans for a 5 year study of brain tumors and RF/MW radiation in 1993. Microwave News, January/February, 1993

[back] 30. The European Commission (EC) Expert Group on health effects of wireless phones called for a 5 year research program with a $20 million budget, reported 1997.  Microwave News , January/February, 1997

[back] 31. A report commissioned by New Zealand’s Ministry of Health stated that “It is imperative that the scientific issues be clarified as soon as possible, as there is much at stake.” It called for more research to examine the potential health effects of RF radiation.  Microwave News, November/December, 1996

[back] 32. The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia announced its sponsorship of a 5 year, $3.5 million project on potential health effects of mobile phone technology in 1996. Microwave News, November/December, 1996

[back] 33. The Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) of Australia concluded in 1995 that the safety of cellular telephones cannot be resolved “in the near future.” Dr. Stan Barnett, a principal researcher of CSIRO, states that “My goal is to establish a national committee to approach this problem by coordinating relevant and focused research.” He estimated a budget of $3 million over a 3 year period would be necessary.

Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, “Status of Research on Biological Effects and Safety of Electromagnetic Radiation: Telecommunications Frequencies,” a report prepared by Dr. Stan Barnett, as sited in Microwave News, September/October, 1995

[back] 34. In Canada, Expert Panels are formed in response to requests from governments and other organizations for guidance on public policy issues where specialized knowledge is required.  The Royal Society of Canada (RSC) is the only national academic organization, encompassing all fields of study in the sciences, arts and humanities that provides, through its Committee on Expert Panels, a service to Canadians by convening Expert Panels that produce publicly disseminated, arms-length, third party reviews.  The most recent Expert Panel report addressing RF/MW radiation examines new data on dosimetry and exposure assessment, thermoregulation, biological effects such as enzyme induction, and toxicological effects, including genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and testicular and reproductive outcomes.  Epidemiological studies of mobile phone users and occupationally exposed populations are examined, along with human and animal studies of neurological and behavioural effects.  All of the authoritative reviews completed within the last two years have supported the need for further research to clarify the possible associations between RF fields and adverse health outcomes that have appeared in some reports. See:

Recent Advances in Research on Radiofrequency Fields and Health: 2001-2003; A Follow-up to The Royal Society of Canada, Report on the Potential Health Risks of Radiofrequency Fields from Wireless Telecommunication Devices, 1999

[back] 35. The European Union effort to address this issue is in the study Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Energy Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods (REFLEX).  Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) in relation to health is a controversial topic throughout the industrial world.  So far epidemiological and animal studies have generated conflicting data and thus uncertainty regarding possible adverse health effects. This situation has triggered controversies in communities especially in Europe with its high density of population and industry and the omnipresence of EMF in infrastructures and consumer products.  These controversies are affecting the siting of facilities, leading people to relocate, schools to close or power lines to be re-sited, all at great expense.  The European Union believes that causality between EMF exposure and disease can never be regarded as proven without knowledge and understanding of the basic mechanisms possibly triggered by EMF.  To search for those basic mechanisms powerful technologies developed in toxicology and molecular biology were to be employed in the REFLEX project to investigate cellular and sub-cellular responses of living cells exposed to EMF in vitro.

The REFLEX data have made a substantial addition to the data base relating to genotoxic and phenotypic effects of both ELF-EMF and RF-EMF on in vitro cellular systems.  While the data neither precludes nor confirms a health risk due to EMF exposure nor was the project designed for this purpose, the value lies in providing new data that will enable mechanisms of EMF effects to be studied more effectively than in the past.  Furthermore, the REFLEX data provide new information that will be used for risk evaluation by WHO, IARC and ICNIRP.  For further information on REFLEX see:

[back] 36.  The Swedish Radiation Protections Institute (SSI) endeavors to ensure that human beings and the environment are protected from the harmful effects of radiation, both in the present and in the future.  SSI has focused on epidemiological research on cancer and exposure from mobile phones and transmitters as well as experimental cancer research.  In addition three selected topics were also discussed, namely blood-brain barrier, heat shock proteins, and precautionary framework.  For further information on SSI see:

[back] 37.  In the United Kingdom, the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) was created by the Radiological Protection Act 1970.  The statutory functions of NRPB are to advance the acquisition of knowledge about the protection of mankind from radiation hazards through research and to provide information and advice to persons (including Government Departments) with responsibilities in the United Kingdom in relation to the protection from radiation hazards either of the community as a whole or of particular sections of the community.  The NFPB believes that there is a need for better occupational studies rather than simply for more. In particular, the studies need to be of occupational groups for whom measurements show that there is genuinely a substantially raised exposure to RF fields. If the studies are to be more informative than those so far, a key requirement will be for improved exposure measurement (or improved estimation of exposure) for individuals, or at least for occupational groups. It would be desirable, as far as practical, that the studies should measure the intensity and timing of RF field exposures, and also that they should include some assessment of major RF field exposures from sources other than the current occupation.  Ideally, exposure assessment needs to be anatomical site (organ)-specific, because some sources result in greatly differing doses to different parts of the body. It is a difficulty in these prescriptions, of course, that the appropriate exposure metric is unknown.  For further information on NRPB see:

[back] 38. On January 5, 2005, the EMF-Team Finland issued the Helsinki Appeal 2005 to members of the European Parliament.  In it physicians and researchers call on the European Parliament to apply the Precautionary Principle to electromagnetic fields, especially in the radio- and microwave- frequency bands. They criticize the present RF/MW radiation safety standards that do not recognize the biological effects caused by non-thermal exposures to non-ionizing radiation [i.e., RF/MW  radiation.]  They also call for continued refunding of the REFLEX  EMF research program.  The text of the Helsinke Appeal 2005 is found at:

[back] 39. On July 19, 1993 Dr. Elizabeth Jacobson, Deputy Director for Science, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration criticized Thomas Wheeler, President of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association:

“I am writing to let you know that we were concerned about two important aspects of your press conference of July 16 concerning the safety of cellular phones, and to ask that you carefully consider the following comments when you make future statements to the press. First, both the written press statements and your verbal comments during the conference seemed to display an unwarranted confidence that these products will be found absolutely safe. In fact, the unremittingly upbeat tone of the press packet strongly implies that there can be no hazard, leading the reader to wonder why any further research would be needed at all…..More specifically, your press packet selectively quotes from our Talk Paper of February 4 in order to imply that FDA believes that cellular phones are “safe.” (“There is no proof at this point that cellular phones are harmful.”) In fact, the same Talk Paper also states, “There is not enough evidence to know for sure, either way.” Our position, as we have stated it before, is this: Although there is no direct evidence linking cellular phones with harmful effects in humans, a few animal studies suggest that such effects could exist. It is simply too soon to assume that cellular phones are perfectly safe, or that they are hazardous–either assumption would be premature. This is precisely why more research is needed.”

Full text of letter can be found in Microwave News, July/August, 1993

[back] 40. In 1993 the Director of the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air of the Environmental Protection Agency suggested that the FCC not adopt the 1992 ANSI/IEEE standard “due to serious flaws,” among them (1) “the ANSI/IEEE conclusion that there is no scientific data indicating that certain subgroups of the population are more at risk than others is not supported by NCRP and EPA reports” and (2) “the thesis that ANSI/IEEE recommendations are protective of all mechanisms of interaction is unwarranted because the adverse effects level in the 1992 ANSI/IEEE standard are based on a thermal effect.”

Letter from Margo T. Oge, Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air to Thomas Stanley, Chief Engineer, Office of engineering and Technology, FCC, dated Nov 9, 1993

[back] 41. A brief sampling of the CSIRO report:

Problems in studies of human populations published to date include imprecise estimates of exposure. As a result, such epidemiological studies may underestimate any real risk. The likelihood of epidemiological studies providing useful information is questionable, particularly if the biological end point cannot be predicted. Its value in the short term (less than 10 years) must be negligible unless there was an enormous increase in the rate of cancer growth. Interestingly, the incidence of brain tumors in the EC countries has increased substantially in recent years.

RF safety cannot be assessed in the absence of reported serious effects when so little research has been aimed at the problem. It is somewhat surprising, and rather disappointing, to find that although the literature contains many hundreds of publications, there are very few areas of consensus….At low levels the absence of clear thresholds and [the] presence of intensity and frequency windows have created questions rather than provided answers.

There is no doubt that the interpretation of bioeffects data has been clouded by a preoccupation with thermally mediated processes. In fact, development of the ANSI/IEEE standard is based only on well-established thermal effects, and ignores the more subtle non-thermal processes that are more difficult to interpret and apply to human health.

Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, “Status of Research on Biological Effects and Safety of Electromagnetic Radiation: Telecommunications Frequencies,” a report prepared by Dr. Stan Barnett, as sited in Microwave News, September/October, 1995

[back] 42. Statement from the October 25-28, 1998 “Symposium of Mobile Phones and Health – Workshop on Possible Biological and Health Effects of RF Electromagnetic Fields” held at the University of Vienna, Austria.

The preferred terminology to be used in public communication:  Instead of using the terms “athermal”, “non-thermal” or “microthermal” effects, the term “low intensity biological effects” is more appropriate.

Preamble: The participants agreed that biological effects from low-intensity exposures are scientifically established. However, the current state of scientific consensus is inadequate to derive reliable exposure standards. The existing evidence demands an increase in the research efforts on the possible health impact and on an adequate exposure and dose assessment.

Base stations: How could satisfactory Public Participation be ensured:  The public should be given timely participation in the process. This should include information on technical and exposure data as well as information on the status of the health debate. Public participation in the decision (limits, siting, etc.) should be enabled.

Cellular phones: How could the situation of the users be improved:  Technical data should be made available to the users to allow comparison with respect to EMF-exposure. In order to promote prudent usage, sufficient information on the health debate should be provided. This procedure should offer opportunities for the users to manage reduction in EMF-exposure. In addition, this process could stimulate further developments of low-intensity emission devices.

[back] 43. Statement from the June 7-8, 2000 International Conference on Cell Tower Siting Linking Science and Public Health, Salzburg, Austria.  The full report can be found at:

·         It is recommended that development rights for the erection and for operation of a base station should be subject to a permission procedure. The protocol should include the following aspects:

o       Information ahead and active involvement of the local public

o        Inspection of alternative locations for the siting

o       Protection of health and wellbeing

o       Considerations on conservation of land- and townscape

o       Computation and measurement of exposure

o       Considerations on existing sources of HF-EMF exposure

o       Inspection and monitoring after installation


·         It is recommended that a national database be set up on a governmental level giving details of all base stations and their emissions.

·         It is recommended for existing and new base stations to exploit all technical possibilities to ensure exposure is as low as achievable (ALATA-principle) and that new base stations are planned to guarantee that the exposure at places where people spend longer periods of time is as low as possible, but within the strict public health guidelines.

·         Presently the assessment of biological effects of exposures from base stations in the low-dose range is difficult but indispensable for protection of public health.  There is at present evidence of no threshold for adverse health effects.

o       Recommendations of specific exposure limits are prone to considerable uncertainties and should be considered preliminary. For the total of all high frequency irradiation a limit value of 100 mW/m² (10 µW/cm²) is recommended.

o       For preventive public health protection a preliminary guideline level for the sum total of exposures from all ELF pulse modulated high-frequency facilities such as GSM base stations of 1 mW/m² (0.1 µW/cm²) is recommended.

[back] 44. Scientists attending the September 13-14, 2002 International Conference “State of the Research on Electromagnetic Fields – Scientific and Legal Issues,” organized by ISPESL (National Institute for Prevention and Work Safety, Italy), the University of Vienna, and the City of Catania, held in Catania, Italy, agreed to the following:

·        Epidemiological and in vivo and in vitro experimental evidence demonstrates the existence for electromagnetic field (EMF) induced effects, some of which can be adverse to health.

·         We take exception to arguments suggesting that weak (low intensity) EMF cannot interact with tissue.

·         There are plausible mechanistic explanations for EMF-induced effects which occur below present ICNIRP and IEEE guidelines and exposure recommendations by the EU.

·        The weight of evidence calls for preventive strategies based on the precautionary principle. At times the precautionary principle may involve prudent avoidance and prudent use.

·        We are aware that there are gaps in knowledge on biological and physical effects, and health risks related to EMF, which require additional independent research.

[back] 45. The Freiburger Appeal is a German based appeal by mainly medical practitioners who are concerned about the effects, they believe, from mobile phone technology including masts that are appearing in their patients.  It started in Oct 2002 and with very little international publicity has got 50,000 signatories with at least 2000 medical signatures from across the world. Mast   These physicians and scientists agreed to establish an international scientific commission to promote research for the protection of public health from EMF and to develop the scientific basis and strategies for assessment, prevention, management and communication of risk, based on the precautionary principle.


On the basis of our daily experiences, we hold the current mobile communications technology (introduced in 1992 and since then globally extensive) and cordless digital telephones (DECT standard) to be among the fundamental triggers for this fatal development.  One can no longer evade these pulsed microwaves. They heighten the risk of already-present chemical/physical influences, stress the body–immune system, and can bring the body–still-functioning regulatory mechanisms to a halt. Pregnant women, children, adolescents, elderly and sick people are especially at risk.

Statement of the physicians and researchers of Interdisziplinäre Gesellschaft für Umweltmedizin e. V. (Interdisciplinary Association for Environmental Medicine) IGUMED, Sackingen, Germany, September 19, 2002.  The Freiburger Appeal can be found at:

[back] 46. Report of the European Union’s REFLEX Project (Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods), November 2004.  The Project studied ELF and RF exposures to various animal cell types.  The report is found at:

From the Summary:  [t]he omnipresence of EMF’s in infrastructures and consumer products have become a topic of public concern.  This is due to the fear of people that based on the many conflicting research data a risk to their health cannot be excluded with some certainty.  Therefore, the overall objective of REFLEX was to find out whether or not the fundamental biological processes at the cellular and molecular level support such an assumption.  For this purpose, possible effects of EMF’s on cellular events controlling key functions, including those involved in carcinogenesis and in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders, were studied through focused research.  Failure to observe the occurrence of such key critical events in living cells after EMF exposure would have suggested that further research efforts in this field could be suspended and financial resources be reallocated to the investigation of more important issues.  But as clearly demonstrated, the results of the REFLEX project show the way into the opposite direction.

[back] 47. From the Discussion section of the December 20, 2004 Second Annual Report of Sweden’s Radiation Protection Board (SSI) entitled:  Recent Research on Mobile Telephony and Health Risks:  Second Annual Report from SSI’s Independent Expert Group on Electromagnetic Fields.  The complete report is available at:

To date, little is known about the levels of radiofrequency radiation exposure in the general population from sources such as mobile phones being used by oneself or other people, mobile phone base stations, and radio and television transmitters.  Measurements that have been performed have usually been made as a result of public concern about base station exposures or other specific sources, and have therefore been made at locations that could be assumed to have higher fields than would be the case if measurement locations were selected randomly.  Furthermore, all measurements have been stationary, and there is today no knowledge about the level of exposure that an individual will have throughout the day.

There is need for information about the personal exposure to RF fields in the general population, to enhance the understanding of the relative importance of exposure from base stations close to the home, from radio and television transmitters, and from the use of mobile phones . . .  Studies with personal RF exposure measurements of randomly selected samples of the general population are strongly encouraged.

[back] 48.  Released January 11, 2005, Mobile Phones and Health 2004: Report by the Board of NRPB Documents of the NRPB: Volume 15, No. 5.  See:  Mobile Phones and Health 2004

From the Executive Summary:

The Board notes that a central recommendation in the Stewart Report was that a precautionary approach to the use of mobile phone technologies be adopted until much more detailed and scientifically robust information on any health effects becomes available.

The Board considers that it is important to understand the signal characteristics and field strengths arising from new telecommunications systems and related technologies, to assess the RF exposure of people, and to understand the potential biological effects on the human body.

[back] 49. The ICNIRP exposure guidelines are only designed to protect against “known adverse health impacts,” according to Dr. Jürgen Bernhardt, ICNIRP’s chairman. Bernhardt reviewed the updated limits, which cover the spectrum from 1 Hz to 300 GHz, in a presentation at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society in St. Pete Beach, FL, on June 10. The limits protect against “short-term, immediate health effects” such as nerve stimulation, contact shocks and thermal insults, according to the guidelines, which appear in the April issue of Health Physics (74, pp.494-522, 1998). Despite “suggestive” evidence that power frequency magnetic fields can be carcinogenic, ICNIRP has concluded that this and other non-thermal health effects have not been “established.” ICNIRP has long followed this approach to standard-setting. In his talk, Bernhardt noted that the guidelines include “no consideration regarding prudent avoidance” for health effects for which evidence is less than conclusive.

Microwave News, July/August 1998

Additional References and Studies

The following references reporting biological effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) at low intensities through January 2005 were compiled on 12/27/04 by Henry C. Lai PhD, Research Professor of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Balode Sci Total Environ 180(1):81-85, 1996 – blood cells from cows from a farm close and in front of a radar installation showed significantly higher level of severe genetic damage.

Boscol et al. Sci Total Environ 273(1-3):1-10, 2001 – RFR from radio transmission stations (0.005 mW/cm2) affects immune system in women.

Chiang et al. J. Bioelectricity 8:127-131, 1989 – people who lived and worked near radio antennae and radar installations showed deficits in psychological and short-term memory tests.

de Pomerai et al. Nature 405:417-418, 2000. Enzyme Microbial Tech 30:73-79, 2002 – reported an increase in a molecular stress response in cells after exposure to a RFR at a SAR of 0.001 W/kg. This stress response is a basic biological process that is present in almost all animals – including humans.

de Pomerai et al. (FEBS Lett  22;543(1-3):93-97, 2003 – RFR damages proteins at 0.015-0.020 W/kg.

D’Inzeo et al. Bioelectromagnetics 9(4):363-372, 1988 – very low intensity RFR  (0.002 – 0.004 mW/cm2) affects the operation of acetylcholine-related ion-channels in cells. These channels play important roles in physiological and behavioral functions.

Dolk et al. Am J Epidemiol 145(1):1-91997- a significant increase in adult leukemias was found in residents who lived near the Sutton Coldfield television (TV) and frequency modulation (FM) radio transmitter in England.

Dutta et al.Bioelectromagnetics 10(2):197-202 1989 – reported an increase in calcium efflux in cells after exposure to RFR at 0.005 W/kg.  Calcium is an important component of normal cellular functions.

Fesenko et al. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 49(1):29-35, 1999 – reported a change in immunological functions in mice after exposure to RFR at a power density of 0.001 mW/cm2.

Hallberg O, Johansson O, ( 2004) concluded that continuous disturbance of cell repair mechanisms by body-resonant FM electromagnetic fields seems to amplify the carcinogenic effects resulting from cell damage caused e.g. by UV-radiation.

Hjollund et al. Reprod Toxicol 11(6):897,  1997 – sperm counts of Danish military personnel, who operated mobile ground-to-air missile units that use several RFR emitting radar systems (maximal mean exposure 0.01 mW/cm2), were significantly lower compared to references.

Hocking et al. Med J Aust  165(11-12):601-605, 1996 – an association was found between increased childhood leukemia incidence and mortality and proximity to TV towers.

Ivaschuk et al. Bioelectromagnetics 18(3):223-229, 1999 – short-term exposure to cellular phone RFR of very low SAR (26 mW/kg) affected a gene related to cancer.

Kolodynski  and Kolodynska,  Sci Total Environ 180(1):87-93, 1996 – school children who lived in front of a radio station had less developed memory and attention, their reaction time was slower, and their neuromuscular apparatus endurance was decreased.

Kwee et al. Electro- and Magnetobiology  20: 141-152, 2001 – 20 minutes of cell phone RFR exposure at 0.0021 W/kg increased stress protein in human cells.

Lebedeva et al. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 28(1-2):323-337, 2000 – brain wave activation was observed in human subjects exposed to cellular phone RFR at 0.06 mW/cm2.

Magras and Xenos  Bioelectromagnetics 18(6):455-461, 1999 – reported a decrease in reproductive function in mice exposed to RFR at power densities of 0.000168 – 0.001053 mW/cm2.  Irreversible sterility was found in the fifth generation of offspring.

Mann et al. Neuroendocrinology 67(2):139-144, 1998 – a transient increase in blood cortisol was observed in human subjects exposed to cellular phone RFR at 0.02 mW/cm2. Cortisol is a hormone involved in stress reaction.

Marinelli et al. J Cell Physiol. 198(2):324-332, 2004 – exposure to 900-MHz RFR at 0.0035 W/kg affected cell’s self-defense responses.

Michelozzi et al.  Epidemiology 9 (Suppl) 354p, 1998 – leukemia mortality within 3.5 km (5,863 inhabitants) near a high power radio-transmitter in a peripheral area of Rome was higher than expected.

Michelozzi et al.  Am J Epidemiol 155(12):1096-1103, 2002 – childhood leukemia higher at a distance up to 6 km from a radio station.

Navakatikian and Tomashevskaya “Biological Effects of Electric and Magnetic Fields, Volume 1,” D.O. Carpenter (ed) Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp.333-342. 1994 – RFR at low intensities (0.01 – 0.1 mW/cm2; 0.0027- 0.027 W/kg) induced behavioral and endocrine changes in rats. Decreases in blood concentrations of testosterone and insulin were reported.

Novoselova et al. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 49(1):37-41, 1999 -low intensity RFR (0.001 mW/cm2) affects functions of the immune system.

Park et al. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 77(6):387-394, 2004 – higher mortality rates for all cancers and leukemia in some age groups in the area near the AM radio broadcasting towers.

Persson et al. Wireless Network 3:455-461, 1997 – reported an increase in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier in mice exposed to RFR at 0.0004 – 0.008 W/kg. The blood-brain barrier envelops the brain and protects it from toxic substances.

Phillips et al. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 45:103-110, 1998 – reported DNA damage in cells exposed to RFR at SAR of 0.0024 – 0.024 W/kg.

Polonga-Moraru et al. Bioelectrochemistry 56(1-2):223-225,  2002 – change in membrane of cells in the retina (eye) after exposure to RFR at 15 µW/cm2.

Pyrpasopoulou et al. Bioelectromagnetics 25(3):216-227, 2004 – exposure to cell phone radiation during early gestation at SAR of 0.0005 W/kg (5 µW/cm2) affected kidney development in rats.

Salford et al. Environ Health Persp Online January 29, 2003 – Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones signal at 0.02 W/kg.

Santini et al. Pathol Biol (Paris) 50(6):369-373, 2002 - increase in complaint frequencies for tiredness, headache, sleep disturbance, discomfort, irritability, depression, loss of memory, dizziness, libido decrease, in people who lived within 300 m of mobile phone base stations.

Sarimov et al. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 32:1600-1608, 2004 – GSM microwaves affect human lymphocyte chromatin similar to stress response at 0.0054 W/kg.

Schwartz et al. Bioelectromagnetics 11(4):349-358, 1990 – calcium movement in the heart affected by RFR at SAR of 0.00015 W/kg. Calcium is important in muscle contraction. Changes in calcium can affect heart functions.

Somosy et al. Scanning Microsc 5(4):1145-1155, 1991 – RFR at 0.024 W/kg caused molecular and structural changes in cells of mouse embryos.

Stagg et al. Bioelectromagnetics 18(3):230-236, 1997- glioma cells exposed to cellular phone RFR at 0.0059 W/kg showed significant increases in thymidine incorporation, which may be an indication of an increase in cell division.

Stark et al. J Pineal Res 22(4):171-176, 1997 - a two- to seven-fold increase of salivary melatonin concentration was observed in dairy cattle exposed to RFR from a radio transmitter antenna.

Tattersall et al. Brain Res 904(1):43-53, 2001 – low-intensity RFR (0.0016 – 0.0044 W/kg) can modulate the function of a part of the brain called the hippocampus, in the absence of gross thermal effects. The changes in excitability may be consistent with reported behavioral effects of RFR, since the hippocampus is involved in learning and memory.

Vangelova et al.  Cent Eur J Public Health 10(1-2):24-28, 2002 – operators of satellite station exposed to low dose (0.1127 J/kg) of RFR over a 24-hr shift showed an increased excretion of stress hormones.

Velizarov et al. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 48(1):177-180, 1999 – showed a decrease in cell proliferation (division) after exposure to RFR of 0.000021 – 0.0021 W/kg.

Veyret et al. Bioelectromagnetics 12(1):47-56, 1991 – low intensity RFR at SAR of 0.015 W/kg affects functions of the immune system.

Wolke et al. Bioelectromagnetics 17(2):144-153, 1996 – RFR at 0.001W/kg affects calcium concentration in heart muscle cells of guinea pigs.


Return to Top of Document

The International Association of Fire Fighters recognizes IAFF Local 3368, Carpinteria-Summerland, California, who brought this issue to the attention of our membership through the Resolution 15, submitted through our biennial convention in August 2004.  Additionally, the following local affiliates provided support for the passage of the resolution: Brookline, Massachusetts, San Diego, California, San Francisco, California and Vancouver, British Columbia.  We also acknowledge the efforts of Dr. Henry C. Lai, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Dr. Magda Havas of Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario; Janet Newton, President of the EMR Policy Institute; and Susan Foster Ambrose for their technical support and continued passion to protect the health and safety of fire fighters and emergency medical personnel.  Finally, we thank Dr. Leslie Plachta and the Safe Ossining Schools for their research efforts and their battle to stop siting cell towers on Ossining, New York schools. 

RMD; 3/2005



I REPORT, YOU DECIDE. by Barry Levinson.

Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson



It is now three years since the senseless, brutal death of Kelly

Thomas at the hands, arms, feet, knees, bodies and Taser gun

handle of 6 Fullerton police officers.

download (20)

Three of those officers are still

gainfully employed under our new Chief of Police, Dan Hughes.

Dan Hughes

Dan Hughes

Sergeant Kevin Craig, the highest-ranking officer on the scene

received the 2013 Fullerton Police Department Supervisor of the Year

Award from the Fullerton Police Association.


Those in power at city hall claim correctly that we have new council

members and a new police chief. However, it is not the names

of those in charge that is important but rather the openness and

transparency in which they govern us that does matter.

Unfortunately, in that regard, little has changed substantively since

the brutal death of Kelly Thomas.

Barry Levinson


North Korea on the Fourth Of July

So here we are 238 years after Independence from England and enslaved to a system deeper than our ancestral counter parts ever were. Granted some of you may have a few more zeros in the bank accounts that can be wiped clean overnight than others, but at least back then, their minds and their children were their own. So where are we really? There is little to celebrate on this Independence day when the very government that most of us trust and worship to educate and feed our children bombs countries back into the stone age that have done nothing to us and turns a blind eye to 50 years of atrocities only rivaled by Hitler as we become awash in liquor and cheeseburgers this weekend.

May we never forget what is still happening in North Korea where our government turns a blind eye to a regime that threatens nuclear attack and rounds up and slaughters its citizens like an Eskimo seal hunt.


zzzzNorth-Korean-Suffering-600x383 Before you get plastered, overeat, and put a bunch of sulfur into the atmosphere this weekend, remember all that the blood of Kelly Thomas got us in Fullerton is Dan Hughes and Fireworks. All the blood of our men and women in uniform is getting us now is the illegitimate control of Arab oil fields, a domestic police state, poppy fields, the heroine trade, and landing bases in North Africa to continue to rape and pillage while turning a blind eye to regimes that have spent decades replicating accoutrements from the pit of hell.



Yes we implement sanctions on a nation whose citizenry has spent decades in the death grip of a food control genocide program while we gave this satanic tyrant snuff film producing butcher who lived in a seven story sex palace  a complete pass for as long as he walked the earth until the day he was cast unrepentant into the lake of fire by the hand of The Almighty.

download (5)

And hell on earth continues under the rule of his demonic son.
download (4)

North Korea is coming to America ladies and gentlemen. It is just washing up on our shores slowly. The lapping waves carry ashore the ever increasing expansion of poverty through the race to the bottom treasonous trade deals that have deindustrialized this once great engine of economic might. Landing in the middle of the night is the consolidation of our food production in the hands of a few corporations that are engineering cancer viruses and sterilants into the toxic food we are forced to eat and on their terms and rates. Yes, the soft kill silent weapons like contraceptive corn are born in the labs your 180 IQ students on scholarships design, then make their way to the grocers’s shelves, head for our cupboards, microwave ovens and finally into your blood streams.

North Korea openly starves their people into submission and we here in the US are forced into full belly starvation with toxic fake foods.

Phony churches that are really nothing more than real estate holding companies and corporations dot the landscape with silent pulpits occupied by hireling, snake oil salesmen that have a knack for separating you from your wallet so they can upgrade their entertainment facilities that are closed 6 days a week. You will never get the truth out of them. Now these 501c3 fleecing operations have come to the point where they have totally abandoned caring for the poor, the needy, the disadvantaged and the downtrodden.  Go to the office and ask them for help and see the ringer they will put you through. No longer do they build hospitals, orphanages and schools to make the present a better place and invest in the future. This is all now in the hands of the government-they control it all-academia, public assistance and now medicine. This is the North Korean style model and it is alive and well in America. You want your food stamps, you have to inject your kids. You want your housing and medical, your kids need to be enrolled in a public school classroom sterilization chamber. They got you under wraps beginning in the cradle all the way to the grave, from your bloodstreams all the way to your brains.

Worthless, overpriced Godless educations that saddle our children with insurmountable debt preparing them for the road to nowhere cover an entire generation in a dark cloud leaving them with their civic mindedness, common sense, and faith in God sucked right out of their brains in the process. They are then left to compete with the H1B visa holders that work for garage sale prices that will do whatever they are told.

Yes washing ashore is brutality at the hands of militarized police, intrusive and illegal government surveillance through Echelon, the Fusion Centers, and NSA clandestine snooping right through the doors of local police departments. Jurisdictions blur, privacy eviscerates, God given rights evaporate all while the phony preachers pass the plates on Sunday mornings and you go home or stay home and cheer for the ball game. In the meantime Halliburton builds FEMA camp facilities that are on a 24 hour readiness standby. Think it can’t happen here? The educational system is teaching your children they are animals while the media is turning everyone else into animals so that you can all be treated like animals.

So now we have  militarized police with everyone dependent on 100 year old water delivery infrastructure and thin ice food supply logistics, coupled with a power grid that is woven together like a cheap old wine skin under a desert sun which leaves us with about as much security as holding junk bonds in the 1980′s. Never mind the house of cards fractional reserve banking system and its mistress, the quadrillion dollar derivative infestation of the financial system with its step child: the debt based currency we worship call the US dollar replete with in your face occult symbolism that goes right over everyone’s heads as it is exchanged for a cheeseburger at the drive thru window.

Will you ignore the plight of your neighbors next door, your dark skinned brothers in the middle east, your children getting irradiated in the classrooms, and our Korean brothers and sisters across the ocean? But hey who gives a damn? It doesn’t affect me right? I got my big screen, my DVR, my hot box, my hot pocket, my diet joke shaved ice, my 12 pack, my nice new car or truck, my oxycotin, my vape chain, my bon bons, my good payin job, my iPad, my connections, my retirement, my hobby lobby or whatever other pile of sand you choose to stick you heads into. Believe me folks, we all got skin in this game with no one being exempt. Our kids are gonna turn over their hides while our ancestors turn over in their graves if we don’t wake up and take things back. They are setting up a total microwave all seeing matrix where most of us will no longer be necessary. All this technology, medical and scientific advancement is a double edged sword which will all be wielded against us. In actuality, it already is and most of you are simply not paying attention. 40 shots before age 6? Really?

The jails and prisons in this once great nation of ours are full of mom’s, dad’s, people’s sons and daughters, cousins nephews, aunts and uncles, many of whom are totally innocent people. Many were once productive members of society until they were exposed to the drugs our own government ships in, addicted to the endless flowing liquor that the government oversees, until they were introduced to the highly addictive opiates or psychotropics by the white coats, or until they or their famiies met their demise at the hands of the government’s economically destructive policies that massively proliferate unemployment or from the violent satanic video games, movies or pornography alone or in combination with any of the preceding.

The well paying predatory system ensnares those unaware of the traps being set by law enforcement officers who are trained to provoke, escalate and incite in order to up the antes to felonies if and whenever possible. As a result, the uninformed and unsuspecting are financially ruined while languishing in captivity in some cases being forcibly drugged and being unwilling subjects of medical experimentation and radiation biology programs on top of being raped and tortured. North Korean leaders could only dream of the vastness of a system such as ours.

We here in the US have a stasi society run by jack booted, black uniforms overseen by the black robes on the bench.  If your are comfortable with it, then it is only because you or a loved one has not felt it’s cold dead hands around your throats. North Korea runs theirs out in the open. We here in the US like to dress it up or down depending on your particular frame of reference and state of mind. Check out this thug with a badge beating up a woman.

The talking heads on the idiot box push the pills and play the car chases for us while we play the Benny Hill music in our little heads and laugh while another life being destroyed.

Look, I love America. It is the greatest country in the world. We are the last bastion of freedom on this planet. It is for this very reason that so many have given their lives to protect our shores and so many risk their lives to reach our shores. I am just sick and tired of our government being hijacked by robber barons, butcher war mongers, and psychopaths that run government sponsored terrorism that wrap themselves in the American flag and pose as our saviors. It is only possible because our vision and discernment is continuously clouded by our own personal myopic idiot box induced greed, selfishness, drunkenness and apathy. The net results are cemeteries full of dead veterans, and the bequeathal of a North Korean society to our children with microwaved reproductive organs.

Look at the debt, look at the streets falling apart, look at the lead flux oozing out of the drinking fountains, look at the filth on the TV, look at the blood running down the drains in the abortion mills, look at our children being brain damaged by the vaccines, look at the sex ed in the schools, look at the forced irradiation with wireless deployment in the schools and homes. Look at the video game addictions flanked by Hollywood’s overtly satanic pornographic etercontainment industry. Is this our rewward being bestowed on our children ?  Are they being sterilized?

Look at the radiation biology programs going on in the schools, jails and hospitals. Look around at the crumbling infrastructure, the blight, the crooks in local governments and the decaying vestiges of the American dream from a bygone era as out of control taxation and government expand exponentially.

So North Korea could never come to America on the 4th of July? Ask Kelly Thomas if he thought this was America when on July 5th, 2011, officers from the Fullerton Police Department “smashed his face to hell”, bludgeoned him, electrocuted him, beat him to death and sent his soul into eternity.

download (6)

Ask his family if this was America when they heard satanic lie after lie during the rigged trial in the courtroom as the murderers slithered out of the charges with high priced taxpayer funded wordsmiths in front of a stacked jury. Ask the reporters about the 4th of July in the Fullerton Police department’s van that were threatened to have “ther f…ing faces smashed in” on the way to jail for filming a protest. Ask the outraged Americans who watched in horror as the verdicts were read acquitting three officers who executed an unarmed homeless man on camera. Ask the goat herders that were rounded up from Afghanistan and renditioned to Guatanemo Bay so they could be waterboarded and hooked up to battery chargers while being sodomized with blunt objects. Yeah some old man named Bin Laden who had been in a CIA hospital months earlier getting taxpayer funded dialysis treatments, from a cave in the desert ran  and orchestrated the controlled demolition of the WTC while Norad was on stand down and the military was running a drill that morning with hijacked airliners hitting the New York skyline.

Ask your son who spent the last three tours of duty huffing depleted uranium in the middle east with his medical records sealed as he was injected with who know what over there fight the best enemies money can buy, an enemy we fund, arm and arrange for while we bomb them back into the stone age.

Ask the kids being brain damaged in the delivery rooms with the cord clampings and injections getting their brains fried with wireless for the rest of their lives when they are old enough to understand that their mental faculties were pruned at birth. Ask them if they knew that they were fed talc laden infant formula that resembled coffee creamer instead of human milk because mom had to work just to pay the taxes or because dad decided to follow the advice of the Bruce Springsteen hit from 1980. Ask the Avocado farmer who had to stump his groves while he looks at the lines in the sky used to run the geo engineering programs which cause the droughts out here and the floods back east to suck kids down the storm drains.

Ask the farmer about how the lines show up in the sky just before the rain and just in time to turn his fertile farm into a dust bowl to run him out of business and to run him off of his land so the banks can pick it up for 2 cents on the dollar. Ask him about being forced into the compact cities to drink the fluoridated water, eat the toxic store bought food and experience the love of the microwave bombardment from the wireless infrastructure that is given carte blanche to pop up like mushrooms on an Arkansas chicken farm after a thunderstorm. Or simply ask the local and national press why they refuse to cover real issues and ram mindless bullshit sports, bimbo diversion stories or meaningless trivial issues down our throats everyday. Ask the parents why they have to subject their kids to 40 nano tech laden injections just so they can sign their kids up for a secular humanist education with a microwave transmitter in their laps all day in a common core algorithm developing microwave matrix irradiating their reproductive organs on your taxpayer dime. Ask the 10,000  American tow and three year old toddlers who every year,  are being given medications like Adderall for ADHD. They are being diagnosed with a behavioral disorder sometimes before preschool, and before they ever meaningfully interact with another person. Ask the hundreds of thousands of elementary school children that have been drugged by the scumbag doctors at the behest of the servile teachers about why the kids’ developing brains are shrunk and their hearts are damaged while Mr. pill pushing vaccine jamming MD takes the pharma rep to Tahiti behind his Stepford wife’s back twice a year.

You think I am too harsh? Too negative? Out of my mind? Should I freeze frame the cartoon your kid is watching and show you what is being beamed into their little brains? Shall I hand you the DTap and Gardasil shot inserts? Should we break down the lyrics of that song on the radio? Shall I explain what the wireless in the classrooms is doing to your children’s reproductive organs? Shall we discuss where all your kids data is going with the common core. Maybe we should discuss why they want your guns in exchange for a Vons card? America is on the highway to hell and you have been singing along for the last 30 years. Take the headphones off for a minute and listen to the cries of  the billions of people in this world living in misery as a direct result of the things that we worship.

Look, America can still be what it once was but only if all of us return to what we are supposed to be to make it work. We must be a God fearing, moral, loving, brave, informed, and politically involved people. We are being turned into the diametric opposite by taxpayer funded social engineers that you invite into your living rooms on TV every night, and by the school district administrators and servile agents that you worship and fund with your blind allegiance, PTA donations and property taxes.

Thousands of years ago, the Egyptians worshiped the dung beetle as a god. It miraculously emerged from piles of feces into some miraculous creature. That was a god to them. Thousands of years later, modern day Cairo is surrounded on all four sides by canals filled with garbage and raw sewage. Be careful what you worship.

What are we really celebrating on this day? Who are we really fooling? The only reason you can still trade a few pieces of paper for a sack of beans, a 12 pack or a hot dog is because the dollar is the world reserve currency. When I speak of the twilight’s last gleaming ladies and gentlemen, I mean it. The dollar’s days are numbered. When that day comes, you will need a sack of rice to get a sack of beans. It may come to trading your daughter for a box of ding dongs. Denial is a powerful thing.There is not enough time or space to elaborate any further here but you may want to ponder anew what you can do for your Country. It all begins with the first step which involves opening your eyes.

May we never allow what hundreds of thousands of veterans over the last 238 years ago bled out barefoot in the snow, took bullets in the back storming the beaches, hung high and tortured in the jungles for only to be stolen by our own despicable apathy and willful ignorance being funneled into the control freaks despotic demonic hands. There isn’t much time folks.

You can dismiss everything I say, you can hate me or you can love me. That is within your purview. North Korea is not coming ashore folks, but rather it is already here and moving inland. We have the largest per capita incarceration rate in the world, the largest prison population in the world, the highest per capita murder rate on earth and we are the largest producers of pornography on the planet. All the starvation, torture, rape, murder and criminality is right in veryones living room staring them in the face every night. We take pleasure in it, we pay for it to be beamed into our homes and we allow it to be etched into our minds.

We must seek he higher ground that begins within all of us. Look your kids in the eyes on this July 4th and remember so many that died and for what. I truly love what this country is supposed to stand for. There are millions of honest, hard working people in The United States. This country has so many magnificent accomplishments, inventions, and victories to be remembered. It is sadly all quickly being eclipsed by the debauchery and criminal acts of our own government. Most of our elected officials are truly criminals who as soon as they are elected spend the rest of their careers getting re elected as they turn their backs on the citizens and the rest of the world.

On July 5th, the antithesis of July 4th, the murder of Kelly Thomas, who was an innocent, unarmed homeless man murdered at the hands of agents of the state know as police officers from the Fullerton Police department and the despicable phony journalists that tried to cover it all up are just more reminders that await us all.

The other antithesis of July 4th is North Korea that is there to remind us the other 363 days a year that the price of liberty is truly eternal vigilance. May we never forget my fellow Americans and may we always remember that Freedom is really the ability to do what is right, not the ability to do what you want.

As the shed blood of the innocents, including the unborn continues to cry out to the Almighty, the pulpits remain silent. How long will all of you?

If there is a decay of conscience, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the public press lacks moral discernment, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the church is degenerate and worldly, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the world loses its interest in Christianity, the pulpit is responsible for it. If Satan rules in our halls of legislation, the pulpit is responsible for it. If our politics become so corrupt that the very foundations of our government are ready to fall away, the pulpit is responsible for it. ~ Rev. Charles Finney

May God help us all ladies and gentlemen especially our brethren across the sea as we celebrate our hard fought independence on this special day.





The untimely death of Gary Carter and what we can learn from what happened to the “kid”


His death was a  tragic, untimely loss, seemingly without reason. The hope of many is that this field of dreams in our home town will offer the next generation what may seem impossible: a chance at the big league and the big time. My sincere hope in this article is, maybe in his memory, I can expose what I believe has stolen the best years of Gary’s and many other ballplayers’ lives. That is what I will attempt to explore and assert. The cruel twists and turns of this arduous life don’t make sense at times, especially when it seems the good die young and the impetuous inherit the earth. I never had the pleasure of personally meeting Mr. Gary Carter,  but his reputation preceded him. His career in the major leagues spanned decades and his philanthropy will span even more. He was known as “Kid” for his ebullient demeanor. He was known to all as number 8 on the field, to some as dad, to some as one of a kind to many more, he will be forever remembered as Gary Carter, one of baseball’s great players.

On Saturday, Febuary 21st, field two at the Fullerton Sports complex will be dedicated and officially named Gary Carter field.

images (7)

One of my sons is a catcher and wore number 8 for several years. My older son will be playing in the tribute game being held in Mr. Carter’s honor, ironically here, just a few miles to the east of where Gary used to play in his younger years in the empty fields on the corner of Rosecrans and Sunny Ridge drive. Today there you can find a 20+ acre golf course which is meticulously landscaped and cared for which is now known as the McColl superfund site.

Gary attended Sunny Hills High School and would eventually write his own ticket because of his athletic gifts. He had what it took to make the big leagues and that he did. In 1972 he signed with the Expos. Life would never be the same. Gary was drafted as a shortstop but several years later he would permanently change positions to catcher. He would spend the better part of the next 20 years behind home plate. This would be the “kid’s” new home. Throughout his remarkable career,  Gary Carter caught more major league games than all but three players in baseball history. Some would estimate that Gary Carter caught upwards of three to four hundred thousand pitches behind home plate.

Gary Carter eventually developed a very aggressive form of terminal cancer in his brain that led to his tragic, untimely death. The type of cancer is known as glioblastoma. Brain cancer seems to be increasingly prevalent in our society and even more so in some sports. Baseball, in particular seems to be the sport where the tumors are becoming the most prevalent. You would initially suspect that head trauma would be responsible and that contact sports like hockey or football would lead the way statistically. Oddly enough, that is not the case. Baseball players like catchers and pitchers seem to be the ones plagued by this dreaded disease.

Cancer is a disease whose causes can vary just a widely as the different forms and is very difficult to prove what specifically is responsible.  With respect to the big leagues, the experts are baffled as to causation but in agreement that there is indeed a strange correlation to baseball. Time magazine had a piece a few years back on it:


There are many baseball players that spend time behind home plate and on the mound. and they live long healthy lives. However there is definitely an inordinate amount that do not.  I believe there are reasons that he and other players met the same fate and succumb to this disease and while many who spend their lives out on that field do not.’

I would like to explore what I believe to be the common denominator and and cause of what is being observed. I believe there is a logical explanation for we are witnessing.

Gary Carter was a catcher. He had tumors that resembled a snake wrapped around the back of his brain. Let us look at some of baseballs other players that suffered a similar fate.

Dan Quisenberry was a right handed pitcher who developed brain cancer on his left temporal lobe.

Dan Quisenberry 1953-1998

Dan Quisenberry 1953-1998


Bobby Bonds, the father of Barry Bonds, was an outfielder. He developed a brain tumor and lung cancer.


Bobby Bonds 1946-2003

Bobby Bonds 1946-2003

One of the more notable anomalies in baseball’s bizarre brain tumor incidence is what went on with The Phillys  at veterans stadium.

Five players, Tug McGraw, John Vukovich, Johnny Oates, Ken Brett and Darren Daulton all had brain tumors.

Tug Mcgraw was a pitcher. The location of his tumor was located on his left temporal lobe.

Tug McGraw 1944-2004

Tug McGraw 1944-2004

John Vukovich was an infielder spending most of his career at 3rd base.

John Vukovich 1947-2007

John Vukovich 1947-2007

Johnny Oates was a catcher. His tumor was in the back of  his head in the brain stem.

Johnny Oates 1946-2004

Johnny Oates 1946-2004

Ken Brett was a pitcher. His tumor was on his frontal lobe.

Ken Brett 1948-2003

Ken Brett 1948-2003

Darren Daulton is a catcher. He has a brain tumor.

Darren Daulton 1962-

Darren Daulton


Ricky Stone is a pitcher. He developed a malignant brain tumor.

Ricky Stone 1975-

Ricky Stone

Bobby Mercer was a center fielder and a broadcaster and his tumor was on his right frontal lobe.

Bobby Mercer 1946-2008

Bobby Mercer


Curt Schilling, one of the Phillies’ all-time greatest pitchers and recently announced  he was recently diagnosed with cancer
download (7)


Giants pitcher Dave Dravecky, 32, had a cancerous tumor on his left arm.

download (6)



Lets look at some umpires. Although they rotate their positions on the field, they spend plenty of time behind the plate.

Orioles long-time umpires attendant Ernie Tyler, who has worked 51 consecutive Opening Days including  3,819 consecutive home games  in Baltimore, was diagnosed with a brain tumor.

Longtime big league home plate umpire Harry Wendelstedt had a career that spanned from 1966-98  and was diagnosed with a brain tumor. 

Henry Wendelstedt 1938-2012

Henry Wendelstedt




Frank Dezelan,  a major league home plate umpire,  umpired for 10 years in the minor leagues and then in the major leagues from 1966-1971. Surgery to remove a brain tumor ended his career when he was 42.


Frank Dezelan 1929-2011

Frank Dezelan

Lanny Harris was a home plate umpire in the National League for 7 full seasons, from 1979 to 1985. In 1985, he was diagnosed with an inoperable brain tumor, and given six months to live.

Lanny Harris 1940-1991

Lanny Harris

Todd Felis walked away from a coordinator position with Big League Dreams to return to umpiring logging 5000 games. He was diagnosed with a brain tumor.

Thomas S. Busdeker, 54, a long time umpire of high school and youth baseball was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor called “glioblastoma multiform.

MLB’s Executive Director Michael Weiner has also been diagnosed with a brain tumor. 

What is striking is the majority of the aforementioned individuals is that most are in the direct trajectory of the ball when it is being pitched. Why do the brain tumors seem to plague pitchers and catchers? Why that particular group of individuals?

The anomaly at Veterans stadium in Philadelphia brings no less than five players to oncology wards. The brain cancer rate was 3 to 4 times what the average should have been and four out of the fiver were either pitchers or catchers.  Was it the synthetic turf that they played on? Was it the proximity to the South Philadelphia refineries? Was it due to the stadium being built on a dump? If so what about all of the other players on the field besides the pitcher and catcher? Why are they not seemingly affected? What about the grounds crew, season ticket holders or anyone else that worked for years in, on and around the astro turf? Considering that the odds in a normal environment of contracting brain cancer is about 1 in 8,000 and that there were only a couple of hundred Phillies who played during the last 30 years,  the question  should be raised concerning possible public health risks from the facility.

Let us first look at Astro Turf. According to the U.S. Patent Office, Astro Turf is composed of many ingredients including polyvinyl chloride which is a plastic that when exposed to temperatures of 86 degrees or more breaks down into a dioxin. In addittion, studies have concluded that artificial turf contains dangerous toxins like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead including the lead chromate pigment.

UV degradation along with the elements aid in the decomposition of polyvinyl chloride compounds and release their contents into their environment. Rub your fingers along a white pvc pipe in your yard that has been exposed to the elements and look at the white powder that will stick to your hand.  The same pipe will not do that on the shelf at the hardware store.

What about the refinery pollution or the jets landing over the stadium? Why does it appear that the pitchers and catchers are the only ones affected? What about all of the other players from other teams that played on the field throughout the seasons? Once more, why are they not affected? Good question.

What did Gary Carter  have in common with the five players from the Phillies who came down with brain tumors?

One of the fields where Gary Carter used to play in his youth was later determined to be a superfund site called the McColl site in Fullerton California. From 1942 to 1946, this location served as a dump for the petroleum industry. The principal contaminants of concern (COC) are: benzene, tetrahydrothiophenes (THTs), and metalsEPA McColl site info When dumping operations ceased, it subsequently became an empty field. Like many children are naturally inclined to do to this very day, they play in empty fields.  Gary, along with hundreds of children over the next 50 years, played in those fields, breathing the air, inhaling the metallic laden dust and the airborne organic compounds. The older kids on my block used to ride up there to dirt bike, play in those fields and even go shooting up in the Coyote Hills. So what about all of the kids that used to play in the fields up there off of Rosecrans? I grew up with some of them. Why are they not all sick? 

Like the five Phillies, Gary was exposed to and ingested carcinogens. Gary breathed his from the dust and physical contact with the soil. So did the neighborhood kids. The five Phillies spent an inordinate amount of time on the Astro Turf breathing and coming into contact with carcinogens as well but so did countless others. The players used their cell phones, lived on an on the road diet at times and were frequently subjected to a lack of sleep on the road trips. So were all the other players?

So what is different about these individuals? 

Why were they possibly susceptible to a greater extent than their counterparts to these carcinogens and external factors off of the field if indeed they were responsible? What did Gary Carter and these others have in common?

All professional Baseball players have it rough. There is no doubt about it. I have known at least one personally and all the way from his farm team days to the big time under the bright lights, it has been an incredibly trying time both physically and emotionally. Long hours away from home and family are just one of the hallmarks of baseball’s  commitments. All baseball players use cellphones to fill the long hours hours away from home. So why are the  GBM’s are on the rise in just the pitchers, and catchers . It is no coincidence that this is the area of the brain closest to which the cell phone is held. Baseball players (even retired) probably use their cell phones often as they are on the road often. So why don’t we see the left or right fielders, coaches, or first basemen inordinately coming down with brain tumors on a similar basis? 

Yankees Phillies Spring Baseball

A lot goes on behind the plate as that is where all the action is. There are a lot of eyes and ears 30 feet back in the stands. What most people don’t realize is that part of the action behind the plate and elsewhere involves radar. The radar is aimed at the pitcher from behind home plate and at times, in center field aimed at the catchers to get the velocities off of the bat. It is used on almost every ball that is pitched and caught, whether it be at practice, spring training or during regular season, a radar gun is in operation aimed directly at the pitcher. The catcher is also smack dab in the middle of the radar beam. Gary Carter was no exception. He was in the radar gun’s line of fire almost all of the time. For that matter, so are most catchers, pitchers and even umpires. So why then, do not all pitchers, catchers and umpires get brain tumors?

Let’s talk about radar. Radar employs microwave technology to determine the velocity of the ball as it travels to home plate from the pitcher’s mound. It emits a precisely focused, directional beam of electromagnetic radiation that travels right through the catcher, umpire and to the pitcher. Just how many radar guns were in use at each respective game is unclear to me at this point but it is being investigated.

In the 1960′s, The X band frequency was used extensively which covered the 8-12 GHz range. In the early 1970′s this was changed to the K band at 18-26 GHZ. Eventually the frequencies on radar guns were shifted to Ka bands, thus creating a more powerful, and accurate reading in the 26-40 GHz range. I can still remember listening to Don Drysdale  broadcasting on KMPC on my transistor radio in the 1970′s talking about them clocking Nolan Ryan’s 100 mph fast balls. Radar has been around on the ball field for a long time.

Today, the readily available inexpensive models current operate on a frequency similar to the microwave oven in your home, which is around 2.4 GHz. This is also the same frequency that your WiFi and WiFi enabled wireless devices, including some cordless and cellular phones operate on as well. It is well established that microwaves have been shown to make the blood brain barrier permeable to toxins and metals.

I believe this unique combination of cause and effect is why Gary and these individuals fell victim to this tragedy and many others, although exposed to the toxins, were not exposed to the radar failed to develop tumors. Those exposed to the radar that were not exposed to the toxins failed to develop tumors as well. I believe that both are required for the brain tumors to form and this explains what we are observing.

Below is an excerpt from Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D. Director, Center for Family and Community Health School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley  that confirms what low intensity microwaves do to the blood brain barrier:

“Since exposure to low intensity microwave radiation can open the blood-brain barrier, toxic chemical exposure may be more harmful to anyone who is exposed to wireless radiation. For example, see]”

‘Putting the next generation of brains in danger’

Saundra Young, CNN, Feb 14, 2014

The number of chemicals known to be toxic to children’s developing brains has doubled over the last seven years, researchers said.

Dr. Philip Landrigan at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York and Dr. Philippe Grandjean from Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, authors of the review published Friday in The Lancet Neurology journal, say the news is so troubling they are calling for a worldwide overhaul of the regulatory process in order to protect children’s brains.

“We know from clinical information on poisoned adult patients that these chemicals can enter the brain through the blood brain barrier and cause neurological symptoms,” said Grandjean.

“When this happens in children or during pregnancy, those chemicals are extremely toxic, because we now know that the developing brain is a uniquely vulnerable organ. Also, the effects are permanent.”

The two have been studying industrial chemicals for about 30 years. In 2006, they published data identifying five chemicals as neurotoxicants — substances that impact brain development and can cause a number of neurodevelopmental disabilities including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, dyslexia and other cognitive damage, they said.

Those five are lead, methylmercury, arsenic, polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, and toluene.

Banned in the United States in 1979, PCBs were used in hundreds of products including paint, plastic, rubber products and dyes. Toluene is in household products like paint thinners, detergents, nail polish, spot removers and antifreeze.

7 chemicals in your food

Now, after further review, six more chemicals have been added to the list: manganese; fluoride; tetrachloroethylene, a solvent; a class of chemicals called polybrominated diphenyl ethers, or flame retardants; and two pesticides, chlorpyrifos, which is widely used in agriculture, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, or DDT.

“The continuing research has identified six new chemicals that are toxic to the developing human brain,” said Landrigan. “We’re turning up chemicals at the rate of about one a year that we’re discovering are capable of damaging the developing brain of a human fetus or human infant.”

To examine fluoride, which is in tap water in many areas, Landrigan and Grandjean looked at an analysis of 27 studies of children, mostly in China, who were exposed to fluoride in drinking water at high concentrations. The data, they said, suggests a decline on average of about seven IQ points.

There’s another big concern: “We are very worried that there are a number of other chemicals out there in consumer products that we all contact every day that have the potential to damage the developing brain, but have never been safety tested,” Landrigan said.

“Over the last six or seven years we are actually adding brain toxic chemicals at a greater speed than we are adding toxicity evidence in children’s brains,” Grandjean said.

“At least 1,000 chemicals using lab animals have shown that they somehow interfere with brain function in rodents — rats and mice — and those are prime candidates for regulatory control to protect human developing brains. But this testing has not been done systematically.”

At greatest risk? Pregnant women and small children, according to Grandjean. According to the review, the biggest window of vulnerability occurs in utero, during infancy and early childhood.

The impact is not limited to loss of IQ points.

“Beyond IQ, we’re talking about behavior problems — shortening of attention span, increased risk of ADHD,” Landrigan said.

“We’re talking about emotion problems, less impulse control, (being) more likely to make bad decisions, get into trouble, be dyslexic and drop out of school. … These are problems that are established early, but travel through childhood, adolescence, even into adult life.”

BPA, phthalate exposure may cause fertility problems

It’s not just children: All these compounds are toxic to adults, too. In fact, in 2006 the pair documented 201 chemicals toxic to the adult nervous system, usually stemming from occupational exposures, poisonings and suicide attempts.

The American Chemistry Council, meanwhile, called the review a “rehash” of the authors’ first review.

“This iteration is as highly flawed as the first, as once again the authors ignore the fundamental scientific principles of exposure and potency,” said council spokesman Scott Jensen.

“What is most concerning is that the authors focus largely on chemicals and heavy metals that are well understood to be inappropriate for children’s exposure, are highly regulated and/or are restricted or being phased out. They then extrapolate that similar conclusions should be applied to chemicals that are more widely used in consumer products without evidence to support their claims. Such assertions do nothing to advance true scientific understanding and only create confusion and alarm.”

Landrigan and Grandjean now say all untested chemicals in use and all new chemicals should be tested for developmental neurotoxicity.

This is not a new concept. In 2007, the European Union adopted regulations known as REACH – Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals – to protect human health from risks posed by chemicals. REACH covers all chemicals, placing the burden of proof on companies to prove that any chemicals they make are safe.

“We are behind right now and we’re falling further behind,” Landrigan said. “… I find it very irritating some of the multinational manufacturers are now marketing products in Europe and the U.S. with the same brand name and same label, but in Europe (they) are free of toxic chemicals and in the U.S. they contain toxic chemicals.”

The best example of this, he said, is cosmetics and phthalates. Phthalates are a group of chemicals used in hundreds of products from cosmetics, perfume, hair spray, soap and shampoos to plastic and vinyl toys, shower curtains, miniblinds, food containers and plastic wrap.

You can also find them in plastic plumbing pipes, medical tubing and fluid bags, vinyl flooring and other building materials. They are used to soften and increase the flexibility of plastic and vinyl.

In Europe, cosmetics don’t contain phthalates, but here in the United States some do.

Phthalates previously were used in pacifiers, soft rattles and teethers. But in 1999, after a push from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, American companies stopped using them in those products.

“We certainly have the capability, it’s a matter of political will,” Landrigan said. “We have tried in this country over the last decade to pass chemical safety legislation but the chemical industry and their supporters have successfully beat back the effort.”

However, the Food and Drug Administration said two of the most common phthalates, — dibutylphthalate, or DBP, used as a plasticizer in products such as nail polishes to reduce cracking by making them less brittle, and dimethylphthalate, or DMP used in hairsprays — are now rarely used in this country.

Diethylphthalate, or DEP, used in fragrances, is the only phthalate still used in cosmetics, the FDA said.

“It’s not clear what effect, if any, phthalates have on human health,” according to the FDA’s website. “An expert panel convened from 1998 to 2000 by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), part of the National Institute for Environmental Safety and Health, concluded that reproductive risks from exposure to phthalates were minimal to negligible in most cases.”

But Grandjean is unfazed.

“We know enough about this to say we need to put a special emphasis on protecting developing brains. We are not just talking about single chemicals anymore. We are talking about chemicals in general.”

“This does not necessarily mean restrict the use of all chemicals, but it means that they need to be tested whether they are toxic to brain cells or not,” he said.

“We have the test methods and protocols to determine if chemicals are toxic to brain cells. If we look at this globally, we are looking at more than a generation of children — a very high proportion of today’s children have been exposed to lead, mercury and other substances, including substances that have not yet been tested but are suspect of being toxic to brain development.”

The Environmental Working Group is an environmental health research organization that specializes in toxic chemical analysis and has long called for reforms. In 2004, the group tested 10 samples of umbilical cord blood for hundreds of industrial pollutants and found an average of 200 in each sample.

“Here in the U.S., the federal law put in place to ostensibly protect adults and children from exposures to dangerous chemicals, including those that can present serious risks to the brain and nervous systems, has been an abject failure,” said Environmental Working Group spokesman Alex Formuzis.

“The 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act has instead been largely responsible for the pollution in people beginning in the womb, where hundreds of industrial contaminants literally bathe the developing fetus.”

Landrigan is recruiting pregnant women for a new study that will test for chemical exposures. He said it’s inevitable that over the next few years more chemicals will be added to the list.

His concern? “The ability to detect these chemicals lags behind the chemical industries’ ability to develop new chemicals and put them into consumer products. That’s why we need new legislation in this country to close that gap.”

“We are lagging behind,” Grandjean said. “And we are putting the next generation of brains in danger.”

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
Director, Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley

There are many studies and research papers that confirm that microwaves allow toxins to get into the brain that would under normal circumstances, not be able to enter:

Increased blood–brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain

 Here is an invaluable 19 min. lecture by world-renowned neurosurgeon and research scientist Dr. Lief Salford of Lund University, Switzerland, on research findings showing blood brain barrier leakage in (thousands of) rat brains leading to increased albumin (neurotoxin) uptake, memory loss and damage of up to 2% of brain cells.
Folks, wireless microwave radiation exposure like any radiation exposure is cumulative. The more exposure over time, the greater propensity for disease. The radar guns have improved in technology over the years much like the cell phones went from a brick to a small flip phone that fits in the palm of your hand. While they are still dangerous, the wireless emissions have dropped in proportion. The same with the radar. Pitchers and catchers are in the radar beam almost continuously. This is the game changer. The radar exposure is the proverbial straw that breaks the camels back when combined with toxin exposure, cell phone use etc. The radar guns behind home plate beamed at the back of Gary’s head for decades. Gary Carter’s tumor was in the back of his head wrapped around the spine.
The radar guns are always aimed at the pitcher and I believe the locations of the tumors indicate the radar is the trigger. For example, catchers would get the cancer on the back of the head or the brain stem and the pitchers would get the cancer in one of the temporal lobes depending on if they were left or right handed. You would expect to find the tumors on the side of the head that faces home plate during the delivery. I believe that is exactly what we are witnessing.  Coincidence? I do not believe so.
What about the scouts, pitching coaches or bullpen catchers? They are around the radar and it is sometimes aimed at the backs of their heads?
Mark Merila, the Padre’s bullpen catcher for more than a decade has brain cancer.
Mark Merila

Mark Merila

Colorado Rockies scout Chris Forbes came down with two brain tumors.

download (4)

Tom Pratt was the 12-year pitching coach for the MLB’s Chicago Cubs and has a brain tumor.

download (5)

Michael Weiner, the executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association died of brain cancer. I believe it was probably due to his cell phone use. 

images (2)

Gliomas (brain cancers) have been linked to wireless exposure.

As a matter of fact, the Italian supreme court ruled that microwave radiation from cell phones did in fact cause tumors. Remember that radar guns emit microwave radiation.

How about other sports like tennis that use radar?

tennis radar system

tennis radar system

So how many tennis players are getting brain tumors?

Tim Gullikson, the uncommon tennis player who never made an enemy and who became the coach of the best player in the world, died of the brain cancer he had been fighting for nearly 18 months at the age of 44.

Timothy Ernest "Tim" Gullikson 1951-1996

Timothy Ernest “Tim” Gullikson

Helen Kelesi  had a brain tumor.

Helen Kelesi

Helen Kelesi

James Broach had just become the first and only Trinity men’s tennis player to win a national championship in singles and doubles. He died after a three-year battle with brain cancer. He was 37

James Broach 1986-2013

James Broach

Renee Simpson died of brain cancer at age 47.

Rene Simpson 1986 -2013

Rene Simpson
1966 -2013

Todd Witsken was a three-time All-American at USC and died of brain cancer at age 34

Todd Witsken 1963-1998

Todd Witsken

Leander Paes, one of the world’s best doubles tennis players, was treated for a brain lesion that turned out to be a parasitic brain infection.

download (6)


Alice Reen, is a professional tennis player and a two-time brain tumor survivor.



Stephen Bell, a champion tennis player died of a brain tumor at the age of 38.

Stephen Bell 1969-2009

Stephen Bell

Chuck McKinley was clearly among the most charismatic players of the early 1960s. He passed away far too young at 45 of a brain tumor. 

Chuck McKinley 1941-1986

Chuck McKinley


I believe that so many are dead or dying from wireless microwave radiation this and yet government and the industry is trying to hide it from the public. How could major league baseball or the tennis associations not even mention any of this anywhere? Has no one ever put these pieces together?

Radar guns emit wireless microwave radiation.   Wireless microwave radiation has been determined to be a class 2B carcinogen by the World Health Organization. list of class 2B carcinogens begins on page 9

Some scientists believe if accurately assessed today, wireless microwave radiation would be listed as a class 1 carcinogen. Dr Hardell of the World Health Organization EMF Working Group,  now states radio frequency radiation meets criteria for a  group 1 carcinogen and that  “Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised”.

Think of the  tremendous industry influence over the scientific community and government regulators.

The FCC exposure guidelines for wireless radiation only take into consideration acute burning of tissue and ignore all non thermal biological effects that are found at much lower exposure levels.  There is much debate over this particular issue. For example:



Epa scientist on wireless

Cell phones, WiFi routers, wireless TVs, dvr’s, blue tooth devices,iPads, tablets, laptops, security systems, printers, and any other wireless device emits this carcinogen. Depending on how toxic of an environment you live in, will determine how synergistically the radiation with work with the poisons around you and your children to produce disease.

I believe that Gary Carter and many others would possibly still be alive today if those we entrust with our safety and our very lives at times would stand up and face head on what has spent the better part of the last 35 years behind home plate. It sadly has now managed to enter our homes, schools and workplaces, and in some cases, without even our knowledge or consent.

Major league baseball as well as all sports need to act on this and end this needless tragedy of some of our finest men and women who tirelessly give of themselves for the game.

images (13)

There is nothing more precious than to see the sun shine forever in a child’s eyes. Their excitement of being in the stands of a big league game or simply playing on the little league field is priceless.  We all know that without the children there is no tomorrow for any aspect of our society.  How much longer will we have to tolerate the silence on the wireless microwave radiation dangers especially to our children?

I would like to show you a photo of what I believe to be the biggest threat of all to our children. It is taking place in the classrooms and maybe even at home. This is a photo of a child, not with a radar gun to his head but rather something, in my opinion, that is far more dangerous. It is a microwave transmitter.

The Fullerton Informer shared from:

Like This Page · March 8, 2013

Student at Commonwealth creating a story on the iPad.

33984_479084712158056_1011868072_n (2)

The wireless antenna is right on his zipper. Need I say more?

What is all this wireless doing to the unborn? Are the same mechanisms at work in Autism involving metals and microwave radiation?

download (5)

You see, my son will be playing on that field tomorrow in honor of Gary Carter. Ironically my other son is number 8 on his little league team and my oldest will be wearing the “kid” shirt tomorrow at the game. My hope for my sons is that they will have a “kid” of their own someday and with any luck more than just one. Sadly I believe that what is taking place right before our very eyes may make that reality a mere impossibility some day.

When my father died of cancer some 12 years ago, I availed myself to warn others of the mistakes he made in the hopes of many others gaining insight into what may not be evident to the unsuspecting.

While what has happened to Gary Carter and those that have gone before him cannot be changed, what can be gained is insight into what needs to change so that others don’t have to go down that road. Ladies and gentlemen, wireless radiation is not harmless, the trillion dollar wireless industry is not your friend and if you think the government is going to protect you, you have another thing coming. The dangers of microwave radiation have been known for the last 50 years and are still being actively suppressed to this day.

I am sure that if the players that gave their all to the fans that meant it all to them were here today and know what is now evident, they would want you to act in a way consistent with the values they collectively embodied as a team. The need to be strong, courageous, brave and to persevere in spite of at times, insurmountable odds, and to act in a way that was fair, kind, and loving towards those who are the most vulnerable would be the best tribute to Gary Carter and the others that any of us could ever make.

Do it for the “kid” and for all the “kids”. Help us end the largest forced irradiation program of school children that the world has ever known that is currently on  being carried out all players in this game of life, including our children  so that the “kids” may live to display Gary Carter’s once youthful exuberance in perpetuity and have “kids” of their own someday. I am sure he would have wanted it that way.



Welcome to 1984 ladies and gentlemen. We really have been there for 30 years.The web of lies is in fact, so intricate that it requires almost 2 brains to navigate it. The screens are lying to us all and that is just the beginning. And you thought the smart TV replaced the idiot box. Would they sterilize all of you by DEPLOYING wireless infrastructure everywhere? Never.

Would they sterilize children by forcing them to be vaccinated with nano tech laden injections to enter school, force them to use wireless devices once they get inside the classroom and then get them addicted to them at home? Never.

Would they lie to us about anything? Never. Governments never turn on their own people. Keep letting the flicker rate manipulated screens turn your brains to mush as they get ready to hand the planet back over to the wolves. By the way, they forgot to tell you that you are not invited. And the band played on…..



I REPORT, YOU DECIDE. By Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson

Barry Levinson

C.O.I.N (Civic Openness in Negotiations) – Well a few of us tried valiantly to persuade two other Fullerton council members in addition to our consistent friend and advocate for the people, Council member Whitaker to reject the City of Fullerton’s sham version of labor negotiation reform. Diane Hickey and I presented a comparison between the two tales of “good” government. The real version known as the Costa Mesa version and than the cynical, phony, corrupt version hoisted upon us at council last night by Human Resources Director Gretchen Beatty with the blessings I suspect from her boss, City Manager, Joe Felz.

Fullerton City manager Joe Felz

Fullerton City manager Joe Felz

It was pitiful to watch, Council member’s Flory, Fitzgerald and Chaffee do their phony acceptance speeches for this so-called reform measure.

Council member Chaffee

Council member Chaffee



Ms. Fitzgerald offered that she would be supportive of removing the language that would allow her with two additional council members to waive the requirement for an independent negotiator under all circumstances. But as Gomer Pyle used to say – surprise, surprise, she never offered that as a motion that with one second would have allowed the entire council to strip that awful part of the ordinance.

Councilmember Jennifer Fitzgerald

Council member Fitzgerald


Council member Flory stated the five components necessary for a good C.O.I.N. ordinance as expressed by OC Supervisor Moorlach in an article he recently wrote was indeed included in our draft ordinance. But of course, Ms. Flory did not even offer up one of those tenets as an example. Why take the time and effort to include even one fact in your argument when it is so much more fun and so much easier for Ms. Flory to provide the 10 people or so left in the audience at 11 pm with hyperbole instead?


Council member Flory


Council member Fitzgerald strongly disagreed with Council member Sebourn’s comment that after reading the five components necessary for a good C.O.I.N ordinance, that he was hard pressed to see those components in our proposed ordinance. Please note that Moorlach’s comments and his five main components for a good C.O.I.N. ordinance follows very closely to the Costa Mesa C.O.I.N. ordinance.

Here are the five components as stated in Supervisor’s Moorlach’s article as follows:
“Independent Negotiator – As is current policy, the County will hire an independent negotiator that is not impacted by any outcome in the negotiation process. Past practice had county staff, who were subject to the same provisions as the bargaining unit they were negotiating with, negotiate on behalf of the Board of Supervisors. Independent negotiators remove this conflict.
Cost of Contracts – Current practice has the county budget office analyze the costs of any contract proposal. Under COIN, the independently elected Auditor-Controller will take on this responsibility. This ensures an equal playing ground for both labor organizations and the county as both will be given the ability to comment about the analysis.
Offers and Counteroffers – This ordinance would require that all offers and counteroffers be disclosed to the public within 24 hours.
Board Disclosure – Each member of the Board of Supervisors will be required to disclose any and all verbal, written, or electronic communications they have had with an official representative of a recognized employee organization.
Contract Approval – This ordinance will require that, before the final proposed contract is placed on the Board agenda, the Memorandum of Understanding will be posted to the County website.”

Well Council member Flory, since you failed to support your claim, I thought that I would take a stab at it. As someone who is independent and also an auditor, I thought I could easily either verify or nullify your claims one by one. Remember ladies and gentlemen Council member Flory stated that all 5 components laid out by Supervisor Moorlach were part of the Fullerton labor negotiation ordinance.

1. Independent Negotiator:
Under Moorlach’s component, an independent negotiator is a requirement for all negotiations.
Under Fullerton ordinance Section B.1. Principal Negotiator second paragraph states as follows:
“The requirement for an outside negotiator may be waived by a majority vote of City Council.” It is also not required when there is not a significant change to the bargaining agreement as defined in the
Therefore, the first component is optional, and not required under the Fullerton ordinance.

2. Cost of Contracts:
Under Moorlach’s component the independently elected Auditor-Controller reviews the costs of proposed contracts and provides the information to all parties and the public before any contractual finalization can take place.
In the Fullerton version it states at A.1. Annual Analysis of Costs and Liabilities second paragraph as follows:
“The annual fiscal analysis shall be submitted to the City’s independent auditor during the course of the annual City financial audit.” Under Fullerton law, there is no requirement to provide this information prior to the signing of the labor negotiation contracts, relegating the independent auditor’s information worthless because the public does not receive it timely.
Therefore, the second component only purpose is not carried out under the Fullerton law.
3. Offers and Counteroffers: 

Under Moorlach’s component – “this ordinance would require that all offers and counteroffers be disclosed to the public within 24 hours.”

Under the just passed Fullerton ordinance, there is no such requirement that states how quickly all offers and counteroffers are to be disclosed too the public nor to the council.

Therefore, the third component is not carried out under the Fullerton ordinance.
4. Board Disclosure:

Under Moorlach’s component – “each member of the Board of Supervisors will be required to disclose any and all verbal, written, or electronic communications they have had with an official representative of a recognized employee organization.”

Again, there is no such language included in the Fullerton ordinance.

Therefore, the fourth competent is missing from the Fullerton ordinance.
5. Contract Approval:

Under Moorlach’s component – “this ordinance will require that, before the final proposed contract is placed on the Board agenda, the Memorandum of Understanding will be posted to the County website.”

There is no such language included in the Fullerton ordinance requiring the M.O.U. to be posted to the City of Fullerton website. Therefore, component number 5 also is not met by our Fullerton ordinance. 
I believe that based on my component-by-component analysis, Fullerton Council member Flory has some explaining to do to the members of the Fullerton public. Since Mayor Chaffee and Council member Fitzgerald also agreed with Ms. Flory and voted for the Fullerton ordinance maybe they should help Ms. Flory with her response. I have proven that not one of the key components of a good C.O.I.N. law as describe by Supervisor Moorlach is included in the Fullerton ordinance.

download (18)

Someone’s got some splainin’ to do.









That is a great question that will be asked someday soon unless we wake up to what is being done to our children. I urge you all to please read this article in its entirety.

As parents, we all work hard and naturally want the best for our children and look forward to watching them someday have a family of their own. We live in a brave new world indeed however and microwave radiation has firmly established itself as an integral part of everyday life. In 2014, it has found its way into your workplace, your home and now even your children’s classrooms. So what if I told you that wireless radiation is illegal in California to spray into a K-6 classroom?

I firmly believe the Autism epidemic is a direct result of wireless radiation exposure and you can read more about that here:

So what if under the guise of progress, 21st century learning and the rush to keep up with technological advances, we unknowingly had our children relinquish their reproductive rights by implied consent to classroom microwave EMF exposure? Is there an agenda behind the wireless classroom model being rolled out all over the world? I truly believe that there is. The overpopulation myth continues to be propagated by academia with our tax dollars ad nauseum and the clinically insane eugenicists. The fact of the matter is that there is so much open land on this planet that it is ridiculous.

I am reminded of what, at first glance by the famous explorer, Vasco De Balboa, upon arrival to the shores of Southern California stated as he surveyed the area. He claimed that the area was “uninhabitable” due to the persistent smoke from the naturally occurring fires and the desert terrain. In reality, nothing could have been further from the truth. Today from an airplane, this area somewhat resembles an urban forest. We are told that there is a water shortage when in reality, the aquifer under Orange County is almost one mile deep. We are told that there is not enough food. Look at everyone’s yards with all of the inedible landscape, trees that produce no fruit, concrete and grass. We now get our food from foreign countries watered in some cases with raw sewage, sprayed with banned pesticides, and fertilized with petrochemical poisons. What on earth is going on? We allow ourselves to be crammed into these compact cities and choose to buy instead of grow our own food.

We are told that the pollution levels continue to rise when in reality, the air has never been cleaner because of improved technologies. We are told the deforestation of the planet will lead to our demise. The fact of the matter is we have more trees alive on this continent than ever before due to irrigation. 50-70% of our oxygen comes from the oceans. We will never run out of air.

Climate change? You bet. It is called geo engineering. This is man made and is accomplished with aerosol dispersal of metallic nano particles at high altitudes (strange lines in the sky and funny clouds that look like powder not a powder puff)  that interact with radio frequency emissions from the billion watt Telsa antenna farm up in Gakona Alaska otherwise know as HAARP along with other infrastructure. Yeah HAARP has been turned off since June, 2013-yeah right. Drought, floods, extreme weather? All engineered and RF technology is involved.

The problems of global food shortages and water shortages are primarily logistics and weather modification technology in the hands of corrupt governments, poor planning, overcrowded living conditions as a result of government policies, onerous land use restrictions and burdensome taxation. Ladies and gentleman, there would be plenty to go around if everyone was paying attention. Sadly we are not. We have the resources, the raw materials, the energy, the know how and the technology to solve our problems. What we don’t have is the leadership. This brings us to the point.

The real reason that the stated goal of those in power is to reduce human populations is not because of any of the aforementioned. In fact it, is quite the opposite. The real reason is that there are too many of us for them to control-plain and simple. The moat around the castles don’t work anymore with 7 billion people.

So how does the wireless classroom agenda fit into all of this? Like a glove I tell you. You see it is no mystery that these microwave EMF emissions effect fertility. There are all kinds of studies that clearly link exposure to infertility and it is via a non-thermal mechanism. You will always be told that it has never been proven. You will be told that your shower, shampoo, a stinkin’ joint or a chicken drumstick is the culprit:

In the meantime I believe that you are all foolishly banking your lineage on the notion that EMF emissions play no role in infertility because there are literally a hundred thousand studies and articles online that state that they do play a role:….0.0..1c.1.20.psy-ab.L4ls45OStw8&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.49405654%2Cd.cGE%2Cpv.xjs.s.en_US.QXiTEk6XjhM.O&fp=759e4372eb9e5bcf&biw=1280&bih=555

So where does the edict originate to implement the microwave matrix in our classrooms? It is top down and I will give you a hint:

It then works its way down the ladder to:

It then shows up in our own schools here:

I try to stop it here:


There, ladies and gentleman, is your implied consent to expose your children. You can laugh, you can kick you can scream, you can love me or hate me but like Elton John sang 40 years ago-”don’t shoot me I am only the piano player”. I am just a messenger. You can choose to do your own research. I already have. You can choose to ignore this warning and bank your family’s lineage on some empty promises from some lackey educrats that will have long since be retired when you find out that old Joe was right.

The choice is yours. They are your children. I don’t know about you but I am not going to allow my children to take part in the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever known and I hope you won’t either. Please get YOUR CHILDREN OUT OF HARMS WAY AND GET involved before it is too late. So here we go gang:



The brain becomes the child, the child becomes the brain:

They put the stores on every corner that peddle this stuff to the kids:

loaded to the hilt: download



The choices are endless:


It starts out being fun:

Then it gets taken up a notch and becomes an obsession:

Suddenly, things begin to change and you wonder why?

You begin to wonder what is going on with your child’s new online friends:

It seemed like yesterday that your child would play outside but now this is all they want to do:

The parks and playgrounds around town now look like this on the weekends:

The sun is out and the kids are not:

Soon they stay up late at night and are not sleeping as much as before:


Now school is a place for rest:

Their behavior at home begins to change and you wonder why:

But mom, all the kids are gaming:

You begin to attempt to limit the screen time and the behavior you observe is frightening:

Soon, the friends your child has, only want to game. The child’s world is not the same anymore and you question if he will ever be the same:

You are losing control of your child to the screen time and the lack of sleep watching certain games involving all kinds of demonic images, violent, bloodthirsty thrill killing sprees, torture ,with places like dungeons, with every evil imaginable, ending up in right in front of your child’s face, eternally etching a place in the recesses of their formidable developing minds.

Now you are realizing that you are losing them to the:

The child regresses into a brave, dark, demonic new world. Activities from what seem to be a bygone era, rife with simple pleasures such as a bike ride or a trip to the park,  now seem a million miles away:


Now human life has little meaning as a result of the constant conditioning:

Adult human life has little or no value:

Much less a child or or the unborn:


You rationalize it and buy him more of the latest and greatest because everyone is doing it:

Soon non stop demonic images end up parading at record speed right in front of your child’s face:

What happened to my child and will he need help?


Does he need:

Will he ever be the same and can I ever get him back from the blue glow and its darkness?

How did all this begin?

Soon one thing led to another with the screen time because the experts know best:

The screen time begins younger and younger with each passing year:

But the experts tell us we need them to compete:

Soon they  use them more and more as they get older:

And soon screen time becomes all the time:

And before you know it, as you were when you were young:

You now find yourself older and all the more surrounded by the blue glow:

Many of the devices are designed to be two way wireless transmitters with infrared imagery sensing and audio feeds that continuously track, record, transmit the data offsite to unknown locations and all the while emit continuous pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation emissions 24/7 even when it IS TURNED OFF. It only stops the emissions when it is UNPLUGGED! Does your child sleep near one of these?

The wireless emissions are 24/7 in your child’s face:

In your child’s lap at home:

And in your child’s lap at school:

All the while seated under or near the wireless router at school:



or next to it at home:

download (11)



And what is all of this screen time and wireless exposure doing to your child?

images (13)


Does constant wireless exposure effect fertility?

There are those 6′s again-3 of them and what is with the luminescent energy splitting open the sphere?:

Did you know that the female gametes or eggs contain only the X sex chromosome ?


The boys gametes contain  both the X and the Y chromosomes:

X -blue + Y-yellow= GREEN

Is this the heart of this device?

Who is the man behind this company?


What is with the red mic and his vaccine agenda?


Here is his legacy to the earth.  This is the future appearance of the world  headquarters for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They have plans for a total of three 6 story buildings. There are those three 6′s again. Funny these look like magnets.



The other big player in all of this is Apple computer company. Let’s have a look at  Apple’s Cupertino headquarters at 1 Infinite loop.

thdownload (8)

Does the Apple facility’s design layout explain part of the process by which their ultimate responsibility to the environment is accomplished? Here is some more of the green and some interesting artwork that appears to outline a bizarre mechanism:


apple-headquarters-cupertino-spaceship-plan-620x663 spermgr149

Looks like a schematic:

apple-3images (6)


Membrane potential is all electrical.


So are wireless tablets and cell phone emissions:


download (13)

Classroom Wireless access point emissions:

images (15)

So back to the gaming systems. What is the significance of the letters and their colors on these buttons again?

Who is ultimately behind the wireless radiation exposure safety guidelines and vaccination programs:


Who has the exclusive market on the wireless device market  in the classrooms?

Here they are those  three sixes  again:

images (11)

images (9)


apple-1-666 (1)

What is with the three 6′s?

What did Adam and Eve do wrong?

f34b7f9d643b5542ebb652744165dea520110325172542 (1)

You just bought these for your children for Christmas:

It will spend more time with your child than you will:

look where the WiFi antenna is located:

images (7)

images (8)

In the classroom and at home, WiFi mode is utilized:

Why is the antenna placed where it would be emitting pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation at levels trillions of times the normal background levels right smack dab in direct proximity to the sensitive developing reproductive areas of our children?

33984_479084712158056_1011868072_n (2)

Your school and PTA are pushing for these:

You find yourself supporting fundraising at the school for more:


And for years these will be transmitting pulse modulated microwave radiation in DIRECT CONTACT WITH:


At home by your choice as a parent:

And forced on your children at school:


Robert Pletka FSD superintendent:

Fullerton School District Superintenedent  Robert Pletka.

Fullerton School District Superintenedent Robert Pletka.


“Your request that the district turn off wireless connectivity and remove IPads from your children’s respective classrooms….is respectfully DENIED.” 11-1-2013 letter to Joe Imbriano.

What does all this mean?


When you add all of this up, is this what  we get?

And by the way, who is watching, listening, tracking, and developing algorithms and dossiers on you and your children through the black box trap doors from afar?


Cant get into school without these right?


No shots No school? Right?

Now you see the city and its people:


Now you don’t:


Notice now how everyone is gone, and to where, you can use your imagination. The three arches above appear to be a resurrected monument of sorts with a striking resemblance to the original location of these funny looking buildings over at The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that remind me of horseshoe magnets. Is it mission accomplished with the 3 arches representing the three  6 story buildings at the Gates foundation headquarters erected upright in their utopian world without people in the above photo of what Seattle may look like someday? 



Let’s have another look at this picture.


What is with the Sun and the little ball next to it? Is the needle symbolic of the force vaccination program’s successes?


Red and yellow make orange. Google is getting ready to blanket the entire planet in microwave emissions from space. Looks like Google paints with all the colors of the wind.

So Google will blanket the planet in WiFi with 180 satellites-

180 satellites- 3 x 60= 180 and just for good measure they may double the number to 360 -there are your 3 sixes again.

Google’s venture is being led by Greg Wyler, founder of satellite-communications start-up O3b Networks, and depending on the network’s final design, the group may double the number of proposed satellites. 

Two-thirds of the world still remain without internet access. Google is now planning to change this by launching a fleet of 180 satellites to provide web access for the 4.8 billion people not yet online

Two-thirds of the world still remain without internet access. Google is now planning to change this by launching a fleet of 180 satellites to provide web access for the 4.8 billion people not yet online

So where does that leave all of us? But really now, where did everybody go?



















  • I REPORT, YOU DECIDE. By Barry Levinson


    This is my first opportunity to compare an excellent law, the CostaMesa Ordinance on Civic Openness in Negotiations (C.O.I.N.) vs. theFullerton Draft C.O.I.N Ordinance, which can be passed into law by a

    vote of our city council on Tuesday, June 17th 2014.


    Costa Mesa’s Civic Openness in Negotiations ordinance was

    designed to make public employee salary and benefit negotiations

    open and transparent to the public and to all members of the city

    council as well.

    First, the Costa Mesa ordinance makes it clear that “the city shall

    have prepared on its behalf, by an independent auditor, …. a

    study and supplemental data upon which the study is based,

    determining the fiscal impacts attributed to each term and condition of


    More importantly “the above report and findings of the independent

    auditor shall be completed and made available for review by the city

    council and the public at least thirty days before consideration by the

    city council of an initial meet and confer proposal to be presented

    to any recognized employee organization regarding negotiation

    of an amended, extended, successor, or original memorandum of


    Finally, “the above report shall be regularly updated by the

    independent auditor to itemize the costs and the funded and

    unfunded actuarial liability which would or may result form adoption or

    acceptance of each meet and confer proposal.”

    The draft Fullerton C.O.I.N. ordinance includes none of the above

    specific steps to ensure the public is being kept informed with

    accurate and timely data and information.


    What does our draft ordinance include? It includes the following:

    “Staff shall prepare an annual analysis of cost and liabilities related to

    each Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between a recognized

    employee association and the city of Fullerton …”. “The annual fiscal

    analysis shall be submitted to the City’s independent auditor during

    the course of the annual City financial audit.”

    Please notice ladies and gentlemen that this audit takes place

    annually, probably after the conclusion and the signing of the labor

    agreements. Learning of an error after a 3 or 5-year agreement has

    been signed, sealed and delivered is meaningless. How convenient

    for all city employees that City Manager Joe Felz and staff would

    rewrite this ordinance in this fashion. The auditing required under

    the Fullerton Draft Ordinance is a waste of money because it is not

    completed on a timely basis.

    Second, the Fullerton draft excludes the Report Format, which

    provides the framework and necessary detail to understand the

    impacts of various items in the proposals.

    Third, if the two items above do not derail the true purpose of

    C.O.I.N. then a simple majority of the council can do away with the

    requirement to have an independent negotiator. This part of the draft

    ordinance is ridiculous on its face. You take a cornerstone of the

    concept of C.O.I.N. and you make it optional with the vote of 3 out of

    5 members of the council. Section B.1 entitled Principal Negotiator,

    states “The requirement for an outside negotiator may be waived by a

    majority vote of City Council.”

    Fullerton city leaders have taken an open, fair and effective law for all

    parties and made it into a paper tiger.

    This is my first review of the Fullerton C.O.I.N. draft ordinance and

    you can see by the length of this critique that the two ordinances

    have far more differences than key points in common. In fact, I would

    be hard pressed to see any of the Costa Mesa key points being

    brought forward to our Fullerton ordinance. Based on all the above

    facts, it would not be far from the truth to state that our Fullerton

    ordinance literally guts the effectiveness of the Costa Mesa law.

    My recommendation is that we throw out this draft in its entirety. We

    start again with the Costa Mesa Ordinance as our draft ordinance as

    originally brought before this council some 7 months ago by Council

    member Whitaker. If any council members want to change any of

    the Costa Mesa requirements they should have documented valid

    reasons why their change would be for the better and each change

    should be voted on separately by our council.

    In my humble opinion, the Costa Mesa Civic Openness in

    Negotiations Ordinance is an excellent law. The only fault that some

    may find with it (certainly not me) is that it will actually accomplish its

    proclaimed purpose.—BARRY LEVINSON



Dr. Leif Salford on WiFi and wireless: how microwave emissions affect the blood brain barrier.

Are your children the canaries in the coal mine, or rats in a cage with 35 kids in a classroom being forcibly exposed to pulse modulated microwave radiation levels that are trillions of times the normal background levels from multiple industrial strength wireless access points with wireless devices in their laps all day 5 days a week 180 days a year for decades? You can shut the wireless off at home but not at school. Robert Pletka refuses to turn off the wireless systems.

I would listen to this neurosurgeon who has been in practice since 1967 long before any education doctor like the Fullerton School District superintendent Dr. Robert Pletka.


Robert Pletka has gone on record and states that the wireless classrooms are “… totally safe for the children..”



How about Greg Dhuyvetter who while runs all the Catholic Schools in The OC?  ALL of his schools are rolling ahead with wireless in spite of the warnings to him.


Does it not appear that he could very well be in love with the technology if not obsessed with it? Or how about this where he uses Jesus’ name in vain to gain bragging rights to the common core? Are you kidding me? . Is this his fantasy?


How about Petaluma school superintendent Steve Bolman who was refused to turn off the wireless systems in his district?


Why does it appear that he is ignoring the Petaluma based website  run by a local parent group?

It is a no brainer folks. The stuff needs to be turned OFF and taken out of the laps and hands of our children before it is too late.

images (14)

images (5)

Obama’s Connect Ed program, and Wheeler’s FCC are directly involved in what amounts to forcibly irradiating your children at school. This is a non-optional situation for your kids.


“John Krull, the information technology officer for the Oakland public school system, said the need for Wi-Fi upgrades cannot wait another year. “We pretty much need an access point in every classroom,” Mr. Krull said. “Just having a few access points spread around the school doesn’t cut it.”

I guess he hasn’t read this:

I would add that once these access points end up being deployed on the ceilings, their pulse modulated microwave emission equivalents-the wireless tablets and laptops-end up being deployed in their laps with, in this case, the antenna resting right on his zipper.




They will also be deployed near their heads,

images (3)

or even at home deployed right next to their siblings developing brains.

images (2)

May God help us ladies and gentlemen, may God help us.


Fullerton Police Chief Dan Hughes — another look

download (14)

I REPORT, YOU DECIDE.-by Barry Levinson

I attended the Fullerton Republican Women’s Federated meeting on May 28, 2014. The guest speaker was our Police Chief Dan Hughes. He gave an interesting if somewhat disjointed speech. He indicated that it was good for his department to acknowledge when they do not live up to the highest standards. Yet, he then referred to activists and complained that whatever the FPD actually does, these activists are going to complain about his department.

Dan, either you want legitimate criticism or you want to bitterly complain whenever a member of the public has a legitimate beef with the FPD. Your speech certainly sent out mixed messages much like that famous pair, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.


He also handed out the 2013 FPD Annual Report, which he indicated was the first one published since way back in 1967.

In it I noted that for 2013, the FPD Supervisor of the Year was none other than Sergeant Kevin Craig, the highest-ranking officer present during the beating death of Kelly Thomas. Craig, you may recall, testified in late 2013 or January 2014 for the defense of Ramos and Cicinelli, claiming that none of the actions taken by any of his fellow officers, including himself that night were indeed against FPD policy. It seemed rather odd that even before the criminal trial had begun, Dan Hughes chose this man to be his star performer.


Why, Dan, did you fire Ramos, Cicinelli and Wolfe, when your Supervisor of the Year testified that they did nothing wrong? Your training officer, Corporal Rubio also testified that they did absolutely nothing wrong.

images (1)

I guess those officers were just walking by and Kelly Thomas just happened to repeatedly strike himself in the head, face, body, etc. and died. I guess Kelly Thomas asked Fullerton Police Officer, Jay Cincinelli if he could borrow his taser, so Kelly could inflict maximum damage to his own face. I guess it was just those 6 officers’ misfortune that they happened to be on their normal rounds when that terrible incident occurred.



One must accept the above scenario as the truth to be able to understand why not one of those 6 officers ever spent a night in jail. But those pesky activists — you know, the protestors — Dan Hughes will make darn sure that they spend some time behind bars. Because that is the fair-minded, not-politically-motivated police chief we are so lucky to have represent us in the most ethically run city in the state of California. Count your blessings, Fullertonians. The city of Bell has nothing over us. After all, they just stole money, not a life!



I forgot to tell all of you, that our police chief kept on repeating one point over and over again during his presentation. That point was that Dan Hughes just does not pay any attention to the politics within Fullerton. No, he just sends 6 police officers, including 2 supervisors as well as several police vehicles to Pasadena for half a day to arrest AJ for a misdemeanor failure to disperse.


I now have learned from Jean Thaxton’s public comments at last council meeting that Dan Hughes put together a police committee to review the tape of the Ramos, Cicinelli not guilty protest that took place on January 18, 2014. Based on that review, FPD filed that non-violent misdemeanor charge against peaceful protester and live streamer, AJ Redkey for failure to disperse (failure I guess to not disperse quickly enough for Dan Hughes because others have alleged that the same tape shows Mr. Redkey running from the protest area at the time the police asked the protestors to disperse). We all know that had to be the highest priority for our FPD that day. Clearly, if AJ Redkey was the most dangerous “suspect” that needed to be arrested that day 40 miles away in Pasadena, and you could afford to send 6 officers to make that arrest, then I would humbly point out that the FPD is greatly overstaffed!

download (1)

By the way, it is my understanding that the most common way, the easiest way and probably the cheapest way to make that arrest was to call the Pasadena Police Department and ask them to make that arrest. I guess that easy solution never crossed your mind, Chief Hughes. I guess the next question is why did that simple and easy solution never cross your mind? Or maybe it was personal to you Dan Hughes, like the game of political payback! Just like the reports that the FPD riot police who taunted those protestors who were arrested on January 18th, 2014 with saying the words Not Guilty over and over again! If true, it shows a great lack of maturity and professionalism by those officers.

But unfortunately for the good people of Fullerton, the alleged bad acts of one or more Fullerton police officers do not end there. In fact, it was reported that those 10 arrested protestors complained that their very lives were threatened by at least one Fullerton police officer who was transporting them to jail. These protestors complained that they were threatened that when they arrived at the Orange County jail all their faces (including both men and women) will be smashed in by 12 waiting OC Sheriff Deputies. Yet when Dan Hughes was asked whether he had reviewed the DAR’s (Digital Audio Recorder’s) of those officers to investigate those extremely serious charges, our open and honest police chief remained totally silent.

PS: It is now over a month and counting when I first asked Dan Hughes to tell me the name of the Officer who replaced Reserve Officer Bill Wallis performing the very important role of monitoring and enforcing Fullerton’s Sex Offender population. I am becoming suspicious that Dan has not and maybe does not want to hire a replacement for Bill Wallis. That would certainly have the same or greater chilling effect as repealing our Ordinance No. 3149. No manpower, no enforcement, no protection for both our children and our women from dangerous sexual predators.

images (2)

Barry Levinson



I REPORT, YOU DECIDE-by Barry Levinson.



I want to thank all the good people from all over California who graced our city with their presence last night at our Fullerton city council meeting. They really showed everyone there that the truth will win out over the public relations machine known as our current FPD.

download (14)

One of the speakers asked Dan Hughes to produce the DAR’s (Digital Audio Recordings) of those officers who arrested the protesters the day of January 18th, 2014 which will allegedly verify that one or more officers taunted the arrestees, with the chant, Not Guilty, Not Guilty with a broad smile. One or more of the officers then allegedly stated that when the protesters are handed over to the sheriff deputies, that they will have their faces beaten in.

Well I now demand that Dan Hughes hand over these DAR’s to prove whether or not those accounts made by I believe all those that were arrested are indeed the truth.

The clock is ticking Dan Hughes and we expect that information to be presented immediately. After all you always tell us that the new FPD is open and transparent and therefore, should have absolutely nothing to hide from the public.

images (19)

One more thing Dan Hughes. What is the more serious crime? A non-violent failure to disperse or a specific threat to 10 people in Fullerton Police custody that their faces will be beaten in by OC sheriffs. Sounds a lot like the threat that Ramos made

images (21)


against Kelly Thomas on July 5, 2011. images (20)

Since these terrible allegations against the police were reported extensively right after the arrests on January 18, 2014, why did you not have the answer to that question last night?

Barry Levinson




download (13)

Barry Levinson


There are many people who are upset about the FPD sending 6 police officers and several vehicles all the way up to Pasadena for a half day just to arrest AJ Redkey on a misdemeanor warrant, for failure to disperse during the January 18th protest over the not guilty verdicts of Ramos and Cincinelli. On June 3rd you will have the opportunity to speak before our city council. This issue is on the agenda as Item No. 9 under Regular Business. It will be very interesting if our Police Chief responds to questions from our council members if not from the public.

FPD chief Dan Hughes

download (14)

Every time I think of that arrest the only two words that make any sense are; political payback! Unless, AJ is a violent felon (and based on all newspaper reports this is not the case), the FPD’s actions are indefensible. Please note that all 5 people streaming (broadcasting) over the internet during the Kelly Thomas not guilty verdict protest on January 18th, 2014 were arrested by the FPD. Coincidence or payback! Remember it was reported that those that were arrested that day while in the police van were heckled by the FPD’s finest with the chant….Not Guilty, Not Guilty! If true just another example of the total lack of professionalism of some of our men and women in blue. I believe that story because I personally know a woman who was not allowed to use a bathroom that day within FPD headquarters after 2 police officers asked her if she was a protester. She said she was peacefully protesting and they told her to take a hike. This woman had major surgery a few days prior and any fool could see that medically she was not doing well. I happened to talk with her right after this alleged innocent and I believe her story 100%. But I guess it was not those 2 officers day to serve and protect the public. 

images (23)

Dan you must be so proud of those 2 officers for refusing a sick woman the “privilege” to use our taxpayer funded FPD bathroom as well as those officers in full riot gear taunting those arrested protesters. A reasonable person would begin to notice a pattern of harassment, by taunting some of the citizens they come into contact with. We all witnessed for ourselves the taunting of Kelly Thomas by Officer Ramos on July 5th, 2011. Instead of police training Dan, how about sending those officers to a class with “Miss Manners”? How about a civics class that teaches your officers the meaning of the words, public servants?

download (10)

Dan I know a half days pay for 6 highly paid FPD officers for a misdemeanor arrest warrant for an activity that occurred 4 months prior, may not seem like a lot of money to you since you make almost $200K a year plus another over $100K in benefits. However, it makes us taxpayers feel like we had our pockets picked by the FPD.

images (24)

piece of cake

The other words that I cannot get out of my head are these; 2013 FPD Supervisor of the Year, Sergeant Kevin Craig! You know him as the highest-ranking officer participating in the KT beating death. He testified for the defense that he saw no violations of any FPD policy or procedures the night of July 5th, 2011. He came on the scene and witnessed 4 officers literally beating the life out of a 135 pound unarmed shirtless man with enough of Kelly’s blood all around to make an ER doctor sick. Yet he apparently did nothing to stop this totally unnecessary and senseless beating.

images (25)

Question to Dan Hughes. Since your award winning Sergeant Craig and your FPD training officer testified under oath, that all officers conducted themselves within prescribed FPD policies and procedures, why sir did you fire Ramos, Cincinelli and Wolfe? Either they did something terribly wrong that night or they did not. You cannot continue to have it both ways. You cannot continue to state that you took care of the problem while you never have admitted any bad acts by those 6 men!

images (26)

We also know based on the testimony of a Fullerton fireman that Sergeant Craig nor any of the other 5 involved officers directed paramedics to help Kelly Thomas to give him the much needed immediate medical attention he desperately needed that night.

images (27)

In Dan Hughes reformed FPD, Sgt. Craig deserves an award!
In my world, Sgt. Craig and those like him would never wear a police officer’s badge.
Well if you were not there in person or watching on the TV or internet, you need to go the the City of Fullerton website under Departments, City Clerk and hit Agendas to pull up yesterday’s video. It was one of the few meetings where the people of Fullerton got a rare true glimpse of city leadership. Go to Public Comments first and then go to Item 9 and listen to the people speak again. Listen to your Police Chief, Dan Hughes and your Mayor, Doug Chaffee speak. It is very educational.
Decide for yourself who were the truth seekers and who wanted to deceive the public. Look at who behaved like adults and who screamed like spoiled children. By the way it was your Fullerton Police Chief, Dan Hughes who yelled out of turn the word “liar” to me, interrupting my few precious minutes our city gives its citizens to voice their concerns. Didi anyone notice that our police chief was not so cordial and easy going last night. I think we witnessed another side of Dan, another real side of Dan. We now know him much better after last night. The real Dan confronted by the truth by so many of us, cracked under the strain of having to listen to the people for a change. He was not supposed to interrupt,(but he did anyway), while the people got a rare opportunity thanks to Council member Whitaker, to speak their minds about how our police too often abuse their power and authority.Samara already knew the real Dan Hughes as he once yelled at her for no good reason during a break at a former Fullerton Council meeting a few years ago. By the way everyone in that chamber heard the despicable way Samara was treated by our Police Chief that night. We got another good look at the real Dan Hughes last night as well.It is interesting to note that this all took place on Election Day. But do not worry we have another election day coming up in a short 5 months and guess who can be shown the door to the front of the City Hall, right past his self-proclaimed VIP parking place, our own not so sweet, not so kind and not so gentle Mayor Chaffee. People we must ensure that Mayor Chaffee no longer has the honor that he squanders at every council meeting to represent the people of Fullerton. Get him out of here.Did you hear Fitzgerald, Flory and Chaffee suck up to our Police Chief last night. They could care less that AJ Redkey was singled out for political payback. Not a problem, because they like the status quo. They represent their own interests and not the interests of the people.

I ask everyone who reads this message to go out and tell at least 10 or your friends to watch the video of our meeting last night. Watch the video of the May 20th meeting concerning the Assessment of the Sex Offender Ordinance and see how rude and disrespectful our Mayor can be. We have work to do and we must start right now! 




The FCC allows for 100 MILLION more times the microwave exposure than The Austrian Medical Association recommends.

RF Radiation Regulations

It is truly a tale of two cities. Yes indeed folks, yes indeed and oceans apart. The Fullerton School District’s Board of Trustees, administrators, principals, teachers, staff and even most of the PTA groups and Foundations are all aware of what we are attempting to stop which is what we believe to be the extremely dangerous forced irradiation of our school children with pulse modulated high frequency microwave emissions to run these totally unnecessary wireless classrooms. My son, who is not using a microwave transmitter at this time as participation is OPTIONAL if you were not aware, tells me it seems like game day every day. All this just so the kids can play games on their Ipads? He finishes with pencil and paper far ahead of his classmates on problems and assignments. He said the other kids get to play games on their Ipads often and everyday. That is certainly what is going on at the Morningside afterschool day care since WiFi was installed recently as well at the behest of the parents ostensibly so the children can do their homework on the Ipads. Ask the staff. It is game day everyday over there now thanks to Mr. Pletka. His agenda has spilled over into the infant care centers now.

Well there was a time when my wife and I would walk in to the day care facility and see all the kids at the tables with their pencils in hand and their noses in their books doing their homework. Well at least the director has partially followed my advice by shutting off the WiFi until the kids get there in the afternoon sparing the infants, preschoolers and the kindergarten late birds the needless and dangerous RF exposure. Oh I forgot, it is all about the common core. You know even as of today, 6 months into this thing, still not one single solitary servile FSD employee has had the courage or decency to break rank and stand up for these kids. It is amazing what a paltry paycheck and a few bucks will do to peoples’ consciences. Ignoring thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies that show harmful effects and sicking an unqualified attack dog on us to obfuscate the issue is not what the children deserve.

So what gives with the folks across the Atlantic deeming 100 MILLION times less microwave radiation exposure as being the upper limit on safe exposure? What do they know that we don’t? Why are their Autism rates one third of the US? How could there be a 100,000,000 variation? THAT IS TOTALLY INSANE.

It can only amount to one of several possibilities. The first is that they know something that we don’t. It is also possible that our government knows something that they know but don’t want us to know, or lastly no one knows anything and they pulled the 10 to 8th power odds off of the back of a powerball ticket. Somewhere in the middle is the Bio Initiative report that the wireless industry and the academia bobble heads pick apart with their RF industry sharpened Pinocchio schnozes. Those folks are a bit more liberal than those from that far land across the sea at the center of culture and wealth at a recommendation of 30,000 times less exposure. Who are these folks? They are scientists. Who are folks at the Austrian Medical Association? They are doctors who happen to live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Who are the folks at the FCC? Well it is simply a regulatory agency. It is not a public health agency. They don’t have one single medical doctor on its entire payroll. So what do they give us? They give us EXPOSURE GUIDELINES 100 million times higher than the Austrians and to add insult to injury, they get themselves off the hook because the guidelines are NOT SAFETY STANDARDS.

How can something so important, be given to chance? How do we have people with Ed.D’s who demand to be called docktahs, people with MBA’s, and risk managers looking the other way while these disparities are glaring them in the face with me at the microphone every two weeks and me passing out fliers in the parking lots every chance they provide me a captive audience making crucial health decisions for 15,000 school children. These folks have appeared to demonstrate that they themselves don’t even understand these numbers by allowing the THE FSD’s RF report and press release to stand with what I believe to be preposterous readings and false and misleading statements of total safety. They just follow orders. If it is legal and the order comes down, they simply flip the switch. We are not getting what we pay for but we are certainly getting what we deserve if no one dares to speak up for these kids.

I firmly believe that these wildly varying numbers clearly show that the meaning of the FSD’s very own superintendent Robert Pletka’s claim that this is “totally safe for the children” is merely based on what I believe to be his extremely limited understanding of the issue, and a mere subjective interpretation of the facts. Ladies and gentlemen, that is simply a chance that none of us should be willing to take with our most valuable assets who happen to be our own children.


Barry Levinson on Fullerton’s fuzzy pension math.

A Friday blast from the past that has even more relevance today with the taxpayers even further behind the eight ball several years later. The last council meeting offered the potential for the city to get behind openness and transparency in municipal labor negotiations. What happened?

Look gang, all balloons pop. The question on this one is who is gonna be around to see it, hear it, feel it,face it and worst of all, pay for it. Looks like the joke’s on you and your kids and the establishment hacks have the taxpayers roped and this particular one fit to be tied. Buddy boy Blankhead didn’t look to happy as it may have been way past his bedtime. He can sleep all he wants now that he can really stretch it out. So what is so wrong with a concerned citizen taking some of his own valuable time and expending a lot of his effort pointing out that the sky is really falling?

Have things only gotten worse under the Flurry, the Ritzgerald (is she a RHINO?), and the dog and pony show Chaffee controlled council? Has the hole for the taxpayers gotten deeper? What about C.O.I.N? Will the Tommy’s truck be back on Tuesday nights? Great questions. Shall I elaborate on what our gracious leaders have chosen to bequeath us and our children with through the leaded, smoked looking glass?
Stay tuned.


A Memorial Day message from Barry Levinson

images (15)


On Memorial Day, a solemn day that our nation honors those that fought and sacrificed so much in order to preserve the precious freedoms we have here in America.

Well this report should question how our city can make arbitrary decisions that seem to fly in the face of those very freedoms that our soldiers have fought to protect for the last 238 years!

This true story starts with the passage of the amended sex offender residency restriction ordinance as follows: Rather than first incorporate the many modifications to the draft amended ordinance that were suggested mainly by me at the May 20 council meeting into a draft ordinance ready to be approved without any further changes at our very next council meeting, the council did this instead. They voted 4-1 to approve the unfinished amended ordinance with the proviso that the city attorney would make all the necessary changes before the 2nd reading of the ordinance in two weeks. Although hopeful that the many changes would be incorporated, I believe that the proper way to get this done correctly, was to first make all the changes to the amended ordinance and then bring it back to the next council for the 1st vote and reading. Rarely, in my experience does the council allow for any changes once an ordinance is passed the first time.

The concern that the city needed to move quickly because of a threatened lawsuit was a very poor excuse to rush this amended ordinance through at the May 20th council meeting.

You see ladies and gentlemen, the city leaders, i.e. Joe Felz, Dick Jones and Dan Hughes were notified that the vagrancy part of Ordinance No. 3149 which deals with keeping child sex offenders out of parks and schools was preempted by state law and that specific part of Fullerton’s law was ruled unconstitutional, according to the case Dermody vs. the people of California filed 4/11/2013. Since the city through our city attorney made no attempt to appeal this decision, the only other thing to do was to go back to council and ask to make the necessary changes to the law to place the entire law back into full compliance with the state. This was totally ignored by our city leaders until May 6th of this year; 13 months after the city knew the law was in violation, due to the Dermody case decision.

They not only squandered 13 months to act, but they unofficially decided at that time to not enforce the entire Ordinance, even though the residency restriction was and still is perfectly good law in full compliance with state statutes. For 13 months they let the council and the good people of Fullerton believe that Sex Offender Ordinance No. 3149 was still being enforced by the city’s police department.


Joe Felz did not have the decency to let my wife and me know the ordinance that we worked day and night on for over 7 months to get written and then passed in 2010 was not being enforced at all for over 13 months and counting. If you think we recently received any kind of apology from Mr. Felz, you would be greatly mistaken.

Why did they knowingly not enforce a hard fought and won ordinance to help protect our children from the worst kind of sexual predators, is a question all of you should ask our city manager, city attorney and our city police chief at the next council meeting?

It is scandalous that they would put our children at risk for their own self-serving reasons.

Finally, I thought Fullerton city laws that were passed had to be enforced unless or until the same council that passed it in the first place officially repealed them. I guess our city has “their own “special” way” to enforce or ignore laws at their own whim. The city IMHO, completely stepped over their legal bounds by arbitrarily and unilaterally deciding not to enforce the major part of Ord. 3149, i.e. the residency restriction as well as the vagrancy part.

Shame on you Joe Felz, Dick Jones, and Dan Hughes.

download (7)   images (14)

images (19)

You do know better and should have done the right thing from the very start. Fullerton, the last time I checked was still a city in the great state of California and California was still part of these United States of America. When did the city decide we became a third rate banana dictatorship where the leaders can pick and choose at their discretion the laws they choose to enforce or not enforce.

If anyone does not believe that the city was not enforcing our Sex Offender Ordinance No. 3149 since last April 2013 through today, all you have to do is go to the May 20th City of Fullerton Regular Meeting Agenda statement. There you would click on the Assessment of City’s Sex Offender Ordinance, Agenda Item No. 7 to get the city attorney’s own write up on this issue, Subject: Assessment of City’s Sex Offender Ordinance, page 10 Item C.1. “The Dermody Decision”. There you will find this quote from Jim Touchstone, our Deputy City Attorney as follows:

“In April 2013, the Superior Court Appellate Division heard the matter and determined that the city’s park exclusion provision contained in the Ordinance (Section 7.150.050) was preempted by state laws and was unenforceable on that basis. Accordingly, the City currently is prohibited from further enforcement of that section of the Ordinance.* The city Attorney’s Office informed the City of this ruling shortly after it was issued. As such, the City ceased enforcement of the Ordinance at that time.” *

Based on the above quoted language, it is clear that we cannot even count on our city leaders to enforce current laws whose sole objective is to help keep our children safe. Remember the city chose not to enforce the entire ordinance when the court only stated that the vagrancy part of the ordinance not be enforced. This is a huge difference and one that the city has never explained to me or to our council either.

Please note that I, Barry Levinson added the bold face and italics for emphasis.

In conclusion, any concerned Fullerton citizen, student, business owner or employee should be outraged at the conduct I described relating to our City Manager, Joe Felz, our City Attorney, Dick Jones and our Police Chief, Dan Hughes.

All of us should attend the next Fullerton City Council meeting on Tuesday, June 3rd, 2014 starting at 6:30 PM and demand answers.

Thank you.

Barry Levinson











First, the agenda item to amend and strengthen Ordinance No. 3149, our Child Sex Offender Residency Restriction Law. The council and Joe Felz agreed to allow me to collaborate in working toward  a revised and improved Ordinance No. 3149. Mr. Felz assured me more than once during the process that any differences I had with the city attorney’s recommendations, I would be given ample opportunity to make my case completely before the council on May 20th. Well Mr. Felz I guess you forgot about your promise to me because right in the middle of my comments and concerns about the city attorney’s revised document Mayor Chaffee cut me off. Mr. Felz did not then speak up and remind the Mayor that both he, (Joe Felz) and the council had assured me that I would have ample time to speak before the council. No Mr. Felz was as quiet as a church mouse.



When I reminded Mayor Chaffee that I was promised this would be a collaborative process and I would have the necessary time to make my points, he rudely said to me that I already went over the 3 minute public comment limit by about a minute or so as the video proves. I followed the Mayor’s wishes even though he failed to keep both the council’s promise and the city manager’s (Felz) promise to me to be allowed to make my case fully before the council. However, it gets worse, much worse. When the agenda item came back to council and council members were allowed to speak, Council member Whitaker stated that he thought the Mayor’s behavior toward me was not proper and disrespectful and that he wanted to allow me the opportunity to finish my thoughts on the topic. Mayor Chaffee rudely stated that public comments were over and refused to let me speak at the request of Council member Whitaker. Let me make two things very clear.


First, Mayor Chaffee was not elected Mayor by the people of Fullerton but rather appointed based primarily on political considerations to the mainly cosmetic post of Mayor. Second, based on the continued dictatorial actions by the aforementioned appointed Mayor Chaffee, as well as his rudeness to the public (he originally denied AJ Redkey from speaking at public comments even though he had a public comment number to speak)

He has shown his true colors and should be asked to step down from the council. Please do not expect that to happen, but we the peoplecan make him step down in November when he runs for reelection.Well after the Mayor refused to allow the request by Council member Whitaker, Council member Sebourn and the Council member Flory,(in that order) said that I should be allowed to speak and because they had the votes to override the Mayor, I was then allowed to finish my comments.

Appointed Mayor Chaffee would probably call himself a liberal. The word liberal used to mean someone who stands for personal liberty and the civil rights of all. Chaffee’s actions belie that definition 100%. Dictator certainly describes the way he behaved at last night’s council meeting, trying to run rough shot over the other council members and it was certainly not the first time he has behaved in such an unbecoming fashion. One last point on the revision of Ordinance No. 3149. My suggestion was to not vote on the ordinance, as there were changes that the city agreed to make to the document. My suggestion was to direct the city attorney to make those changes and have a final draft document ready for the next council meeting. Only Council member Bruce Whitaker supported that very sensible idea. For that reason and that reason only, Council member Whitaker voted against the agenda item. In fact he was the most supportive of any of the council members and without his support to allow me to finish giving my suggestions, some important items would probably been left out of the ordinance.

On the Civics in Open Negotiation presentation, Ms. Gretchen Beatty basically followed the previous guidance of the majority of the council and provided Fullerton’s outlined version of COIN, which basically watered down the independence and oversight portions of the Costa Mesa COIN ordinance. You see the independent negotiator might cost the city a whopping 20,000 dollars to cover all bargaining units negotiations. This was Ms. Beatty’s estimate not mine. It is amazing to me how quickly the status quo becomes so tight fisted when they are against a proposal. We just incurred more than a 20 million-taxpayer liability because the city and city attorney’s recommendation to not settle the Verona homeowner mudslide lawsuit resulted in the city loosing the case.



No problem a 6 million dollar bond will pay for most of it over the next 20 – 25 years at a total cost of the aforementioned over 20 million of our tax dollars. Just another example of how some might say we are wasting are tax dollars when we do not have any money to squander, period. The city leadership in my opinion, starting with Joe Felz is trying to make COIN as weak as possible to keep the status quo. It is so informative to learn that so many who are appointed or elected to serve the people would be working so hard to diminish an ordinance whose only goal is to provide the taxpayer with information for the very first time about the negotiating process before it becomes a faitaccompli, usually all behind closed doors.

download (15)

Ask anyone who objects to the Costa Mesa COIN ordinance that is working so well in Costa Mesa, why they do not like that model? That model attempts for the very first time to put the taxpayer, the people who pay for all city employees, to have timely access to the same information as the city leadership insiders have. An objective negotiating process that places the employees and the employer i.e. the taxpayers of Fullerton on equal footing. Those that protest too much I would suggest are not for openness, transparency and fairness. I say this because the Costa Mesa version of COIN is precisely those things!

Onto another council topic relating to the arrest of AJ Redkey in Pasadena a few days ago. 6 FPD officers, mostly undercover went to Pasadena earlier this month to arrest AJ for an outstanding misdemeanor warrant, for failure to disperse (I guess not quickly enough according to the FPD) at the January 2014 protest outside of FPD headquarters over the KT not-guilty verdicts. Well, do not worry ladies and gentlemen, even though the 6 involved FPD officers have not and apparently will not serve one day in jail over their actions that directly lead to the death of Kelly Thomas, it appears now that some of the protestors apparently will serve some time.


There appeared to be no “good” reason why AJ attracted so much FPD attention in Pasadena. If anyone would do a Freedom of Information request about the number of outstanding felony warrants in the city of Fullerton, you would most likely find evidence that those 6 FPD officers going to Pasadena was a terrible misuse of taxpayer dollars.

Dan Hughes by this action alone has made it clear that the FPD has not been reformed.



Is what he did illegal or even harassment under the law, probably not. However, his action with regard to AJ tells us that he is not using what he claims is his understaffed FPD manpower to its best use. Do not expect him to respond to the many members of the public who spoke out at yesterday’s council meeting. The chief would not even look at the people speaking to him, let alone answer their questions. These are legitimate issues that demand an answer from him. I guess we can all look forward to FPD open house day (not ever to be confused with open and transparent FPD on any day) or another article by his paid consultant, Bill Rams in the Thursday edition of the Fullerton News Tribune. Dan for an understaffed department, you sure no how to waste taxpayer monies on non-essential “police services”.

Finally there is one more very important item to report to you from yesterday’s council meeting. With the passage of a revised Child Sex Offender Residency Restriction Ordinance, it would seem a faitaccompli that are children will be better protected under the law from dangerous child sexual predators. However, this would not be the case if the Police Chief did not replace Reserve Officer Bill Wallis with another full-time reserve officer solely dedicated to tracking our sex offender population and enforcing all the laws that relate to them. Yet I have asked for the name of Bill Wallis replacement 4 different times between asking City Manager Joe Felz and Police Chief Dan Hughes via email and in person, never receiving that information. They both refused to respond to my direct inquiries not once but twice at the last 2 city council meetings. In fact, Mayor Chaffee stated I would get a response later in the council meeting and yet it never happened. How easily our Mayor breaks his promise while hosting our city council meeting. He gives his word that I will get a response later that evening and then he or Police Chief Hughes or City Manager Felz fail to answer my inquiry during the rest of the council meeting. Just another reason why the voters should remove Mayor Chaffee from office this November and at the same time start demanding some accountability by our to top appointed city positions, police chief and city manager.

It has been an incredibly busy and stressful April and May for both my wife and myself. We forced the status quo to bend to the needs and wishes of the people with regard to helping to protect our children from dangerous pedophiles. That effort by the people is not over by a long shot for the very reasons I just explained right above. We live in very dangerous times, where our government sometimes acts more like a third world banana dictatorship than the America we studied in school during our civics lessons. But all I can ask of you is to not give up the good fight, for ladies and gentleman, saving our country from the growing corruption within, is a fight very much worth making!






In 2014, a conspiracy theory is nothing more than imbecilic vernacular for an inconvenient truth. This is the reader’s digest version of what I believe this is all about. Yup, these control freaks in academia and media tell us that we humans are trashing the planet while the air has never been cleaner, that geo-engineering/chemtrail induced drought and extreme weather , ehhm, I mean climate change is upon us, there is not enough land in the hands of the BLM (the 640 million acres off limits to development in the US alone) ehhm, I mean there is not enough land left in the compact cities, and that the sky is falling because the plant food levels, ehhm I mean the Co2 levels are way too high. Almost every tree for a 100 miles in any direction in the So Cal garden of Eden climate that are planted by virtually every municipality and homeowner is not fruit bearing along with their roundup sprayed inedible landscapes and we wonder how or why we could run out of food?  Yes the fluoridated water must be beneficial, sunlight exposure is dangerous, mercury vapor compact fluorescent lighting is the source of vitality and circadian rhythm renewal, carbonated toxic sweetener bone and tooth dissolving colas out of a silver colored can are a silver bullet, and wires are evil and wireless devices are a godsend. And you take this con job hook line and sinker. Yes it begs the question: do they cull out in the open or clandestinely? You actually think they are gonna let you collect on that pension as they fish out the king crab stocks just so and yours can go Norwegian cruising the globe and stuff your faces at the buffet?

Look gang, when the TV is full of cesspool sitcoms, blithering idiot talk show hosts peddling the latest and greatest insult to your intelligence, lying baboon politicians, replete with vampire soft porn kinky movies, bloodlust, bloodletting, hit pieces that call booze fine spirits, pill commercials, satanic children’s cartoons, and mindless endless bullshit sports diversions, with the pickpocket preachers on Sunday mornings watering it down like they do with the well drinks at happy hour bringing up the rear, you know the hour is late. Here it is right here folks. Step right up and read all about it. Actually just point, click, and listen. Amazingly, as you will see, that is how they intend to return this planet back to the wolves, as you paint with all the colors of the wind. Yes, literally with the click of a mouse, literally.

Once you are done with the 7 plus minutes, join me here:

for an in depth expose on the nefarious hidden in plain view exploits of some of the most popular personalities on the planet. You will not be disappointed. I personally guarantee it.

1544358_3609375290939_888880943_n (1)



On July 5, 2011, Kelly Thomas, while being detained and mind screwed by a few thugs with badges, fell into the trap of police provocation and it ended up costing him dearly.  It ended up costing him his life.
In the dytsopian, North Korean style aftermath of the Fullerton officers’ acquittals, more protests erupted. The trials were delayed long enough to get this out of most peoples’ minds. Damage control was now the name of the game.

So here is the moral of the story that needs to be incorporated into the Fullerton School District’s common core curriculum. It goes something like this:  If you wear a badge and murder an innocent citizen on camera, you get the best lawyers money can buy, get out of jail free, and get the longest paid vacations in Fullerton’s history.  If you don’t wear a badge and spill the beans on the men in the black uniforms, it’s the hoosegow or bust.

The ensuing protests were impressive and considering the reason for them, they for the most part remained surprisingly peaceful. AJ with other members of the media were there live streaming the developments as they unfolded. Cops hate the independent media’s live streamers because confiscating the the devices or their memory cards doesn’t keep misdeeds out of the cloud, it simply keeps the footage out of their hot little hands.  AJ was a live streamer at the protests when an unlawful assembly was declared. So why did our very own Dragnet boys in black have the hots for him so much so that they took their show 40 miles down the road out of uniform to the streets of Pasadena to pick him up on a MISDEMEANOR!  Yeah they don’t have an officer to keep tabs on the sex offenders in town but good old Danny boy sure has no problem with throwin’ around some dough to bring our boys home when they cross that line-the line our veterans and soldiers bled out barefoot in the snow or soaking wet with bullets in their backs on the beaches of Normandy to hold-our First Amendment rights as Americans. Ladies and gentlemen, here are your tax dollars at work and they claim there is no culture of corruption in The FPD?

Where have we devolved to as a society that the long arm of the law deems clear cut video evidence during a murder extraneous and meticulously analyzes other video evidence of a  protest to criminally implicate a member of the press engaging in activities that ostensibly are designed to keep us free.
It is just where we are folks but it doesn’t have to be that way.

Is this a taste of things to come?


What do we tell our children ladies and gentlemen? What do we make of the dichotomy of what is taught in the civics textbooks, and the abdication of our civic responsibilities that  have allowed us to reach this point? Look them in the eyes tonight and ponder this as you celebrate Memorial day. Remember those who gave their lives to keep behaviors such as this relegated to banana republic cesspools. I know that they would turn over in their graves if they could see just how much we have let them and our children down.




The faces of forced irradiation in the FSD: Pletka’s all star cast.

Everyone that you will see in this video knows about the two sides of this issue. There are many other key players in this saga who are not in this 7 minute damage control piece. Ladies and gentlemen. We all make choices and the choices we make will have to be lived with for the rest of our God given lives. I have no problem with technology. This message was produced and delivered via a hardwired desktop computer. The problem that I have is with the wireless radiation that the district has chosen to spray from wireless access points into the classrooms to bridge the gap from the fiber optic cables in the walls to the students devices. I am not alone. It is the position of many scientific experts in the fields of neurology, physics, biochemistry, engineering, public health, environmental medicine and mainstream medicine that wireless microwave radiation DOES NOT BELONG IN A CLASSROOM. Yes this is marketing plain and simple, Madison Avenue style complete with airbrushing. They are candy coating a jawbreaker on this one gang, believe me.

No, what you won’t see here are the stacks of thousands of scientific studies that show wireless radiation is harmful. What you won’t see here are the RF meters picking up wireless microwave radiation emissions whose levels are trillions of times the normal background levels coming off of the district’s wireless access points and wireless devices. What you won’t see here are the impassioned pleas to the board members and staff to stop the wireless proliferation until it has been proven safe. What you won’t see here are the interviews with the scientists whose credentials vastly exceed anyone employed by the district that warn against the very things Robert Pletka is doing with wireless in the FSD. What you won’t see here is Karent Whisnant, and Nancy Regitz at a parent teacher conference refusing to accept peer reviewed scientific literature warning against the forced wireless exposure and the potential for harm to the children. What you won’t see here are the potential biological effects of chronic microwave exposure to the brains and reproductive organs of these students. What you won’t see here is the 100 page electrical contract that the Fullerton Joint Union High School District entered into in order to HARDWIRE ALL OF THEIR COMPUTERS. What you won’t see here are the decisions being made at all of the Fullerton High Schools to put student safety in front of an agenda. What you won’t see here is Acacia Principal Karen Whisnant calling the police on our group as we peacefully handed out literature to parents on the public sidewalk in attempts to warn of the potential irreparable biological harm to students. What you won’t see here, in my opinion, are people who are worthy of their positions.

WHAT YOU WILL SEE HERE IS AN ALL STAR CAST COMPRISED OF THOSE WHO HAVE DECIDED TO IGNORE THE REPEATED WARNINGS AND PARTICIPATE IN THE LARGEST FORCED IRRADIATION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN THAT THE WORLD HAS EVER KNOWN. What you will see here are children with microwave transmitters in direct proximity to their sensitive developing reproductive areas. What you will see here are students using wireless devices crammed into close quarters all day long being exposed to unprecedented levels of microwave radiation trillions of times the levels that you and I were exposed to growing up. The classroom microwave radiation levels are higher than those of a cell tower 100 meters away. Yes ladies and gentlemen, what you will see here are your children and those who are making the crucial health decisions for them in a manner, in my opinion, which demonstrates callous disregard for the well being of these children as well as current State Law. They sugar coat all this and slickly sell it to you. These are the faces of the irradiated and the irradiators, plain and simple. We are the faces of those who want caution exercised when it comes to something so unnecessary and dangerous as wireless classrooms.





images (16)






By Susan Foster

In May 2011 the World Health Organization’s cancer committee, IARC, voted to classify the RF – EMF Spectrum as a 2B or “possible human carcinogen.”  Worldwide attention was once again focused on the possible cancer causing effects of RF (microwave) radiation, yet in the three years since the 2B classification, two divergent paths have been taken with respect to the science focusing on cell phones and brain tumors.

On one hand, the Hardell Group from Sweden led by oncologist Dr. Lennart Hardell published five more studies in 2013 – for the first time looking at over 20 years of data. As a result of these findings Dr. Hardell has called for an urgent upgrading of the classification of RF – EMF from 2B to Group 1 – a known human carcinogen. If IARC were to accept Dr. Hardell’s recommendation, RF – EMF  would then be placed in the same carcinogenic category as tobacco and asbestos.

On the other hand, there appears to be a back-room effort to ignore, denounce and bury Dr. Hardell’s newest science by two highly recognized groups, the World Health Organization and SCENIHR, the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks.

Susan Foster, on behalf of the UK’s Radiation Research Trust, has discovered that one man appears to be responsible for the attempted suppression of what is arguably the best epidemiological research in the world on cell phone usage and its correlation to gliomas and acoustic neuromas. This science could threaten a multi-trillion dollar industry; thus the stakes could not be higher – for corporate profits, yet more importantly, for the health of people all over the world.

In her letter of May 8, 2014 to the European Commission’s John Ryan, Acting Director of the European Commission’s Health and Consumers division, Susan Foster accuses SCENIHR of scientific misconduct. She further asks for a thorough review of the process whereby science was selected for SCENIHR’s Preliminary Report. SCENIHR had been given the charge of reviewing the present RF – EMF safety limits affecting over 500,000,000 European citizens.

“This is not ‘independence’ on SCENIHR’s part,” states Susan Foster. “This is scientific misconduct. SCENIHR is claiming to be something it is not, and hundreds of millions of lives are at stake as well as the ability to impact standards worldwide, albeit indirectly.”
Susan Foster joins Eileen O’Connor, Director of the UK’s Radiation Research Trust, Cindy Sage, co-author of The BioInitiative Reports, Swedish investigative journalist and Chairman of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation Mona Nilsson, as well as Blake Levitt and Henry Lai in demanding a new unbiased evaluation of health risks from RF – EMF by SCENIHR.


Susan Foster


May 8, 2014

John F. Ryan, Acting Director
Public Health Directorate

Health and Consumers Directorate General
European Commission,
L – 2920 Luxembourg

SCENIHR Preliminary Report on Potential Health Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)

Sent Via Email

Dear Mr. Ryan:


The concern about the 2014 SCENIHR Preliminary Report has been swift, severe,and global. It causes those who know the science and comprehend the potential for harm from microwave radiation to ask if SCENIHR is truly a body worth listening to, or has it lost all credibility. In hopes that all is not lost, I am writing to express my profound concern that industry-bias is destroying the ability of standard-setting bodies to protect the citizens of Europe, and indirectly, citizens on a global scale.


As an Advisor to the UK’s Radiation Research Trust (RRT), I am following up on RRT Director Eileen O’Connor’s recent letter to you asking for a thorough review of the SCENIHR Preliminary Report and the process itself by which science is selected for consideration. I contend the current selection process by SCENIHR is suggestive of a pattern of scientific fraud that is intended to suppress high quality science in order to preserve the way the telecommunications industry conducts business. The question must be asked if both SCENIHR and the World Health Organization are being influenced or controlled by the same interests and individuals who favor industry profits over their charge of protecting the public health.


No fewer than 500 million citizens of the European Commission are relying on SCENIHR for review of the current EMF standards, which have already been criticized as being set more than a thousand times higher than the level at which adverse biological impacts occur. When standards are set this high, it allows the manufacturers to falsely yet legally assure consumers, “There is no health problem or safety concern as the level of exposure is 1/1000th of what is allowable.” Thus there is the promise of safety, which is only an illusion because so-called “safety standards” are set capriciously high to begin with. There is no legitimate, independent science that will declare the current standards are safe. Absolutely none.
In my opinion and that of many others, the 2014 SCENIHR Preliminary Report inaccurately and, in part, fraudulently assesses the existing science. It ignores the new science by Lennart Hardell (five studies in 2013) in which he calls for radiofrequency RF – EMF to be classified a Group 1 carcinogen. Yet rarely has “dismissing” a group of studies shone the spotlight on them so brightly. It is causing people around the world to ask what is so significant about these new Hardell studies. The answer to that question may shed some light on the inner-workings and true motivation behind some key SCENIHR scientists.


It was the Hardell Group’s earlier science that IARC, the World Health Organization’s cancer committee, used along with the Interphone Study before declaring a 2B classification in May 2011 for all EMF within the RF Spectrum. The newer Hardell epidemiological studies cover more than 20 years, something no similar study has ever done, and the results are so convincing that Lennart Hardell states in his conclusion that RF – EMF should be urgently upgraded to a human carcinogen with no “possible” or “probable” qualifications. Dr. Hardell makes the case that RF radiation belongs in the Group 1 human carcinogen category.


By ignoring Hardell’s science, SCENIHR attempts to marginalize and even suppress the Hardell Group’s science which could change the way the world—consumers, courts, and governments alike—view the use of wireless in today’s world. Why would SCENIHR, a group composed predominantly of industry-friendly scientists, work so hard to pretend they “had not received” or “did not like the methodology of the epidemiology” of the 2013 Hardell studies? There is a possible answer to this question. A Group 1 or even a 2A classification changes the “causation” argument in cell phone/brain tumor court cases, and will make it easier for victims who have developed brain tumors related to cell phone usage to prevail in the courts. When consumers prevail in the courts, it may force the mobile industry toward a more cost effective manufacturing decision to shield mobile phones and find safer ways (e.g., fiber optics) to replace microwave signal transmissions. It would, at least in the short run, increase costs for the mobile industry and decrease profits. I believe the Hardell Group’s 2013 studies are game-changing, and as such, the industry wants this science suppressed.


To further the concern that SCENIHR is not operating in good faith, the one scientist who was touted by SCENIHR as being their proof of objectivity is Dr. Kjell Hansson Mild of Sweden. Dr. Hansson Mild is one of the co-authors along with Dr. Lennart Hardell in four of the five studies published in 2013 and subsequently ignored by both the World Health Organization (WHO) in its 2014 World Cancer Report and SCENIHR. For SCENIHR to pin their reputation as an objective body on the presence of Dr. Hansson Mild, and then to ignore five Hardell studies, four of which were co-authored by Dr. Mild himself, is the height of hypocrisy. It casts a deep shadow of doubt on SCENIHR’s Report. I am aware that Dr. Hansson Mild has come forward with a letter detailing his attempts to have the 2013 Hardell Group science included in SCENIHR’s report, and his efforts were denied. He described bringing the Hardell Group studies to the attention of Dr. Joachim Schüz, in particular. These papers were delivered within the time frame for acceptance of publication and are relevant as they provide evidence of the link between mobile phone use and glioma and acoustic neuroma. The Hardell papers were systematically disregarded while SCENIHR relies heavily on the much criticized Danish cohort study using poor exposure data. [See Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L. Review of four publications on the Danish cohort study on mobile phone subscribers and risk of brain tumors. Reviews Environmental Health. 2012; 27: 51-58.]

When another highly criticized study was sent to SCENIHR [Benson et al, with Joachim Schüz as a co-author], including two reports that were published during the same time or even after the Hardell studies, it was included in the SCENIHR Preliminary Report. This study failed to find a link between cell phones and cancer, and when it initially did find a link between cell phones and acoustic neuroma, the authors, including Schüz, failed to discuss it in the Abstract. The systematic inclusion of poor quality science with industry backing, and the systematic exclusion of Hardell’s science, allowed SCENIHR to come to an erroneous conclusion that evidence for glioma is weaker now than in 2009. This sort of “cherry-picking” favors industry profits over consumer protection and thus the SCENIHR Report should not even be considered science.


This is not “independence” on SCENIHR’s part. This is scientific misconduct. SCENIHR is claiming to be something it is not, and hundreds of millions of lives are at stake as well as the ability to impact standards worldwide, albeit indirectly.
It is important to note that Dr. Joachim Schüz has been named as the key person to whom Hardell’s science was delivered and summarily dismissed, both as Head of IARC’s Section of Environment and Radiation and as a SCENIHR Committee Member. As Dr. Mild wrote to you in a letter dated 28 April 2014: “It must be clearly stated that Dr Schüz refused to include these studies in SCENIHR and that the omission is his responsibility.” Dr. Mild elaborates: “[Schüz] clearly stated that the epidemiological part was solely his responsibility to write and furthermore he himself was to decide what to include.” It is also important to note that Schüz has received industry funding for much of his participation in studies such as Interphone and COSMOS which had predictable findings. Should Dr. Schüz’s influence continue to be felt at SCENIHR, and by the same token, at IARC?


Gratefully, the BioInitiative Working Group is offering us an alternative that is receiving increasing recognition and respect around the world and, as you know from Cindy Sage’s recent letter to you, BioInitiative has done a thorough review of SCENIHR’s Report and issued its response. I am offering the link to the BioInitiative Working Group’s letter commenting on the 2014 SCENIHR Preliminary Report.

Mona Nilsson on behalf of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation submitted her comments to SCENIHR on 16 April 2014, and they are well-worth reading. I have included a link to Ms. Nilsson’s comments, in which she writes to SCENIHR: “The Preliminary Opinion of SCENIHR gives a false and even fraudulent presentation of research results and statistical data. Critical data are abundantly omitted or ignored. Studies and results showing health risks from radiofrequency and low frequency radiation are misrepresented. Studies showing no risks with severe limitations and errors are instead presented without any relevant criticism.”

I join the RRT’s Director Eileen O’Connor, Cindy Sage on behalf of the BioInitiative Working Group, Mona Nilsson of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation, and scores of others in calling upon the European Commission to investigate possible conflicts of interest on the part of SCENIHR scientists, and to demand a thorough investigation of the selection process of science for the 2014 SCENIHR Preliminary Report. I also call for a new unbiased evaluation of health risks from RF – EMF by SCENIHR.

Respectfully Yours,


Susan Foster

Advisor, Radiation Research Trust (UK)

Medical Writer


For More Information Contact: Susan Foster   -

The EM Radiation Research Trust is an educational organisation funded by donations. An independent Charity Registered No. 1106304 © The EM Radiation Research Trust 2003-2004


California’s geo-engineered drought

For the better part of my childhood, young adult, adult, and now middle aged life, I have always paid careful attention to the weather. Almost all of my available free time was, and is to this day, spent outdoors. I have always been connected to the sky above and the land and sea beneath as my hobbies, interests and pursuits have been inexorably linked up to life giving climactic cycles.

I know what the sky is supposed to look like because I used to be able to read it like a book in terms of the weather. To this day, I still can, but the predictions I now make are based on the predictability of the weather being manipulated and the tell tale sign of such: aerosol operations involving metallic nano particles interacting with electromagnetic forces being emitted from various key infrastructure systems all around us. Clouds are not straight lines with tire tracks in them. Clouds are not a tic tac toe game in the sky. People you need to take your eyes off of your screens for a while and pay attention to what is being done to all of us from above by those who serve and get their orders from those down below.

Since 1977, I have personally taken and categorically logged barometric pressure readings, relative humidity, visibility, wind direction and speed, cloud cover and precipitation. My collection of photos of the sunrises and sunsets spanning decades over the bow of a boat, the ball field backstops, the isthmus at Catalina, or over the Newport pier span decades along with my collection of newspaper clippings of the weather satellite images. The 16 year collection came to an end when the local papers stopped printing satellite images in the mid 1990′s. The weather section in these papers is now in cartoon format.

Fortunately the Unisys satellite loops give us far more information than ever before available. Thank God for the internet.

Today, there is no hiding what is being done to the weather. You would never know it is happening however, unless you had the frame of reference of what the sky used to look like and how the weather patterns used to play themselves out. Without the knowledge of how fronts, ridges and systems are supposed to appear in person or on the visible, infrared, or water vapor satellite imagery, you cannot begin to understand just how far from normal they have taken us. Without an understanding of how these weather systems have historically behaved, you cannot to discern the fact that almost everything that we call weather patterns today are actually complete weather anomalies.

There are no longer normal weather patterns.  It should come as no surprise, that none of this is due to global warming. There is climate change for sure folks. It just ain’t caused by your car, your cow or your kid.  Extreme weather is merely man made in your face technologically induced climate change that will be blamed on excess levels of human respiration otherwise known as plant food or carbon emissions.

This is THE pretext that will be used to depopulate the planet.

Blanketing the planet with metallic nano particles that get into our bloodstreams via the food and water supplies along with their biologically damaging electromagnetic interactions once inside our bodies from wireless radiation is THE GOAL. This is called radiation biology ladies and gentlemen. It is an extension of the Manhattan Project and it is alive and well in the year 2014.

The identities and intentions of those and the mechanisms by which this will be accomplished have been dealt with at length on this website.

So back to my own back yard. Things began to drastically change around early 1993 in Southern California with the sky becoming enveloped in the strange haze that followed the tic tac toe in the sky.  The chemtrails have now become part of the landscape all over the world, including the movies, commercials and cartoons. What began gradually back then is now commonplace three days before a high, a cutoff low or a low pressure system approaches.  These lines all over the sky are not water vapor folks.

So as the stone fruit trees, the  marine food chain and the bees die en masse from this radiation biology program involving electromagnetic interactions with these metallic nano particles, we don’t care because, we got WiFi, iPads,  big screens and there are 500 channels now? When will people ever realize that they cannot eat money?

Ladies and gentlemen, those are not commercial aircraft and those grid patterns are not commercial flight paths. If they were, the F.A.A. would fire every last air traffic controller in the country.

But who cares, you got your WiFi, my iPad, a big screen and there are 500 channels now.

California’s drought is a geo engineered drought. Please consider this perspective on the Geoengineering and Chemtrail Manufactured Drought that all of our elected leaders continue to ignore. Will all of you?

Climatologists report that the 2013-2014 rainfall season is well on its way to becoming California’s driest period in more than 400 years. In 2013, California received an average of just over 4 inches of rain. Downtown Los Angeles, which receives nearly 15 inches of rain during a normal year, only got 3.6 inches in 2013. It’s currently California’s driest period since it was granted statehood in 1850.

It is no coincidence that the extreme drought coincides with unprecedented geoengineering and chemtrail activity. In Engineered Drought Catastrophe, Target California, Dane Wigington of Geoengineering Watch says, “intentionally caused drought is weather warfare.” California’ drought works like this:

“With the combination of constant aerosol spraying and ionosphere heater utilization (HAARP) the climate engineers have effectively cut off the flow of moisture to the state of California. Why? First, California is possibly a climate “sacrifice zone”. This means that California is collateral damage for the constant parade of engineered snow storms being whipped up further east in the US. The rain blocking high pressure ridge that the climate engineers have locked in place over the western US and the eastern Pacific pushes the jet stream straight north, carrying the moisture with it before rain can come anywhere near California. This moisture then travels as far as Alaska and the Arctic. The jet is then turned back south as it wraps clockwise around the HAARP/ionosphere heater created dome of high pressure. Then, it is pumped all the way down to the southern US carrying heavily sprayed and chemically ice nucleated moisture with it which enhances the artificial cool down of the eastern US.”

Our loss is another’s unwanted excess gain in terms of flooding and extreme weather. Look folks, the weather is being controlled in order to justify the draconian regulations and measures that Agenda 21 requires. Look into it.  Weather modification has been around for a very long time. There are Tesla antenna farms all over the world. The fact that they have gotten you to believe that water vapor is supposed to look like powder is indicative of how much time people spend in front of their flicker rate manipulated screens.

There is nothing good about what they have planned for you and yours. The technology exists to solve  all of our problems. We can put probes on pluto, yet we allow a private bank to print money out of thin air and loan it at interest to the government who loans it at interest to banks who loan it interest to us which enslave the future generations with debt. Yes we  have rectangular chemtrail formation dumping of aluminum and barium salts at 40,000 feet pawned off on us as clouds and still we cannot fix a pothole. Maybe we deserve the potholes.

The technology and its control are simply in the wrong hands. The ability to solve our problems is well within our reach. However, as long as they train us to act like animals, the closer we will all come to the inevitability of being treated like animals. Break your conditioning before it is too late. As they herd the world’s populations into the compact cities which are actually scientific kill grids, as they erect masts, antenna arrays, and WiFi networks everywhere to finish the job, ask yourself how did I get here? Really-what will happen after a few weeks without power, electricity, or water? What will happen when the switch doesn’t work because they turned it off? You think the love your neighbor routine is gonna work in this demoralized, debased, depraved dystopia that they have planned?  Look if they can spray this stuff all over the world in plain view of all of humanity for decades without recourse, what recourse do you think we deserve for our willful ignorance and cowardice?

Get your kids off of the screens tonight and open their eyes before they close like all of yours. Please before it is too late and above all, let’s be Truthful. You are not going to collect on your pensions. The reset is coming. Going along with all of this crap and thinking you are safe by being silent is akin to trying to shave a few bucks off the bar tab on the Titanic. Hard times are ahead. Money will not solve them. The handwriting has gone from the wall all the way to the sky gang.

Call me what you want and I will call it as I see it. Houston, we have a problem ladies and gentlemen.







download (13)

Fullerton resident Barry Levinson



My wife Susan and I had been instrumental in getting Fullerton Ordinance No. 3149 (the Child Sex Offender Protection Law) passed in 2010. We also have been vigilant in protecting it since that time. We spoke out at the last council meeting to condemn the city for making the decision to not enforce the ordinance for the last year. And we are speaking out now to insist that the public has a role in ensuring that our ordinance does not get repealed but that it gets updated properly.

Please be assured that Susan and I will not rest until we know for sure that Ordinance No. 3149 remains strong and effective to protect the most vulnerable among us, our children!  This is not a time to sit back and believe we have won! All of you must be present at our May 6th meeting to let the council, the city manager and the city attorney know that we strongly believe that a public study session must be held to allow for public comment and participation. This must take place before the council votes to accept the city manager’s and city attorney’s recommendations to direct the city attorney (with little or no specific guidance from council) to draft any and all changes and improvements to the Ordinance. We demand an open and transparent process to ensure the very best results. Although Susan and I are relieved that the repeal of Ordinance No. 3149 has been removed from the city’s consideration, we still believe the city has more work to do to ensure that this ordinance is amended and strengthened properly.

Accuracy and attention to detail must be followed to ensure that our amended ordinance makes for a strengthened and effective law. The agenda as seen at: (click on agenda) displays a number of significant errors.

Agenda Item No. 15 begins as follows:

“In the 1990’s, the federal and state governments enacted various pieces of legislation intended to protect minors from registered sex offenders including megan’s law adopted at the federal level in 1996 and chelsea’s law and the voter-approved Jessica’s law adopted at the state level.”

Fact:  Chelsea’s Law was not enacted in the 1990’s as stated above but rather was signed into law by Governor Schwarzenegger in September 2010.

Fact: Jessica’s Law also known as Proposition No. 83 was passed by a vote of the people of California on November 7, 2006 – not in the 1990’s as stated in the agenda item. It was passed by a direct vote of the people agenda item as well. It does not give me comfort that these rather significant errors have been overlooked by our city manager and city attorney and issued as a formal city document.

To summarize, I need dozens of people to attend the May 6th meeting starting at 6:30 PM. Please do not assume others will attend and your presence is not necessary. It is not only necessary, it is vital that you come and speak up for the rights and safety of our children.

Why would the city manager, the city attorney and a majority of our city council be against a public study session that would both allow for the people’s participation and allow for the free flow of factual information that people like myself possess?


Hilda Sugarman’s dystopic vision of wireless iPads: Every single child will have one 24/7

Hilda Sugarman, a member of the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees, helped create the Fullerton Technology Foundation to aid funding of new devices. The foundation, founded in 2006, gave $175,000 to the district this year, with $40,000 of that total saved for teacher grants. “My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7,” Sugarman said about iPad use. “I want them to take it home. I want families to use it. I want somehow for us to find funds so the families can be connected.” A more immediate goal, Sugarman said, would be to provide every fifth- through eighth-grader in the district with an iPad for daily use in the next year and a half. That adds up to about 4,600 students.

Hilda Sugarman, a member of the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees,
My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7,” Sugarman said about iPad use.

The dangers of microwave radiation have been known for decades. The dangers of the wrong people in positions of authority have been known for millenia. 

Wireless dangers have been thoroughly presented to the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees for the better part of over a year now. 

There are well over 20,000 research papers written on the effects of RF/EMF radiation according to John Osepchuck, PhD the chair of IEEE/ASTM and the the biological effects have been known since the 1920s.

HERE ARE OVER ONE THOUSAND Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation

Parents for Safe Schools 2013 Collection of Studies, Videos and News Releases


FSD’s very own Hilda Sugarman in the Orange County Register.

My vision: Every single child will have one 24/7,” Sugarman said about iPad use.

This woman along with the rest of  have chosen to make receiving a public education in The Fullerton School District conditional upon being continuously forcibly irradiated with pulse modulated microwave wireless radiation at levels trillions of times the normal background levels that we and our ancestors were exposed to as children. I guess in her infinite wisdom, forced exposure at school is not enough. It appears that our very own Dr. Strangelove is pushing for it 24/7.  

These wireless classrooms are loaded with upwards of 30-40 of these wireless devices that emit as much or more pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation than in use cell phones.

Nowhere on earth does this environment exist in terms of the levels of wireless microwave radio frequency electromagnetic radiation exposure, the age of subjects being exposed being exclusively young, developing children, having the distance to the source of the emissions approaching zero in almost all cases, the duration of constant exposure in terms of it being chronic, as well as the sheer number of transmitters present in such close quarters. 



I won’t even get into the lighting, the magnetic fields from the HVAC units on the roof, the indoor air quality and the forced vaccinations. Those are all important but Hilda!hilda-sugarman/zoom/c8zl/image1ig8 seems to have the hots for wireless so we will attempt to stay focused on that for now.  

How can this be safe for children crammed in these rooms all day? It has to be safe because a trillion dollar industry and their bought and paid for scientists and experts say it is.

It has to be safe because the establishment worshipers say that it is:

It has to be because Simon Says

images (5)


Yes folks, these school district lackeys have been sold a bill of goods with your tax dollars and Hilda Sugarman wants your kid to have an iPad 24/7.

The sickening reality is these school required devices are the gateways to other addictions that you are in total denial of as we speak, in addition to the radiation health concerns.  Do you really want your kid addicted to and staring at these things all day while it irradiates their brains and reproductive organs at school and under their pillow at night.  iPads and wireless devices are constantly emitting a potential human carcinogen called wireless microwave radiation.

Did the school district ever go over the safety warnings with you at any of the meetings?  No Pletka says “….totally safe for the children..” Yeah, I thought so.

Yup, we now have upwards of 15,000 young children who are in the district with no waiver, no opt out and no options. To be or not to be exposed, that is the question. 8536213

So you have five choices as a parent:

1) You can listen to Pletka, Hilda, the trillion dollar wireless industry, or Roman Schulze, and go along with the 24/7 iPad routine.

2) You can stand up to the district and its servile minions and demand that they stop irradiating your children.

3) You can sell your new car, your home, quit your job, or dole out some serious dough and home school your child.

4) You can search high and low all over the country to find a private school that is not irradiating the students like the the FSD is. Good luck on that one.

5) OR-you can call me a nut job, a conspiracy theorist, a junk science purveyor, a fear monger, and while you are at it, feel free to assign me any other derogatory implication as a vicarious appeasement to your conscience and keep your kids exposed in these classrooms.

You see the choice is yours. Sadly the choice is not your child’s.

Wireless microwave radiation is a class 2B carcinogen:

Here is a list of some class 2B carciongens.

Polymeric, prepared as thin smooth films (with the exception of poly(glycolic acid))
Metallic, prepared as thin smooth films
Metallic cobalt, metallic nickel and an alloy powder containing 66-67% nickel, 13-16% chromium and 7% iron



Inquiring minds want to know, how this woman, being married to a medical doctor, could make such a despotically arrogant statement? Has she lost her mind? Is she drunk on wireless?   There are thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies that show harm. The wireless industry is several trillion dollars now. Obama wants to irradiate the entire US school system with Connect-Ed. Looks like with her project inkwell connections, she thinks she is in the car.

Ladies and gentlemen, the road to hell may be paved with good intentions but based on the behavior of the school board in this town, I wouldn’t even give them that much.

The alleged health affects that wireless causes are not my assertions, they are the assertions of medical and scientific experts.

What have we become where we willingly hand over our children to a forced irradiation babysitting program and collectively turn our backs on decades of scientific research jeopardizing an entire generation just so we can keep our new cars, enjoy our free time during the day and get our nails done? The next time you drive by us on the sidewalk outside your school with our banner, ponder these things. Pletka can fundamentally reject all the studies, science and common sense all he wants and Hilda can wish for 24/7 iPad exposure till the cows come home. We will not rest until we end the largest forced irradiation program of school children that the world has ever known.

May God help us ladies and gentlemen. 



Make no bones about it, the dosage is higher than a kite and it is not what the doctor ordered. Are your kids at risk at school in these wireless classrooms with the schools using commercial or industrial grade routers that broadcast on several frequencies at the same time? You want your kids slouched over an in use wireless radiation emitting cell phone all day? How about at home  or everywhere else with these things right in front of their heads and in their laps all the time? That is exactly what your children are doing at school and at home. These tablet devices are microwave transmitters and emit wireless radiation trillions of times the normal background levels that many of us and our parents were exposed to as children.  

What will it take to get the parents to act. I think that there are many obstacles, not the least of which is them dealing with the fact that they themselves have been irradiating their children since the beginning. So if they acknowledge this as harmful, then they have to deal with their guilt. It is time to deal with reality, swallow the pride and put your children ahead of your fears, the school administrators and your fair weather friends ladies and gentlemen. We are talking about your kids, a trillion dollar industry that doesn’t give a rat’s behind about them, and school administrators that will do whatever they are ordered to do without batting an eye.

 Let us begin.

skull vs ipad basic


As, we know, WiFi and wireless devices emit RF radiofrequency microwave radiation.
The question remains: How much radiation are the teachers and children being exposed to in the classroom?
From the very beginning, we have stated that the radiation levels were dangerously high. Here we have proof, as according to Apple’s Important Product Information Guide , iPads emit about the same radiation as cell phones.
The tables above show us that the iPad, using standard WiFi frequencies (2400-2483 MHz), emits an SAR value of 1.19, which is actually higher than comparable iPhones.
This issue deserves careful and methodical analysis.  I believe that for some time now, that we have been more than doing our part in conveying this to both parents and administrators alike.  This evidence shows that we need to do our due diligence.
brain penetration
Children are especially vulnerable to this kind of microwave radiation. This chart shows how much more deeply the radiation penetrates a child’s brain than for an adult. 
So now it has come time to post a blog entry about cell phone science and studies. We have all heard varying reports from the media about cell phone safety.  One story says that they are safe, another says that they are harmful.  These stories leave us with nothing more than confusion, apathy, and little true knowledge.  As with many industries before, such as tobacco, lead, asbestos, plastics, and many other toxic materials, the multi-trillion dollar wireless industry has been proven to obscure science and to create doubt in the general public.  What they would like to obscure is that according to the science, the fact is that all long term, as in over 10 year case-control studies report an increased risk of brain tumors.
The largest of these scientific reports is called INTERPHONE. Completed in 2004, and not released until 2010, this multi-million dollar international research project, funded in part by the mobile phone industry, officially reported that using a cell phone led to a reduced risk of brain cancer! In other words, the public was told that cell phones protect you from brain cancer. Many media sources simply reported that the coast was clear.
Meanwhile, was not reported to the general public was that according to the data itself, “heavy usage”, as in over 30 minutes of use per day, actually lead to a substantial increase in brain cancer risk.  As they say, the devil is in the details.
Cardis, E. Brain Tumor Risk in Relation to Mobile Telephone Use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case -control study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2010

Glioma and Meningioma Table 3

In this chart, we can see that for those that used a cell phone for over 1640 hours in 1-4 years, meaning about an hour a day, had an OR of 4.8 for developing a meningioma brain tumor and an OR of 3.77 for developing a glioma.

In other words, using a cell phone for over an hour a day, lead to a 5-fold increased risk of developing brain cancer, according to INTERPHONE, the largest cell phone case-control research study ever.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on
use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours
diagnosed in 1997-2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006

Hardell pooled analysis 2006 b (1)

It takes a certain amount of exposure for brain tumors to start to appear.  In this chart by a Swedish team of independent researchers lead by Lennart Hardell, there was only a slight increase in risk from using a cell phone 1-1000 hours. The brain tumor risk really jumped, however, after 1000 hours of usage, and was much higher with prolonged usage.

According to the science, using a cell phone for over 1000 hours leads to an increased risk of brain cancer. According to the manufacturer, iPads emit as much or more radiation than cell phones. According to research, children absorb more radiation than adults.  Given this evidence, what will happen to these children who spend at least 4 hours a day on an iPad at school, followed by another 4 hours at home?  This is at least 2000 hours each and every year, and at least 12,000 hours of exposure in elementary school alone.

The Fullerton School District Superintendent Robert Pletka states that the wireless classrooms are “totally safe for the children” as he proudly displays his ignorance of the science by equating two equally important exposure guidelines that are in reality TEN THOUSAND TIMES APART and he gives it all to you right here in writing with his John Hancock on it:
You want to bank your children’s health and reproductive future on a person with an education degree?
Or do we heed the warnings of top medical and scientific experts, many with direct research experience, who state that this is an unacceptable risk for our children?
I would also like to mention that the 60,000 member American Academy of Pediatrics recently put a letter out to the FCC regarding wireless exposure involving children:
As we know, brain tumors generally take at least 10 years, and in many cases 20-30 years to develop. So these children will be grown up before we know the results of this FORCED IRRADIATION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN. Reproductive harm may not show up for decades either. That’s not the kind of running start into the brick wall and over the cliff, head first dive that we want to give them…..Do we really want to look back and find out that we made a w